MP3 File sharing Dying! | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 310 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613461
Today 4
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
MP3 File sharing Dying!
 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 13:52 [#00272478]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



B3N:...yeah, thought it was you but couldn't remember...wish
I'd gone to one of those; I bet it was well interesting
talking to a guy like that...

Meho: wise words & very very true...


 

offline babydieonchord from Middlesboro' (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 13:53 [#00272480]
Points: 68 Status: Lurker



I am also an artist and I have to agree with that quivvuulum
person. I am not so vehemeently against file sharing though.
There are some facts: Artists record sales in "idm" have
been falling since the advent of filesharing. Examples of a
single idm artist album sales are on average: 30,000 for an
album in 1993, to 40,000 in 1995, to 23,000 in 97, 12,000 in
98, 6000, in 99, 3000 in 2000, 1500 in 91, to 500 this
year.

Of course there is much more choice now (in 1993 there was
only really black dog, aphex, autechre, m-ziq, derrick may,
lfo, etc) but you get the point.

Is this to do with file-sharing? could be, but not 100%. ---


There are many many labels who offer mp3's and clips on
their sites and mailing lists. (By the way.) So don't
complain you can't hear an mp3 clip to decide if you like.
see rephlex offering a great deal of astrobotnia, but in
their case their sales are down the dumper and they are
struggling.

now you could say this is due to more competition and the
frankly appalling selection of releases they put out between
97 and 99 (which still haunts them).

But there are other reasons. When releases' sales fall below
a certain amount, the distributor finds it hard to place
them in stores because the label's previous releases are
used as a benchmark for sales and they don't order the new
(for example) warp release if the prev. one sold no copies
in that shop and had to be returned. So you get the
situation that idm labels aren't ordered in by shops. So
now you complain - "i can't find it in shops so I have to
d/l it!". And the label says "You are d/ling it so we can't
get it in shops". And the artist says.."I can't finish the
album because I am homeless and no-one accepts dss
claimants."



 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 13:54 [#00272482]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



well said, all the rest of you are immoral scumbags, who
dont care for the people that make your life worth living


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-06-18 13:55 [#00272483]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Having only just looked at this topic, I'd have to say
there's an element of trolling in what quivvulum is
saying...


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-06-18 13:55 [#00272485]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I'd make more mainstream/accessible music if I just wanted
to make money...
Isn't trying to sell a lot of IDM just a bad
business-decision?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 13:56 [#00272486]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



music is your love IDM fans, but you hate the people behind
it


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 13:57 [#00272488]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00272485



i dont think we should pay doctors, after all they should be
in medicine for altruistic reasons, not the money,

GROW UP


 

offline chapman from United Kingdom on 2002-06-18 13:58 [#00272490]
Points: 1134 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



If mp3s didnt exist, i can guarantee IDM artists would sell
a LOT less records at the moment. It is how most people get
into the scene these days, the internet is essential,
otherwise a tiny fraction of IDM fans would even know about
the genre


 

offline babydieonchord from Middlesboro' (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 13:59 [#00272491]
Points: 68 Status: Lurker



I am also an artist and I have to agree with that quivvuulum
person. I am not so vehemeently against file sharing though.
There are some facts: Artists record sales in "idm" have
been falling since the advent of filesharing. Examples of a
single idm artist album sales are on average: 30,000 for an
album in 1993, to 40,000 in 1995, to 23,000 in 97, 12,000 in
98, 6000, in 99, 3000 in 2000, 1500 in 91, to 500 this
year.

Of course there is much more choice now (in 1993 there was
only really black dog, aphex, autechre, m-ziq, derrick may,
lfo, etc) but you get the point.

Is this to do with file-sharing? could be, but not 100%. ---


There are many many labels who offer mp3's and clips on
their sites and mailing lists. (By the way.) So don't
complain you can't hear an mp3 clip to decide if you like.
see rephlex offering a great deal of astrobotnia, but in
their case their sales are down the dumper and they are
struggling.

now you could say this is due to more competition and the
frankly appalling selection of releases they put out between
97 and 99 (which still haunts them).

