Oversteps- Initial Impressions | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 175 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613447
Today 0
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Oversteps- Initial Impressions
 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2010-02-07 11:53 [#02365258]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



im finding this to be most good

most good indeed


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 11:55 [#02365260]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02365250



Is it possible that Autechre making money from cheap amateur
music?

For example how to distinguish art from amateur art?
Sometimes people pay millions for paintings which looks
scribble, just because those paintings are famous.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2010-02-07 11:58 [#02365263]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker



aaaah, got it

but what about telepathics?


 

offline magicant from Canada on 2010-02-07 12:00 [#02365264]
Points: 2465 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02365250



I like this post.

What the fuck is all this shit about Autechre not making
good melodies?? Seriously??? Sit the fuck down!! They made
"Bike", then they made "Eggshell", then they made "444".
Then they made "Flutter", which is a beautifully melodic
piece: work out an interpretation of "Flutter" on the piano
and you will see how masterful their melodic work can be.
Pay attention to the changes that happen.

Fuck, "Nine", "Yulquen" and "Piezo". That was a long time
ago. Now they do a new kind of sound. Sit down and listen to
it!!!!

Someone said that Oversteps was like Altibzz the album --
I'd said it's more like "Simmm" the album.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:05 [#02365268]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02365260



i just took a long walk outside in the snow, equipped with a
flashlight and Oversteps on the cans. It was good.
Then when i came back and listened to it on the car stereo.
It was gooder.

This album is a winner,
this album is a winner.



 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 12:08 [#02365269]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to magicant: #02365264



no one will deny that they made something unique in that
time, but oversteps and querantize is ... dunno maybe I
geting older :)


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2010-02-07 12:08 [#02365270]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I think quite a few of you should really think about getting
laid.


 

offline RussellDust on 2010-02-07 12:09 [#02365271]
Points: 16053 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02365260



I don't want to sound rude or hurt your feelings but you're
being an idiot. Whate ever happened to subjectivity?

"For example how to distinguish art from amateur art? "

That's up to you.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 12:10 [#02365272]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365268



But can you even compare older autechre works with that.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:12 [#02365274]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02365272



yes, and the conclusion is, hence release ar1 != ar2 != ar3
!= ..
Oversteps = boom.



 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2010-02-07 12:14 [#02365275]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular | Followup to hanal: #02365270



sex while playing oversteps?


 

offline cx from Norway on 2010-02-07 12:15 [#02365277]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to RussellDust: #02365271



i agree with this. there is no objective value to music. you
all must decide what you like and why, and personally its
better to just shut up about it.

yeah i know i said my opinion too but this is ae ffs.



 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-02-07 12:16 [#02365278]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to hanal: #02365270



i think quite a few people thought you meant plaid


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 12:17 [#02365279]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to RussellDust: #02365271



Thats a problem we cant be completely subjective because as
soon you see world only through subjective prism and
automatically reject objective reality you are nihilist.
There is objective "truths" and there is subjective
"truths".

People, I claim, must see beauty in logic of art, and how
this art reflects in our minds and world, otherwise this art
is meaningless.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:17 [#02365280]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02365278



haha!


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:18 [#02365282]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02365279



if you like, we can get into an argument about art IS IN
FACT meaningless.


 

offline RussellDust on 2010-02-07 12:19 [#02365283]
Points: 16053 Status: Lurker



Who talked about objective reality? I think you're confused
my friend.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2010-02-07 12:19 [#02365284]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02365278 | Show recordbag



that was actually rather good.



 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2010-02-07 12:20 [#02365285]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365280



plaid's next album's gonna be named b-laid. where the b
stands for beijing. it'll be a conceptual album covering
their experiences in the far east.


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2010-02-07 12:20 [#02365286]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular | Followup to nightex: #02365272



you have ears


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2010-02-07 12:23 [#02365287]
Points: 31145 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i think about getting laid everyday but nothing happens

oversteps would be more than welcome in that sense


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 12:25 [#02365290]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365282



ok :D Try to prove it.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2010-02-07 12:31 [#02365295]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i feel i have been misunderstood.

what i meant with my previous posts can be justified reading
this topic - that listeners tend to like the more simple and
melodic tracks from years back instead of those new with a
forced "artistic" approach.

i'm not saying they are trying to hard. hell if they
wouldn't they hadn't released a few of the best electronic
albums ever. i just won't listen that often to this
particular record.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:34 [#02365297]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker



nothing to prove here, this is metaphysical and the beauty
of it is that it defies empiric logic. it exists solely for
the sake of discourse. a meme if you will. i'm flat out
saying, meaning is something the viewer invents by
experiencing something in order to not get crazy. that's how
we survive… art has nothing to do with survival, in fact
it's the exact opposite: it's there for its own sake, for
the aesthetics, or the sheer "beauty" of it.

you're saying we're using art as a mirror and you're right.
this mirror doesn't need to make sense though…
blabla069*(&$(&A$ORtgh9;oj


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:36 [#02365299]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker



art =/= science


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 12:36 [#02365300]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



oversteps is appreciated but old autechre works wins for me,
maybe it is opposite dunno.


 

offline lardossa on 2010-02-07 12:38 [#02365302]
Points: 80 Status: Lurker



are there other links? this uploading.com shit is
downloading horribly slow with me


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2010-02-07 12:39 [#02365304]
Points: 31145 Status: Regular | Followup to lardossa: #02365302 | Show recordbag



read the other overspte threadsLAZY_TITLE


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2010-02-07 12:40 [#02365305]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365299



But I don't find this is the case with Autechre. They've
been into generative composition for a while now, just
didn't use it on their last few releases. All that boils
down to is maths, and AFAIK, they use equations from science
within their patches to control events. I saw something
about them using fluidity equations in a few Max patches.


