 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 45 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613275 Today 1 Topics 127496 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
oh and also: Moloch- 8.4 Goodbye, Dragon Inn- 8.5 Alila- 7.0 Wind Will Carry Us- 9.4 also: watching movies on the computer is terrible. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
lost in La Mancha 4/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Stalker by Tarkovsky - 4/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
La Société (french thriller) 4/5 Wendigo 3.5/5 (young actor playin in Malcolm is great) Planete of the apes (1973 version) 4.5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The Creature From the Black Lagoon - 6/10 - quite good for the 50s. I like american women of the period. No matter who they are, scientists, pilots, javelin throwers - they always made perfect housewives, They tended to scream very often however. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Goodnight and Good Luck 4/5 Thumbsucker 2/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Highlander: Endgame..............shit/10 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Canadian Bacon 3/5 -- Michael Moore's ridiculous fictional film is saved by Alan Alda and some funny satire. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i consider watching the previous Highlanders. are they worth my time [ except the first one of course ] ? please, share your thoughts. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
tetsuo x the iron man: 3/10 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
imo no |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
thanks biggie. would you, however, care to elaborate a lil' bit mo' ? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it's all a bit shit, but i keep mixing them up, the first one was already a bit campy bad, maybe just try them: here they keep rerunning all of them all the time |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I agree with big. The first one was good enough for a kid, but even as a kid I noticed that the next ones were a bit shit, particularly third part (the bad guys came from space). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
apparantly end game is the fourth one, im always flipping through the channels or drunk when im watching it and get really confused because that guy from the series is in it who i thought was duncan mcloud as well |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah, end game is 4 - and the last one [hopefully]. all i can remember from it was lots of memories/flashbacks. and fighting. there was almost no [reasonable] plot. anyway i'll watch part 1 [just to check how and why it all started] and maybe part 3 [for those guys from space, lol] thanks again mr big and mr qrdl. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The Exorcism of Emily Rose ---> 8/10 The BRothers Grimm ---> 6/10 The Thing ---> 9/10 Wedding Crashers ---> 7,5/10 (a good laugh) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
By all means watch the first one. It's a classic regardless of how actually bad it is. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Big Fish. 9/10.very good film |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) - I'm still in the process of aquiring knowledge about the not-so-important period in the cinema that were the 50s, but at the moment I can safely say this is the best Hollywood did in the SF/horror departament. Great cast, engaging story and a good score. I don't get how they were taking over the bodies, though. They weren't substituting them by the clones, were they? And if the were not, what did they make the clones for? For me it seemed like they had two concepts and they weren't able to decide which one to choose. Awaiting help on this one, for now - 8/10 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
paris,texas 5/5 primer 5/5 ronco beats rock 9/4 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Grizzly Man 4.5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
american history x - 5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
indeed. Burton is a man with vision. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
valerie a týden divu 4.5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the island -0.5/5 holy fcuk, that movie was a peice of shit. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Would it have been better if you'd seen her titties? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yes, absolutely. That would've been something worthwhile at least. I'm glad it was a downloaded version, or else I'd write Michael Bay and demand my $4 back. That was the worst movie I've seen since Armageddon. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
c'mon, exposed knockers make even the worst films worth seeing |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Her knockers are particularly nice too. Hmm... I suppose, depending on the duration of exposure, those alone could've bumped it up to a 2 or 2.5 out of 5. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Kill Bill ----> 3.5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
film wasn't helped :( |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
NO ! 5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the quality of the knockers are ofcourse paramount |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ohmy, the movie must've been horrible then :O |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Too much blood :Þ I think it's a great film anyway. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
why the fuck does eva longoria have a ? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ahaha, Oh Woody, not again! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
has she been nibbling at it too? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Too much blood? What are you 12 or something? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hahah, oh jesus. She's a fucking hound. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
if you think it's a great film why only 3/5 ? jessus |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
In his defence though, I would be turned into a sexual predator if I was 'directing' Scarlett. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i think she has. by the looks of it, she's so hungover it took her several hours to realize that it wasn't a nutri-grain breakfast bar. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
No. I like horror films like Resident Evil and others, I was just joking. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
3.5 isn't that bad, is it. Giginger: Have you seen the second episode as well? Is it good like the first one? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I would |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I was going to watch Match Point last night but I accidentally downloaded it in spanish or some other shit language, so I watched Lost In Translation which is probably a 5/5 |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well, as this topic is up here... 2 Tarkovsky movies seen yesterday: . Zerkalo (The Mirror) - 4/5. Gimme a spade, i wanna dig this one more. . Andrey Rublyov - 5/5. more than 3 hours of a good film. i have also the Offret movie but this fucking file is corrupted and doesn't work. Down by Law and by Jarmush (seen first half yet) - 5/5. he he he. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