But there are other reasons. When releases' sales fall below
a certain amount, the distributor finds it hard to place
them in stores because the label's previous releases are
used as a benchmark for sales and they don't order the new
(for example) warp release if the prev. one sold no copies
in that shop and had to be returned. So you get the
situation that idm labels aren't ordered in by shops. So
now you complain - "i can't find it in shops so I have to
d/l it!". And the label says "You are d/ling it so we can't
get it in shops". And the artist says.."I can't finish the
album because I am homeless and no-one accepts dss
claimants."



 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:00 [#00272492]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to chapman: #00272490



show me the evidence


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:01 [#00272494]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Agh, we're clearly discussing business here as opposed to
music. But the bottom line is why should I pay to RDJ or
quivvuulum or anyone to hear their music? Why? Why should I
pay his bills just because he makes great (or average or
shit) music? As the late, wise Sun Ra said: "Musicians think
they are so special because of their tallent and that they
are so beutiful doing what they do. And they are but
everyone is beautiful at what they do, everybody is
special." I mean, I do pay to people who deal with garbage,
because it's a community service but, as some of you know, i
work for the red cross and we daily work with VOLUNTEERS,
people who offer us their work and time for NOTHING in
return because they feel the need to help other people and
are not expecting to be paid for this as they feel they NEED
to do it. So, are musicians just community service, like
garbage people, or what?


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2002-06-18 14:01 [#00272496]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker | Followup to babydieonchord: #00272491



What are your sources for those figures?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:03 [#00272497]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00272494



there must be others we dont need to pay then;
architects
doctors
nurses
teachers

where do you stop? you dont think a musician deserves to
make a living wage?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:04 [#00272500]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00272494



your volunteers get food and accomodation though, many
musicians are being forced into the streets


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:05 [#00272501]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



interesting thoughts, babydie...good to hear some figures
from someone who knows...

the way I see it is that the market has changed
considerably, MP3s are a fact of life now so record labels
(big or small) need to find a way to change as well...at the
moment, they are trying hard to stay the same & carry on as
they were, which as we can see, simply isn't economically
possible...

I haven't got a business model for you that'll work 100% but
I can't help feeling that if half the energy & money spent
trying to back-peddle and denouce MP3s/File Sharing was put
into trying to find a new business model then maybe a way to
survive could be found....

Evolve or die...it really is as simple as that...


 

offline babajela from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:06 [#00272503]
Points: 74 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00272497



quivvuulum: you obviously miss the point he was trying to
make: is music a community service? Is art a community
service? Or is it independent of community needs and is
being made by people who have to make it, regardless of the
feedback (financial and otherwise).


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:10 [#00272505]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Quivvuulum: what do you mean they get accomodation and food?
No they don't, not from us. And here in Yugoslavia, it's
really a struggle to survive for most people out there so
still having so many volunteers prooves people will do
things even against better rational judgement if they feel
that's right for them to do. Why can't musicians have proper
jobs and still be great artists?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:10 [#00272506]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to jand: #00272501



to produce good music, a musician needs to devote ALL his
time to it. MP3s are forcing many musicians (yes the ones
discussed often on this mb) into working outside of their
music, thus the quality of their music falls, all coming
back down on your ears, so PLEASE buy, otherwise the only
music available will be of the MP3.com quality (ie crap)


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:11 [#00272508]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00272505



because of the above reason, a good musician needs to devote
ALL his time to music. would you trust a doctor who only
worked part time?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:12 [#00272510]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00272508



ie professional, in the fullest sense


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:18 [#00272515]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to quivvuulum: #00272506



Oh, come on, this is what I am trying to say: is someone
pushing a trackball so much more special then someone mixing
cement? How come other musicians can work (examples as many
as you can imagine) and the poor IDM crew have to sit the
whole day in front of their screens. But even if it is so:
OK, if they feel they HAVE to do it, that's OK with me, but
does that guarantee good music? No and still if they have to
do it, then it doesn't depend on me buying it or not, that's
their personal choice: like Van Gogh: he sold only one
painting in his life and was piss poor all the time but
never wanted to give up or "sell out" as he was pursuing his
vision: the only way he could. Hey, if you have to work or
steal or sell drugs or whore to make your music it's OK with
me, i just don't see why should I give you money to make it.
It feels awkward to me.

