ableton live 5 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 473 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
ableton live 5
 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-21 21:10 [#01784423]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



i am heavily considering purchasing this DAW for making
more music... i would like to here fellow xltronic'ers
comments and arguments as to what ableton live (any version)
is capable of.

love,
mr. quoth


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-21 22:01 [#01784456]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



It's the only host worth buying. Looks good, sounds good,
runs stable, plays nicely with the plugins I use.

Most importantly with Ableton, it's totally inspiring to
work in scene mode as opposed to master timeline mode which
is what you're stuck in with every other host. It is the
polar opposite of Cubase which is a pleasure annihilation
device.


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-22 00:15 [#01784482]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker



It's bloody amazing. BUT, I wouldn't spend £250 on it. I
have a crack of it if anyone's interested.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-11-22 03:11 [#01784541]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular | Followup to futureimage: #01784482



you're a fucking cheapskate


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-22 04:26 [#01784592]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



fleetmouse, this "scene" mode... does this mean like for
instance if you're fucking with a sample in real time, you
can just keep on layering things on... bit by bit as
oppossed to dropping them into a visual display like for
instance on fruity loops? fl's you have to click on the
sequencer's pads in order to get the sound when it's playing
back.... am i understanding this correctly? i'll just
fucking look it up myself if i'm wrong... but alll of these
features jam packed into a program... current owners must
have A LOT of owner manual reading to do before they get
into it... to get the most out of the program... or is it
too fucking easy to do everything you want it to?

love,
mr. quoth


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2005-11-22 04:34 [#01784601]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular | Followup to Quoth: #01784592



It seemed a bit tricky to get into, but I found making
these mixes a great way of getting into it. It's not done
in scene mode, but from what I could see, scene is more like
a jam-out type of thing. Powerful and fun.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-11-22 04:37 [#01784606]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Programs like ableton live are just as likely to act as a
crutch as they are to benefit you.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-11-22 04:48 [#01784618]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Cubase, altho a bit clunkier than ableton gives you the
ability to write full songs with less of a reliance upon
loops. It also gives you the ability to route your audio and
midi settings with as much flexibility as possible. It just
takes forever to figure out.


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-22 11:18 [#01784883]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01784618



cubase is fucking expensive... and i've already got
something that can control all of my midi equipment...

i'm running MOTU digital performer w/unisyn, mx4, and mach
five

ableton live seems like a step up from mx4 (basic vst) and
the mach five... (software sampler)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-22 11:41 [#01784891]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quoth: #01784592



The thing with ableton is, let's say you have four or five
instruments and ten sequences for each. You can swap the
sequences in and out in real-time with the punch-in point
quantized to a quarter note, or a bar, or whatever, per
loop. And the loops can be different lengths and each loop
replays when it reaches its own end, so the loops phase
shift against each other. Of course you can record this
punching in and out to the master timeline and edit it
afterwards to create a full track. No other sequencer / host
on earth has that flexibility.

Of course you don't have to work with loops at all, or even
quantize, if you prefer. You can also set a slot to play its
clips in random order to create constantly evolving never
repeating soundscape installations. It's... insane.

Imagine having an unlimited number of hardware sequencers
with different pattern lengths that you can mix in and out
in realtime and also record every action you take. It's
insane.

Also, the routing possibilities are just as flexible IMHOTEP
as Cubase, it's just that the interface is better thought
out and clearer. (I don't know why people think Cubase is so
complex. It's very simple, except it has an awkward
workflow-inhibiting interface)

The Ableton demo is fully functional except you can't save,
so check it out.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-22 11:43 [#01784893]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Oh, the clips can be midi data or audio, if that isn't
already clear.


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-22 11:45 [#01784894]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to vlari: #01784541



I know, but I live off pocket money, soo.....


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-22 11:48 [#01784896]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Oh yeah, and you don't have to prearrange your clips to get
them to sound like in FL - just trigger them live in scene
mode, hence the name Live. So it's very intuitive to build
up a scene - you're working more with your ears than your
eyes like other sequencers.

I know that FL has a bastard live mode as an afterthought
but it's horrible, just horrible.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-22 12:40 [#01784968]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Quoth: #01784423



i fucking love ableton live 4 it's pretty much all i use
now. if live 5 is better, then i can't see how you could go
wrong.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-22 12:43 [#01784971]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Quoth: #01784592



it's really quite intuitive. i do reference the manual every
now and then. but actually it has this little info window,
that pretty thoroughly explains the function of everything
in the program. it's very easy to use. if you are familiar
with Acid, i think it is very similar but much more
versatile.


