Max/MSP | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (4)
big
steve mcqueen
DADONCK
dariusgriffin
...and 122 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614072
Today 16
Topics 127541
  
 
Messageboard index
Max/MSP
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-28 21:53 [#01052915]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Twerk uses Max/MSP to program his own instruments - I
gather it's something like Reaktor but for people who are
even geekier. Is it worth checking out? I'd have to upgrade
from 2000 to XP to install the demo.



 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-01-28 22:02 [#01052921]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



com.a uses it too


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-01-28 22:17 [#01052929]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



my friend told me about how com.a sets up sequences that set
off other sequences or something

i dunno i just downloaded super collider and it confounds
the shit out of me


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-01-28 22:17 [#01052930]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



fleetmouse whats up with your posts lately? youve only been
getting like 2 or 3 replies.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-01-28 22:56 [#01052934]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



its the sweet candy smell.


 

offline john is fast from sacramento (United States) on 2004-01-29 01:09 [#01052983]
Points: 638 Status: Regular



I got the windows version, I never had the patience to put
it to use. which irritates me cause I know you can do some
wacked out stuff with it. and I'm really drawn to
randomness and chaos theory type stuff.


 

offline snAre from .oO Ghent Oo. (Belgium) on 2004-01-29 02:03 [#01053010]
Points: 247 Status: Lurker



It's worth checking out!

But don't forget, you have to spend *ALOT* of time with
Max/MSP to get the best out of it...



 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 06:02 [#01053201]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to pomme de terre: #01052930



Well you're a moderator - can't you move other people's
posts into my threads?

*sigh* I'll always have "now playing"


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2004-01-29 07:02 [#01053273]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



"I'd have to upgrade from 2000 to XP to install the demo."

It works on 2000 as well, at least in my case it does...
It's way too complicated for me now, I barely know Reaktor
so I need to get into that first. I think it's not always
better to have more options to play with as someone who is
fairly new to it.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 07:13 [#01053285]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



MAX/MSP is a really hardcore program.

You can do amazingly complex stuff with it.

I would say go for it. Get the tutorials, play with them
from the beggining, so you can learn step by step. There is
also a MAX/MSP community on the web, so you can get help
there too.

I havnt started using it myself, but I plan to take a class
on it next summer.

My friend made a program that was like 16 sampler tracks,
that you could record to live. Then you could loop the
samples (complete with a visual waveform display) Then he
had a sequencer, and a matrix control, that allowed to use
fractal based algorithms to modulate various paramaters (did
I mention it was also a granular sampler?)

We performed this piece, him using his patch, and a
guitarist, and me on bass. Me and the guitarist were
improvising on some chord changes, and the guitar part was
running into his laptop.

So he sampled various phrases on the first go around, and
then came in on the second, doing all sorts of granular
editing live over us.

Nice spacy/melodic sound collage type thing.

And he had only scratched the surface of the program, when
he made it.

Good luck!


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-29 17:04 [#01053999]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



^ what he said...

And also there's a ton of additonal modules & plug-ins on
the net for MAX/MSP ...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 17:08 [#01054005]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Haha, I was expecting mister academica knew something about
it. :-)

Sounds like a killer program - you make it sound like a
modular cross between Cubase and Reaktor, in kit form. So
you can build a sequencer into your programs, or do you mean
he was using some other sequencer?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 17:09 [#01054006]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



oh man this is fuckleducked.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-29 17:12 [#01054010]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I'm going to check this out becuase i'm bored as hell these
days!


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-01-29 17:14 [#01054013]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker



Wow sounds pretty neat... too bad i have zero patience
currently


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-29 17:17 [#01054015]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I'm liking the idea of being able to do my own thing so i'm
definately check it out.

Can somebody Provide me with some links?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 17:20 [#01054017]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Well cheesedick to this, the installer says "os must be
windows xp"

I just got through copying my install of Windows 2000 over
to a new hard drive and I don't feel like any more computer
shenanigans ATM. This'll have to wait until I get my
laptop.

Now, I can't decide between a Mac running OSX or a Win XP
machine... both of those could run Max.

