Xbox 360 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 296 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Xbox 360
 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 10:48 [#01783827]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Who's getting it? Even though the initial wave of games
doesn't have anything I'm superexcited for, I'll be at
Walmart at 7AM tomorrow morning to ensure I get one. I've
already bought Call of Duty 2 and Perfect Dark Zero, and I'm
thinking about getting Condemned, I'll rent it first though.
The games I'm really looking forward to aren't dropping
until early 2006... Oblivion and Alan Wake. Anybody planning
on getting onto Xbox Live to play Perfect Dark? Considering
I had billions of hours of insane fun with the original, and
considering I'm a pessimist, I think PDZ is going to let me
down and can't possibly measure up to the N64 version.

I'm really looking forward to the backwards compatibility...
dunno if it's going to help framerates but the old XBox
games should look great bumped up to 720p/1080i resolution.
Big improvement to Halo 2.


 

offline ToXikFB on 2005-11-21 10:55 [#01783835]
Points: 4414 Status: Lurker



im gonna hold out and get the ps3


 

offline Taffmonster from dog_belch (Japan) on 2005-11-21 10:57 [#01783839]
Points: 6196 Status: Lurker



im not gonna buy any of em
well maybe a normal xbox if the price drops low


 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2005-11-21 11:01 [#01783841]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I am actually gonna wait awhile on this one also. Although
late on the bus here, I just recently got on xbox live and I
am having fun with Halo2 and Star Wars Battlefront 2.

I will definately end up getting the 360, but I will be
waiting till the new year.
Hey phecks, do you know if the 360'ers and the regular xbox
users will be able to play Halo2 online together? Just
curious as to if they are going to be compatible for online
play.

=)


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 11:20 [#01783848]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to IronLung: #01783841 | Show recordbag



I think there was a guy on IGN that got his 360 early and
was playing Halo 2 as usual, with the plebians. So it's
backwards compatible and all that jazz.


 

offline furoi from Udine (Eriko Sato's undies) (Italy) on 2005-11-21 11:24 [#01783849]
Points: 1706 Status: Lurker



i actually have xbox
but i'm not sure i will buy xbox360
i'm mature now....i think i'm just gonna buy a psp next
year
it's awesome...and it will go far



 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2005-11-21 11:31 [#01783853]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #01783848 | Show recordbag



right on...well if you ever wanna play some Halo2
online...lemme know Ill add ya to my list:)


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 11:33 [#01783854]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i feel bad for sony and the ps3 :(

"each wafer run through the fab costs $9-10K, and IBM gets
about 65 good chips per wafer."

This would put each raw Cell on sale at a price tag of
almost $150 give or take a bit. Toss in $25-30 for the
packaging, and you are at a non-trivial number for a
console. Assuming $175 for a 'solder to the board' working
Cell, and you are at about half the cost of the console with
just the CPU. Add in the GPU, RAM and a HD, and you are in
loss-leader territory.

Hopefully yields will go up before the PS3 launches, there
are about 200 good sites on the wafer, 2 per 'square', so
there is room for IBM to knock $100 or so off the cost.
Either way, it looks like IBM and Sony have a long uphill
climb for the next console. µ


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 11:41 [#01783863]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to IronLung: #01783853 | Show recordbag



I didn't have Xbox Live on my Xbox1 but I'll be buying the
premium 360 package so I'll get a year of Gold live... plus
Xbox Live Basic is free now anyway. I don't have an account
yet but I'll get one soon.

Elusive- half of that was Greek to me. I could be wrong, but
Sony's hardware always puts them in a big hole to start
with, they're gonna lose tons of money on the PS3 itself.
But hopefully not TOO much. The games are the key, anyway,
that's gonna make or break them, not the hardware.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-21 11:44 [#01783864]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



The PS3 despite starting later than Xbox should fare pretty
well. I dont follow the scene that close but i know a good
deal about it and am excited about the possibilities.

Xbox is throwing a kidney punch by releasing Halo 3 at the
exact same time as the ps3 launch.

I would love to play a new tiger woods on the Xbox 360 or
Ps3. We've turned it into a nice drinking game. Really
competitive over here.

Luckily my brother renewed his game informer. I can learn
more about these both as time approaches and have something
to read on the can! Bonus!


