Stupid English Judicial System | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
belb
...and 330 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614083
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Stupid English Judicial System
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-11 03:47 [#01067931]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01067609 | Show recordbag



Yes, the court seems to take the childish view that schools
do; that the "winner" in a fight is the guilty party,
irrespective of who started it.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-11 04:01 [#01067938]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Shitting hell this thread has grown.

The fact is:

Our Government fucked up. They said he wasn't allowed in the
country but allowed him, by their own laziness, to live in
this country. He got a paltry sentence for killing someone.
He didn't do it intentionally but he still did it. Hit and
Run is fucking low. He's not facing the consequences of his
actions. A few months in prison is nothing. They have the
fucker now and I'm hoping they'll deport him after his
sentence.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-11 07:18 [#01068060]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Erm, no I said he shouldn't have been in this country
because his application for assylum had been turned down and
he was an illegal alien, nothing to do with race, so in
future, before you make yourself look a total prick,
actually think before you type. I would have said the same
thing had he been an illegal alien from any part of the
world.

While I don't think the assylum application process is far
from perfect it has to be in place and abided by, and THAT
is why he shouldn't have been in this country.

Personally I would have no arguement in seeing Bush and
Blair up in front of a UN tribuneral for the Iraq
"conflict", but that has absolutely nothing to do with this
topic.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-11 07:41 [#01068085]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #01067913 | Show recordbag



My above post was a follow up to the post I am following up
on with this follow up. I hope that is clear.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-02-11 07:42 [#01068088]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



99% of government around the world is corrupt and fucked up
in someway. Unforutantly its something we have to live with.
God....


 

online big from lsg on 2004-02-11 07:49 [#01068092]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #01068088 | Show recordbag



god corrupt too? nice to think he's not much better than us.
but that was probably his point on that jesus dude he sent
to us


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-11 07:54 [#01068099]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #01068088 | Show recordbag



84% of statistics are made up.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-11 08:05 [#01068103]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



all rumours are true


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-02-11 08:08 [#01068106]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



big: maybe. i think man makes god in his image, or most of
man anyway.

giginger: well this one iam sure is true.


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2004-02-11 08:10 [#01068107]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01068085



yaknow when I`m listenin to mp3s your avatar fucks my
winamp. change it you scouse scum!

:P


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-11 08:16 [#01068111]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01068060



Oh right. And our immigration laws are not racist? Did you
not hear of Amnesty International's condemnation of the
asylum process?

This guy was in someone else's country and killed someone.
Should we dispense harsh justice on him?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3478133.stm


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-11 08:24 [#01068117]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #01068111 | Show recordbag



I said that the immigration laws are far from perfect, I was
just pointing out that my comment about the fact he
shouldn't have been here was based on current legal status
and not his race.

As for the link, if it is found that the allegations have
basis, then of course he should be tried for murder.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-11 08:26 [#01068120]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



he's a witch! bUUUUUUrn him!


 

online big from lsg on 2004-02-11 08:26 [#01068121]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to jonesy: #01068111 | Show recordbag



in holland it was the other way around almost
this soldier apparantly had shot in the ground near a mob
that was luding, one dude in the mob fell, was thrown in a
car by the rest and they drove off. the soldier was arrested
pretty soon after. it was pretty bad for moral. apparantly
there's no other way here to handle such things. it's pretty
harsh to be thrown in jail because of suspicion when you
were just doing your job (of course it has to be
investigated though)


 

online big from lsg on 2004-02-11 08:29 [#01068124]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01068060 | Show recordbag



are we all agreed that him being illigal has not to be
taking into acount when judging his fellony (crime) of
hitting the kid? it's something different not having your
passport than not having your license


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-02-11 08:30 [#01068126]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to earthleakage: #01068103 | Show recordbag



"all rumours are true"

hahahaha


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-11 08:32 [#01068128]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01068124 | Show recordbag



I agree totally the only reason I brought up the fact he was
an illegal was the perversity of the the fact he got more
time for passport offenses than killing a child, and the
fact that had he not been in the country he wouldn't have
caused the death.

