Gulf War II? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (4)
dariusgriffin
big
belb
recycle
...and 281 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614248
Today 17
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
Gulf War II?
 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-04 19:48 [#00111336]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00111170



you see saddam as a threat because that's what you were
exposed to. saddam has done no more than america or britain.
his weapons were supplied by the "allies" - they just don't
want him to get his hands on "their" oil


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-03-04 22:16 [#00111608]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



throughout history it seems that humanity has not advanced
at all..

yes, we are bigger w/ more technology, and more complex
societies..

but what good has it done?
if u study the social problems/issues (ie wars, politics) of
2000 years ago... then turn on CNN, do you not notice
uncanny similartities?

the people in charge, and the people they charge around have
never changed:

fools cought up in fighting over lines on a map...

leaders tricking peoples into taking up arms for their own
causes...

making up moral justifications for a war thats all about
benifiting those in charge, usually economicaly

its like watching kids in a playground..


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-04 22:26 [#00111623]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



I'm doing at the cold war in History at the moment, cuban
missile crisis in particular. Now wot i dont get is y dont
america get rid of all of their nukes? There seems to be an
agreement about the nukes, its like u can only nuke
'potential-nukers'.

If america were to openly remove their nuke bases,
everywhere, wot do u ppl think every1 else would do?

I had a really INTELLIGENT thort about how it cud all be
sorted out.... but I've forgotten it (or realised that it
wudn't work) but it involved america removing their nukes,
and then even if they were to get nuked then they would not
be able to retaliate so no1 else would get nuked.... saving
lives surely. I know that sounds sick, and makes millions of
lives seem expendable, but it just seemed to make sense
earlier...

I think i need some sleep!


 

offline Fernz from A Scottish Wanker (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 09:15 [#00112259]
Points: 1692 Status: Regular



Moral of the topic... Fuck war. :)


 

offline Jedy from dublin (Ireland) on 2002-03-05 09:23 [#00112265]
Points: 1280 Status: Regular



yeap fuck war!



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 09:58 [#00112290]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Laserbreak:

There is something we can do to figh Bush and Blair's war.
Mass demonstrations can put pressure on governments. The US
had to pull out of Vietnam because they were losing the
fight against Vietcong guerillas, but also because of mass
demonstrations at home.

As the war continued and the bodybags were coming back home,
people saw the war for what it was. The state even felt so
under pressure that they shot students at Kent State
University. Governments don't shoot citizens unless they
feel threatened; that people no longer accept the status
quo.

In London we have seen demonstrations of 50,000 then
100,000. In Italy 500,000 people have demonstrated against
the war.

The anti-war movement is globally far more advanced than the
anti-Vietnam movement. It can only grow.

What is different is that the anti-capitalist movement is
feeding into the anti-war movement and vice versa. People
are now making the links between war and the capitalist
system. Profit, exploitation and war are inextricably
linked.

Sorry I'll shut up now.

Us3: is that a photo of the great Ray Mears?


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:14 [#00112549]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to mylittlesister: #00111623



Mylittlesister, I'm doing the same course


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:15 [#00112552]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00112290



It is the great ray mears yes! I don't think people give him
enough credit, he is THE MAN


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:16 [#00112553]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



i dont really like the usa.
the first moonlanding was a hoax.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:17 [#00112555]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to jonesy: #00112290



any modern warfare by the western world is linked with their
greed and crazed thirst for power and oil and
people-control

there just isn't room for freedom any more


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:18 [#00112557]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



and i dont really understand why americans always give
credit for themselfes in hollywood movies.
for example that submarine move with bon jovi. And
man...Pearl harbor. it sucks


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:20 [#00112559]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to raimons: #00112557



yeah i got real fucking mad when the yanks took the fucking
credit in that piece of shit movie U571. and mel gibson
(honorary yank by now surely), with his baseless
anti-english couplet of trash films, the patriot and
braveheart.

btw, did you know that president roosevelt knew that the
japanese were planning to bomb pearl harbor, but let it
happen because before that the US public didn't want to join
the war and he did?


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:21 [#00112560]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to raimons: #00112557



I saw a programme on tv about the moon landing, I think it
was a hoax too. I think they wanted a publicity stunt to
beat the russians too much to risk it. I mean, how else
would the flag flap in space when there is no wind?


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:22 [#00112562]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



i didnt see the whole pearl harbor.. did they mention
something about what usa did ?