 

offline IronLung from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2005-11-21 11:47 [#01783866]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01783864 | Show recordbag



is that true...Halo3 is coming out that soon?

or are you thinking of the re-releases of Halo2?



 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-11-21 11:49 [#01783867]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker



I'm gonna buy The Nintendo Revolution and maybe in future a
Ps3.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-21 11:56 [#01783870]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to IronLung: #01783866



Halo 3 is set to launch on the PS3 launch date. Which is
fall 2006 from what i have heard


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-21 11:56 [#01783871]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to tridenti: #01783867



The Revolution will be crushed by its flawed controller
design.


 

offline tridenti from Milano (Italy) on 2005-11-21 12:00 [#01783873]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01783871



Uhm.. why? I personally find it revolutionary , it
just won't be a normal controller like all.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 12:07 [#01783876]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"Elusive- half of that was Greek to me. I could be
wrong, but
Sony's hardware always puts them in a big hole to start
with, they're gonna lose tons of money on the PS3 itself.
But hopefully not TOO much. The games are the key, anyway,
that's gonna make or break them, not the hardware.
"


i dont play consoles, so im not taking sides (sony vs ms)
but here goes:

the problem with sony is the following:

1 new hardware architecture (cell processor)
1st of it's kind to be used heavily in production
thus, all of the developers have to learn an ENTIRE (and i
mean ENTIRE!) new architecture to code for.

-development funds, education for devs, etc goes way up
-since no one has really 'coded' for the cell, the learning
curve is way up there. but this is why the 1st gen games
will be ok, and the 2nd gen games will most likely be
awesome (once the devs get to hang of the new code and
become more efficient at it and discover what they can do)
all this takes time (and wicked amounts of dev dollars).

-the average dollar figure for the dev of a ps3 game i think
is around 20million usd right now. that's way up there from
the others

now the thing is, microsoft took the other approach and
stuck with what has worked, the x86 instruction set. long
story short, it's easy to code for and devs dont have to
"re-learn" anything (besides the fact that now they're
working with multiple cpus and doing a lot more parellel
tasking etc) ... for the most part it won't be too
different.

also, this will make the games easier to be ported to and
from the pc and whatnot.

sony has an expensive little baby on it's hands, and it's
quite a gamble. luckily ibm is behind them

they already cut out the gateway feature of their ps3
(home-router) and with the above quote on how expensive (at
current fab yields) the cell cores are costing ... wow, not
to mention i think the blu-ray dvd drives are costing the m
$150 ALONE

dont quote me but im 99% sure that's what it is.
yes, just the drive


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 12:10 [#01783880]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yes, just the drive alone will cost sony $150 (per
unit)...yikes!

now of course they are positioning this box to be what, a
7yr+ lifetime or whatever? that should hopefully bring
enough game revenues in to re-coop some of those losses.

i dunno,

it's just insane

$400 is going to get you a supercomputer here ... my how
times have changed.

on the other hand we could go into cell discussion about why
it is a badass technology but i think that's outside the
scope here.

it is going to be an interesting few years that is a fact.

im not much of a console guy so i dont allow myself to get
all worked up in the marketing of the lot, but it's fun to
watch.

im glad im not a dev working for either of these companies
right now; stressful times i can only imagine


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 12:12 [#01783884]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



also about ms, i think the timing is pretty well done.
they are totally beating sony to the market, and will sell a
lot im sure.

it's just funny because now ms is going to see just how many
loyal fans are out there (by the number of people who dont
buy a 360 and who hold out for a ps3)

mmmmm brand loyalty

delicious, innit it?


 

offline kaen from the magical land of moo (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-21 12:20 [#01783900]
Points: 154 Status: Lurker



lol theres no fucking competition, ps3 will pwn xbox, theres
a huge amount of good games and a loyal following not to
mention a perfect history to secure it, xbox has fuckall
going for it.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 12:22 [#01783903]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



lol, kaen
blind little man

blind blind blind


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 12:23 [#01783905]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



spoken like a true fanboy,


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 12:25 [#01783908]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01783871 | Show recordbag



I think the controller is the best thing they could have
done! No HD and poor third party support is what's going to
hurt, but I think people are going to be interested in the
controller and I think it has potential. But Nintendo is
still going to be third place, a more distant third place
than ever. They're going to be a niche thing and they know
it. The peculiar controller is going to be help them.

