file sharing - THE TRUTH | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 340 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613462
Today 5
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
file sharing - THE TRUTH
 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 18:53 [#00273160]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



from planet mu's web site

from planet mu

INTERVIEWER;
File sharing seems rather bad for small labels but then
electronic music labels are some of the most downloaded on
the internet – even though home taping didn’t kill music

this seems like something different –

MIKE PARADINAS;
Well, our sales are down... I'm sure Rephlex and Warp's are

too. It must be at least 50% due to downloading mp3s, it
might not be - who can tell?
It could just be there are less people buying cds generally

and electronic music is just unsexy. But the low sales mean

we can't release much vinyl anymore because it loses money
unless we sell over, say 1500 for a 12" or 3000 for an album

(2LP) just for that format - and not many releases sell that

much these days. I was talking to my man Mark Melton (who
used to work for GPR in early 90s, you know - Black Dog,
Beaumont Hannant, Luke Slater etc.) and he was saying that
whatever album he released in 92-95 was guaranteed to sell
10,000 - 15,000 minimum or at least 5000 - 7000 for a 12"
single and when they started to sell only 3000 for one of
their 12"s they were in trouble... so when the UK gets true

file sharing capabilities (beyond 40 mins on a phone for an

mp3 at 128k) then we'll all be in trouble.



 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 18:55 [#00273168]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



"Nobody listens to techno"


 

offline Deathsmith from Brussels (Belgium) on 2002-06-18 18:57 [#00273173]
Points: 1027 Status: Regular



Hehe at my last dj gig on Saturday I played that song like 4
times throughout the 8 hours, and I totally muted the volume
through the mixer at that part on the Emimen song. . . it
pissed people off, because none of them were really fans of
"techno", and I was playing alot of electronica anyway.


 

offline diego from Belgium on 2002-06-18 18:59 [#00273181]
Points: 246 Status: Regular



Mike P. is damn right.


 

offline Deathsmith from Brussels (Belgium) on 2002-06-18 19:02 [#00273185]
Points: 1027 Status: Regular



How could they lose money on vinyls due to file sharing??
One sure as hell cannot burn songs to vinyl. . . if you want
vinyls you have to buy 'em, is what I mean.

Also, if they overall want more profits record labels and
music stores all over the world should cut back on cd prices
a few bucks, and that would make a HUGE difference. They'd
get more sales, alot more sales, and they'd be making more
profits, I am sure.


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:03 [#00273188]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



this is straight from the horses hoof dude, argue with mike
p, not me


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:04 [#00273193]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Deathsmith: #00273185



well, the big labels should cut back


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-06-18 19:05 [#00273199]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



this really didnt need a new thread... could have been
continued on the other one...


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:06 [#00273200]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



if they planet mu cut the price theyd have to sell more CD's
to keep afloat, thats economics dude ;D


 

offline Deathsmith from Brussels (Belgium) on 2002-06-18 19:06 [#00273201]
Points: 1027 Status: Regular



hehe yah you're right.


 

offline plugexpert from Nijmegen (Netherlands, The) on 2002-06-18 19:08 [#00273207]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



I believe that this whole music-industry thing is in a
transition fase. Where the 'old' industry has a lot of
trouble catching up with technology.

I'm all for progression


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:08 [#00273211]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00273199



the other thread was way too cumbersome/aggro, this is the
reasonable version, with mike p's voice as the head honcho
duderinatron


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:09 [#00273213]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to plugexpert: #00273207



I think you're right plug, unfortunately small labels also
have to take the brunt of big labels' complacency


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-06-18 19:10 [#00273216]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



you're not seriously going to stop making music though quiv
are you?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:10 [#00273219]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



but rephlex and warp arent anti-technology, but they are the
ones suffering the most


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:12 [#00273224]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



its all a product of mass culture


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:12 [#00273225]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phatbert 000: #00273216



i will make it as a hobby, but that inevitably means i wont
be able to release very much, because after working a full
day, i just wanna chill with my mates and a beer/ganja-pipe


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-06-18 19:12 [#00273226]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



Way back when I had so many copied tapes. Same thing

"Home taping did not kill music"


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-06-18 19:12 [#00273227]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



Rephlex's website is anti-technology!

That's a case of "old-skool" being very "un-kool"


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:13 [#00273231]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phatbert 000: #00273227



I think its more a case of piss-poor, still beats annoying
overused flash :D


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:14 [#00273232]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00273226



did you read that section of the interview, mike p says his
sales have gone down 50% even though the interest in IDM has
grown massively in the past 2 or 3 years (esp in the usa)


 

offline VampireAngel from San Juan (Cuntland) (Puerto Rico) on 2002-06-18 19:15 [#00273235]
Points: 1746 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00273219 | Show recordbag



Unfortunately Quivvuulum,it's true,they're the ones who are
suffering the consequences and please not to forget the
artists themselves,I will just keep on saying,support them
in any possible way you can,after all they deserve it for
bringing us what we really like,musically speaking......==)


 

offline plugexpert from Nijmegen (Netherlands, The) on 2002-06-18 19:15 [#00273236]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



"beer/ganja-pipe"

don't use this combo on a hot day like 2day,.cuz man,.....I
almost fainted.

33 degrees celsius and flying high


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:15 [#00273237]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00273232



could record labels have not said that back in the 80's
though?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:16 [#00273240]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to VampireAngel: #00273235



thanks dude, mucho-respecto


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-06-18 19:18 [#00273246]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



I really enjoyed your set in Munich. I was the guy with the
"out of my tree" t-shirt on in case you noticed.