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:23 [#00112564]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



http://www.interalpha.net/customer/farmer/subjects/conspira
cies.htm


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:23 [#00112566]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00112559



Yeah, that pro-usa bullshit really annoys me. What about the
recent black hawk down film? I heard that another country
got real pissed off cos america just sidelined their large
role in somalia and turned it into a victory film....when it
was an embarressing catastrophe. Shame on Ridley Scott, I am
ashamed to have a sellout like that ever born in my country.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:25 [#00112568]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to B3n: #00112560



yeah the moon landings being a fake is a popular theory -
the evidence seems to be mainly contradictory shadows and
flags or something :)

but apparantly man really has been on the moon, even if the
first landing was fake as p diddy


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-03-05 14:26 [#00112569]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



It's not that I don't agree with you guys (I don't on
certain points), but this american-bashing is a little over
the top. I have been fucked and screwed by american
administration more than any of you (my country has been
bombed by NATO), I do hate holywood bullshit propaganda and
a lot of it in this countries culture is ill, but so is with
my own culture, and I hate my own leaders as bad as american
political leaders. I have nothing against americans in
principle, and I hate all government in principle.


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:26 [#00112570]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



i heard that the movie was blaming america in the end. but
they were forced to cut it


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:29 [#00112573]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



its sick that you dont hear more about the moonlanding. why
doesnt anyone bother? i meen you can yell att athetics when
they cheat but what about faking a moonlandig. thats big
man!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:29 [#00112574]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00112569



just cause you don't like your own leaders, don't mean
america's leaders are good - they deserve to be hated, and
hated they are


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:30 [#00112575]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



yes they are hated. and they know it.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 14:31 [#00112576]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Meho: you're right to make a distinction betwenn
governments/states and the people of a country. Blair didn't
represent me when he bombed your country and killed
civilians, just as he doesn't when he bombs Afghanistan.

The working class in every country are brothers and sisters.
We should all unite against all of our rulers.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 14:32 [#00112577]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



And Black Hawk Down is racist crap


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:33 [#00112578]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00112569



I'm not trying to bash americans, but come on, credit
where's credit's due.

And I'm not a complete jingoist either, I am completely
dissillusioned by the present state of Britain and after uni
plan to move abroad. But when people have died in the war
for missions like recovering the enigma machine, I don't
want a story to portray itself as fact and almost completely
miss these people's sacrifices.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:33 [#00112579]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular



i was watching emperor blair on tV today. he is the worst
actor since ronny reagan to be a head of state... he uses
the same tonal modulations when he is expressing "sincere
sadness" that it's embarassing - he couldn't get a part even
in a roger corman flick!! man, he just oozes insincerity!


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:34 [#00112580]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



have you seen "Wag the dog"
see it!


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:36 [#00112583]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



And I wasn't naive enough to believe milosovic represented
the majority of yugoslavians, it was a dictatorship, the
people have little choice.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:37 [#00112584]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00112579



O couldn't believe he'll have been PM for coming up to 5
years! fuck, time flys and he's done NOTHING


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 14:37 [#00112585]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



And the people got rid of Milosevic, not NATO and their
murderous bombs. They would have sooner as well had NATO
kept the fuck out.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-03-05 14:37 [#00112586]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



I never intended to see Black Hawk Down. Even Gladiator was
PC supremacist crap... Ridley Scott has clearly lost it.
Jonesy, I hear you, as I usually think people will
understand that crimes done by Serbs in recent Balkans
conflicts have nothing to do with me... And your working
class slogan really sounds like straight outta Class War
pages, you read that mag, don't you. But I've long ago lost
any trust in working class revolutionary potential. Mind
you, I live in a country that was under socialist regime for
50 years. Well, I've seen it firsthand and it didn't work.
USSR was as evil as USA, only the USA was based on
principles that led it to outliving their oponents:
consumerism against ideological opression...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 14:41 [#00112588]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



No mate I don't read Class War. I read Socialist Worker.

The communism in Eastern Europe was nothing I, nor anyone in
my tradition, supported. It was undemocratic and a total
bastardisation of socialism.

I do think that there is the potential for a society based
on equality, freedom and democracy. It has to come from the
bottom up, not from a beauracratic elite or invading army.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:42 [#00112589]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to raimons: #00112580



yeah i've seen wag the dog, primary colours, all the
president's men (about watergate).

what do you lot think about israel - apparantly, the state
of israel was created after WWII to keep rockefeller happy -
i doubt the palestinians had much say in the matter


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:42 [#00112590]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



listen to this.

Like all Americans, on Tuesday, 9-11, I was shocked and
horrified to watch the WTC Twin Towers attacked by hijacked
planes and collapse, resulting in the deaths of perhaps up
to 10, 000 innocent people.

I had not been that shocked and horrified since January 16,
1991,
when then President Bush attacked Baghdad, and the rest of
Iraq
and began killing 200, 000 people during that "war"

keeps you thinking



 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-03-05 14:42 [#00112591]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Uh, shit, guys, you're too fast for this non-anglophone
webmate.

