Numark Matrix 3 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 129 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613975
Today 0
Topics 127530
  
 
Messageboard index
Numark Matrix 3
 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-04-11 16:18 [#01138597]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



i just wanted to disturb the triforce this thread had going
on.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-04-11 22:42 [#01138845]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to thecurbcreeper: #01138597



GOLD!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-12 02:11 [#01138901]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to princo: #01138845 | Show recordbag



Fortunatley, Me, Dave and Mastah made a thread of exactly
100 posts, before curbcreeper tried to break the flow
:)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-12 07:49 [#01139082]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Questions for Dave, but open to anyone with any ideas:

I bought a cheap old PA amp (sort of small club/mobile DJing
one) so I don't have to take my whole setup apart for
parties.
I'm pretty happy with it, but two questions.

1. It's a mono one, so I've just plugged the two speakers
into the same pair of ports. Is that the right way? It seems
to be okay...

2. It emits a low hum (not unlike a toaster or pylon), not
through the speakers, but the actual amp itself. If I push
the volume dial "in" firmly or press down on the top of the
case, it greatly decreases. It's not a huge problem as it's
only really noticeable when no music is playing, but it's
annoying enough to make you want to turn off the amp when
not in use. Extra info: It has an aux/line port that I'm
plugging the mixer into, but it also has a phono port,
presumably for plugging a single turntable directly into it.
There's also a grounding clip like on a mixer, but as well
as that, an extra port on the back that's roughly about the
size of an XLR one, but with 4 holes arranged in a "Y"
shape. It's labelled "negative GROUND 12V". Any ideas?

Many thanks.



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-12 09:01 [#01139158]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"1. It's a mono one, so I've just plugged the two
speakers
into the same pair of ports. Is that the right way? It seems

to be okay...
"

eh..? two speakers into one terminal?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-12 09:10 [#01139173]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01139158 | Show recordbag



Yeah, each speaker has two connectors on the end (bare wire-
not barrels, they're just cheapo hi-fi speakers) I've just
put both black wires into one slot and both red into the
other. It seems to work fine, just wondering if there was
anything wrong with doing that/if there was a better way.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-13 01:51 [#01140007]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01139173 | Show recordbag



I think that'll reduce the power input to the speakers, and
thereby the sound-quality.

the low hum could be a transformer.. they often hum for no
apparent reason... But if it stops when you press down on
it, it could also be a fan... it's just that PA-gear more
often has cooling-ribs than fans to reduce noise...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 02:56 [#01140050]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01140007 | Show recordbag



It has cooling slots in the top of it. The hum appears to of
almost stopped completely now I've moved it to another room
(maybe it was the surface the amp was on?).



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-13 03:02 [#01140053]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01140050 | Show recordbag



maybe.. or maybe conflicting electro-magnetic fields (I've
actually had a problem with something like this.. a mixer
that made a loud hum when it was close to a power
outlet...)

of course, you may have had to "break it in" as well...

but who knows...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 03:09 [#01140057]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01140053 | Show recordbag



Come to think of it, it was right next to a mixer before,
now it's a couple of feet away with a few inches of
fibreboard between them.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-13 03:13 [#01140060]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01140057 | Show recordbag



that COULD have been the issue, yes. Try moving it back near
the mixer, and see if it starts making noise again. If not,
it was just a matter of breaking it in...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 10:14 [#01140530]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I don't think it's breaking it in- it's at least second
hand. I bought it from a pawn shop downtown and it looks
like it was used for in store demos before whoever sold it
to them got rid of it.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2004-04-13 12:38 [#01140780]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



So, you have your speakers connected in parallel to the
amp.
According to the maximum power transfer theorum, the load
impedance must match the source impedance.
In other words, its best to match the speakers to the amp,
i.e. 8 ohm amp output to 8ohm speaker , 4 ohm to 4 ohm,
etc.
Now if you connect two 4 ohms in series, that is 8
ohm(R1+R2), but if you connect them in parrallel, it is
worked out as Rtotal=(R1+R2)/(R1*R2). in this case(two 4 ohm
speakers) it would be 0.5 ohm

Basically what I'm trying to get at is that if you drive a
4ohm from an 8ohm output, it is more likely to go bang,
since its getting twice as much power as is nominal,
especially if the two speakers are connected in parallel.
also if 8ohm speakers are driven from a 4 ohm output, it
will only reach 50% volume.