And it's definitely going to be an interesting gen. Lots of
risky business moves and big leaps of faith. In the end I
think Sony is going to win because of superior exclusives
like GTA and Metal Gear. I'm definitely a Sony whore, but I
spend thousands on EVERY platform anyway.

Nintendo makes the biggest profit, though... talk about
their poor sales and their sagging support, but they bring
home the dough while Sony likes to burn cash like Elusive is
pointing out. Also good points about the game development...
the software tools are improving but to make a game that
actually utilizes all this power, it's wicked expensive,
tons of labor. Eventually, although I don't think it'll
happen this gen, only the big companies are going to afford
to actually tap all that. Actually this is what Nintendo is
counting on... the Revolution will be underpowered and
inexpensive and they want the smaller development houses to
flock to them and be ''innovative'', quote unquote, instead
of appeasing the graphics whores. That's getting more and
more costly.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 12:28 [#01783912]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to kaen: #01783900 | Show recordbag



Microsoft are going to pull closer to Sony, they've got good
timing and they've got a pretty impressive list of
exclusives for it. And they're taking less risks. M$ is the
real deal.


 

offline kaen from the magical land of moo (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-21 12:33 [#01783914]
Points: 154 Status: Lurker



ive never owned a ps in my life. u dont have to be fan of
sony to see that xbox doesnt have a leg to stand on, the ps3
will beat it in every department.

xbox are relying on halo, its one and only half-decent game.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-21 12:46 [#01783922]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #01783908



technically they are screwed on a basic level.

Ports.

You cant port a complex game that uses a number of buttons
on that controller. Its a gimmick that that dumbass drumset
thing for gamecube.

Controllers are the most important thing aside from the
games themselves and there is a ton of negitve rep following
this design around


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 12:47 [#01783924]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Yeah it's going to be one hell of a rollercoaster ride.

Ophecks, you're spot on.

Nintendo does have that niche that really works for them,
much like apple. They aren't there "whoring" themselves out
to the world like sony/ms, and keep a little bit of respect
for themselves :)

Not to mention, they still make games that are fun to play
and most of all: simple.

Which is something they've always bet on. Games these days
are getting so f'ing complex you can't just "sit down and
play a game" anymore. Not for the most part at least.

It's good to see a company (read: founding commpany)
sticking to their roots and not going all sideways on the
market.
Cheers,


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2005-11-21 13:00 [#01783934]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker



I think I read an interview with John Carmack somewhere, in
which he stated that the power of PS3 is only on paper and
that there is no efficient way to use the 9 cores. Something
like that.
He could have been given a decent lump of cash from MS for
that interview.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 13:02 [#01783935]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01783922 | Show recordbag



Apparently you'll be able to play NES games, SNES games, N64
games and Gamecube games comfortably. How that's possible
remains to be seen. It only makes sense, since all of these
platforms are going to be represented on the Revolution in
the form of downloadable content. If you can play GC or N64
games on the Rev, it shouldn't be impossible to play ports
of Xbox or PS3 games.

And besides, I don't think ports are going to matter much to
them. Again, it's all about the niche. More than ever, the
Rev is going to be about a small but passionate audience,
with a smaller selection of mostly exlusive games carrying
the load. Millions of people are going to buy the Rev just
because it'll be the only place to get the new Mario, Smash
Bros, Zelda, Metroid, Mario Kart, Donkey Kong, etc. I think
it's going to be successful. They have their loyal following
and they're not breaking the bank like Microsoft and Sony
are. Sales are going to be lower than ever for them but the
profits will still be there. Nintendo makes more money in
this business than Sony and Microsoft do, they're a major
player even in third place. I doubted them for a long time
but I see what they're doing now and I think they're making
the right moves.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2005-11-21 13:03 [#01783937]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker



*though


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-11-21 13:13 [#01783946]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #01783935



Perhaps i have yet to see the light regarding this issue. In
my personal opinion they are dropping the ball a bit on the
issue and are going to miss on great games that wont be able
to be ported over thus alienating their fans.



 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-21 13:18 [#01783958]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'm holding out on getting one for a bit. Probably won't get
a PS3 on principle of the DRM shit that Sony pulled. If
they'll do that with a CD then who knows what the fuck
they'll try and pull with a piece of hardware now. Fuck
that.