Advantage with the Mac is, it's based on Unix which is way
slammin cool. Disadvantage is I have to buy all new software
and it won't run the Fruit.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 17:21 [#01054018]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



http://www.cycling74.com/index.html


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 17:57 [#01054046]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



you can make sequencers in it


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2004-01-29 18:05 [#01054050]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



its good if you want to spend months or years customizing
and reading manuals. after that it should treat you very
well. frankly that has never appealed to me. i like the
program but its curve is absurdly high i find. christ, i use
reaktor all the time and max/msp still makes my head spin.
reaktor is kinda babyish in comparison, but you are still
assembling modules, which is no different than something
like the nord modular, albeit nord modulars design is
23259235035 times better than reaktors. but max/msp is just
insane compared to even the biggest reaktor ensemble.

ill give maxmsp a shot one of these days (ive used to a few
times, and created smaller things), but right now its not
too necessary for what i want to do. if you like text boxes
and command lines id say go for it, or if you want to make a
completely customizable synthesizer/sequencer, id say go for
it. me, i just want to make some beats and melodies.

fruity loops it is.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-29 18:05 [#01054051]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



You can make whatever you want. Even a cat.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-01-29 18:10 [#01054053]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i really want to learn supercollider

i think it's like the mac equivalent


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2004-01-29 18:11 [#01054054]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular | Followup to horsefactory: #01054051



making cats is good fun


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 18:12 [#01054056]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



well, thats odd. Seeing as MAX/MSP originally was for Mac.
so... mac equivalent of whosa wasa?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 18:15 [#01054059]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



ive seen max patches that where like, mmm, 15-20 times
larger then this


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 18:17 [#01054060]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



modularism is fun.

MAX/MSP
Reaktor
Nords
Tassman

its the way of the future baby!


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2004-01-29 18:21 [#01054061]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



oh god i don't understand!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 18:22 [#01054062]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



With the Nord, can you set up routing and shit between the
different components, so it's like a hardware Reaktor?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-01-29 18:25 [#01054063]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01054060 | Show recordbag



No THIS is the way of the future baby.


Attached picture

 

offline rarndaraki from from from from (United States) on 2004-01-29 18:26 [#01054064]
Points: 1833 Status: Regular



i use max/MSP, mainly for guitar processing, but i have been
known to write a few "electronic" songs with my patches.

the goal with max/MSP is to completely master it. Once you
have done that, anything you can imagine can come true.

obviously i haven't mastered it, but from what I have
learned, I am very pleased. I have made MANY synths,
including a version of the nord lead 1 (copied the specs
from the internet). i have made a few different sequencers.
basically this is what max/MSP all comes down to:

Once you've learned it, there are infinite ways to do
anything, synthesis, sequencing, sample playback, ANYTHING.
On one hand its good because you have no limits, on the
other hand its frustrating because you don't know how to
create limits for yourself, i.e. constantly working on
patches, no matter if you tell yourself they are finished or
not. in the end you ahve to remember to make music and not
get to into the programming side of things, if you start to
use max and become frustrated that you haven't made music in
awhile, stop programming and just make the best shit you can
out of the patches you have.

hope that helps


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 18:42 [#01054074]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



yeah, the nord is alot like reaktor. But it doesnt have
granular synthesis, and is less geared to effects processing
(I could be wrong)

And speaking of which I just placed my preorder for a nord
modular g2.

biggity bam!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 18:49 [#01054076]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to rarndaraki: #01054064



Hey dude I downloaded the Tiki Obmar album from Emusic, so
you probably earned some negligible amount of money for
that. :-)

I take it there's some Max/MSP stuff going on in there? Lots
of interesting sounds for sure.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 18:58 [#01054089]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



fleetmouse: heres what the nord editor looks like.
bling bling

I like its editor more the reaktor because its all right
there. you dont have to switch between the patching screen,
and the actual ensemble screen

(note, the wires are hidden in this picture)


