Mastering tips #1: Compression | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
big
recycle
belb
...and 425 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Mastering tips #1: Compression
 

offline nobsmuggler from silly mid-off on 2004-04-03 01:31 [#01130898]
Points: 6265 Status: Addict | Followup to Sempoo: #01130395



try ozone 2.0


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2004-04-03 02:18 [#01130918]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #01125258



i think the EQ is the most "useful" effect if there is ever
one...

As for over-using compressors it is typicaly something of
our times, instead of having punchy drums because your
samples are good or your drummer and/or recording session
was exellent, people will just think, oh no problem i can
always compress the fuck out of them after...
It is a gain of time, but is it worth it?

Now for "dance" music its something else, you don't really
care for the overall audio quality that much, if the beat is
pumping hard, sound quality might not be an issue, but
that's also why it's VERY boring to listen to dance music
most of the time, check your meters and all, overall volume
doesn't move at all until their is a break... (the contrast
can be very interesting, but you'll have problems when
muting sounds in an overcompressed mix : everything will go
sudenly louder because of the space left by the sound(s) you
muted)

That's why when i try to do or mix some "braindance" i try
to have a good balance between the beats which can be
extremly compressed but then not much compression on the
whole so the rest of the sounds can have their maximum
dynamic range, and just totaly mix with the beats when they
(the rest of the sounds) are loud enough


 

offline JKristos from santa cruz ca (United States) on 2004-04-03 03:16 [#01130937]
Points: 1 Status: Lurker



Some of the tracks I've released have had no compression at
all and still sounded decent, but I went back and remastered
them using some compression and it helped quite a bit.

Also, using different compression on different parts makes
it more interesting, but of course is quite a bit more
work.

Compression isn't a fix all technique, like people have been
saying. It requires a lot of subtlelty and using your ear to
make it sound right. Overcompression is very easy to do and
is difficult to repair. Have someone else master it when
you're mastering, another ear is a huge advantage to curbing
your instincts before you get the feeling of what sounds
good

Mastering tips 2 will be on EQ, soon... soon


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-04-03 03:17 [#01130938]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



Whoops... was over at a friend's house and used his login

So yeah, Mastering tips 2 on EQ will be soon, I'll post a
topic when I have enough time to think it through, that's a
complex subject


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-04-03 05:14 [#01130984]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to E-man: #01130918 | Show recordbag



"As for over-using compressors it is typicaly something of
our times, instead of having punchy drums because your
samples are good or your drummer and/or recording session
was exellent, people will just think, oh no problem i can
always compress the fuck out of them after...
It is a gain of time, but is it worth it?"

Spot on... it's exactly the same as the mentality people
have when taking digital photos, "oh, I can always photoshop
that our/correct the contrast/whatever on my computer".


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2004-04-03 11:56 [#01131266]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to E-man: #01130918



I agree about EQ.

i'd say learning to EQ really effectively needs to be
learned before learning to compress.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-04-03 12:25 [#01131297]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



Do not EQ with headphones.


 

offline Sido Dyas from a computer on 2004-04-03 12:38 [#01131303]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sanguine: #01130938



What is this "reversed compresion" you mentioned ?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-03 14:20 [#01131359]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01130984



"Spot on... it's exactly the same as the mentality people
have when taking digital photos, "oh, I can always photoshop
that our/correct the contrast/whatever on my computer". "

Actually, sometimes it's better to take a photo / scan with
default settings and fix it in photoshop instead of with the
poor color and gamma correction such devices usually have...
there's usually enough contrast even in a dark image to make
it look great in photoshop with the curves adjustments.


 

offline tlink from sofla (United States) on 2004-04-03 14:56 [#01131389]
Points: 403 Status: Regular



Sidechain compression is cool.



 

offline ziggomatic from ??....uv ajed...deja vu....?? on 2004-04-03 18:40 [#01131661]
Points: 2523 Status: Lurker



fav+ that shiiit....LAZY_TITLE


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2004-04-04 15:10 [#01132109]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Sempoo: #01131297



why oh why if you know them well?
explain...


