RIP michael jackson | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
belb
...and 357 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
RIP michael jackson
 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 00:59 [#02300827]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



I agree though, he's dead.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2009-06-28 01:08 [#02300828]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02300825 | Show recordbag



Jesus, any tart could see that I'm not referring literally
to the tuss. I didn't even read end of your post because
you've obviously completely misconstrued my meaning.

"feeding off of one thing and going on the next."

haha that's exactly what you're doing you tit. oh wait,
michael was your whole childhood... LOL


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 01:14 [#02300829]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02300828



LOL


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 01:19 [#02300830]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zephyr Twin: #02300828



so you were referring then to the tuss meaning a penis? I'm
sorry help me here, i'm lost.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 03:57 [#02300844]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



argh guys. dont get so heated. yeah im having a fight with
barcode but that aside this really should be an interesting
thread. michael was massive, bigger than elvis. he is the
most fascinating look into the inevitable rot of the
american dream. and the rot was there.
seriously, even if you ignore every screaming instinct
within you, there are good reasons to believe there was
something really fishy going on. my oppinion on michael has
been steadily forming for years (like i said i think its v
interesting) but during that time ive never picked up the
sun, watched bbc news ect. i still say the most personal
insight into him is moonwalker which im sure was his
creation through and through. not only does the film convey
some of the basics of peado psychology but many of its
intricate details. the short film ghosts even more so, its
actually very creepy. and considering its quite venomous
nature its hard to believe hes just a kind loving soul as it
was his idea, was financed by his money, and was right
after/relating to the recent court cases. just using that as
an example; i find it hard to believe that michael was so
tortured by the accusations (to the point where he just
wanted it all over, paying MILLIONS to end it), then on the
other hand created a film like this in which he chastises
the children that 'told the secret' and scares the mayor
(heavily based on the lawyer that gave him such a hard time)
and makes him throw himself out of the window. i still, in
some ways, am not sure. watching the bashir doc makes me
wonder if im right at all. but i think michaels lived his
whole life controlling his image of himself, playing mr
nieve 'i just want to share some childhood' probably wouldnt
have been that hard.
i really would like to go on about this all day folks. i
think its relevant and not really disrespectful. we talk
about science/girls/'tuss' all day lets squeeze this in
aswell. why not. dont call me worm tho thats not a debate
thats just crap


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-28 04:01 [#02300845]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



.


Attached picture

 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 04:29 [#02300848]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



one of the things i find most worth talking about is
michaels sexuality. the bashir doc portrays him as a
sexless, child minded, innocent with a mousey voice. sex is
the last thing on his mind right?
no. every part of that man oozed sexuality. his moves, his
voice, his look. it was all so souped up on sex. he conveyed
himself as a very sexual person. you cant fake that kind of
charisma, it was fucking massive.
but. where did he invest that sexuality? it wasn't with
women at all, but not with men either....thats a grey area
isnt it.
so putting 2+2 together; very sexual man (unless youre going
to assume he could only be sexual on stage. and that he
defies male sexual nature and dosnt require sex at all
outside of that performance) + the child ting. youd have to
really be reaching to come up with an alternative. if thats
too weak an argument then think of his performance on totp
(which anyone with any decency would avoid considering the
court stuff). is he shy or is he flaunting? is he really
clueless or is he living the peado dream; doing it in front
of everyone?
i understand that none of this is conclusive at all, its
speculation. but with cases of child molestation it always
goes this way. there is never anything concrete, just hints
and undertones. as if we didn't have more than enough to go
on here. i honestly reccomend ghosts and moonwalker. watch
them both carefully before you defend the man. he was smart


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 04:32 [#02300849]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to hanal: #02300845



kids! whos up for some naked twister!


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 09:34 [#02300903]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



Xltronic is of course a coarse, naïve, somewhat introverted
and emotionally reduced, pseudo-gay collection of failed
Eurotrash boy dreams of success, intelligence and
recognition. I'm indiffeent to irony as such, I like funny
irony. What are you trying to pull? Obvious, repetitive
jokes about gossip and weakness? Are those funny to you?

