[Lightsabers to support Jedy Chris] | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 591 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[Lightsabers to support Jedy Chris]
 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-06-01 04:15 [#01618562]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker



Do you feel in the deep of your heart that Jedy Chris
doesn't deserve this bad end and would you like he backs
here?
Well, go and check in your cupboard for the light saber he
gave you years ago. Change your avatar with the light saber
avatar to support Jedy Chris.

\/\/.


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2005-06-01 04:16 [#01618565]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



great idea... but i may have lost my lightsabre avatars, ill
check when im at home...


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-06-01 04:18 [#01618567]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



jedi.

he never gave me one :(


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-01 04:19 [#01618570]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict



will you ever stop ? be fair and do the same for every
member that was unfairly banned, and they are out there, not
only jedi, who was banned coz he deserved. please stop this
friendship-based unfair way of expressing your feelings.
mail phob instead.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 04:19 [#01618572]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Opto: #01618570



i'm with you all the way, brother.


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-01 04:21 [#01618576]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict



i just dotn think its right to do somethign like this. you
need to be fair to all, not only to your internet lovers,
you know.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2005-06-01 04:22 [#01618580]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



yes this reeks of a bum smootch.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 04:23 [#01618581]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



I've been banned on several occasions and not one single
selfish bastard has unsheathed their big red sword to help
me!


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-06-01 04:23 [#01618583]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to Opto: #01618570



if you are not agree, simply don't post the avatar light
saber photo, it's so easy to understand... no?


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-06-01 04:24 [#01618585]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #01618581



god bless who banned you


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-06-01 04:26 [#01618590]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



Opto is right here.

My avatar fully expresses what i think of it.


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2005-06-01 04:26 [#01618591]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to Opto: #01618570



it isnt about who was banned, its about whoever is leaving,
whoever needs convincing to stay...


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-06-01 04:27 [#01618595]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #01618591



jedy chris asked for a permanent ban, he was a his decision


 

offline WooferAttack from Milano (Italy) on 2005-06-01 04:28 [#01618597]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01618595



he=it


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2005-06-01 04:29 [#01618599]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to WooferAttack: #01618595



yes, and he needs convincing to stay...


 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2005-06-01 04:30 [#01618601]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker



my saber is hiding behind my smokey avatar as I do not have
photo editing software =o)


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-06-01 04:30 [#01618603]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to obara: #01618590



We all have friends to support, some of them have been
banned, i suggest we put on avatars of those we really miss
here

BANNED FRIENDS AVATAR DAY - 1st of June every year


 

offline Marshmelo from United Kingdom on 2005-06-01 04:34 [#01618610]
Points: 73 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01618595



He actually perm banned himself.


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-01 04:35 [#01618611]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #01618599



oh please, if hes banned that means it wasnt his decision.
jedi hasnt got any special rights for that maner, he doesnt
need to be here again, just as every other member that was
perm banned. equal rights. phobia told this many times, so
why now he should make any difference ? jedi deserved
bannage, and thats a fact. he got it, no way returen. simple
as that.

if i would see you doing this for every member, but no - you
do this only for your friends, which is no fair to be
honest.simple as that twice.


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-01 04:36 [#01618612]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict



well allirhgt update after previous posts :

he wanted perm ban, he got it. why do you want to convince
him to stay ? was he valuable in any other way that others
are ? i dont think so.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 04:45 [#01618617]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01618562



I see the lightsabers appeal is going well, woofter.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2005-06-01 04:47 [#01618618]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



Let's all hope this is the first day of new peace and new
order in this xlt galaxy


 

offline xf from Australia on 2005-06-01 04:52 [#01618620]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker



anybody want to superimpose a light sabre onto my avatar for
me?

HE NEVER GAVE ME ONE


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 04:56 [#01618622]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to xf: #01618620



He gave me one but i told him where to fucking shove it.

Marshmelo = jedi_piss and I want the cunt banned now.
JUSTICE FOR ALL!



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-06-01 05:01 [#01618623]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Opto: #01618611 | Show recordbag



Opto:
if i would see you doing this for every member, but no -
you
do this only for your friends, which is no fair to be
honest.simple as that twice.


Well duuuur. The fact woofer wants to do this shows he is
sorry to see Chris go. The reason similar things aren't done
for all banned members is that for a lot of people
who are perm banned, no one is bothered. You think we should
commemorate 'Rachel Love'?

