 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 188 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613461 Today 4 Topics 127500 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Makes sense... He actually mentions in an interview, that he takes samples from playstation games. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Kode9 video interview. He goes a bit into sampling and the legality of it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Endorphin: |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this thread is interesting! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'll be talking to him tonight, I will ask him. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
amazing |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The majority of the samples have clearence, although most of the permission was gained after release, unbeknown to the original artist but they have said 'yes' now so they can't sue. The samples that do not have permission are pretty safe as they would fall into the 'unrecognisable by the layman', as in the Beastie Boys ruling. I hope this puts everyone at ease. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
that is kule and i am glad nobody is getting sued. did you do an interview or something? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I liek Burial even more now. What a brilliant warping of samples into something that sounds only and uniquely like him / her / it / them. 010101, could you tell me more about this "unrecognizable by the layman" loophole? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The Beastie Boys used a flute peice, they got permission from the publishers but not the artist. The case rested on the fact the original piece was not distiguisable (by the layman) and that the band had altered it enough to use at their own. The initial problem arose from the fact that the publisher did not realise that the artist had to OK the sample before they gave permission. But the term 'unrecognisable by the layman' set a presidence for law regarding sampling. I hope this clears things up. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"We hold that Beastie Boys' use of a brief segment of that composition, consisting of three notes separated by a half-step over a background C note, is not sufficient to sustain a claim for infringement of Newton's copyright," Chief Judge Mary Schroeder said. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Good stuff. I guess Kode 9 didn't expect Burial to blow up like he did, so i'm sure now that he'll go out of his way to get sample clearance before any of his releases come out. That might also be the cause of delay for the new 12" actually... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The words spoken in the intro are from David Lynch's INLAND EMPIRE. A great scene I might add. "I'll show you light now. It burns bright forever." You can see it listed towards the bottom. It's spoken by "street person 1" The strangest thing is, when I first heard 'Untrue', the mood of the album reminded me of Inland Empire... and then I noticed the quote from the film. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Deja Vu |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yea I noticed that right away - and it was funny too, considering that the film had only been out a little while |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i saw a shitty kids film on tv (just a 30 minute stare) and noticed one bit which was definitely sampled in the burial untrue album the film is called '' < 4.6 rating (imdb) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wow.. thats awesome. i dont have the guts to use any unlicensed samples like that, but i wish i could, movies is a GREAT resource |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
too lazy to re-read thread. in endorphin, he pitched up the the last bit of female vocals in the silent hill movie. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it doesn't make sense to do any sample clearance before someone tells you to do so. if burial would send out mails for every sample he used, firstly he would have to send a few dozen requests, secondly being a unrecognisable artist he would get 90 % denies. i once tried to get clearance for using tracks in a non-profit film project and i got 3 of 11 cleared. we still made the movie and noone complains until now. now when burial is already known clearance is much easier for him. and i can even imagine that most companies/artists really care about this. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it would be quite awesome if for example venetian snares had to clear every sample used. he would never be able to do it. still, as a unrecognisable artist nobody cares about this. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
