Some good news from Iraq | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
belb
...and 308 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Some good news from Iraq
 

offline tlink from sofla (United States) on 2004-05-20 18:22 [#01199013]
Points: 403 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #01198938



You don't want to be free?


 

offline altai on 2004-05-20 18:26 [#01199017]
Points: 373 Status: Regular



Nora, I am just anti-twat, and that my friend is you


 

offline k_maty on 2004-05-20 19:10 [#01199062]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular



Wow, nacmat, I know you're like almost 30 and still live
with your parents and everything, and have experienced so
much...I'm sure you are the leading authority on what is
going on in Iraq. Heh...reverse brainwashing...


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-05-20 19:16 [#01199074]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



if US wants to make peace so badly, worldwide, why don't
they stop the war between palestins and israelis?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-20 20:37 [#01199152]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01199074



along those same lines, why doesn't the rest of the world
step in to help create peace between the palestinians &
israelies?

what's the UN doing to help? or the arab community?

is turning a blind eye helping the situation there?


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-05-20 20:42 [#01199163]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



did the refusal to take action save lives in rowanda?

it's not always as cut and dried as saying that refusal to
take action saves lives. it's a shitty thing that in the
real world it has to come down to that, but sometimes
military action can actually save lives. it's really easy
to be anti war, but in reality sometimes it can actually be
the lesser of two evils. who will ever know until after the
fact? the reality is that even after the fact it's still
not always clear.


 

offline PhystPhukt from The Holiest of Holes (United States) on 2004-05-20 21:02 [#01199190]
Points: 1414 Status: Addict | Followup to epohs: #01199163



Children stop fighting, I will pull this car over...


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-20 21:32 [#01199299]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"...palestins and israelis?"
Because Palestine is not recognized as a country but as a
territory with "something" they call Palestinians.
Basically, WWII is exploated to its depths.

"Children stop fighting, I will pull this car over..."
I still love your avatar no matter who you think you are and
what you think you did. Say, are those your real eyebrows?



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-05-20 21:52 [#01199324]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01199163



regardless of whether or not certain iraqis are better off
now, i can assure you that the world is taking a turn for
the worse by allowing america to stick its war penis into
everything in sight... think the israel-palestine conflict
is bad? just wait until multiple third world nations get so
desperate and furious that they have no problem with killing
all westereners indescriminately...


 

offline Peter File from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2004-05-20 22:13 [#01199340]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker



It wouldn't surprise me if most of the "facts" in the first
post are demonstrably false or at best misleading. I don't
have the time to check the veracity of each and every one,
though -- it would have helped if the guy had gone to the
trouble of actually citing sources. But here's the
main reason for my doubt: there is one I know for certain to
be bullshit:
"Girls are allowed to attend school for the first time ever
in Iraq."

The "first time ever"? Iraqi girls were attending school
before the war, and this immediately calls the rest of the
purported facts into question.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-05-20 23:35 [#01199463]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



namcat,

your image you have created on this message board over the
past few years that I have been here,

......

.....has just been crushed by this thread.

In all honestly, you sound like a 15yr old........not the
other figure I am so used to associating with your
name/avatar.

Sorry,



 

offline Glitch from New Zealand on 2004-05-21 00:05 [#01199467]
Points: 519 Status: Regular



politics brings out the best in people. ..

now come on.. . if the us wanted a fair government.. . and
indeed if it actually wanted to be a democracy rather than
the obvious republic that it is why not vote for politicians
that AREN'T religious and AREN'T involved with major
corporations and greedy profit seeking individuals. ..


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-05-21 03:29 [#01199696]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to epohs: #01199152



we're talking about US taking actions here...and as far as i
know, european comunity is very preocupied with this
problem...i doubt they would ever take military actions
though.

"it's really easy to be anti war, but in reality sometimes
it can actually be the lesser of two evils"
ok, that is why i asked about the palestin and israel...more
people are getting killed there than iraq, but still US
doesn't seem to care...im thinking simply because there's
nothing in it for them...but, ofcourse you (and many
aothers) don't think so, so we will never agree im affraid
:) ah, well...maybe i'll be convinced one day that they
really care for people :)


 

offline EugeneII on 2004-05-21 03:40 [#01199702]
Points: 206 Status: Lurker



Radiohead.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-05-21 03:46 [#01199703]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



Rwanda: No oil, no US.