Michael Jackson was one of the most gifted men in music. He
created new music, fusioning jazz and Motown, linking pop
and rock. He was a true innovator in total control of his
early expression. He ignited the world. His dance was
divine. He created the music video as we know it.

You can't like music without respecting, honouring him.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-28 09:35 [#02300904]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02300903 | Show recordbag



actually most on here are virgins


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-06-28 09:45 [#02300908]
Points: 23729 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



he prolly should have died after thriller. tbqh and
musically


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 09:53 [#02300910]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



Hanal!

Explain yourself. Do you want to? Do you feel like it? Do
you have to? What's your interest, what's your nature?

I know you like posting anal sexual imagery. That's all I
know about you. You have 12.080 posts. Are you interested in
music?


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 10:04 [#02300912]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02300910



masugnen you seem like an alright guy. give me a little more
credit tho.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2009-06-28 10:04 [#02300913]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02300910



you obviously don't know much about hanal. ever seen him
post mixes?


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 11:01 [#02300924]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



Ampi you wonder why he didn't ever fuck any body, probably
because he had a whole audience to entertain every day of
his life, people watching his every move i'm sure as soon as
he walked out the door, let's not forget here that michael
jackson isn't some colin farrell, he doesn't go fucking
every girl he meets. He probably had fucked up sexual
experiences with women alot older than him before he had
hair on his nuts. his whole life on this earth was since an
infant, in front of a microphone and selling himself out to
keep his money. He didn't need to fuck children to escape
from all of that. Plus masturbation is a sexual activity
that you didn't consider. Which i'm sure a recluse like him
did often. Don't watch the BAshir Interview, it was shit
they edited the shit out of it and twisted it, you should
watch the one, "Life with Michael Jackson" Hosted by Maury.
IT still is dramatized but it shows footage from michael's
camera he had going during the interviews. I think the whole
thing about him and kids is that he just loves being around
they're free-spirited personalities instead of business
driven, mind-fucked emotionally disturbed adults. Michael
recognized that he wasn't the one that was wierd, it was all
the others pointing fingers and couldn't deal with their own
lives. He even said his father was a genius for the way he
brought his kids, they didn't get into alot of trouble,
didnt really get into drugs or delinquencies. They were just
on one tight ass leash. Mike the most. imo


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 11:03 [#02300926]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



Hanal's lowest level is insufficient, don't you think?


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-28 11:54 [#02300957]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02300926 | Show recordbag



you better believe it


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2009-06-28 12:28 [#02300976]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



retape, your thread is quite succesful


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 12:32 [#02300977]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02300924



nah man thats not the point at all. no ones understanding my
point here. just take my word for it. is peado


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 13:28 [#02301000]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02300977



Your point is redundant. A much more salient point, and one
that refuse to broach because you're probably too right
wing, is that if Jackson was a paedo he was a man-made
paedo.

You still seem to think that somebody with a life like his
was capable of rational, lucid behaviour - I'd say the abuse
he suffered would have rendered that impossible.

That's why you're a worm. You want the quick fix, the lethal
injection, forget cause and effect. People like you ensure
society remains entrenched in its own petty little rut,
where abuse is perpetually sustained by the ignorance of the
many. Even if you don't inflict it personally, you're still
part of that big ugly thought machine - therefore, guilty.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2009-06-28 13:42 [#02301005]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 13:59 [#02301015]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02301000