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-04-06 06:40 [#01134266]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to E-man: #01132109 | Show recordbag



'cause headphones aren't stereo.

eq'ing and panning will sound CRAP in real stereo if done
with headphones.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-04-06 07:44 [#01134316]
Points: 621 Status: Regular | Followup to E-man: #01132109



Lot about headphones


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-04-06 08:10 [#01134336]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



what a useful thread


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-04-06 08:13 [#01134338]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



fuck compression...

distortion ROX!


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-04-07 02:49 [#01135391]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



In reference to the headphones thing, although I am
adamantly against using them to do a final mix, they are
necessary in the mastering process. I did not realize this
until recently, this will be a future thread here... but...
onto the stuff I was fooling with yesterday...


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2004-04-07 02:56 [#01135400]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01134266



you can definately eq in headphones if it's not you be-all,
especially higher frequencies, i mean if you don't have good
monitoring loudspeakers, it's maybe better to do it with the
headphones AND with the speakers...
IMO it's all depending on the quality of your monitors.


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-04-07 03:35 [#01135412]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



Reverse compression:

So I was fooling with this with the Linear Multiband
compressor from the Waves package. I use the multiband from
the cubase package more just because it's easier on my
processor (I need to get more memory... *le sigh*). But the
waves version has some interesting presets, the one that
caught my eye was reverse compression.

It does pretty much what you expect it to do, amplifies
peaks instead of drop them. This becomes interesting when
you specify the bands in which it does these things and with
some very VERY fine tuning of the decibel and threshold
levels can bring out strange effects in otherwise normal
lines.

I had a lot of fun throwing it over a bass line in
frequencies other than the subs that I wanted continuous,
getting some weird mid and high effects, then throwing them
into separate channels and effecting them. You can get
minute details out of lines.

The big problem was it took some huge differences in numbers
to make any difference in the sound (at least in my
semi-decent monitor speakers) which frustrated me to no end,
especially when I was trying to get a specific sound.

Summary so far... weird

I will investigate further and post more specific comments,
I recommend somebody download the waves linear multiband and
fooling with it... and just maybe posting a reply.


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-04-07 03:38 [#01135414]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



Yes, headphones and monitor speakers... and whatever other
setups you can get. Car stereo, computer speakers, PA/DJ
setup, whatever... and compare the difference in sound with
another song you know to be professionally mastered well...
see what your sound is missing and buffer the areas that are
shown to be weak by comparison to a well mastered track.

My songs always come out fine on speakers, PA, and in my car
now that I found out how to make some decent bass, but
lately listening in my headphones I've heard some atrocious
panning and other things... didn't realize I wasn't picking
up on that on the monitor speakers. I will cover this in
more detail on one of the next threads


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2004-04-07 06:57 [#01135554]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker | Followup to princo: #01134338



amen brutha


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-10 06:20 [#01180404]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



still waiting for #2!!!!!!!!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-10 06:34 [#01180425]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Sanguine: #01135414 | Show recordbag



Also check on a mono setup- stuff that sounds very clear
with similar frequency elements hard panned away from each
other can be v. murky when they're both in the middle. Worth
bearing in mind if the track will be played in smaller
nightclubs.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-05-10 07:45 [#01180477]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



What do you think about Waves' LinMB with 4 bands? Do
you use factory presets or your own?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-10 07:48 [#01180483]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



what do you think of this? it has knobs, and it's
cheap... do you think it'll do the job?


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-05-10 08:15 [#01180510]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



I do not know nothing about audio ciruit quality of this
stuff, and its only 18bit...


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-29 06:23 [#01546130]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Useful thread :D

I always use my headphones for stuff... coule be a problem
there!