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2005-11-21 13:18 [#01783960]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



Strange, from Reggie's recent interview, I thougt Nintendo
was all about expanding the market to casual and non-gamers.
Time will tell. Oh, and expect PS3 to cost at least $500. It
aint gonna be cheap.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-21 13:25 [#01783967]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to Mertens: #01783960 | Show recordbag



Yeah I think he's full of shit though. He's a spin doctor,
guys like him and J. Allard like to talk big but I take
everything they say with a grain of salt, or I just flat out
disregard it. I can't fathom Nintendo doing anything to
expand the market this gen, but I'll wait and see what
happens. I think things are not going to happen as Reggie
says they are.

In Reggie's defense, he's very groovy.

Oh, and expect PS3 to cost at least $500

I'll pay anything. Tomorrow I'm dropping 575 dollars for the
premium Xbox 360 with NO games. Granted, I'm Canadian. It
hurts. If I have to pay 700 for the PS3, so be it.


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2005-11-21 13:30 [#01783972]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



You're not too far from the border are ya? Buying it here
isn't an option?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 13:30 [#01783974]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



MERTENS!!!!


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2005-11-21 13:30 [#01783976]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



Yes, it is I.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 13:59 [#01784014]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



where you been


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2005-11-21 14:21 [#01784033]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



The big problem I have with buying a 360 is the xbox live
subscription. If Revolution doesn't have a subscription it
may be a game winner. The remote controll style controller
puts me off a little though.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2005-11-21 14:31 [#01784040]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



but you haven't even used it yet!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-11-21 14:45 [#01784053]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to elusive: #01784040



sadly the gaming public is much like the moviegoing public -
don't do anything too weird, keep the games within genre,
fuck story we want EXPLOSIONS and BLOOD, don't change
anything too much..

(which in the case of gamesystems isn't that weird, because
it does cost a lot of money. but that doesn't mean you can
try a system beforehand.)


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-11-21 14:49 [#01784057]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



When I saw the Revolution Controller I was a bit taken
aback. It looked clunky and uncomfortable. I've read more
about it though and the word is that it's actually
exceptionally great in the hand, you almost forget that it's
there it's that nice. That is the mark of good design. You
forget you're using a "tool" and just use it intuitively.
Can't wait to get my hands on a Nintendo Revolution.


 

offline stilaktive from a place on 2005-11-21 14:57 [#01784068]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker



im going to buy the one that will be chipped the quickest
and has the most fake games available for it.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-11-23 21:32 [#01786348]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



XBOX 360 FUN! FUN! FUN!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-11-23 21:34 [#01786349]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



"At one Best Buy in suburban Seattle, Microsoft Chairman
and Chief Software Architect Bill Gates showed up to help
hand out 360s and engage in several not-so-impromptu Project
Gotham Racing 3 sessions. "In the living room itself, Xbox
360 is our centerpiece and a product that redefines what
goes on there," Gates told the Associated Press."


pfff.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2005-11-23 21:39 [#01786351]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



i want an xbox classic to turn into a media center. lol.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2005-11-23 21:45 [#01786352]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



oh wow this story is super too.. good ol' Fiddy Cent has his
own M-rated game coming out, "The game that they will be
playing sees 50 taking on underground crime syndicates in
New York City with a boatload of guns, capping would-be foes
in the dome, and looting their corpses for cash."


and now 50 C. has come out and said that.. "Just because
it is rated Mature doesn't mean you shouldn't buy it for
your kids. Play the game and explain to them what they are
playing."


full story mode.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-11-23 22:27 [#01786362]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular



Ophecks and friends.......


Attached picture

 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-23 22:43 [#01786365]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I motherfucking failed. Apparently the entirety of Canada
only got like 20,000 units. I bought a few games and I can't
even play them and I'm so depressed.


 

offline darkpromenade from Australia on 2005-11-23 22:48 [#01786367]
Points: 2777 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #01786365



Was there queuing involved? :(


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2005-11-23 22:54 [#01786370]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to darkpromenade: #01786367 | Show recordbag



Oh God yeah. I never had a chance. I seriously
underestimated the resolve and astuteness of the other nerds
in my city. I got there like two minutes after the place
opened and that was about 8 hours too late.


 


Messageboard index