|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 04:49 [#00719272]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
reaching bandwith limit is possible in theis site?
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-05-29 04:50 [#00719273]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
If they didn't purchase enough bandwidth from the host then I suppose it could :D
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-05-29 04:50 [#00719274]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker
|
|
You wanna tell us what site that was? In nice bold print ;)
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-05-29 04:51 [#00719275]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to princo: #00719274 | Show recordbag
|
|
The names on the bottom :D of the pic.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 04:53 [#00719279]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
I love that place too, but lately I find problems to enter there... if bandwith problems continue I think joy should consider the donation sistem
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-29 04:54 [#00719281]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00719279 | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm worried about what'll happen when there's actually something on the site!
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2003-05-29 05:27 [#00719304]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to nacmat: #00719272 | Show recordbag
|
|
no, that wont happen here... well, it could happen - but i guess our site has 10x more capacity than watmm. we're not even remotely closed to our limits yet - but it will change after the full site has been launched, of course.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 05:29 [#00719306]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phobiazero: #00719304
|
|
and when its launched... can you get more bandwith so that we era not close to the limit?
or how would you deal with that?
|
|
jamesa
from United Kingdom on 2003-05-29 05:32 [#00719312]
Points: 1080 Status: Lurker
|
|
there is a donation system me thinks
|
|
uzim
on 2003-05-29 06:02 [#00719334]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
aww, this sucks =(
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2003-05-29 06:28 [#00719369]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to nacmat: #00719306 | Show recordbag
|
|
yes, its possible to extend the limits, for an additional monthly fee.... :-/
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-05-29 06:32 [#00719370]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
|
|
so, next time someone is thinking about starting a thread called "omg" and then the only thing written inside is "yep" and then having everyone respond to the thread "yep" and "i like mallowmars"...
think that you might be fucking over the site with your boredom, and someday you might try to log on, and *gasp* the bandwith is exceeded!
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-29 06:38 [#00719372]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
Why don't you just delete old threads... like there's thousands... the old ones serve no purpose really... wouldn't that save bandwith? i have no idea.
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-05-29 06:41 [#00719374]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00719372
|
|
i personally think that would be kind of a good idea too...
im mean its not like many people use the search function anyways...
but I guess they want to have archives?
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-29 06:42 [#00719377]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
Why not have only 1000 threads, the newest ones... at a time.. any over that delete..
hmm.. why do they want archives?
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-05-29 06:43 [#00719378]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
|
|
*shrug*
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-29 06:44 [#00719379]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
cause if they only had a certain amount of threads, people wouldn't have to be so anal about topics not being to their standards of worth. spamming still shouldn't be allowed... but things would be more relaxed .
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 06:45 [#00719381]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00719377
|
|
better to delete useless threads rather than old usefull ones
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-29 06:46 [#00719382]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #00719381
|
|
how are they usefull?
i think useless and really old threads should be deleted... if you need to save space.. that is.
|
|
Zeus
from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-05-29 06:50 [#00719385]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker
|
|
i see nothing wrong with spamming threads
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2003-05-29 07:41 [#00719434]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00719379
|
|
thats funny coming from you...
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-05-29 07:51 [#00719451]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
if no more than 30 post are in a thread they should get deleted i my opinion
like this one i saw, "autechre on radio 1 27th may" (10 posts) im mean when will that ever come in handy..... please
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-29 08:16 [#00719504]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #00719434
|
|
why?
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2003-05-29 08:19 [#00719518]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
I don't spam... sure i've had conversations here, but im not saying people shouldn't write crap, or spam, or talk or anything.. all im saying is that there's like a million threads no one ever uses.. and it's just an idea of saving space. that's all.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-05-29 08:25 [#00719524]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
unless i'm wrong, and i entirely could be, the old threads shouldn't matter as far as bandwidth goes... that's more of a server storage space issue.
bandwidth is only refering to the actual amount of data being sent over the net, so, if nobody ever clicks on the old threads, they take up no bandwidth.
the streaming and downloading of songs is prolly taking up a sizeably larger chunk of bandwithdth than dinky little threads that probably only amount to 5k of bandwidth.
course, they do clutter up the board.
|
|
hepburnenthorpe
from sydney (Australia) on 2003-05-29 08:57 [#00719566]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #00719524
|
|
that my good man is correct. bandwidth is only the amount of data being transferd to and from the site. not how much space the site is taking up.
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2003-05-29 10:12 [#00719640]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
I've seen that message in the last week or two. I just thought it was a glitch, and didn't pay anymore attention to it!
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-05-29 10:29 [#00719661]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
bandwidth
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 10:52 [#00719690]
Points: 67 Status: Addict | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00719518
|
|
He was referring to Zeus, not you. ;)
And giginger, nice stupid quip you just made there, ;) If you are just totally oblivious to the fact that this site has ZERO content besides a messageboard that forgot there was a life outside Warp records, then I understand. Otherwise, your just another lameass who likes to "take sides"....