AMP----Speaker-----speaker--| series
|---------------------------------|

*-----speaker------*
|---------speaker---|------amp parallel
|_________________________|

If it works ok as it is, leave it. Its probably ok, if not,
you would have noticed by now
--------------------------

As for the hum, well it sounds like mechanical hum probably
from a transformer or something in the power supply, which
is fed by 50Hz mains. And will physically move at 50Hz and
produce a buzz sound if loose/old/badly designed/other.
(like streetlamps at night-very loud 50hz buzz I'm sure
you've noticed.)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 12:55 [#01140813]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to dave_g: #01140780 | Show recordbag



Thanks for the explanation Dave. The speakers both ask for 4
ohm impedance 20 Watt power. The amp is 20 Watt and there
are (among others) a 4 ohm and 8 ohm port on the back. I
should use 4 ohm, right (speakers only have connections to
be linked in parallel)?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2004-04-13 12:56 [#01140814]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



yeh, that matrix 3 really sucked.

;)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 12:59 [#01140821]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tibbar: #01140814 | Show recordbag



So, you've got a mixer? Or you've just had a go on the
matrix3? :)

BTW, hold off on the cart order from HTFR for a day or two,
they're being evasive with me about a recent order they
messed up. If they don't sort it, you might like to order
from somewhere else (I can give you URLs)... you don't want
to be trying to sort out an international order via email
with them if they don't respond.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2004-04-13 13:01 [#01140824]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01140821



it was just an oportunity for me to bust neo's balls, sicne
i finally saw that pile of dog vomit they called a sequel
last night.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 13:17 [#01140849]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tibbar: #01140824 | Show recordbag



Damn, for a second there I mistook you for drunken mastah!
(It's only usuaully me, dave and him in this thread :)


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2004-04-13 13:18 [#01140852]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01140849



hahahaha

no harm, no foul.

btw: that 3rd matrix real WAS crap.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2004-04-13 13:52 [#01140978]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01140813



Just use the two 4 ohm speakers connected in series with the
8 ohm output. 4+4=8 :) or you could do one 4 ohm speaker
to the 4 ohm output, but not both in parallel, cos in
parallel, they would be 0.5 ohm total impedance.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-13 16:08 [#01141275]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to dave_g: #01140978 | Show recordbag



How would I go about connecting them in series?

Just for clarity's sake, here's a quick diagram of the back
of the amp.

Basically, each of the 5 places to put a speaker wire in
(com, 4 ohm, etc.) have only one space, as opposed to the
two you'd have on a similar thing in a stereo system. Where
exactly should I put the wires (currently both black in the
COM, both red in the 4 ohm)?

Also, whilst it's obviously not essential, can you throw any
light on what that grounding thing is?

Thanks a bundle for the help, sorry I'm being so slow to
grasp this, I always was poor at electronics (reason I only
scraped a pass in physics ;-)


Attached picture

 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2004-04-13 21:27 [#01141569]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01141275



"How would I go about connecting them in series?"

don't ask the wachowskis, they aparently had no clue how to
either. ;)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-14 01:34 [#01141650]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tibbar: #01141569 | Show recordbag



He he, very good! :)

Dave:
I'm pretty sure connecting them in series is where one
speaker has "piggy backing" ports to connect the other
speaker's wires into it, so only one speaker is directly
connected to the amp. I just wanted to clear up that by
connecting in parallel you didn't mean each speaker to
left/right ports of the same ohmage on the amp.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2004-04-17 06:21 [#01146935]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01141650



Ceri, I'm dissapointed you can't remember such a simple bit
of physics! ;P

Ok, here is what you do in SIMPLE terms:

Red wire on first speaker goes to 8ohm socket.

Black wire on first speaker goes to red wire on second
speaker.

Black wire on second speaker goes to COM socket.

You have now connected the 2x 4ohm to make 1x 8ohm speaker
effectivly, by putting the speakers in series.
Now the load impedance matches the source impedance and you
will get maximum power transfer.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-17 07:38 [#01146976]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to dave_g: #01146935 | Show recordbag



Ah! thanks Dave :)

(In my defense the guy who taught electronics was totally
inept and most of the class did badly at it. I was great at
waves and forces ;-)

I've got it set up now so that I've got my amp and speakers
out of one master out, the PC out of the other. Means I can
still record/sample to HD, but don't need my PC turned on to
use the tables- best both worlds.

