Radiohead makes 10 million | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
recycle
DADONCK
belb
...and 139 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613865
Today 5
Topics 127525
  
 
Messageboard index
Radiohead makes 10 million
 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 12:11 [#02134067]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to PORICK: #02133970



they just need to mantain that 'artsy' outlook and they're
all set. their music is straight enough so mainstream
audience can take it. and they do take it because that way
they can say they're alternative too. im sure there are
plenty of people who enjoy it for music (such as yourself i
guess), but i don't have any doubts there are also lots of
those who just listen to them so that they turn out cool
infront of their friends. and that's hype.
they've done a few really nice songs but all this hype is
way exaggerated..just because they're cool. and yes, once
again, i can understand there are people like yourself who
find their music brilliant for other reasons. but given that
there are many of those who don't know a thing about music
who praise them, radiohead don't need to do anything to sell
but to keep that same artsy pose.
as for that remark on throat singing..if they used it in a
way that i would find nice then sure. you know, there are
couple of songs on the new album i find alright. i wish i
knew what it is that makes some people say it's best album
this year..it's even stranger because i can enjoy music like
that and im pretty open minded about music in general.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 12:15 [#02134074]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



this thread is turning out to be ghey+ with all of the
arguing

its just Radiohead

they are great

the end


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 12:17 [#02134076]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



no argue just talk



 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 12:19 [#02134078]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



people are taking this "talk" way to fucking deep, its all
the people on all the 100000s of messageboards that take
away from the beauty of the album and how it was released

so just shut the fuck up and listen to the tunes
love it/hate it, who cares

the end


 

offline George_Kaplan on 2007-10-17 12:21 [#02134081]
Points: 838 Status: Regular



yeah stop talking you bastards


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 12:22 [#02134082]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



right..it's pretty pointless. specially because i don't mind
people who like them for their music. eventhough i can't
hear it : )


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 12:24 [#02134086]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134082



you havent heard "in rainbows" or you cant "hear" radiohead
in general, im thinking the later, tis sad for you then

i could totally crank Kid-A and Amnesiac now, but I hve to
listen to this Audioslave shite at work.....

pray for me-


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 12:31 [#02134099]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to recycle: #02134086



i don't hear what it is about their music that makes them so
great, yeah. as i said before, i like couple of songs
though. 'how to disappear comletly' is my favourite one and
i can say i love it, but most of other stuff doesn't do much
for me.

*prays for recycle*


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 12:33 [#02134107]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



thx tolstoyed

right now the new kid rock is on, I actually like that one


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2007-10-17 12:58 [#02134132]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



Listen I don't mean to offend anyone that really likes
radiohead, I really like their music I really do, but I'm
just complaining because I think the somewhere, the whole
thing got distorted and seems dis honest. You know what, it
isn't really radioheads fault as much as it's the people
that whore-ship them.

Wu tang released there entire catalog on their website, Dave
Matthews donates millions of dollars to charities, and
countless other bands have released music on their own
dollar for free. I guess what I'm trying to say is, fuck
off.

"Well I'm all for supporting artists who create beautiful
art.

That's the only criterion I find to be relevant. If I enjoy
its beauty, then I shall reward them with my respect,
admiration and monetary credit. "

Me too, and I would sooner shell out money for Saskrotch,
Paul F Savage, Earvalve, Oddioblender, Impakt, and so many
others here then to pay for Radioheads 3 gas guslin tour
busses.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 13:00 [#02134136]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



home taping is killing the record business

gew = few


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2007-10-17 13:17 [#02134144]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



:D

Sorry guys, I don't mean to be a dick or take up too much
space in the thread.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 13:25 [#02134147]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict | Followup to oxygenfad: #02134144



id rather read that post 10x than most other stuff said in
this thread, youve spoken well

although, id rather see three radiohead gas guslin tour
busses than Saskrotch, PFS, Earvalve, Oddioblender and
Impakt all added together :)

kidding man, life is what it is, radiohead are what they are


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-17 14:51 [#02134239]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #02133958



And you're good for talking utter shit, generally.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 14:53 [#02134243]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134239



are you affraid i may be right?


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-17 15:04 [#02134247]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



No, I disagree with your ideas and don't feel you are
familiar enough with the band. You are making brash
arguments painting them as publicity seekers and trying to
make out that people "know don't know a thing about music"
only like them to be cool.

Just who determines whether someone knows a thing about
music anyway? You? How many albums does someone have to
listen to before the know about music? Besides, you're
average 15 yr old has probably downloaded more shit than you
did at that age I'd bet, which makes your ascertion even
more worthless.



 

offline George_Kaplan on 2007-10-17 15:08 [#02134248]
Points: 838 Status: Regular | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134247



yeah sorry i take that back its not a publicity stunt theyre
just extremely lucky


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 15:11 [#02134249]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134247



when does someone know something about music? when they're
interested enough to look up something new..something on
their own. as opposed to what media/labels serve them.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-17 15:17 [#02134252]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to George_Kaplan: #02134248



it's a way to release a record. If people decide to report
on it... then great. Radiohead were the first out the door.
And they're reaping the rewards. It is publicity, but
Radiohead haven't paid for it.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-17 15:19 [#02134255]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134249



everyone starts somewhere obviously. If some people start
on this Radiohead album and aren't familiar with other
music, there are worse places they could start than here.
What's your problem with that?