Anyway, just let me tell you this: Milosevic was no more a
dictator than Bush is (or Blair for that matter). He won all
elections during the first half of '90s, clear. And at those
last elections he still managed to get over 30% of votes. He
wasn't relying on power and fear alone. He brainwashed
people with cheap ideologies and false promises, just like
other leaders...

Sadly, now he is gone, our current authorities kiss up the
worst of western leaders' arses and try to convert us into
good hearted consumers... I hated Milosevic's guts, but I
hated these other's guys guts too. And still do.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:43 [#00112592]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00112586



Its ironic that the countries that had the communist
revolutions were not the industrialised ones like marx
predicted and so who knows whether its still a possible
idea. Personally, I think not, but I do believe strongly in
the welfare state and thats all gone to shit in Britain.


 

offline raimons from Stockholm (Sweden) on 2002-03-05 14:44 [#00112596]
Points: 4266 Status: Lurker



This includes the infamous "highway of death" in the last
days of the slaughter when U.S. pilots literally shot in the
back retreating Iraqi civilians and soldiers. I continue to
be horrified by the sanctions on Iraq, which have resulted
in the death of over 1, 000, 000 Iraqis, including over 500,
000 children, about whom former Secretary of State Madeline
Allbright has stated that their deaths "are worth the cost".




 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-03-05 14:46 [#00112597]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Uh, Jonesy, I don't know what to say... Sounds great to me
but I stopped believing all that stuff long ago... Socialism
has a big problem with economical basis and no model I've
yet seen has offered any convincing solution...


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:47 [#00112598]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to raimons: #00112590



apparantly, the final death toll of WTC was just under
3,500, which doesn't quite make it the bloodiest day in US
history... but shit, i've forgotten which day is.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:47 [#00112599]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



If you haven't watched it already, see Three Kings. It is
one of the most highly critical films made about america and
the allies actions during the gulf war. Its a wonder it ever
got past the drawing board


 

offline Fernz from A Scottish Wanker (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:48 [#00112600]
Points: 1692 Status: Regular



It pisses me off that Tony Blair takes so many holidays
instead of running this country.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-03-05 14:49 [#00112602]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



And what B3n says is so true, Lenin and his crew in Russia
fucked it all up with their revision of Marxism. And I do
believe they did it for their own benefit... It screwed up
half the world, I'm afraid... Anyway, welfare state sounds
like a nice idea, but I have yet to see the state more
concerned with its citizens welfare than with its own
survival.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:50 [#00112603]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to Fernz: #00112600



after australia, blair is off to spain for a summit, then
off to washington for a meeting with george wanker bush --
not even HE wants to stay in the country


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 14:50 [#00112605]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



Marx never predicted anything. That's a common
misconception/how it is presented. I don't mean to be
patronising but that is how the establishment tries to
refute what he and others on the left have to offer.

Something else is possible if it comes from
self-organisation. There are 60 million people in Britain
and if they decided enough was enough, they could gain
control of the means of production. We could take control of
schools, hospitals, factories, shops etc and set up
democratic organisations on a grassroots level to run them
for the benefit of all, not the few.

The point is that it has to be organised at a grassroots
level, power should never be centralised like in the USSR.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:52 [#00112607]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00112602



I think the NHS (National Health Service) was a great idea
and functioned with much success for nearly half a century.
There are virtually no other countries in the world with a
system like it and I'd be saddened to see it go.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-03-05 14:54 [#00112610]
Points: 24595 Status: Regular | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00112602



you'll notice how all these dictatorships masquerading as
communist states failed - one despotic leader pretending to
be one thing so he could spark a revolution with his
cronies, then instilling his own crazed scheme on the
country - Cuba was the only real communist state - and i
don't even think that is real any more


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-03-05 14:55 [#00112611]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



I believe it was the defeat of the Revolution by counter
revolutionaries and the fact that Russia came under attack
from various armies that a beauracracy emerged that led to
Stalinism, the Gulags and great state repression.

For me the problem didn't start with Lenin, but Stalin.
Trotsky argued against the regime and was murdered by
Stalin. I think Trotsky has alot to tell us about the
failure of the Russian Revolution and the potential for a
new society


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:55 [#00112612]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00112605



Sorry, I shouldn't have really said 'predicted'. What was in
actual fact true was that he and Engels brought together
their theories from looking at the textile industry in the
north of Britain which was completely different to russia
which at that time was still mainly peasant farming. There
was no comparison but lenin still tried to apply it.


 

offline Fernz from A Scottish Wanker (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:57 [#00112615]
Points: 1692 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00112603



Britain and America are as bad as each other! (The
governments, not the people)
:)


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-05 14:58 [#00112616]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00112611



Oh yeah, for sure jonesy. Stalinism is completely different
to leninism, that is why china and the ussr never saw eye to
eye. Communist china's ideologies were much more based on
leninism. Lenin didn't even like stalin


 


Messageboard index