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-03-29 06:57 [#01546162]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #01546130



Thanks for bumping this! I forgot to fav+


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-03-29 07:04 [#01546169]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01546162 | Show recordbag



:)


 

offline engine7 from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2007-01-31 09:23 [#02041955]
Points: 11 Status: Lurker



Excellent thread, i've learned a lot.
I've found Waves' MultiDynamics 5 to be incredibly useful.
Definitely worth testing.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2007-01-31 09:42 [#02041976]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



A pretty good limiter to catch peaks

I stick it in set at the defaults just to catch live
transient peaks in whatever host I'm using. Less than 1ms
latency. It's not too bad for a basic mastering limiter
either but I'd leave that to the pros.


 

offline ebolawasher from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-01-31 10:24 [#02042012]
Points: 229 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sanguine: #01123238



"Compression... I've heard it is the only effect
you can never have too much of if you do it right."

That's a silly statement


 

offline _awt_ from Malmö (Sweden) on 2007-01-31 12:25 [#02042120]
Points: 2202 Status: Regular | Followup to ebolawasher: #02042012



a part of "doing it right" is not "having too much of it"


 

offline ebolawasher from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-02-01 07:07 [#02042743]
Points: 229 Status: Lurker | Followup to _awt_: #02042120



Exactly


 

offline sirmailbox from chicago area (United States) on 2007-02-01 07:54 [#02042761]
Points: 213 Status: Lurker



I rarely use compression for increases in volume, just
limits and such. Some synths just make too much noise when a
certain combination of notes are played and they need a
compressor for those times.

If you've got a song with a lot of tracks on it, and it's
fairly loud, it's often a good idea to run the entire thing
through a compressor--BUT--set the threshold to the max
allowed, which I believe is typically the volume at which
the sound will clip. Make sure the attack and release are
pretty low, especially the release. Setting up a compressor
in this way will prevent clipping but leave everything else
alone, avoiding the watered down effect compressors can
have.

In general, I find that EQ's are much more effective in
limiting/amplifying the sound of different instruments. If
your song feels "crowded" or loud, it may be the case that
you have too many sounds operating in the same bands. Rather
than using a compressor, use EQ's to narrow the sound range
of each instrument. For instance, you might wish to bring
down the high end of a bass, and the low end of a violin or
what have you. When you reduce the overlap of bands by
different instruments, the song tends to sound fuller, and
each instrument is much more distinct.


 

offline sirmailbox from chicago area (United States) on 2007-02-01 07:58 [#02042763]
Points: 213 Status: Lurker



Oh, and also, really try to avoid applying EQ effects post
production to the entire song. The longer you wait in
applying EQ, the more difficult it is to pull off
successfully. Apply EQ on an instrument by instrument
basis.

Putting EQ on an entire song isn't always disastrous, but I
find it difficult to think of a situation where instrument
EQ during production wouldn't do a better job.


 

offline ebolawasher from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-02-01 09:03 [#02042784]
Points: 229 Status: Lurker



Great thread! Thats's sound advice, sirmailbox - thankyou.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2007-02-01 11:00 [#02042808]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The only thing I'm able to use compression for is as an
effect, altering the sound. I can't do anything
mastering-like with it.


 

offline Phobiazero from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2007-02-01 11:06 [#02042809]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag



This is exactly the type of info/tutorials that I want to be
featured on Xltronic.

Give us more!


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-02-01 11:15 [#02042817]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



yep, this thread has been in my favs since its conception.
It's a shame Sanguine didn't start any other ones.. Or if he
did I missed them somehow.


 

offline ebolawasher from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-02-08 18:42 [#02047589]
Points: 229 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02042808



In mastering it's used much more subtly. Multiband
compression is what mastering is all about. It's not
everyone's forte, though - not everyone has the ear for
mastering. I fucking don't!


 

offline ebolawasher from Dublin (Ireland) on 2007-02-08 18:43 [#02047590]
Points: 229 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #02042808



In mastering it's used much more subtly. Multiband
compression is what mastering is all about. It's not
everyone's forte, though - not everyone has the ear for
mastering. I fucking don't!


 


Messageboard index