BTW after a week of using it Flare/Butchwax's Hee-Haw Brayks
has become my favourite scratch record. I never realised the
female, high pitched, cadent "Argh!" on Dizee Rascal's "Fix
Up, Look Sharp" was a sample.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2004-04-17 07:50 [#01146991]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01146976



lol. Fix up look sharp is the number 1 comedy record of all
time. I really wanted to do a mickey take remix of it, but
after listening to the section I downloaded, I couldn't
quite bring myself to do it.

BTW, you might also like Bionic Booger Breaks by Qbert, on
Dirt style records. Thats a good one too.
The only problem with these is that cos they are us imports
they are more expensive than you DJ peabird "shoddy breakz"
or white label poo.

Anyway, I'm glad you've finally got it working, just don't
try and rewire your house or anything.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-17 09:44 [#01147123]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to dave_g: #01146991 | Show recordbag



"Anyway, I'm glad you've finally got it working, just
don't
try and rewire your house or anything."


You wouldn't believe it, but I've CAT-5ed my house myself
and it all works perfectly ;)

The UK prices can be annoying. I mean, Needlethrashers -
Alpha, cost me £14 and that's really just 6 fairly short
instrumental tracks. Sure, there's an unskippable beep-cha,
two very small skits and an unskippable scratch section, but
I already have copies of the unskippable bits/won't use the
skits. I certainly didn't mind paying £11 for Hee-haw
though, the layout of that is fantastic and I shudder to
think how much time/how many dub plates he must of gone
through to get it like it is. My other criticism is that my
local store has a (extremly retarded) policy of ordering in
single copies of battle records. So, you might well see
Peanut Butter Wolf for £12, but there's no guarantee you
can get a second copy unless you buy it from mail order or
another Cardiff store that absolutely rapes you on the price
(More likely to be about £19 there).


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-20 05:21 [#01151790]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



YEEE!

just got word: the cartridge (+1 extra stylus, I think) has
arrived!

*does that silly victory dance that sit-com-writers think is
funny*


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 00:42 [#01153446]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



welcome, welcome, to another round of questionjs about
turntables and stuff...

the ortofons arrived, and I attached it and managed to
playback a few records plus some lightweight test-scratching
(but as I don't have a mixer yet and the slipmat is heavy as
six tons of crap and junk and stuff, I'll stick to playback
for a while). I was just wondering.. it says in the carts
specs that it weighs 18g, and that the weight should be
about 4g. In the turntables manual, it says that for carts
weighing over 10g or something, I should apply the auxiliary
weight. So.. I put it on, but then the tonearm became WAY to
heavy, and when I made it float (for 0-align), the weight
had to be so far forwards that it couldn't be turned to 3.
That's the second problem.. the weight only goes to three
while the cart says recommended is 4... also: playback works
fine at 2,5. Are these specs fucked up or something?

anyway.. I still want to have the right height-adjustment
for the tonearm, and it says in the specs that that would be
20degrees. How the fuck am I supposed to know if the
stylustip is in 20degreee angle to the record?

and again: if you didn't catch it the other time: the
audio-quality for pure listening with these carts is
awesome! it beats both CD and MP3 with MILES of quality. Of
course, it doesn't compare to a normal listening cart of the
same price and quality, but when you pay 1995 nok (£
157,11) (one cart w/ stylus + two more styli), you'd expect
such quality. (this pack was real cheap, though.. in
comparison, the cart bought separately costs 1450 and a
stylus costs 5-600 (both in kroner))


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 03:41 [#01153612]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



bump for ceri. and anyone else.

"question my integrity, won't you?"


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 03:59 [#01153641]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01153446 | Show recordbag



I was just wondering.. it says in the carts
specs that it weighs 18g, and that the weight should be
about 4g. In the turntables manual, it says that for carts
weighing over 10g or something, I should apply the auxiliary

weight. So.. I put it on, but then the tonearm became WAY to

heavy, and when I made it float (for 0-align), the weight
had to be so far forwards that it couldn't be turned to
3.


You should bear in mind that the technics manual is probably
taking the weight of the headshell (which most carts are
attached to) into account in that...

weight of Headshell + Cartridge (over 10g) is probably more
than than 18g (the weight of ortofons) therefore, treat
ortofons as though they are less than 10g.

That's the second problem.. the weight only goes to three
while the cart says recommended is 4... also: playback works

fine at 2,5. Are these specs fucked up or something?