On the more economy-based level: how come so many musicians
otherwise perfectly well organise their lives by having
regular live appearances, and IDM crew rely solely on their
record sales. Come on man, your arguments sound like those
of a spoilt kid. And I don't mean to insult you by this.


 

offline babydieonchord from Middlesboro' (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:22 [#00272518]
Points: 68 Status: Lurker



I have worked at 2 record labels (both now bankrupt) and
work at a distributor (which handles some idm (but mostly
rock, indie, drum & bass and house). Now all record sales
are falling across the board mainly because shops are going
for stocking and supporting the lowest common denominator
releases. Taking an example of the sales figures of one
single artist (sort of idm/breakcore) in their 2000 release
it sold 2750. Their 2001 release sold 1345, their 2002 album
has sold 507 copies. And I have to go now because I need to
try and sell some idm to sales reps at virgin who only want
to hear about Coldplays next album


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:22 [#00272520]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00272515



mmm, you are ignorant my friend, ill give you one example;

cylob, a well known and respected IDM artist, earns less
than 5000 euros a year


 

offline babajela from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:24 [#00272521]
Points: 74 Status: Lurker



which all probably leads to small labels offering their
stuff directly over the web to general public on pay for
download basis. We are looking at that kind of future where
small labels will not depend on distributors. Or am I being
naive?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:24 [#00272522]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



thankyou babydieonchord, someone talking sense at last


 

offline chapman from United Kingdom on 2002-06-18 14:26 [#00272525]
Points: 1134 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



quivvuulum... where are u getting your facts and figures
from?


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-18 14:27 [#00272527]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



at which pint who will need labels? After all they are
merely filters on our listening tastes.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:27 [#00272530]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to quivvuulum: #00272520



I don't see the point in your example of cylob being piss
poor. All the time i'm saying that if these people need
money, they should get a job/ steal or anything. Why should
it have anything with them making music they feel they need
to make? You comparison with doctors is proving you are
thinking along business, not artistic lines. Music, and
other art transcends political economy exactly because it's
value can not be precisely measured, despite the good job
capitalism has done in forcing us to think otherwise.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:30 [#00272533]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to Quernstone: #00272527



Quernstone: that's right, although they are useful filters
to an extent but also suppressive. It's all a question of
finding a healthy balance.


 

offline babydieonchord from Middlesboro' (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:31 [#00272534]
Points: 68 Status: Lurker



You are being naive. why pay for something when you can get
it free in the shop across the road. It only takes one
download for something to be free. There is no business
model left for those wishing to sell recorded sound on
physical media that won't be eroded to the point of
unfeasability by the advent of affordable widespread
broadband. So, music (mp3's) in the future will become the
province of rich kids on their parents allowance rather than
those in a tight spot with something to say and an
enterprising spirit.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-06-18 14:31 [#00272536]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00272506



".....otherwise the only music available will be of the
MP3.com quality (ie crap)"

Hehe, really?


 

offline Narkotic from United States on 2002-06-18 14:31 [#00272537]
Points: 667 Status: Regular



Why the fuck should an artist make money from it in the
first place? you call that hard work? Make music in your
spare time as a hobby cause you enjoy it, and go get a real
fucking job. Thats how I feel about it. I have an old car
sitting in the garage that i'm working on for a hobby, i'm
not expecting people to pay me to take a fucking ride in it,
it's my hobby. If I could make money off of it, cool, but
it's nothing I expect to make money from. I will never
consider "making music" a job, or that it should be your
primary source of income. It happens sometimes, and more
power to those people. But don't ever expect it. Thats just
fuckin' LAME.