lol 'i dont get personally involved on websites' sheeeit.
dont presume im right wing just cos youre that kind
of left. your case is rubbish, of course he was lucid. you
dont understand. 'man made' is a redundant point, if you
really want to throw words like redundant around.
you cant indentify the subtle details, youre the narrow one.
you havnt even thought this out, its obvious you havnt even
looked at what ive suggested just shunned it out of snobbery
and fashionable thinking. you could be so much more fucking
grown up about this. you know nothing of this abuse and the
way you harp on is rediculous. its like its the only point
youve got to contribute to this. remember when you said it
the first time and i said 'yeah', well then it needn't be
repeated cos it really isnt the focus of what michael was.
if im the right wing media slaved twit then why is it you
spouting the 'jacko, victim of a cruel life' tv drivel. IVE
DONE NUFF MORE THINKING ON THIS THAN YOU. NUFF YOU LITTLE
MAN.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 14:05 [#02301018]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02301000



"refuse to broach because you're probably too right
wing"
shit man. fuck you flexing your cock at me. i was 'broachin'
that shit 2 years ago. i grew out of your small perspective.
and as if this point isnt obvious enough despite realising
that its not entirely true. i said this before but you
werent listening. you are so that kind of left ha. is
why i hate you


 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-06-28 14:06 [#02301020]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



MJ made some great tunes in his time, kudos to him for that.
The king of pop. RIP.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 14:11 [#02301024]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



"I think the whole
thing about him and kids is that he just loves being around

they're free-spirited personalities instead of business
driven, mind-fucked emotionally disturbed adults. Michael
recognized that he wasn't the one that was wierd, it was all

the others pointing fingers and couldn't deal with their own

lives."
this is terrible. would people please stop underestimating
me on this. and sorry pclock i really dont want to criticise
its just youre wrting this to me as if i was too stupid to
have considered, and i did, but moved on because it really
is wrong. the bashir doc was the least damning insight into
michael ive watched. my oppinion has come from observing his
art. shit dont make me write an essay, i will do that.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-28 14:19 [#02301030]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i think he prob just slipped the odd finger up children's
bums
then just had a wank after.



 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 14:22 [#02301033]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



"I think the whole thing about him and kids is that he just
loves being around they're free-spirited personalities
instead of business driven, mind-fucked emotionally
disturbed adults."

There's a lot of truth in that. Society stinks to its core.
It's got so bad that can't even enjoy an innocent pleasure
like sharing a bedroom with your nephew for example without
people thinking your a paedo. You can't even go there. As if
a bed + a child automatically = sex.

I remember babysitting my nephew when he was a baby, and I
was scared to go into his room to check he was sleeping ok
in case my brother and his wife got home, came upstairs and
saw me in his room.

That's what media/society has implanted in people's heads.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 14:22 [#02301035]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02301024



I was just explaining what i thought.. me, my thoughts on
the subject of michael jackson's lifestyle, not what i think
you should think, notice how i said, "I think the whole
thing about him and kids is that..." Sorry if we can't agree
about his possible pedophile acts, but i wouldn't be SO
surprised if we end up factually finding that he did molest
a kid. But as of now, with no evidence, no real reason to go
on other than people having "a hunch" because he's so wierd
and abnormal and because the kid's parents sued michael and
got money from it.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-06-28 14:29 [#02301039]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02301033



Interesting thought..
Shows how paranoid and fear driven society is sometimes..


 

offline Jamaar from Missouri (United States) on 2009-06-28 14:51 [#02301061]
Points: 86 Status: Lurker



sad sad sad


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 15:24 [#02301074]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



I find a discussion about Michael Jackson's masturbation
habits absurd. and perverse. But on a general note I would
like to respond Ampi Max's thesis on sexuality.

I think he's wrong. I believe most official demonstrations
of male potence in proportional magnitude cover a private
impotence. History's rich of examples: Napoleon, Hitler et
al. (On the other hand we have the madonna sexuality of the
female: in an aura of innocense, frailty and virginity,
girls attract men stronger.) The effeminate male poses an
insult to the macho, afraid in his own sexual identity.

