abortion: pro or against? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 285 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
abortion: pro or against?
 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-10-22 14:40 [#00413192]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



i'm pro-choice, definately.

lots of reasons, all of which i think people have stated, or
i dont know how to express


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2002-10-23 10:42 [#00414125]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to uviol: #00413187



i took all day to think about my reply, because your last
post confused me uviol. Mostly because i don't disagree with
it ;-) Actually I admire people that decide to keep their
baby and take responsibility for their actions. And I think
if I would ever come in such a situation myself, and had to
make such a tough decision... i would probably lean more
towards keeping the baby instead of having it aborted...

BUT... that is just my personal opinion, and I still do
believe everyone should be allowed to decide for themselves.
So I would have to say that I am still pro-choice.

I can understand if other people (for whatever reasons) do
not want a baby to be born... and i feel they should be
allowed the choice not to have it. (i mean the opposite of
pro-choice is probably that you feel abortion should be
forbidden, or...?).

Even though I personally would not like it, i believe very
strongly people should decide for themselves. Imo it is just
wrong to an woman with an unwanted pregnancy "we don't care
how you feel about it, you must have the baby anyway!" You
just can't do that... again imho :-)


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 22:25 [#00914404]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I think when a woman consents to having sexual relations she
should realize there is a possibility for conception, even
if protection is used. Being that as the case, I think she
has already made her choice. Also there is always adoption
if the woman can't afford to raise the child. Not wanting
to deal with carrying it to term is no reason to end its
life.

One argument that is often brought up is this idea that,
because a fetus is not conscious it is not human but only a
potential human and therefore has no rights of its own.
People take action on potentiality all of the time. Many
civil cases are based around the loss of potential income.
For instance if someone sends a bunch of letters to people
really slagging company x, company x can sue for losses
based on potential profit they may have lossed. The RIAA
blames p2p networks for cd sale drops because of the
potential sales of those cds to customers who are d/l the
songs instead ... (cont.)


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 22:31 [#00914405]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



After a baby has been born, can I smash it's fingers just
because it cannot use them for anything yet? The child only
has the potential and probability to use them but has not
developed those skills yet. It can only move them around,
but it could do that in the womb as well when it was
supposedly not yet a person. I think that to abort the
development of a child that has been conceived is the same
as murder.


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2003-10-22 22:34 [#00914407]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker



choice.

choice.

choice.

its all about options, thats what makes this the "free"
world, right? ;)

although i would never choose abortion myself, i repect the
decision a woman will make.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 22:43 [#00914413]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



So what makes this issue any different than anything else?
I can choose not to pay taxes, or kill my neighbor, but
society will punish me for doing so. However I still have
the choice. I believe, however, that our laws should match
our ethics, and by saying making abortion legal we are
saying that it is a morally just thing for us to do. I do
not believe it to be a morally just thing for us to do.

Then the is the idea that woman are going to have it done in
back alleys and that is dangerous so we need to make it
legal so it can be done in clinics where it is safe. If
that is the case lets set up a whore house on every block
where the government makes sure the prostitutes are tested
for STDs. Let's create heroin clinics where we can make
sure that no one gets a lethal dose and that nothing is cut.
Let's allow bank robbers to sign up for free tazers so that
they don't kill anyone in the process of robbing a bank. In
fact lets supply all of our nations criminals with non
lethal weapons.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 22:46 [#00914414]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #00914413



They have heroin clinics for addicts to shoot up in
Canada... or at least one that I heard of


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 22:47 [#00914415]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



But as a libertarian, yes, I think all drugs should be
legal, abortian should be legal, prostitution should be
legal. Get government OUT of other people's business.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 22:47 [#00914416]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I support methadone clinics, but not heroin clinics


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 22:48 [#00914417]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



I don't support either clinic, unless they want to pay for
it.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 22:50 [#00914418]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



As a christian I believe that people are totally depraved,
and that government is ordained because people will not do
the right thing on their own without guidance .. most of the
time anyway. Without government we would have chaos and
anarchy. There has to be standards of ethics, laws, and
accountability.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 22:53 [#00914419]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Yeah, of course there has to be accountability, whichi is my
whole point.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 22:55 [#00914420]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



whether one is a christian or not, they have to at least
admit to there being good and evil. Many people today
believe in moral relativism, the idea that there is no
absolute good and evil. If this is the case, that same
person would have no justification going to the authorities
after I blew up their house, or stole their car. I have
done nothing wrong because there is no such thing as wrong.
Just a random stream of events. This person may choose to
get revenge, but never seek justice. What is justice?
Nothing would be just because nothing is unjust.