 

offline babydieonchord from Middlesboro' (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:33 [#00272541]
Points: 68 Status: Lurker



It is hard to think along artistic lines when you have no
food in your stomach, no roof over your head and no time to
be creative.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:34 [#00272542]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Hmm, narkotic just repeated my thoughts without using my
pretentious language, word!


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:35 [#00272543]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to babydieonchord: #00272541



But should we give money to all people starving because
they'd rather pursue their hobbies than work?


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-18 14:36 [#00272545]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



That my friend is the life of an artist!

It has happened to all the great and the good ones.


 

offline Quernstone from Padova (Italy) on 2002-06-18 14:36 [#00272547]
Points: 1826 Status: Regular



That my friend is the life of an artist!

It has happened to all the great and the good ones.


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:38 [#00272548]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular | Followup to Narkotic: #00272537



Nicely put.}:>


 

offline Narkotic from United States on 2002-06-18 14:39 [#00272551]
Points: 667 Status: Regular | Followup to babydieonchord: #00272541



ya know what I don't want to hear it. If you can afford
keyboards and computers to make music, you can afford food.
If for some lame ass reason that you can not, go get a
wanker job at mcdonalds or something ( no offense to the
mcdonalds employees of this board ). This is pathetic
hearing this arguement when I see mexicans standing out on
my street at 5am WAITING for any kind of work they can get
to live. They may be illegals, but at least they're trying
and not sitting on fuckin welfare. I just can't STAND to sit
here and see people argue about not making money from
"making music" or playing fucking BASEBALL! HOW LAME IS
THAT! ITS A HOBBY PEOPLE, figure it out.


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:40 [#00272554]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular



I keep hearing 'no roof over there heads' 'on the streets'
etc.Maybe THEY should go out and get a 'proper' job like the
rest of us.It's all just a hobby.Also,Jand was correct: They
are lucky we are paying so much attention.}:>


 

offline babajela from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:41 [#00272556]
Points: 74 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00272543



To follow-up Meho's last post: if we decide that artists
should be paid for what they do on the basis of their social
need, than they should not be subject to market laws, i.e.
not only "good" artists should be able to make a living
because their records sell well, all artists should be given
money by the society because they need it and are unwilling
to make it any other way.


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:41 [#00272557]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00272543



music a hobby, you think so? To a lot of people it is the
most important thing in their life (not just the artists)


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:44 [#00272559]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to quivvuulum: #00272557



Mate, are you listening at all? Or is my english so fucked
up? Could well be the case... If it is the most important
thing in your life, then you will produce it/ consume it
regardless of the circumstances. Why should anyone pay to
you if you'd do it anyway because it is the most important
thing to you? Read babajela's last post: I agree with him.


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:45 [#00272560]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular



quivvuulum: I respect your views,but can you put your hand
on your heart and honestly say you've never D/L any tracks
before? }:>


 

offline babydieonchord from Middlesboro' (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:49 [#00272567]
Points: 68 Status: Lurker



But they do all have jobs you fuckwits.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-06-18 14:50 [#00272568]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to babydieonchord: #00272567



so? are we supposed to supply the difference between their
actual income and their desired income? Why doesn't anyone
do it for me or you, mate? Because we don't make nice music?
Is that fair?


 

offline babajela from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:51 [#00272569]
Points: 74 Status: Lurker | Followup to babydieonchord: #00272567



Hey, we did not insult you.


 

offline Narkotic from United States on 2002-06-18 14:51 [#00272570]
Points: 667 Status: Regular



If music is "the most important thing in your life," then
you should have listened to that tiny piece of advice that
goes:

GET YOUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:51 [#00272571]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular | Followup to babydieonchord: #00272567



No need to be thrown on the streets then,eh? }:>


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 14:56 [#00272578]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



fuckwits?...that certainly wasn't deserved; we're only
telling you like it is...

Did you say you work in distribution?...hope you've got some
other skills, baby...


 


Messageboard index