|
|
oyvinto
on 2005-01-27 17:36 [#01478083]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i'm having a little discussion with a friend. is analord 10 a aphex twin or afx release? the rephlex-analord release does'nt tell. the mp3 tracktitles are aphex, but discogs says afx (don't trust them though).. what do you say?
|
|
Quoth
from Sweden on 2005-01-27 17:37 [#01478085]
Points: 3840 Status: Lurker
|
|
it is a richard d. james release... as far as an alias, you have beat the shit out of me
sorry
|
|
pomme de terre
from obscure body in the SK System on 2005-01-27 17:37 [#01478086]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Aphex Twin. It says it on the record. Look in the xlt discography for a pic.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-01-27 17:38 [#01478087]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to oyvinto: #01478083 | Show recordbag
|
|
It's Aphex Twin if you look on the record label that cost 40 odd quid.
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-01-27 17:39 [#01478088]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker
|
|
Afx. Definately Afx.
|
|
pomme de terre
from obscure body in the SK System on 2005-01-27 17:39 [#01478089]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to Taxidermist: #01478088 | Show recordbag
|
|
why?
|
|
oyvinto
on 2005-01-27 17:42 [#01478091]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to Quoth: #01478085 | Show recordbag
|
|
huh?
|
|
oyvinto
on 2005-01-27 17:45 [#01478096]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
end of discussion. Aphex it is.
|
|
trentee
from Berlin (Germany) on 2005-01-27 18:04 [#01478115]
Points: 1081 Status: Lurker
|
|
APHEX TWIN.
|
|
xceque
on 2005-01-27 18:07 [#01478117]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
#10 says Aphex Twin on the label, #1 says AFX and 3 says AFX. So either each is "by a different alias" or (and this is my favourite) who gives a shit?
|
|
xceque
on 2005-01-27 18:08 [#01478119]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Followup to xceque: #01478117 | Show recordbag
|
|
trainspotter alert: when I said "3" I meant "2"
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2005-01-27 18:13 [#01478122]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to xceque: #01478119 | Show recordbag
|
|
I like your Bagpuss avatar, that's all I'm saying. Professor Yaffle would say "nah nah nah, Analord, it's simply old ideas regurgitated and then fed spasmodically to a feverish fanbase that's lost all sense of its critical faculties, nah nah, it's quite rubbish", and he'd only be half right.
|
|
xceque
on 2005-01-27 18:24 [#01478136]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01478122 | Show recordbag
|
|
And what would Peppa say?
|
|
earthleakage
from tell the world you're winning on 2005-01-27 18:26 [#01478138]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular
|
|
gabriel was a cunt
|
|
OK
on 2005-01-27 21:36 [#01478400]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker
|
|
well, correct me if I'm wrong but Analord 10 is listed as Analord for artist, Analord 10 for title, and Analord10 for catalogue number... so if you really want to figure out this pointles trivia, it's actually an Analord release.
but, it says Aphex Twin on the centre label
|
|
elusive
from detroit (United States) on 2005-01-27 21:39 [#01478403]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
analord 10 is the latest in the series, hence the drukqs resemblance.
earlier works (analord 1,2, ) acid-era are the start of A - F - X .
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2005-01-27 21:44 [#01478408]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to OK: #01478400
|
|
"Analord 10 is listed as Analord for artist"
wrong.
" it says Aphex Twin on the centre label"
right.
conclusion = it's Aphex Twin
|
|
TehLaw
from around. (Canada) on 2005-01-27 23:16 [#01478522]
Points: 242 Status: Regular
|
|
IT IS ANALORD
APHEX TWIN IS WARP.
|
|
bogala
from NYC (United States) on 2005-01-27 23:41 [#01478529]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular
|
|
They are all Richard d. James. That's what really matters, right?
|
|
Combo
from Sex on 2005-01-28 01:50 [#01478574]
Points: 7541 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's "aphex twin" cuz it's 40$ ; if it has been afx for the same EP withbthe same binder it would have been 12£.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2005-01-28 02:02 [#01478578]
Points: 23746 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
it would seem that aphex didnt totally get his name back from warp, hence the afx for 01 and 02, and the non shop sale of 10
|
|
Taxidermist
from Black Grass on 2005-01-28 03:02 [#01478625]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01478403
|
|
1&2 are definately afx, although I do agree, 10 is much more aphex twin than afx. Maybe he plans on slowly weening his music from one point in his carrer to the other.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-01-28 03:03 [#01478626]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
analord is GAK!
|
|
nacmat
on 2005-01-28 05:31 [#01478701]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
analord is ceephax
|
|
zero-cool
on 2005-01-28 05:35 [#01478702]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker
|
|
AFX
cause Rephlex sounds like fx
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2005-01-28 05:37 [#01478704]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
why my analord 2 (alberto balsalm pic) is in b/n?
|
|
nacmat
on 2005-01-28 05:40 [#01478706]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to melack: #01478704
|
|
all analord 2 are b/n
|
|
nacmat
on 2005-01-28 05:41 [#01478708]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #01478706
|
|
mine at least is
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-01-28 05:43 [#01478711]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
It couldn't be much fucking clearer.
oyvinto has said the question was answered and still people argue the fuck out of it!
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
big
from lsg on 2005-01-28 05:46 [#01478715]
Points: 23746 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
he should have registered the name aphex when he thought it up as a kid
|
|
Chihiro
from twins land on 2005-01-28 05:46 [#01478717]
Points: 4650 Status: Regular
|
|
it totally sounds like Aphex Twin... AFX is more squarish... more minimaL.
|
|
Messageboard index
|