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2003-10-22 23:03 [#00914423]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #00914413



i know what your getting at.

where will the line be made?

who knows... but this line concerning abortion has already
been crossed...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-10-22 23:07 [#00914424]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #00914420



That good and evil are human constructs does not prevent us
from living by them, just as we can build a house measuring
in meters and centimeters even though those standards of
measurement are perfectly artificial.

All we know is what we've learned from the history we can
remember, and the fact that this wisdom was not handed down
to us by some absolute authority is no reason to discard
it.

Christians must live very close to nihilism because it seems
to be the only alternative they can think of.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:10 [#00914426]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i agree with you, of course, but i think my approach is just
different.

see...
for me, i KNOW theyre never gonna do the right thing, so i
just say... well, then they reap what they sow. those babies
go to heaven, which is great. they never have to know the
misery of this life on earth. my concern is more for the
people who are commiting this act.

it's truly horrible, but i dont see that itll ever change.
in a world where there are so many other things wrong, what
makes me think theyll ever go back?

nothing.

and i think thats the thing.
its never gonna change for the better.

sure, we try.
but as humans, as a whole, we're doomed to failure.
because our society and many other nations in the world
right now just flat out don't care. its barbaric.

people like bush claim to be christian.
i fail to see how.
and then people like greg proops go and cut us down on
national tv, cuz theyre too dumb to see that what
christianity IS and how people live up to it is just as bad
as everyone else.

why??????

because we're human too.
we're not God.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:10 [#00914427]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



that was to glasse, btw


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:12 [#00914428]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



making my thought clear, i missed some punctuation...

"cuz theyre too dumb to see what christianity really IS, and
that how people live up to it is just as bad as everyone
else"


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:16 [#00914432]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



i think abortion should be legal.... i think alot of things
the goverment tries to stop should be legal...
on the other hand i think it's morally wrong since birth
control is so easy to get and use properly...... this
partial birth nonsense was insane though i suport that being
banned...womens health rights or no....we're supposed to be
civilized and cracking baby's skulls open is no way to
go....even if some women may die in child birth....mabey
that sounds harsh and as a man i have no right to say that
but thats what I believe....anyways i guess i'm for
abortation rights....but i don't like the term pro-choice


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:18 [#00914433]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



So then is the only reason for one to do something good over
something bad is because either a) in their subjective
paradigm it is what is right to them or b) the majority of
society has decided what is good and can force them to do it
and/or punish them if they choose not to. Are good and evil
then defined by a majority vote? Were orgies and gladiator
games morally right for Rome because the majority supported
them? What about slavery? The Spanish conquests?


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:20 [#00914434]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #00914413



i actually believe that drugs and whores should be
legal...thats why i'm a libertarian....but thats a whole
other discussion...
i'm bassically agianst goverment interfernce with out
lives....(talking about the us here...other contries have
different laws i know)


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:21 [#00914435]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Tibbar yea I know that we are headed down that road. I
think that makes it important now more than ever to be an
advocate though. Even if you can't stop the whole ship,
even a couple people who change makes it worth it.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:22 [#00914436]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



personally, i think youre butting your head against a wall.

if God itself has said he will giv emen over to their sick
pleasures, how can you expect more? have can you have
standards higher than God's for men.

this time is critical, i keep saying this to you.

i know this sounds liek im coming against you, but im not.

im just saying, dont expect it to change.
of course its bad, but...

i guess it's more personal for some than others.
thats probably a lack of empathy on my part, but im not so
sure.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-10-22 23:22 [#00914437]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



of course abortion is immoral. i know people who have had
them though and i respect their decision


