The christian plague | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 436 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614211
Today 15
Topics 127548
  
 
Messageboard index | Topic is closed
The christian plague
 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 07:46 [#00705201]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



so i follow an ideal of love.

i do NOT subscribe to anything that goes against this.

and i don't converse on such things to convert anyone, i
just state my opinion and my belief. i hope no one thinks i
am on a crusade here. i AM offended however that such a
topic exists. i thought we were all alot more mature than
this.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-05-19 07:48 [#00705202]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



this should be closed yes. this will only result in a
flamewar...

the title of this thread is a bit too agressive, its better
to discuss such delicate matters with a little more care and
respect


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 07:49 [#00705204]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



agreed. and this is my only "cause" with this thread, is to
hope people realise that this thinking is dangerous and
innappropriate for the nature of the board. if skyfarmer's
threads got closed for offending phob or the mods, than THIS
TOO should get closed.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 07:54 [#00705208]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Tibbar, Christianity is just another superstition. It is
based on fantasy and not on fact. Because it is divorced
from reality, it can be bent into any malevolent shape
demagogues and tyrants can dream up to drive the will of the
people. It doesn't have to make sense because it's based on
gnosis and revelation, on feelings not reason.


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 07:55 [#00705209]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705204



your random caps offend me.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 07:56 [#00705211]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



so who WAS christ then?

becuase, like i have stated before, there is tremendous
CONCRETE factual support (from non-biblical sources) to
support his existance.

so who was he then, that men should remember him so?


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 07:58 [#00705212]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705204



do you believe non-christians go to hell? if not then why
would the christian rligion even matter? if so, then that's
wrong because a person who was born muslim is born to go to
hell.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 07:59 [#00705214]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



are you exactly who you were when you were born?

culture is no substitute for a God.


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 07:59 [#00705215]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705211



if you think jesus is the lord, then i think david blain is
the lord.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-05-19 08:00 [#00705216]
Points: 24591 Status: Lurker



Christianity is more like a collection of older religious
texts with a new testement appended.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:00 [#00705217]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



you once again ignore evidences and choose subjective
reality.

to have a rational, logical discussion requires more thanme
speaking into thin air, you know.


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:01 [#00705218]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705214



how could a person who has never known christianity be
banished to hell for their ignorance. it doesn't seem fair.
isn't god supposed to be fair?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:01 [#00705219]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



sorry, marl... that wasnt directed at you.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:02 [#00705221]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



they arent. they are like babies. they are considered
innocents.

you have to have heard of christ to reject him.

but this too, will no doubt brings controversy.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:03 [#00705222]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



of course, on the other hand, seek and you will find.


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:05 [#00705223]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705221



innocent? as opposed to guilty? what are non-christians
guilty of? thinking differently?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:06 [#00705224]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



sin.


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:07 [#00705226]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705222



yeah, seek and you will find nothing. why is your religion
right, and other religions wrong? a friend and i we're
talking about death and the afterlife. we thought about how
many people will be surprised to see what lies after death.
will you be expecting to be standing in front of a huge
gate?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-05-19 08:07 [#00705227]
Points: 24591 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705219



hehe, it's ok tibbs ;)

I think that JC existed, but I'm more of the believe that he
was a Hebrew freedom fighter and member of a society


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 08:08 [#00705228]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705211



Tibbar, what concrete factual evidence do you have that
Jesus:

a) existed

b) was the son of God


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:08 [#00705229]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705224



so disbelieving god is a sin? just becuz a person isn't
religous doesn't mean they don't have the same morals as
religion. its commen sense that lying, stealing, killing,
etc. is wrong. i don't need a 'god' to help me decide right
and wrong.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:08 [#00705230]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i dont imagine theres a literal gate. i imagine its
metaphor. if so, oh well, theres a gate.


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:10 [#00705232]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705230



what do you get from being religous? are you just afraid of
going to hell?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:12 [#00705235]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



before i go make lunch...

fleet: if we just take for example the roman death warrant.
nothing else, just that article. explain it. their
government was TIGHT. explain that away.

there IS no "undeniable proof" of his being the messiah. why
else do the jews deny him. if it was completely undeniable,
no one would have the crucial freedom of choice.

neo: you misunderstand what sin is, apparently. it isnt not
believing, its defiling yourself in God's eyes. he wants to
help you. you want to do whatever YOU think you should be
allowed.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-05-19 08:13 [#00705237]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



Christianity, from my point of view, is a story mixed up
with some true storys and other layers of older religions
(ive said this before)

A religion based on things that cannot be verified, and
based on using fear to control people (IF sin = TRUE: GOTO
HELL: ELSE GOTO HEAVEN) is wrong. However, people are free
to believe whatever they want.

Tibbar: im bloody seriously here, and i dont want to diss
anyone, but what made you believe in god and all?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:13 [#00705238]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



if that was my only motivation, i wouldnt be saved, would
i?

love of God and his son is salvation, not fear of hell.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-05-19 08:13 [#00705240]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



whoa a lot of people posted before i was done typing that...


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:15 [#00705241]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705235



i believe i am smart enough to take care of myself and be
respectful to others and be a good person without having a
false prophet to show me the way. i am strong enough to
stand alone.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-05-19 08:15 [#00705242]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



jaroen: thats a LOOOOOOOOOONG story. seriously. it would
take hours to tell. it took 14 years of my life to get where
i am now. some pretty bad times. i really wish i had time to
tell it and not have to type it out into the emotionless
internet.

nevertheless, i DO have to go now, as my lunch is cooking.

good day, gentlemen

peace, love, compassion


 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:17 [#00705244]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00705238



what do you need salvation from? sin? telling lies? how
could you repent for your sin, when at the time you sinned
you knew you were sinning, but you still went through with
it? do people like you accidentally sin?