Barcode presents several points. We love to read about
Fritzl rapes, serial killing, sex sects. The pedophilia of
Michael Jackson is a pervese phantasm of a sexually
disturbed society in hatred of all personal idiosyncracy and
divergence. Everything under the Sun can be attributed to
this apparent freak, beast. Can also a streak of envious
vengence be traced? You cannot be too successfull, you know.
We love to build icons ad then tear them apart. In post
mortem retrospect we carte blanche ourselves saying we've
always loved the ouevre.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 15:37 [#02301078]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02301074



What's wrong with bringing up masturbation in a conversation
about Michael's supposed pedophilia? I brought it up so that
people would stop insinuating he was trying to fuck/not fuck
everybody who stood next to him. Sex is an activity that he
chose not to engage in most times (from what i gather), so
that leaves masturbation as a release valve if he was
feeling sexually frustrated. Knowing this, it seems more
irrational to think he wanted to have sex with a child as
well.

This whole discussion wasn't about masturbation either.



 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 15:46 [#02301082]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



I suggest you phantasize irrationally and
counterproductivly. Why do you want to defend him on the
field of sexuality when noone can launch any real attack
there? Your argument affirms the allegation discourse and
the sexual sickness of society.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 15:53 [#02301086]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02301082



i'm not trying to say that society doesn't have mechanisms
that people use in such ways as you said, like when men mask
their own insecurity about sex by making more anxious men
look less masculine. This i agree with, and i've also
pointed out in this thread. Who am i defending here? I am
only defending my own ability to have a separate opinion
from AMPI's. I am defending, with logic, my opinion on why
it is incorrect to assume he molested a child, which again
is why i brought up masturbation. Sorry if that comes off to
you as conterproductive or perverse.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-28 15:55 [#02301088]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




isn't this thread a 'thriller'?


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 15:57 [#02301090]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



I thought you wanted to defend Michael Jackson. I don't care
about the internal battles on this forum.

"He didn't need to molest a child since he could wank and
order hockers and surf porn on the Internet. He had access
to it all. He could masturbate. He did masturbate. It seems
very, very likely that he did masturbate. He did often
masturbate. I think he often did masturbate so he didn't
need to molest a child."


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 16:03 [#02301094]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02301074



yeah alright. i dont dissagree with any of that really but
its not the point.
1st is the sexuality thing. my ideas on all this are based
pretty heavily on moonwalker, a film that obviously came
from him very personally. its an art film in some ways, not
a kids hollywood feature. its a very conscious and deceptive
piece of work. aimed exclusively at children it mixes
disturbing elements, subtle but its there. some of those are
for example him painting himself as a saviour to these
children, whilst not really sympathising with them. in that
i mean the film itself is luring the childs attention yet is
not nurturing the childs perspective, rather introducing it
to something more adult. besides that he paints himself as a
god and saviour, rather than placing himself on a more
comfortable child level; he wants to control them not be
part of them (which is why i dont buy that 'i just want to
be a kid again). the whole film is a plotless mess, except
when you look at it from the angle of pedo art, where its an
almost perfect expression of a molesters world. in the film
michael expresses himself as the controller, using dreams
and promises of safety. not only that but he promises magic
to the children, portraying himself as the magic in these
childrens lives. youre special if michael comes to save you.
id have to show you clips to really make my point. anyway
'ghosts' is a much harder example. it makes my point very
clear. a basic summary of it is; the kids told everyone, now
michael must razzle dazzle the parents and 'scare' the
accuser; the one that just dosn't understand michael, wont
let him do what he wants. also he must punish the children
so he scares them in two ways; firstly with a demonstration
of his power to 'scare' and secondly threatening to die and
leave them. again i need to show clips.
2nd Barcodes points are poo, not that i disagree. please
remember tho i havnt got my ideas from papers or tv, its
from michaels own personal works.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 16:03 [#02301095]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02301090



wait who are you quoting?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-06-28 16:04 [#02301096]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02301024



What you're failing to understand is that, for fuck's sake,
how is his art evidence for anything?
Do you also think Francisco Goya went around eating
children?