 

offline lardossa on 2010-02-07 12:41 [#02365306]
Points: 80 Status: Lurker



way to go. thx a lot mohamed


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 12:42 [#02365307]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365299



You know that this was far from argument.

Art without science is impossible including music, because
music is built on science of sound.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2010-02-07 12:44 [#02365308]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



i think i'll wait until it's released, not that excited
about it anyhow.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2010-02-07 12:50 [#02365312]
Points: 31145 Status: Regular | Followup to lardossa: #02365306 | Show recordbag



u r the lardossa of the youtube videos?!

you're more than welcome if so


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2010-02-07 12:51 [#02365313]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365297



Being able to distinguish art from non-art is one of the
ways for inferior individuals to get a chance in
reproduction if they manage to convince the females that
knowing art is an important part of being a valuable
representative of the species. In a way whole culture is an
elaborate trick played by the not-so-perfect individuals on
females and the alpha males. Sometimes, like in the case of
internet forum users, this true goal of art's existence is
obscured by the illusions of objective value. They play the
trick on themselves,

Not saying that I fully agree with the above, just saying.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:52 [#02365314]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to futureimage: #02365305



okay, but they don't release academic papers on how and what
they did. all they communicate is purely esoteric: "we're
doing crazy ass computors stuff, in the fucking dark dude!".
In fact, it's hard to distinguish where they push random
buttons and are having a laugh or when they work two months
on a really fancy neural network-based AI drum machine
(which i doubt they do at all).
also in a quaristice interview Sean Booth stated something
along the lines, where if one tries to analyze their music
for production techniques, they miss the point…

i believe their music is best listened to with the fresh,
unspoiled mind of a child. imagine you don't know shit about
fm synthesis and convolution reverb. Much like you would
take in a painting that is just playing with the fact that
it uses 'red' on a 'canvas' etc...


 

offline lardossa on 2010-02-07 12:55 [#02365315]
Points: 80 Status: Lurker



@ mohamed: yeah that's me. thank you!


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:56 [#02365316]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to nightex: #02365307



wow, i would have thought music came before science. a baby
ain't good at science, but is great at music.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 12:57 [#02365317]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to QRDL: #02365313



lol, interesting.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 13:01 [#02365319]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365314



Agreed. If for example quarintize reflects "child play" its
ok and its true art because no one has done it before and it
sounds good. But that does not meen that people could not
distinguish art and evrything is based on pure subjectivity,
its absolute crazy...


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 13:04 [#02365320]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



Maybe you put shit on scaner then convert jpeg digital
information to sound sequences, is it art :D


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 13:19 [#02365322]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker



dunno… isn't 'objective' simply a social agreement thing?
if three people say 'up' is 'up' and point downwards, and
the fourth guy points upwards he might get beaten up and
raped…

so then it all becomes some sort of a pop jury thing, where
an elite defines the objective 'right' and everyone has to
follow… this might be good for survival etc… in arts i'd
say we are all judging things too eagerly, and mostly
towards the negative. If we see something new, we tend to
dismiss it when it doesn't seem to have a meaning for us, we
think we don't understand it, even if there is nothing to
understand. we're in fact conditioned by society towards
ratio (Apollonian) and try to even rationalize the pleasures
and the arts (part of the Dionysian)…

Mr. Nietzsche had to say stuff about this too but atually i don't know maybe i'm
misunderstanding shit completely.

i'm on a wank streak sorry.

so yeah, jpg on a scanner for creating music sounds like
fun. if you're good at it art might emerge :D


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 13:20 [#02365324]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker



LAZY_NIETZSCHE


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 13:31 [#02365330]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker



I believe art isnt objective and isnt subjective. Each
individual understands art as subjective thing, but art
exist between us as objective thing, problem we cant define
art because as soon as we define art this is no longer art.

For example we can define Electronic music, Rock, Rap and so
on. This means that music as art have objectivity.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-02-07 13:33 [#02365332]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker



let's agree that Oversteps is lush then. :]


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2010-02-07 13:37 [#02365333]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



maybe pondering the career of autechre is what drove
nietzsche mad.


 

offline nightex from Šiauliai (Lithuania) on 2010-02-07 13:37 [#02365334]
Points: 1275 Status: Lurker | Followup to Terence Hill: #02365332



Ok. Lush because it is autechre :)


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2010-02-07 13:42 [#02365335]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i haven't heard this album yet, but i have rarely thought of
autechre as being lush since tri rep era. it may be good,
like really good, but generally it is more toward the spare
rather than lush side of the scale, even if dense.


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2010-02-07 13:46 [#02365336]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #02365335



Seriously, this album is more "lush" and celestial and
floating and bright and cerebral and melodic than anything
they've done before.

It's Autechre isn't even two dudes anymore. Its a genre.
Or some sentient AI that came back out to play with our
brainholes and nuts.


 

offline gl0tch from www.gl0tch.com     on 2010-02-07 13:46 [#02365337]
Points: 2708 Status: Lurker | Followup to gl0tch: #02365336



It's *like Autechre...


 

offline khrimson from the fridge on 2010-02-07 13:48 [#02365338]
Points: 1757 Status: Regular



_First listen review: I'm liking it, defintly it's a more
enjoyable experience than quarisice with its abstract-hop
feeling.

My favourites so far are ilanders and krYlon, the latter
especially


 


Messageboard index