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-05-19 08:17 [#00705245]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



still going i see.



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 08:18 [#00705247]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Do you have a link on this death warrant?

there IS no "undeniable proof" of his being the messiah.
why else do the jews deny him. if it was completely
undeniable, no one would have the crucial freedom of
choice.


I'm not asking for "undeniable" proof. Just some evidence
that he was more than a man.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-05-19 08:20 [#00705250]
Points: 24591 Status: Lurker



there is evidence that Jesus (or Yoshua) existed, but none
that he is the messiah.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-05-19 08:20 [#00705251]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



the problem is, something doubtfully exists untill it has
been proven to be false.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-05-19 08:21 [#00705252]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00705250



im pretty sure he existed, its just that everyone adapted
the stories to fit their needs... check some history books..



 

offline NeoExmnist from United States on 2003-05-19 08:24 [#00705256]
Points: 1385 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #00705252



im sure the stories were blown way out of proportion over
time too.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 08:26 [#00705257]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00705250



But how much do we know about this Yoshua? How much of the
gospels is really about him, and how do we know?

It's like the Minoan civilization - we know they practiced a
"sacred sport" called bull-leaping, and this fact was
distorted over time into the legend of the Minotaur. Complex
myths need only a tiny grain of fact around which to
crystallize.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-05-19 10:29 [#00705437]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Hey I can't stay on right now, I am on my lunch break. I
found an article relating to Tyre that addresses some of the
alleged discrepancies. I will see if I can find anymore.
Here is a link to that article.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/rr/rr1996/r&r9612c.htm

If you are all willing, I would like to come on later and
present evidence that Jesus of Nazareth was the prophecied
messiah of the Old Testament. There is enough
extra-biblical evidence for the existance of the historical
Jesus alone that most scholars agree that this man walked
the earth and was crucified pretty much how it is told to
have happened in the gospels. The item in question would be
whether or not He was divine or only a man.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 11:21 [#00705480]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #00705437



:: braces for lord, lunatic or liar argument ::


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 11:25 [#00705483]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #00705437



It's inhabited and rebuilt. Case closed.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-05-19 13:03 [#00705558]
Points: 24591 Status: Lurker



There is evidence that he was a regular Jew worried about
the Romans and that he was a member of a couple of groups
who were pretty spartan... but like I said, no proof that he
is the messiah or that he was 'THE' literal son of god. BTW,
the thief Barabas that he was crucified with was his brother
(Barabas also means either son of god or king of jews - I
forget which) the term was applied sarcastically of course.


 

offline Empiricus from South Carolina (United States) on 2003-05-19 14:57 [#00705726]
Points: 774 Status: Lurker



From a purely rational/logical standpoint, the Bible is
garbage. Two-Valued Logic demands at least internal
consistancy, and thus the New Testament fails. For a super
quick example, compare the two different versions of the
cruxifiction as described in Mark and John. Mark says
someone carries Jesus's cross to the Place of the Skull,
while John asserts that Jesus carried it the entire way.
Who's lying? If we are not going to throw Reason out, then
one of the two conflicting versions MUST be incorrect. Also,
why don't Mark and John agree on what Jesus's last words
were? Once again, someone has it wrong. Further, in Acts
Paul tells three conflicting versions of what happened to he
and his companions on the road to Damascus. Rationally, only
one can be correct. Even if we throw Reason out completely
and take it on faith, which version are we to have faith in?
Want more confusion? Genesis contains not one, but TWO
creation stories. Guess what? They are totally different in
order of creation and what happens after creation. Etc. Etc.
Etc.

I would like to understand how Christians rationalize these
obvious inconsistancies and still maintain the veracity of
the Bible.


 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2003-05-19 15:24 [#00705796]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker



"Fuck off !!"

"....?....How shall we fuck off oh lord ? "


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 15:28 [#00705807]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Empiricus: #00705726



Empiricus, what you want is some Apologetics. That is the
science and art of making excuses for the absurdities,
cruelties and inconsistencies of the Bible.

Though what a text inspired by God needs in the way of
excuses from poor fallible humans I don't know -

Anyhoo it's an entertaining read, mostly because they often
leave the glaring errors and contradictions unresolved and
hanging right in front of your nose. It's like they can't
even see it.


 

offline Empiricus from South Carolina (United States) on 2003-05-19 15:39 [#00705830]
Points: 774 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00705807



Thanks. Pretty amusing stuff.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 15:47 [#00705852]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Empiricus: #00705830



If you've ever visited infidels.org then you've probably
already come across this, but what the hell:

Christians say the darndest things


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-05-19 16:52 [#00705929]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



well, I must say I'm on the side of tibbar... this thread is
downright offensive... it seems some people have some
definite anger built up inside of them towards Christians...
and I really hate it when all Christians are blamed for
anything wrong that has ever been done in the name of
Christianity... hey, I have never killed anyone for that, so
please don't lump me in with any fanatical people from the
past... I'm a Christian, I have my own personal beliefs, and
I don't throw them at peoples faces... so please, can you
respect me for my choice of beliefs, and not make fun of
them? It's really disrespectful, and like I've said before,
is like a slap to my face... people talk about evidence and
all that, but there is no concrete proof for the existence
or non existence of God... no matter how much people call
Christians ignorant, or silly for their beliefs, there is
still no concrete proof that we're wrong, so how can you do
that? Doing that, harrassing us for our beliefs, is just as
ignorant and silly... my belief is a personal thing... if
you choose not to believe, fine... but dammit, please have
some respect for my beliefs ok... we are civilized human
beings here are we not?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-05-19 17:00 [#00705936]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #00705929



The Invisible Pink Unicorn told me that there is no God.
That's all the proof I need.


 


Messageboard index