Provided it's new (but worn in), well pressed vinyl and the
turntable is set up properly (and a good one for anti-skip,
like technics), listening environment is good (not too near
speakers, turntables on stable base, etc) playback can be
acceptably skip free, at a lot less than the minimum
recommended weight. The thing to remember is that cart is
for DJing- specifically scratching, so estimates will be
comparatively heavy.

anyway.. I still want to have the right height-adjustment

for the tonearm, and it says in the specs that that would be

20degrees. How the fuck am I supposed to know if the
stylustip is in 20degreee angle to the record?


Are you sure that's height adjustment and not how it should
be rotated on the headshell? I know 23 degrees is the
"magic angle" for emulating straight arms (for scratching)
on S-arm tone arms (like on Technics). NB, you obviously
can't rotate a concorde cart in that way!

Are you reading that out of the Technics manual or the
cartridge one?

audio-quality for pure listening with these carts is
awesome!


Good to hear!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 04:02 [#01153653]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The 20degree-thingie is from the carts manual.

But you think it hasn't got anything to do with the
arm-height?

What SHOULD the arm-height be normally anyway? Is it just
taste and trying + failing?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 04:04 [#01153660]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153641 | Show recordbag



Your best bet is to ask somewhere like this.
Technics (did you get a mk2/3/5 out of interest?) and
Ortofon Concorde Scratch is a reasonably common setup for
"serious" turntabilists (probably only techs and Shure m-447
is more common), so you should be able to find at least one
person with the same setup who can help you.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 04:05 [#01153664]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153660 | Show recordbag



the technichs are 1210 MKIIs. What are the 1200s about? They
seem exactly the same, and they have the same manual...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 04:18 [#01153684]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01153664 | Show recordbag



1200s are the original (silver as opposed to black) model.
1210s tend to be more common in clubs/listening posts for
some reason. I've read (on the technics site no less) that
the way they "feel" when scratching or queuing (perhaps the
torque/platter?), but I've not used them side by side and
have never noticed the difference (I've only used 1200s
briefly though, and never for scratching).

Re: 20 degrees. Ah okay, it probably is refering to the
height then... best bet would probably be to ask at the
forum I linked to. Personally, My tonearm is as low as
possible (although the high platter on PDX2000s might make a
difference) and works fine there. Bear in mind I've got
"normal" carts (stanton 505s) on a normal headshell though
as opposed to a concorde cart.

You won't really damage you styli or records (provided you
don't have it set up wrongly for weeks at a time!) by having
an experiment with different heights/tone arm weight
settings.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 04:19 [#01153691]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153684 | Show recordbag



*the way they feel when scratching or queuing (perhaps the
torque/platter?), is different to 1210s.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 04:22 [#01153694]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Ok.

but that forum.. being a stanton-forum, will they care if I
ask, and have NO questions whatsoever about stanton gear?

btw: are stanton slipmats any good (the music-shop where I
can get them right away only has stanton)?

I want a slipmat thats not TOO slippery, but not as firm as
the one that comes with the technics.. I'd like to be able
to move the record easily when using the whole arm, but not
at all when only using my fingers (as with those strange
slipmat-ish things I mentioned earlier in this thread)... or
at least that's what I think.. I don't want it to slip if I
accidentally touch it, so...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 04:34 [#01153708]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01153694 | Show recordbag



There are plenty of discussions about other brand
turntables, mixers etc. there, they won't ban you :)

Re: Slipmats. Are you sure? You might find it hard to
scratch (and the record might skip more) if you used very
heavy, "grippy" slipmats. Perhaps just get a pair of generic
ones you like the design on. Get mats that are marketed
towards mixing as opposed to scratching, too...


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 04:36 [#01153713]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153708 | Show recordbag



so you'd recommend very light slipmats really? I just
figured that it wouldn't be that good it it could slip by a
light touch...

if so, I think I'll look into those butter-rugs and those
magic carpet thingies.. the carpets were just something to
put under or on top of the slipmat, right?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 04:44 [#01153721]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01153713 | Show recordbag



The only problem I find (for normal mixing) with v. slippy
mats is that sometimes when you use the stop button they
move a split second after the record platter has stopped and
also that they take a bit of getting used to, to develop a
gentle touch when nudging them backwards or forwards a bit
to get records in time. I've got normal slipmats as well as
butter rugs, but in reality, I don't even bother to put the
normal rugs back on when I'm mixing (as opposed to
scratching). One thing they're good at for normal mixing is
that if you want to rewind or backspin, it'll go
faster/longer if you want it to.