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 15:21 [#02134258]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134255



that's not what i've been saying.
and i don't have a problem. it's you radiohead fans that
keep coming at me.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 15:22 [#02134260]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134252



radiohead werent the 1sr, what gave you that idea? there are
lots of other artists who put up their music for free but
since they're not popular with schoolyboys no one knew ablut
it and media wasn't interested in it either.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-17 15:23 [#02134261]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



so you don't have a problem then? You accept that people
who listen to this album aren't doing it to be cool.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 15:25 [#02134262]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134261



no. im positive lots of their listeners do it to be cool,
but it isn't my problem.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-17 15:28 [#02134264]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134260



first big band out the door, so it's a publicity stunt
because the big band tries something different. OK, I
understand now. Bollocks. They couldn't win anyway. There
would be you or someone complaining about them if they made
a mint releasing by traditional means as you clearly have a
dislike of the band (and very hard to please generally going
by posts elsewhere). I'm not sure whether picking arguments
is the best option, so I'll back off from here.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-17 15:29 [#02134265]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



would you two shut the fuck up
you proved my point again in this thread
quit arguing
its just radiohead
great music
like it or dont
the end.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-17 15:30 [#02134266]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134264



i never said anything about they way they released this
album. you're confusing my with someone else.


 

offline misantroll from Switzerland on 2007-10-17 15:30 [#02134267]
Points: 2151 Status: Lurker



paranoïd android??


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-10-17 15:44 [#02134272]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



How much of that 10 million will go to English taxes? Half?


 

offline Spprw from Czech Republic on 2007-10-17 22:14 [#02134391]
Points: 41 Status: Regular



how would they even know this? I really doubt they brought
in 10 million from this


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-18 01:31 [#02134409]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spprw: #02134391 | Show recordbag



me 2
maybe relatively more who bought it want to show this by
filling out the survey, why the ones who paid nothing
thought it was a crappy album and didn't bother to fill it
out


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-10-18 02:59 [#02134429]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



did any of you stop to think that maybe just one person in
the world bought the album and thought it was worth 10
million dollars


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-10-18 02:59 [#02134430]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



because i don't think anybody has stopped to think that


 

offline hexane on 2007-10-18 03:06 [#02134431]
Points: 2035 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02134430 | Show recordbag



lol


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-10-18 04:31 [#02134450]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



Those are some of the ridiculous things I would do if I were
Bill Gates


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-18 07:34 [#02134480]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



Bill Gates = Radiohead = The Tuss


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-18 07:54 [#02134491]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i'd go to radiohead and burn 10 million in front of their
eyes


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-10-18 09:03 [#02134502]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



Too bad Radiohead sucks so much.


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2007-10-18 12:18 [#02134592]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



radiohead is not cool anymore, isnt it?


 

offline OK on 2007-10-18 12:19 [#02134593]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spprw: #02134391



it's all based on unreliable data, some firm calculated
around 1.2 million downloads based on website traffic, then
some other site made a poll to find out the average price
people paid.

the poll must certainly have some bias towards people who
paid something.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-18 12:22 [#02134594]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134262



I'm sure lots of people listen to your favourite music to be
cool as well then. You can argue the other way. The more
unknown your music, the hipper you must feel. You are
subsequently cool in your own head. You know about stuff
someone else doesn't. You can subsequently talk down about
more well known music like Radiohead to make you feel more
superior.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-10-18 12:25 [#02134595]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134266



You were responding to my post about how they released this
being a publicity seeking exercise. In that case, if I
misread what you are talking about I am glad you don't feel
Radiohead are publicity seekers.


 

online recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2007-10-18 12:49 [#02134611]
Points: 40030 Status: Addict



Radiohead want you to shut the fuck up(remix).


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-18 13:56 [#02134683]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Vin3islih: #02134594



see..that's how radiohead fans think about music. it is
exactly that sort of thinking that bothers me.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2007-10-18 14:07 [#02134689]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134683



when will you give up your "everything i like is good,
everything i hate is bad, if you like what i don't like you
like it for stupid, unjustifiable reasons" bullshit.



 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2007-10-18 14:08 [#02134691]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular | Followup to plaidzebra: #02134689



You are both wrong my opinion is the only valid one here


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2007-10-18 14:14 [#02134698]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to plaidzebra: #02134689



dunno where you picked that from im affraid as i never said
anything like it. i don't even think you can address music
with bad or good. it's all about personal (subjective)
preference.


 

offline OK on 2007-10-18 15:10 [#02134715]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



i have no idea how it is that tostoyed thinks he knows the
reasons people listen to music for. like he is enlightened
or something.

save us tolstoyed from making choices for the wrong
reasons!, you know better than all of us toghether, you
deserve to have the power to make choices for us. clearly
people are stupid and can't choose for themselves, save us
from freedom please!


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2007-10-18 15:18 [#02134716]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #02134698



many moons ago we had a discussion of what made music good
or bad, and you insisted that there was such a thing as good
music and bad music. i remember more of this stuff than i
want to.

that's somewhat of a generalization...maybe you were just
winding us up. i've been mistaken before.

also your insistence that people are interested in the
radiohead album because that's what the media is feeding
them...of course there are always some fashionistas, but it
seems presumptuous and arrogant to paint every radiohead fan
with the same brush.

although i do believe that at some point you acknowledged
your radiohead prejudice. ; )



 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2007-10-18 15:18 [#02134717]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



I like this new Radiohead music, it's the best thing I've
heard by them, as a whole, I think. Sounds like they lost
their interest in fucking IDM pretty damn quick, a lesson we
could all learn from.


 


Messageboard index