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:22 [#00914438]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00914426



if your a catholic you beleive that unbaptized babies go to
limbo...

ps. does anyone remember that ninja turtles episode where
they ended up in limbo


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-10-22 23:23 [#00914439]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



yes its totally personal.. and its not like an easy way out
either


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:24 [#00914440]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



btw, im not against activism, let me make it clear...

but you sometimes (sometimes) seem to make it sound like you
expect everyone to have a change of heart, which they wont.

it IS worth it to reach out to the few who WILL listen
though.

just to be clear.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-10-22 23:25 [#00914441]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



this had nothing specific to do with christianity either. no
faiths condone abortion


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:25 [#00914442]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



well, catholicism is rarely christian-based, so i dont doubt
they think something lame like that.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:26 [#00914443]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



The bible is pretty much silent on the fate of children who
were either unborn or too young to be held accoutable when
they died. I guess one shouldn't speak loudly when
scripture is mostly silent. However by appealing to the
nature of God we know that He is mercyful and just, so I
personally believe that they never knew wrong and would not
be held accountable.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 23:28 [#00914444]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00914442



"catholicism is rarely christian-based"

...is it just me, or did that make no sense?


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:28 [#00914445]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Tibbar: I realize that I can't change anyones heart, but I
believe that God does work through people and that He may
change a heart through something someone says or does etc.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:28 [#00914446]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



dude, its not silent.

"the innocents", dude.

who do you think "the innocents" refers to?

obviously something of this category.


 

offline DeLtoiD from Ontario on 2003-10-22 23:29 [#00914447]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cfern: #00914438



lol... i still have the tourist pamphlet from when i went to
pugatory last year

:D


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:30 [#00914449]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



map: if you trace the catholic lineage, and inspect its
doctrines by the bible, youll see that it couldnt be farther
from chrisitanity.

just cuz they have a cross on the wall, is no reason to take
them at face value.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:31 [#00914450]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



mappatazee: protestants/evangelicals believe in sola
scriptura, that is that scripture alone is inspired and that
doctrines should be based on that. in contrast the catholic
church believes that the pontif is as inspired as scripture
and that his doctrines can be equivalent with scripture.
this is part of what the reformation was about.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:32 [#00914451]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



so you have the catholic church adding things like
purgatory, mary's near divinity, prayers to saints etc etc


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:33 [#00914452]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



which wouldnt be so bad, if it werent for the fact that the
bible is clearly against ALL that stuff


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:33 [#00914453]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



That being said I believe that a catholic can be saved
through faith in Christ, but that it would be in spite of,
rather than because of many official doctrines of the
church.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-10-22 23:38 [#00914456]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



this is interesting. ive been needing to hear and educated
(and tolerant!) comparison of the catholic and protestant
faiths. all i hear from some people is that the anglican
church is responsible for so much evil, which makes no sense
to me at all!


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 23:38 [#00914457]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Any religion is bad; protestant, jewish, catholic, hindu,
islam, etc.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-10-22 23:39 [#00914459]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #00914457



get yer head out of the sand!


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 23:42 [#00914464]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #00914459



They all try to tell people how to behave; they all enslave
people to make a broader analogy, and that's what they are,
systems of control and guidance. People should think for
themselves


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:43 [#00914467]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



hehehehehehe...

and the fact that we acknowledge that no one can ever live
up to it & that we all fall short of these beliefs is our
way of being oppressive and ungiving, right?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:44 [#00914468]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



you cant control someone by forcing them to do somethign
they can never do.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 23:45 [#00914469]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Yeah, it's teaching you hate yourself, to feel imperfect, to
accept suffering above all else.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:46 [#00914471]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



no, its teaching to forgive.

big difference.

and we all are imperfect, unless you've got a false ego.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:47 [#00914472]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Not really to hate yourself, but to accept and learn how to
deal with your duality.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-10-22 23:47 [#00914473]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



and dude, yeah... accept suffering.

its life, whereve YOU been.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-10-22 23:50 [#00914477]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00914473



Yeah, suffering exists, but it can be overcome, but
christianity just teaches to be penetant, and you'll be
rewarded in your "next life" which, heh...


 


Messageboard index