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-22 19:33 [#01785138]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



thank you for the good response... i am stuck... i don't
know if i truly want to go software & hardware mix, like i
have in the past... i'm willing to give up my insecurities
however for a wonderful piece of equipment such as
ableton... muwhahaha


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-23 05:16 [#01785271]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



I think it's one of the most powerful pieces of music
software around....not a toy like f-loops or reason....not a
complete head fuck like cubase or logic.

Try Plugging in a real instrument...I use it with my bass,
which i can't play to save my life....after i record
something that sounds even remotely ok; warp markers can be
used to tighten up the timing and all the envolopes and
effects make it sound the nuts.

I hate using timelines to sequence stuff, I tend to make
neat and pretty patterns rather than exciting structures.
Get a midi controller and jam in the clip view, which is
really good for dj'ing with aswell.

I blagged a copy off a top geezer on here a few months back,
now i'm addicted i will be buying the real deal soon.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-11-23 05:54 [#01785304]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to KADO: #01785271 | Show recordbag



Agreed. It's one of the few things where I actually use
improvised material in finished tracks. It practically
demands that you just play around, recording the audio
and/or events and then afterwards pick out the good bits and
tidy it up.

Evolume: Agreed on the Acid Comparison.

Fleetmouse: Yep, Floops' Live mode is very much tacked on
and not really any more 'live' than selecting pre-programmed
patterns on a drum machine.


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2005-11-23 06:15 [#01785354]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



i paid for my copy and im happy i did !!!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-11-23 08:36 [#01785548]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to futureimage: #01784482 | Show recordbag



You've got mail.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2005-11-23 08:40 [#01785555]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to KADO: #01785271



Dave, you remeber that as yet unfinished remix of
carbonated? Well, i did that in reason. I don't think
personally that reason is a toy. Just a matter of
preference. But i do really want live 5, it seems to offer i
few things that i need.

: )


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-11-23 08:47 [#01785571]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Skink: #01785555 | Show recordbag



I agree that Reason isn't a toy, plenty of commercial dance
tracks have been done almost entirely in it. Sampler,
synths, drum machine, fx, what more do you need?

Same goes for Floops. In my book, any infinite-track VST/VTi
host with a velocity sensitive piano roll isn't exactly
mickey-mouse with the right plugins.

I think the reason both these programs are slated is that
they're easy to use, so a lot of people start making music
with them, or as their first step after ejay and even if
their composition is good (perhaps they come from a
classical, or hardware background), the production tends to
be a bit lacking as they are not that experienced/au fait
with how to get the best sound out of software.

Generally, by the time people progress to cubase/logic/etc.
they've got the hang of that side of things, so there's
already a kick in the right direction...


 

offline acid_polic3 from london (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-23 08:54 [#01785582]
Points: 769 Status: Regular



yeah reason and fl have their place , but its just as bad
when people doggedly stick to them as when people slate
anything done on them - remember nutters like plasticman and
vibert use reason - though of course sire vibert samples
from some rather tasty rolands..... and thats what i dislike
about reason so much , the dry sound i guess... seems to
sound either really weak or mega compressed/distorted
w/scream or whatever its called. im sure every single grime
track made on reason has employed that effect.

i use ableton 5 (been with it since 3) and it is amazing.
simple as. but you need a good arsenal of plug ins /
hardware / soundcard and midicard to the most out of it....i
have it with reaktor/maxmsp/operator/roland hardware etc and
yeah i can do a fair bit of stuff to say the least. top for
dj'ing too.

yeah and the clips are genius. what often happens for
example is say the intro bassline may work better with a
beat that appears later on and so forth it's then literally
no work to switch stuff around, above all its well fun.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-23 09:12 [#01785603]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



i have used reason rewired to ableton in the past just to
use the dope synths. and it's really fucking easy to
rewire it to reason and any other rewire capable program.
you can even rewire it to itself if that gets you off.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-11-23 11:02 [#01785693]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to acid_polic3: #01785582 | Show recordbag



Certainly, I'm not one of these people who say, "Floops does
everything I want, I'm never learning another program". I
still use it for making the odd loop, despite having
technically "better" gear now.


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-23 13:01 [#01785808]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



this is 1/5 reasons why i want to incorporate live 5 into my
music... observe the setup...