Bill hicks:
Marshmelo = jedi_piss and I want the cunt banned now.
JUSTICE FOR ALL!


No, as was pointed out in the other thread, they're
different people and I know both of them in real life. To
say otherwise is to question my integrity.


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-01 05:06 [#01618625]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #01618623



i think that nothing really happened and thos who were
banned might feel sad for the fact that some of us arent
objective in their judgements.thats really it, i can see
others banned for this kind athread. equal rights, thats teh
only thing im saying. you gotta problem ? mail phob. jedi is
not browsing through forum anyway, so whats the point.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 05:06 [#01618626]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



No, as was pointed out in the other thread, they're
2 different people and I know both of them in real life. To

say otherwise is to question my integrity. "

And your point is? Is questioning your integrity a problem?
I QUESTION YOUR INTEGRITY! I don't trust you one bit fella.
I don't know what it is but there is something about you
that doesn't quite sit right. I think jedi_chris = marshmelo
and nothing you can do or say is gonna change that. now - IS
THAT A PROBLEM?



 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2005-06-01 05:11 [#01618628]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



rebecca love


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-06-01 05:12 [#01618629]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to bill_hicks: #01618626 | Show recordbag



And your point is? Is questioning your integrity a
problem?
I QUESTION YOUR INTEGRITY! I don't trust you one bit fella.

I don't know what it is but there is something about you
that doesn't quite sit right. I think jedi_chris = marshmelo

and nothing you can do or say is gonna change that. now - IS

THAT A PROBLEM?


Yes, it is a problem when you question my integrity where
modding is concerned. Consider this a formal warning. Drop
the matter or you'll be temp banned.

Opto: Jedi Chris could well be one of the 'guests' here at
the moment. He would only appear in the list if he had been
temp banned, but as he has been perm. banned, he wouldn't
appear there.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2005-06-01 05:12 [#01618630]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker



it'd be very wrong to carry a lightsaber at this point. let
him leave, he has done enough.


 

offline sneakattack on 2005-06-01 05:12 [#01618631]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



glad to hear it, and good fucking riddance. this place has
been markedly shittier since his pathetic squiggle of
cranial cavity cells (don't call it a brain) started
randomly throwing his fat weight around here and banning
people that didn't match his gay conception of reality.

so yeah, GREAT.


 

offline Opto on 2005-06-01 05:14 [#01618632]
Points: 1016 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #01618629



how many threads will woofer create just to say how sad he
is seeing his friends banned eh ? 20 ?

plus, if jedi is perm banned, as hes suposed, he wont browse
the forum.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2005-06-01 05:15 [#01618633]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01618629



what, ceri, doesnt it affect your integrity that you know
them both in real life? it most certainly does. anyway, jedi
chris really had it coming in my opinion.


 

offline sneakattack on 2005-06-01 05:16 [#01618634]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker



Opto, either way let's cultivate enough hatred to create a
strong intrinsic revulsion towards asshats like him.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-01 05:16 [#01618635]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to WooferAttack: #01618562



Although it would appear that you have the best of
intentions, realistically none of this would have happened
if you would have just kept quiet about the whole banning
issue.

Not to be a dick but alot of the trouble came from your
threads and constant persistance.

This doesnt really help either. I respect the fact that you
are bummed that one of your friends is gone. But i can only
see a thread like this bring forth negitive vibes and
insults. Perhaps thinking these things through would help in
the future. I wont be surprised when this is closed.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-01 05:19 [#01618638]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01618629



Ceri,

With all due respect (and i seriously mean that) saying
things like "Yes, it is a problem when you question my
integrity where modding is concerned. Consider this a formal
warning. Drop the matter or you'll be temp banned." is the
kind of thing that started this whole situation in the first
place.

Thats favortism in a sense because he is a real life friend
and there is nothing actually ban worthy about discussing
this issue aside from the fact that it minorly irks you.



 

offline pOgO from behind your belly button fluff on 2005-06-01 05:21 [#01618639]
Points: 12687 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01618638



I found your pants ;op


Attached picture

 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-01 05:22 [#01618641]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



As i posted in another thread:

Can you really ban me?
Of course we can. If we find you annoying,
destructive for the mb or behaves in a "bad" way - then
we won't hesitate to ban you.

If you notice the underlined text it shows that moderators
work as part of a moderation team. "If we find you annoying"

would imply that more than one moderator is annoyed. That it

was discussed and justly decided upon.

I believe that this very text which is used as an ample
reason to ban people is being used as an unfair loophole.
"we" implies the team aspect of a community.