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 11:14 [#00719704]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719690
|
|
you are wrong about giginger... he is one of the nicest people around...
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-05-29 11:19 [#00719707]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719690 | Show recordbag
|
|
What the fuck is going on today? Is it bash giginger day or something? That is twice now his comments have been taken totally out of context by people just looking to be controversial...
He wasn't racist before and there was NOTHING in his comment in this thread that was "taking sides" with anyone. Fuck, if anything it was a slight at phobia & crew for the time it is taking to get xltronic up and running.
|
|
Loogie
from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-29 11:21 [#00719711]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker
|
|
i personally think these 10000+ posters are responsbile for the amount of dross on this board ;)
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 11:21 [#00719712]
Points: 67 Status: Addict
|
|
Just looking to be controversial???? Fuck you pal. I am trying to comment on the fact that stupid pot shots between message boards are perpetuating a RETARDED attitude on both boards, if you can't read between the lines, that's yoru fuckin' problem...
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-05-29 11:27 [#00719715]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
"I'm worried about what'll happen when there's actually something on the site!"
How the fuck did you read inbetween the lines on that statement and come up with some sort of pot shot being taken?
I mean the topic of this thread is the only reason you are here tonight.
" I am trying to comment on the fact that stupid pot shots between
message boards are perpetuating a RETARDED attitude on both
boards,"
that followed on from:
"you are just totally oblivious to the fact that this site
has ZERO content besides a messageboard that forgot there was a life outside Warp records, then I understand."
hmm....good one...
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 11:28 [#00719716]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719712
|
|
If you keep that mood I can see very little future for you here... but you are free man, do what you want
its a sunny day here in madrid
Loogie: I think you are right
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2003-05-29 11:29 [#00719717]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719712
|
|
good point.
and your posts do wonders to calm the seas of animosity.
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2003-05-29 11:30 [#00719718]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719712
|
|
you are a funny little stressed man
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 11:31 [#00719719]
Points: 67 Status: Addict | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00719715
|
|
Always there for ya, man, oh, and "this thread" isn't the only reason I'm here, you assumptive prick. The REAL reason I'm here is because Watmm is down, Planet-µ's forum bores me to tears most of the time, I'm at work and bored, I read random threads, I see giginger's stupid post, I comment on it, your ass decides to try to fight me on it, etc....
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 11:33 [#00719721]
Points: 67 Status: Addict | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00719715
|
|
Oh, and smart guy, explain to me how there is no way giginger meant watmm and not xltronic.....because it looks to me like watmm is the subject there, making my first point valid once again....
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-05-29 11:33 [#00719722]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719719 | Show recordbag
|
|
No you are wrong, and you seem incapable of comprehending even simple statement...I said the topic of this thread (ie. watmm forum is down) is the reason you are here...you deny it and then type "The REAL reason
I'm here is because Watmm is down,"
Anyway, I have nothing more to say on this.
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 11:36 [#00719724]
Points: 67 Status: Addict
|
|
I typed alot more than that, you are also a selective asshole....
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 11:38 [#00719725]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719719
|
|
why come here for one day and start judging people you dont know?
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 11:41 [#00719727]
Points: 67 Status: Addict
|
|
Trust me, I've been here alot more than one day.....I read this MB, don't post often(because of pure indifference to content, which is its own subject). I just find stupid pot shots like what giginger originally said to be really dumb and wanted to comment on it, as that is my right at a message board....yeah, that Warp comment was a bit underhanded, I admit(still stand by it, though), but it's how I feel. I'm happy with your attitude on this, nacmat, very productive.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 11:41 [#00719728]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719724
|
|
we were all talking about bandwidth till you started talking shit on us... I really think you owe us an apologie.
|
|
tHALidomide
from Austin (United States) on 2003-05-29 11:42 [#00719729]
Points: 67 Status: Addict
|
|
Umm, actually, giginger made the first crack, so I don't owe anybody shit....and I STILL stand by everything I said, if you want another reason why I won't apologize
|
|
pomme de terre
from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-05-29 11:47 [#00719733]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
yeah but gigingers crack didnt offend any of us..
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-05-29 11:49 [#00719736]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to tHALidomide: #00719729
|
|
you have the right to express your opinion but without insults like this:
_______________________________ nice stupid quip you just made there
your just another lameass who likes to "take sides"....
Fuck you pal.
you assumptive prick. _________________________________
you come here and say what you feel, but without attacking when nobody attacked you, cos remember, you started.
now be nice and apologize
|
|
pomme de terre
from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-05-29 11:51 [#00719737]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
..or just leave
|
|
PigeonSt
from Detroit on 2003-05-29 14:30 [#00719882]
Points: 1780 Status: Regular
|
|
looks like the council of jedis has spoken (except for chris that is)
|
|
titsworth
from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-29 14:36 [#00719892]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker
|
|
let's cut bandwidth by temp banning corrupted-girl for a week, then she can go chat somewhere else! :)
[that's what you get when you make veiled insults]
|
|
Messageboard index
|