Attached picture

 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-23 13:02 [#01785809]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



2/5


Attached picture

 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-23 13:02 [#01785810]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



3/5


Attached picture

 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-23 13:03 [#01785811]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



4/5


Attached picture

 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-23 13:03 [#01785812]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker



5/5


Attached picture

 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-23 13:05 [#01785813]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



you need to buy some colour for your studio


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2005-11-23 13:17 [#01785827]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Our little quoth is all grown up now.

:wipes away tear:


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-23 13:26 [#01785839]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01785827



don't cry young jedi, soon you will master the
force


... no but do you see why i want to incorporate something
like live into my setup fleetmouse?

love,
mr. quoth


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-23 13:28 [#01785842]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'm a big fan of Ableton and Reason.

Can't stand Fruity Loops.


 

offline KADO from The Belafonte (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-23 14:16 [#01785877]
Points: 1484 Status: Regular



I used to use both reason and fruity loops a few years back,
and I know that it is possible to get really good sounds out
of both of them if you put in enough effort (Like The
Talented Mr Skink). Alas, Im a lazy bastard and so ended up
using all the shiddy presets, looking at all the pretty
wires and making rubbish tunes.

I guess everyone has different working methods and
requirements when it comes to sequencers... floops and
reason would be much better if they had direct audio
recording. (I Haven't looked at the updates for over a
year, so they may well have that feature now)

Quoth: I am utterly Jealous of you owning a Machinedrum and
Juno....Well Jackson!


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2005-11-23 14:54 [#01785905]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01785693



i think FL is a great little scratch pad. crank out a quick
beat, then export the loop and mangle it in ableton.


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-24 00:21 [#01786389]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #01785905



Yeah, exactly.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2005-11-24 00:37 [#01786390]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



i like ableton a lot


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-11-24 00:47 [#01786391]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quoth: #01785809



Is that the An200 or the Dx200?


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-24 00:53 [#01786392]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01786391



It is the Yamaha AN200 Analog Physical Modeling Desktop
Control Synthesizer


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2005-11-24 01:24 [#01786399]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to Quoth: #01786392



brilliant setup mate !
After reading this thread, i feel like getting the ol'
ableton back into consideration


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2005-11-24 01:25 [#01786401]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



big up the VAIO btw :D


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-11-24 02:45 [#01786425]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quoth: #01786392



How do you like it? I have been trying to track down an
DX200, but have had no luck :(

Just wondering about the AN200. Haven't heard many first
hand experiences.


 

offline acid_polic3 from london (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-24 18:34 [#01786860]
Points: 769 Status: Regular



fucking machinedrum. i will steal it from you. is it fun? i
have a super duper roland 303 so neeeeeeh. sorry. and
2xrackmount Nord G2 engines....

but yeah live with midi hardware is amazing .... looping
about mental acid patterns with nutty breaks never fails.


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-24 22:47 [#01786996]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to acid_polic3: #01786860



i am putting my down payments on the Nord Modular G2X
synthesizer... so my Roland Juno 60 will not feel left out,
he'll have a little brother to share music creation with :)
i am two months away from owning the guy :)

i love my machinedrum...fuck man, i want to own another one
so there could be twice the beat creation... muwhahahaha


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-24 23:26 [#01786998]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01786425



to this date... i still have not got my attached image to
control my an200... i think my midi settings on my computer
are fucked up versus what is on my hardware... overall
though, just think if i was able to control the an200 from
my computer... how bad ass that would be, eh?

fucking lush


Attached picture

 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-11-24 23:55 [#01787001]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quoth: #01786998



Well, just connecting a midi cable through should let you
control most of the CC's and notes, but the software editors
and drivers for the an200 and the dx200 only have win98
supported, unfortunately. Aparently someone wrote a version
for xp, but its not supported by yamaha, and its dodgy.

Nord modular G2X!! That, the machine drum and a juno 106 are
on my 'next to buy' list :)


 

offline Phobiazero from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2005-11-25 03:50 [#01787058]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to Quoth: #01786998 | Show recordbag



nice to see you quoth...


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-25 07:47 [#01787219]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01787001



would i only plug the midi cable into the "MIDI IN" on the
AN200, since i only want to control the machine from the
computer?

i have both midi cables hooked up right now, but nothing is
working... also I am using a MIDIMAN UNO 1X1 cable on a mac
ox 9.2 system... should i use something completely older
than that?

any help on this would be much appreciated


 

offline Quoth from Sweden on 2005-11-25 07:47 [#01787220]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phobiazero: #01787058



yes, you too phobiazero. indeed.


 


Messageboard index