 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-01 05:23 [#01618642]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to pOgO: #01618639



hahahaah! ewww!


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 05:26 [#01618645]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01618638



I think after jedi_chris's fucking stupid antics I've got
every right to question every single moderators integrity.
Who moderates the moderators?? FREEDOM OF SPEECH MY
BROTHERS!


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2005-06-01 05:27 [#01618646]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to pOgO: #01618639



why is the poo stain on the *crotch* of the pants? and what
kind of sad loser would scrape noel edmonds' face into it?


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-01 05:30 [#01618648]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #01618645



Yes. And we shouldnt at all be afraid to do so. It should be
like a system of checks and balences. Just to make sure
everything is in proper order.

People all to often get infatuated with the power of being
able to silence the few that speak up because it ends
arguments with ease. It takes a real man to listen and try
to understand a viewpoint that he doesnt hold.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2005-06-01 05:32 [#01618650]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



it's like buying a lightsaber and losing your account at the
same time


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-06-01 05:33 [#01618652]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01618650



:p


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 05:34 [#01618653]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01618648



Let's see if Ceri JC is a real man or not. JUSTICE FOR ALL!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-06-01 05:38 [#01618655]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01618638 | Show recordbag



Cuntychuck and virginpusher:

what, ceri, doesnt it affect your integrity that you know

them both in real life? it most certainly does. anyway, jedi

chris really had it coming in my opinion.


and

Thats favortism in a sense because he is a real life
friend
and there is nothing actually ban worthy about discussing
this issue aside from the fact that it minorly irks you.


respectively.

If anything, I tend to be more lenient with people
haranguing those I know in real life (of which, on this
board, there are about a dozen) for the very reasons of
being seen to be fair in my treatment of all users.

My threat to Bill Hicks was as a result of him effectively
calling me a liar. I had already stated that his accusations
that Marshmelo and Jedi Chris were the same person were
untrue. He persisted, saying that he didn't, 'trust [me]
one bit '
. I have not once lied on this message
board, in all the years I have come here. For someone to
accuse me of doing so, especially on a matter that is so
factually black and white, is certainly worthy of a warning
of a temp. ban.

At the risk of being seen to be antagonistic, I might remark
that your suggestion that I have in any way shown
favouritism towards either Marshmelo or Jedi Chris, could
itself be deemed to be questioning my integrity in a similar
vein.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2005-06-01 05:40 [#01618658]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



[Insert i_x_ten naked fat woman picture]


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2005-06-01 05:40 [#01618659]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01618655



BAN US ALL! Then you can just have a little chat with
yourself and you'll agree about everything. It'll be lovely.


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2005-06-01 05:41 [#01618660]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01618655



theres a difference between calling you a liar and dont
trust you. you cant force everyone to trust you.

this came out even more simple than it'w supposed to be.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2005-06-01 05:53 [#01618671]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01618648 | Show recordbag



It should be
like a system of checks and balences. Just to make sure
everything is in proper order.


You're having a laugh! We don't (really) even have that sort
of system in government. You think it's worth the massive
time/cost necessary for that sort of system for something as
banal as a messageboard?!

Bill Hicks: Phobiazero moderates the moderators of course.

Who moderates him? No one- it's his site, he can close it
tomorrow or ban whomever he likes, for whatever reason.

Of course I understand Bill Hick's POV, he doesn't know me
and his petulant attitude causes him to have a problem with
any sort of 'power' (as if being able to close threads and
ban people was any sort of real control over him). As a
result, he is perhaps filled with a mistrust of me and is
certianly 'looking for a fight'. I would argue he probably
doesn't think I'm actually lying, more he's just out for a
wind-up, which is part of the reason he was threated with
the temp ban.

I now ask you to return the favour and to look at it
from my POV: I know both Marshmelo and Jedi chris. I
know that they are different people. To me, this is not a
grey area, it is a factual truth. Someone, who is in a
position which makes them less well informed argues that
this is not the case. I point out that my position of
knowing the users concerned in the real world shows this to
be untrue. He still persists in his argument. I explain that
I take offence to being called a liar, particularly as I
have been made a moderator by Phobiazero. He cannot even
pinpoint his reason for not trusting me, nor give an
example, with proof citing where I have been shown to be a
liar in the past. Instead, he resorts to vagaries such as,
"[I] don't know what it is but there is something about
you
that doesn't quite sit right."
. Can you see why I take
offence?


 


Messageboard index