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 16:08 [#02301098]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02301094



dude...do you think kids are even old enough to grasp the
concept of a personal saviour? Do you think the even give a
shit? Why would michael hand craft this whole thing and sell
it to the public? Like it's a code only kids can crack and
understand. Michael believed he was peter-pan, probably
being the epitome of "Peter-pan syndrome" disproving your
child saviour pedophiliac theory. He wanted to help kids be
able to express themselves as kids. And yes kids are sexual
by the way, don't try to act like kids aren't sexually
active even if they can't reproduce.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 16:09 [#02301099]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02301086



pedos never just wank off. no one understands this but they
dont love children, or even like childrens bodies. its the
control and control ppl never stop at wanking. michael was
given too much control when young, also he was the golden
goose and control came easy. everyone is buying the soft
broken paper pale michael. i kind of feel absurd suggesting
it but i think thats an act. remember it was him and the
rest of his fake squeeky voiced johavas witness family who
sold us the 'victim' image of michael. it feels like media
spin more than the pedo accusations


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 16:11 [#02301100]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



I'm quoting the subconscious implosion of your thought
process, Pulseclock.

Ampi Max doesn't convince me. You'll find what you('ll)
seek. I am in no way hesitant towards the tormented nature
of Michael Jackson's psychology. It is not impossible that
he suffered a Messiah complex. I've not seen his movies but
certain late videos affirms this suggestion. He was clearly
a fucked up guy – but why should I care and why should I
speculate in a sexual extrapolation? The music gives me
more.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 16:12 [#02301101]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02301096



wtf? that dosnt make a lick of sense. of course its a part
of him. goya didnt want to eat children but the part that
wanted to express that was all him, a huge part of him.
moonwalker is all michael


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-06-28 16:13 [#02301102]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02301094



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 16:16 [#02301103]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02301099



I'm gonna say it again, i don't assume he did or didn't have
sex with a child. I do however find it to be more rational
to be that he didn't. If we all find out one day, if one of
the kids that was supposedly molested comes forward as an
adult and says it was all a lie, or it was truth, that's
when i'll start making my judgements. Even still, given his
history and lifestyle since a child, finding out he actually
was having sex with children, he would just be another adult
who was screwed up way before he ever was tempted to touch a
kid.



 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 16:17 [#02301104]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02301098



yes kids do grasp saviours. thats why he was the ultimate
guy youd love to be with for kids across the globe. again
hes not sharing with kids, hes teaching them something. hes
not getting cosy in there world, hes coaxing them into his.
he full well knows that kids are sexual, he knows it. and
yes! it is a code for kids. abused kids dont even know they
are being abused because of these kind of subtle tactics.
its a manipulative film. this sounds far fetched dosnt
it...but im right


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 16:18 [#02301105]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02301100



Well since you revealed your psychic powers, maybe you can
use them to your advantage.


 

offline MASUGNEN from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-06-28 16:20 [#02301106]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker



I have questions for you:

Do you hate pedophiles?
If Michael Jackson was a pedophile, what's in it for you?
Is it stimulating to think about pedophily?

Do you hate murderers?


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-28 16:21 [#02301107]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02301104



you could be right, and it makes sense seeing as how *myself
inlcuded* many children were drawn to him. But to me it
seems you are turning him into a demon, as if he should be
burned alive for his witchy-ways. It's not like this was his
motive in life even if what you are saying is true, i think
you have a concept of evil that might be amplified.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-06-28 16:21 [#02301108]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to MASUGNEN: #02301100



"why should I care and why should I
speculate in a sexual extrapolation?"
because it defines something truly relevant. it defines
america and the bones of the dead natives its all built on.
it defines the lie of perfection. this is why barcodes point
is empty because this is the real human sickness; our gods
fathers and paedophiles (im not quite sure what i mean but
im right). ha im enjoying this ill be back later yo


 


Messageboard index