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:22 [#00273253]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker



at pathos?


 

offline RobE from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:22 [#00273254]
Points: 1608 Status: Regular



zzzzz....}:>


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-06-18 19:23 [#00273259]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



Pfff haha whatever, there are lots of musicians who still be
making music if if they didnt earn a dime !

Why dont you stop being so naive and face the fact that you
cant support yourself with Music that appeals only to a
minority ?


 

offline plugexpert from Nijmegen (Netherlands, The) on 2002-06-18 19:24 [#00273265]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



Amen monoid!


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:25 [#00273266]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #00273259



ahh, but it doesnt appeal to a minority, it appeals to
hundreds of thousands of people, aphex sells 2-300,000 cds,


 

offline Deathsmith from Brussels (Belgium) on 2002-06-18 19:25 [#00273268]
Points: 1027 Status: Regular



Yah I highly doubt downloading will kill the music industry.
Before cd burners and file-sharing came around, EVERYONE
recorded casette tapes and cd's to blank casette tapes, and
yet still everyone bought plenty of real recordings as well.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:25 [#00273269]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00273266



but aphex is the most well known and arguable the most
commercial viable, he's mastered his image


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:26 [#00273270]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to quivvuulum: #00273266



just that most those people are only willing to download.

why not read the first message rather than jumping to
conclusions mono?


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:28 [#00273275]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Deathsmith: #00273268



read the interview dude, a record company has to sell at
least 3000 copies of a cd to start making profit, all the
record labels sales are probably down by 50%, so lots of
labels will have to close down because of mp3s


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:30 [#00273281]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Deathsmith: #00273268



they couldnt copy a tape from someone on the other side of
the world could they dude?


 

offline Deathsmith from Brussels (Belgium) on 2002-06-18 19:31 [#00273283]
Points: 1027 Status: Regular



Good point I guess.


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:32 [#00273287]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Deathsmith: #00273283



:D


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-06-18 19:32 [#00273288]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



A Marxist Philosopher/Art Historian called Walter Benjemin
predicted that the value of art would go due to mechanical
reproduction/photography.

I still prefer to have the original CD even though it is
usually available online.

The original art object will always have value as a
photograph of a Picasso will never be worth as much as the
original.


 

offline plugexpert from Nijmegen (Netherlands, The) on 2002-06-18 19:35 [#00273293]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



"read the interview dude, a record company has to sell at
least 3000 copies of a cd to start making profit"

So small labels who press something like 1000 copies R
doomed 2 fail?



 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-06-18 19:38 [#00273296]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



It puts pressure on designers to make the packaging better
so you want to own the object as well as the music.


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-06-18 19:39 [#00273299]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



yeah, at pathos. When you started everyone was worried there
was gonna be more of what Russel Haswell did (which didn't
come over very well) but you certainly got everyone rocking
after a short while!


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:39 [#00273301]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to plugexpert: #00273293



if you sell 1000 copies, youll spend more money than youll
make


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:41 [#00273305]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phatbert 000: #00273299



have you seen russels neck, shit it looks fucked, a massive
scar from ear to ear, poor thing, he tried to top himself


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2002-06-18 19:42 [#00273309]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



Techno orianted labels that release mostly Tool Techno for
DJs, are making profit when they sell more than 1000s
Vinyls........


 

offline quivvuulum from southhampton (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:42 [#00273310]
Points: 289 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #00273288



good


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:42 [#00273311]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Study: File sharing boosts music sales

Hundreds of millions of songs may illegally trade hands
online every month, but file swapping may actually be
causing people to spend more money on music, according to a
new research report.
A study released this week by Jupiter Research reports that
about 34 percent of veteran file swappers say they are
spending more on music than they did before they started
downloading files. About 14 percent of heavy file traders
say they now spend less on music.

The findings, which are drawn from a survey of 3,319 people
conducted last summer, are contrasted with claims from the
record industry that file sharing and CD burning have been
key contributors to a drop in major-label music sales in
2001.



"It is safe to say that active usage of online music content
is one of the best predictors of increased consumer
purchasing," lead author Aram Sinnreich wrote in the report.
"Music sellers should devote their limited resources to
online marketing and distribution--rather than eradicating
the phantom threat of file sharing--if they truly wish to
stanch the blood flow and turn the music market around."

You can read the rest at http://news.com.com/2100-1023-898813.html....

The recent Poll at Soulseek was pretty conclusive as
well...

http://www.remmelt.org/slskboard/ikonboard.cgi?s=3d0f7aa8... ...


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-06-18 19:43 [#00273314]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Who's Russel Haswell, and what did he do?


 

offline Phatbert 000 from Augsburg (Germany) on 2002-06-18 19:43 [#00273315]
Points: 1618 Status: Lurker



oh dear. that's gonna hurt.

btw there are pictures from that show here:

http://ab.art.de/media%20archiv/pictures/warp.htm


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-18 19:44 [#00273318]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I've actually started buying CDs again after a rest of many
years....I must have ~1000 of em so I dare to think how much
the labels have made from me...

Wish Warp would say thanks for us buying all those early
CDs, instead of branding us thiefs (They recently tried to
get Soulseek to filter their files...)...WARP wouldn't be
where they are without all the people who bought their
product when they started...


 


Messageboard index