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2004-01-29 19:00 [#01054091]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



yeah nord modular is great. i dont have one at the moment,
but i do want one....trying to get my friend to send me his,
since he doesnt use it

probably no such luck though :\


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-01-29 19:07 [#01054101]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #01054089



Wow there's a lot of potential there - I wonder if it's
possible to create patches so hairy that they overload the
unit's processors?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-29 19:33 [#01054116]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01054101



yes. but usually what happens, is it compensates by
decreasing polyphony.

and apparently the new editor is smart. self optimizing...
so if you have unnessasary # of moduals, it will change it,
so it takes up less processing or something like that


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-30 07:34 [#01054665]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



Max/MSP sounds awesome i'm definately going to have a go!

I'll have to wait a bit though.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-01-30 07:39 [#01054670]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01054063



i think somebody here has used that


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-01-30 08:20 [#01054733]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to earthleakage: #01054670 | Show recordbag



Probably...I don't pay enough attention :P


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2004-01-30 08:42 [#01054745]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



learn python and write your own programs...


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-30 08:47 [#01054750]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to hepburnenthorpe: #01054745



Ok, hit me with some info and i'll have a look and see if it
fries my brain or not.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-31 02:12 [#01056031]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



You may wanna try PureData ... an open source, freeware
version of MAX/MSP...

http://www.pure-data.org/about/ ....

"Quote from the PD manual: "Pd is a real-time graphical
programming environment for audio and graphical processing.
It resembles the Max/MSP system but is much simpler and more
portable"."


Pure
Data Review...
...



 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-01-31 02:27 [#01056034]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



So reaktor is used to program your own sounds?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-01-31 03:13 [#01056041]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to mappatazee: #01056034 | Show recordbag



Reaktor is used to make your own synths/drum
machines/samplers/fx/etc.

Quite similar to Buzz/Audiomulch (both of which are
free/shareware) in principle. I never really got on with
Reaktor 2/3, I could make simple synths, but they didn't
really have any sounds I couldn't get out freeware vsts/or
my own setups in Vaz Modular.

Although my aging CPU isn't up to it for real time
applications, I like Reaktor 4. For once you can make your
own synths that have sounds you'd be hard pressed to make
synth patches for in existing programs, but don't take too
long to make. I've made a (horrendously innefficient CPU
wise) nice granular noise one that's good for
water/rain/traffic/general ambient sounds and it only took
me about an hour.

Jand, Ta for the heads up re: PureData... I'm going to have
to check that out.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-31 04:40 [#01056066]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



this shit os gonna occupy me on a 24 hours flight. w00t!


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2004-01-31 08:35 [#01056198]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to jand: #01056031



Cheers Jand! That sounds like a cheaper alternative. I also
found it interesting how it was developed by one of the guys
at IRCAM, should be juicy!

Audiomulch is the bomb! I'm having loads of fun with it.


 

offline grinningcat from london (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-31 08:51 [#01056205]
Points: 1073 Status: Lurker



thing about max is it looks like work too much... not fun
like fruityloops for example.

its pretty fucking awkward, i downloaded the demo, and
opened it up expecting to get straight into it like every
other music program, but its completly different.

ill try it out again when i have some time


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-01-31 08:54 [#01056207]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



"i downloaded the demo, and opened it up expecting to get
straight into it like every
other music program,"

well whyd you expect that? We told you throughout the entire
thread that it was a hardcore program! :-P


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2004-01-31 22:37 [#01056899]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to grinningcat: #01056205 | Show recordbag



I agree with ZEUS...

There are NO limits with MAX/MSP/Pure-data....

I woud've given my right arm for that kind of power, during
my music-making days...

My major problem with most music software is how it limits
you; making complex things easy is commendable, but really
just leads to EASY music...Presetitus etc...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-01 02:21 [#01056917]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jand: #01056899 | Show recordbag



My atttitude towards presets now is that they are there for
two reasons:
1) To show the new user what the program/VST is capable of
and
2) To provide a basis for other patches.
By this I mean, say you want some brass in your piece, you
load up all the brass presets, find the one nearest the
sound you want and then use that to make the sound you want.




 


Messageboard index