Nuff said.



 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 04:40 [#01199752]
Points: 793 Status: Regular



This whole thing of justifying the iraq intervention
retrospectively as humanitarian, when at the time it
was quite blatantly motivated by other factors (oil, US need
to relocate from saudi arabia) and sold on others still
(fictitious saddam - al-qaida links, WMD), really pisses me
off.

I think military intervention is sometimes a necessary evil,
if you take a utilitarian view of ethics etc. So where was
the congo's intervention (1 million dead in the past 3 years
due to civil war)? And rwanda's? These would have been a
walkover compared to iraq, and achieved so much more.

In fact, if we're talking about interventions, let's start
with some fucking aids drugs and clean water.



 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-05-21 04:50 [#01199756]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



yes...and education.

1,000,000 projected Aids orphans in South africa over the
next 10 years.

The Earth needs to be balanced.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 04:56 [#01199760]
Points: 793 Status: Regular



i've posted this little stat before but it always bears
repeating:

30,000 people die every day from preventable
diseases.
(world health organisation report)

and of course they suffer for a long time before that. clean
water sources and mass vaccination programmes would sort
much of this out.

put the tragic 3000 dead from 9/11 in perspective, people.


 

offline nacmat on 2004-05-21 05:53 [#01199802]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01199463



elusive:

this were my pots in this thread:
_________________________________________________
Bush = murderer

what USA has done for money = genocide
_________________________________________________

LOL

nora: aznar is such a liar, I understand how he is so nice
friend with bush

both liars both murderers, both corrupt

but at least bush is powerful, not like that sad small being

called aznar... poor thing
__________________________________________________

I am sure soldiers in iraq are trying to do their best now
to improve those people´s lifes... but at first that war
should have never taken place.... not for money

and maybe some of those stats are true, which is good for
iraq... but what a bout the 40 people who died today in a
wedding? or the prisioners being humiated?

its normal that we disbelieve
__________________________________________________

no, I am sorry but your war was illegal, as the UN was
against... well you didnt even let the UN vote for that...
you just decided to attack on your own

I say "you" talking about the US goverment you seem to be so

proud of
___________________________________________________

fuck bush
___________________________________________________

nora, I am sorry but I think you are the ignorant here, but

hey thats just my ignorant opinion

I just pray so that USA dont bomb my country if they find
they could make money out of it
__________________________________________________
__________________________________________________

so, elusive:

what exactly made you think those were the posts of a 15
year old?

I was talking serious, sorry to have dissapointed you, but
thats how I feel and think.


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-21 05:58 [#01199809]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"im thinking simply because there's nothing in it for
them..."
That is what I meant too!


 

offline nacmat on 2004-05-21 06:03 [#01199823]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to k_maty: #01199062



i didnt mean to offend you either, sorry for thinking the
way I do.

and yes, my life sounds pathetic as described in your post,
thanks for reminding me. I wont forget the next time I want
to give my opinion


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-21 06:16 [#01199854]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"and of course they suffer for a long time before that.
clean
water sources and mass vaccination programmes would sort
much of this out. "

Form uneliable sources of information:

In North America few years ago students who were vaccinated
were injected with some virus that attacks monkeys which was
gradually destroying their brains

In X-Yugoslavia, America was offering some kind of a help
(in area where I lived in) with altered plant seeds. They
were doing experiments on people that way, and Yugoslavian
government did not want their help. US was very insulted
after the offer was rejected and they started doing some bad
things because of that.


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-21 06:18 [#01199857]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



Now, what kind of a help is that if it makes you more
miserable?

Lets talk about terrorism eh?


 

offline k_maty on 2004-05-21 06:18 [#01199858]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular



What about Saddam?


 

offline Nora on 2004-05-21 06:44 [#01199929]
Points: 214 Status: Addict



if it wasn't for those pretty pictures of saddam found in a
hole by our soldiers qaddafi wouldn't have given up the tons
of mustard gas canisters which he had hidden in a farm in
libya. mustard gas are wmd's for people who don't know what
they are. i guess we didnt find wmd's in iraq but we
indirectly did result in finding wmd's elsewere. qaddafi
gave up his weapons to get on the us's good side AND he's
not stupid he gained free trade with us as well after coming
forward.

not a stupid man like our friend saddam.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-21 06:47 [#01199934]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Saddam Hussein, meet Donald Rumsfeld.