If you get butter rugs, you won't need magic carpets- magic
carpets are designed to make "normal" mats more like butter
rugs. From what I can gather (and I know Dave agrees on
this) they're not significantly different to cutting out a
circle of the inside of a record's poly-lined sleeve a using
that underneath the slip mat.

Slipmats aren't very expensive (you can even get them as
freebies at hip hop events, with magazines etc.), even
butter rugs are only about £20 a pair, so if you do buy
some and then decide you want to change, it's not really a
big deal.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 04:50 [#01153725]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153721 | Show recordbag



haha! if I get them at freebies, I'll be ok! I'm going to
Nas later this month, and two days after that, it's Pharoahe
Monch + Erick Sermon + Kool Keith + lots of div. artists!

But still.. I think I'm going to order some butter rugs
then. since they'll only set me back £20 (=244,48 kroner).
That's two-packs right?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-21 05:05 [#01153734]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01153725 | Show recordbag



Yes, you only need to buy 1 pack of butter rugs they (and
all slipmatts I've encountered) come in packs of two :)

The only thing to bear in mind if you get them as freebies
(I was talking more turntabilism events like Skratchcon,
DMC, ITF, etc. but you might get them at gigs like those) is
that they tend to throw them on their own into the crowd
(you can throw more rigid ones quite far), so unless you and
a mate work together you'll only end up with one ;) It's not
impossible to do though, I got a pair of Technics ones (I
gave them to a mate with techs) at the local DMC heats.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-21 05:09 [#01153737]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153734 | Show recordbag



haha! I know about that throwing into the audience stuff..

I caught a ralph myerz vinyl plus a drum-stick and almost a
water-bottle (which almost hit me in the face) at a ralph
myerz gig!

once again; thanks for all the help. there will surely be
more questions later, though.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-22 06:17 [#01155452]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ok. the butter-rugs aren't sold by any place I can find here
in norway, so I'll have to order from UK, I think..

I'd like to know if you've ever shopped here, or
if you have any recommendations as to which shop I should
get them at (since they don't cost that much anyway, the
price doesn't matter.. what matters is that they arrive).

On that page it says that that's the price for four pairs?
that makes 8 mats.. could that be correct?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-22 07:16 [#01155512]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01155452 | Show recordbag



I've not bought from them myself, but I looked into it (I
was going to get my mixer there before the price hike) and
they seemed reputable.

8 mats = Yep- you have to bear in mind those are flying
carpets you linked to... not butter rugs!


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-22 07:23 [#01155522]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01155512 | Show recordbag



did I? damn.

that's what work'll do to your head, kids! don't ever get a
job!

It seems that shop doesn't even carry butter rugs, nor does
it deliver outside of the UK!

HAHA! I've been at the office for too long today!

do you know of any other place where I might buy it?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-22 07:32 [#01155533]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01155522 | Show recordbag



I believe this lot deliver worldwide.

They're usually pretty good, but they cocke dup my last
order (although to be fair, they've agreed to sort it out,
free of charge).


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-22 07:37 [#01155540]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01155533 | Show recordbag



Ok. I'll try them.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-26 03:11 [#01160413]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01153660 | Show recordbag



btw: MK.. I'm guessing 2 is the worst and 5 is the best, but
what is the difference? When I look at the specs on the
page, it just seems that they've taken different specs, but
they are the same... like, the mk2 doesn't have "detachable
lid" in the specs while the mk5 has.. both of them have
detachable lid in reality...

the "adjustable stop break" is new, though.. probaly handy
for making those "whjEEEeeeeuuuwwww" sounds when slowing
down the record more easy... Also the pitch reset button
(which I doubt I'd have any use for anyway...)

the "stylus pressure adjuster"... isn't that just that
weight-thingie? that's on both as well, but not in the
specs...

the long-life LED needle light is on both, but only noted in
the mk5 specs...

strange...

the mk5g seems good, though... more pitch-range and stuff,
but in the specs for that, they've just put the specs in
x2... weird page...


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-26 05:02 [#01160495]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01160413 | Show recordbag



nah, noticed the difference.. the wider pitch is on the mk5
as well.. didn't look at that earlier.

But the other things are just weird...

I've been praticing some beatmixing now, and I'll probably
keep doing that until I buy the mixer...

Have you got any songs you've done some turntablism stuff
on? Like doing the drums on one deck, or scratching or
something like that?


 


Messageboard index