This humanitarian effort bullshit is getting on my nerves.
Spare me the dubious altruism and revert to the
non-interventionist nation we are supposed to be.


Attached picture

 

offline Nora on 2004-05-21 06:51 [#01199936]
Points: 214 Status: Addict



mappatazee i've seen that picture in a million other forums.
when nobody has anything intelligent to debate about they
end up posting that picture. i guess things would've been
better if we left saddam in power seeing as rumsfeld was
shaking hands with saddam 2 1/2 decades ago. err...


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 06:59 [#01199945]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to 3051: #01199854



wtf? you do not make clear what kind of vaccination this
was, if it was an experimental procedure, or any other
details.

You have a laughably poor understanding of what vaccination
actually is, or the scale of what it has done to eradicate
disease.

Vaccination programmes

Number of people who died of hunger on 11/09/2001: 24,000
Number of children killed by diarrhoea on 11/09/2001: 6,020
Number of children killed by measles on 11/09/2001: 2,700
from New Internationalist Magazine

Get terrorism in context. 1, 2


 

offline Nora on 2004-05-21 07:04 [#01199950]
Points: 214 Status: Addict



i'm sorry to dissapoint you but i have a clear understanding
as to what they mean by vaccination *coughs and points
down*

The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID),
through a $7 million grant to UNICEF, is co-sponsoring a
national children's vaccination program in Iraq. The funds
are being used to purchase vaccines, syringes and cold chain
equipment which will support child immunizations for one
year. There are approximately four million children under
the age of five in Iraq; another 75,000 children are born
every month. The immunizations protect the children against
preventable diseases including whooping cough, tetanus,
polio, diphtheria, tuberculosis, Hepatitis B, polio and
measles.

USAID and UNICEF are worldwide partners in immunizing the
world's children. UNICEF has maintained a national
immunization strategy in Iraq for the past 23 years. Just
prior to the conflict, a national measles vaccination
campaign was carried out by UNICEF, which resulted in a
national coverage rate of an estimated 85% of all Iraqi
children under the age of five. Previous campaigns, known as
National Immunization Days, have lead to relatively high
rates of vaccination against measles, mumps, rubella,
diphtheria, whooping cough and polio. There has not been a
new reported case of polio in Iraq in the past three years.



 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-21 07:05 [#01199952]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Nora: #01199950



Like I said, altruism is not our job and it is immoral.


 

offline Nora on 2004-05-21 07:08 [#01199954]
Points: 214 Status: Addict



i would say your dont give a fuck attitude about global
security is the extremist thinking of altruism, but thats
just my honest opinion what do i know...


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 07:08 [#01199955]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to Nora: #01199950



There has not been a
new reported case of polio in Iraq in the past three years.

So all this has been achieved before the current
occupation?

Something tells me you're not even reading the stuff you're
copying and pasting into your posts


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2004-05-21 07:08 [#01199956]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I think it's safe to say that we now live in a far more
dangerous world than before the war. How much worse Saddam
was compared to the big religious leaders in the area
remains to be seen. Terrorism is much more likely with all
this instability.

BTW: I wonder how many of the pro war people are also pro
Israel zionist, maybe it has something to do with Israel,
given their relations with Iraq in the past...


 

offline k_maty on 2004-05-21 07:11 [#01199962]
Points: 2362 Status: Regular



OMG!


Attached picture

 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-21 07:12 [#01199963]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Nora: #01199954



"global security" That's a made up word.


 

offline Nora on 2004-05-21 07:12 [#01199964]
Points: 214 Status: Addict



i know exactly what i posted. unicef is an organization
which provides medical care to underprivlegaed individuals.
if you read the first paragrah it states they just received
a 7 million dollar grant enabling them to help more people
in a grandeur scale. so my question is. what is the point of
your article it states vaccination is essential. thats what
we're trying to do as you can obviously tell. so please
explain to me what is your problem with whats going on.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 07:12 [#01199965]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to Nora: #01199954



I most definitely give a fuck about global security, which
is why the bush administration's policies give me such cause
for concern.

Pentagon report: global warming is a greater threat to the
world than terrorism.



 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-21 07:14 [#01199968]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to VLetr: #01199965



Global warming is not a threat. Volcanos emit far more
greenhouse gases in a year than we do. By far.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 07:16 [#01199971]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to Nora: #01199964



so we agree vaccination is essential.

now, how about we take that lovely £7 million; then we add
to it the $100+ billion spent on the military
excursion into iraq? and perhaps help the children of
countries without oil as well?

oh dear, too late.

you give me no reason why vaccination programmes in iraq
need be accompanied by a hugely unpopular military presence.


 

offline VLetr from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 07:17 [#01199973]
Points: 793 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01199968



link please, mapp


 

offline Nora on 2004-05-21 07:20 [#01199974]
Points: 214 Status: Addict



theirs still tyrants present in iraq. theres still conflict
going on as we speak. thats why we're trying to secure the
country until elections start up and running around June
30th when we intend to give up soveriegnty to iraq.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 07:23 [#01199976]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01199968



but we may be upsetting the balance between gases.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-21 07:38 [#01199988]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



"theirs still tyrants present in iraq. theres still conflict

going on as we speak. thats why we're trying to secure the
country until elections start up and running around June
30th when we intend to give up soveriegnty to iraq."

yeah, the tyrants are the US, and the conflict is from
Iraqis who dont want us (and rightfullly so) in thier
country.

and do you REALLY think that they will regain control on
June 30th?

I'm sorry, but you just seem to believe everything you are
told regarding this whole situation, and you turn everything
around to be pro-US.

you said: "if it wasn't for those pretty pictures of saddam
found in a
hole by our soldiers qaddafi wouldn't have given up the tons

of mustard gas canisters which he had hidden in a farm in
libya. mustard gas are wmd's for people who don't know what

they are. i guess we didnt find wmd's in iraq but we
indirectly did result in finding wmd's elsewere.
qaddafi

gave up his weapons to get on the us's good side AND he's
not stupid he gained free trade with us as well after coming

forward.

JESUS CHRIST. So you are justifying all of this, by what we
found in a different country? An entire war, is ok because
of this?

Of course you dont want to hear any of this... so its kind
of pointless. Youll just say something about me being a
paranoid, misinformed, traitor or something. But I tell you
this, and I hope you really dwell on it for awhile: you
attitude is more dangerous then terrorism.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-05-21 07:39 [#01199992]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



-perhaps someone could back me up on this one:
i believe i had read that Qaddafi had been offering some
sort of reconciliation with the Americans since before the
Clinton administration ended, and that it is basically only
being brought up/addressed now because of its usefulness as
a publicity tool... does this sound familiar to anyone?
anyone have a good link?

-secondly, America's per capita spending on humanitarian
relief in Iraq and elsewhere pails in comparison to other
countries, particularly when you do consider just how much
money they are spending on their military... you say that
they must spend lots on military to snuff out tyranny
(although some might call it self determination, you know?),
but the fact of the matter is that they wouldn't still be
having this war on such a large scale if they truly were a
beneficial alternative to the Ba'athists (sorry if this is
misspelt) <-- perhaps they have running water now, but how
many months did it take? and yet whenever significant
problems occur, they have no problem dropping billions of
dollars of explosives out of the sky...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-05-21 07:43 [#01199994]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Nora: #01199974



Wow. I didn't actually think that there were Americans who
actually believed what the Bush gang said. Rumsfeld lays on
his back at night wanking over a fantasy like you.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-05-21 07:49 [#01200003]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Then how much is enough?

$7 Million in perspective seems like chumpchange to the
military spending.

Uhh, sorry. We'll just take our 7 mil back since you guys
don't want it.

sigh,


"I think it's safe to say that we now live in a far more

dangerous world than before the war."


Yeah, does the word you use, "we" include Iraqis????


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-21 08:01 [#01200029]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01200003



typical, typical, typical...

and yes, i think "we" does include iraqis.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-05-21 08:31 [#01200078]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



why is it so hard to accept for some, that US is in this
mostly for money?


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-21 08:45 [#01200112]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



Sherpa Uber alles!!

(is there "Sherpa" in Slovenian) ??


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-05-21 08:48 [#01200116]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



you mean if we have our name for sherpa's? i thought that
was a universal name :)

we call them Å¡erpa. see :)


 


Messageboard index