But yes, the fact he was an illegal has no baring on what
his sentence should be...all deaths caused in this manner
should be dealt with more harshly.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2004-02-11 08:37 [#01068132]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01068128 | Show recordbag



I agree


 

online big from lsg on 2004-02-11 08:50 [#01068155]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01068128 | Show recordbag



yes of course that's crazy, but that charge was dropped
altogether, right? i dont get it anyway, being an illigal
gets you in jail? not just out of the country?
if he hadnt been in the country... you can only speculate on
that. if he'd been smarter he would have gotten into the
country maybe. if he'd been born in england he would have
had his driverslicense without being able to drive anyway
maybe


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-11 09:10 [#01068196]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01068155 | Show recordbag



No, the charge wasn't dropped. He was convicted of motoring
offenses such as driving without a license and the judge
gave him an 8 months sentence. The sentence has been
reduced to 6 months because that is all the judge exceded
what he was allowed to give him.

His failed assylum application meant he would have been
immediately deported, not held in prison.

In the UK most deaths caused by road accidents are tried
inder the charge "driving without due care and attention"
and carry relatively small custodial sentences.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-02-11 10:45 [#01068418]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



i'm shocked that some people arre sticking up forr this dick
head child killerr.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-11 10:51 [#01068428]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



maybe we should take the law into our own hands and get mr
big to pay a visit to him in the showers


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-11 11:37 [#01068499]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I'm a firm believer in capital punishment.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-12 00:39 [#01069227]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01068128



"the fact that had he not been in the country he wouldn't
have
caused the death."

What a stupid thing to say? Of course he wouldn't but that
doesn't mean he deserves more contempt (which is what you
were implying). I could drive up a particular road in
Cardiff tonight and knock down some kid and if I wasn't
there on that street I wouldn't have killed him. Its a 'what
if" and is totally irrelevant.

Maybe we need to ask ourselves why such people have to drive
without documentation etc. If this wasn't such a shit
country we wouldn't try and shut people out. And just
because someone's application has failed in doesn't mean
they don't have a legitimate claim.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-12 06:23 [#01069515]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



You are being arguementative and completely rediculous. The
fact of the matter is that the sentence is far too short.
Personally yes, I do beleive that the fact he committed this
crime whilst in the process of committing another he does
deserve more contempt, especially as he showed more concern
with his own well being in fleeing the scene than for the
person he ran over.

"If this wasn't such a shit
country we wouldn't try and shut people out"


Typical overly liberal stupid comment...I'm not even going
to start responding to this with reason because the very
fact you made it shows you don't know what the fuck you are
talking about.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-12 06:47 [#01069538]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"If this wasn't such a shit country we wouldn't try and
shut people out"


Oh come on! I thought better of you than to make a statement
like that Jonesy.

This country is shit because there's too many fucking drains
on it's resources.
Adding more is not an answer. It's a fucking mistake!



 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-02-12 10:58 [#01070016]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



my opinions on this subject are as follows:

the sentence is too light.
this man should not have been driving.
whether you are an illegal immigrant or not, it is against
the law to drive without the relevant documentation. it is
irrelevant to this argument how many bad drivers WITH
licences there are - that is a different matter entirely.
i'm not saying it shouldnt be sorted out (ie. re-test
drivers at various points in their lives) - but its not an
excuse for not having a license. that is a cop out. despite
the fact that it is far from perfect, the legal requirement
to have a license is there for a reason. primarily :
accountability. otherwise, ANYONE could get behind the wheel
of a car.
driving without a license is like playing russian roulette
with your life+the lives of others. it is an irresponsible
act, just as driving under the influence of alcohol is.
in my opinion, drunk drivers should have their license
removed permanently, with no reprieve. if they kill anyone
as a result of drink driving, it should not be treated as an
accident. jail sentences should apply
there is no excuse for driving over the limit. it is not an
accident, it is a selfish+stupid act. i realise that
drink-driving is not immediately relevant to this particualr
case, but the reason i bring it up is that (in my opinion)
driving without a license is tantamount to driving drunk :
there is no excuse. for whatever reason, you should NOT be
behind the wheel of a car.

as for him being an illegal immigrant - there seems to be a
typical knee-jerk reaction that any anti-immigrant
commentary is the direct result of xenophobia and/or
racism.
unfortunately, yes, a lot of people who support tougher
immigration laws carry some pretty strong racial prejudices
around with them.
i firmly distance myself from any racist. i believe that the
ethnic diversity present in the uk is one of the most
exciting things about the country. to me, the spectrum of
different races, religions & cultures present is a
fundamental part of being british.
the


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-02-12 11:28 [#01070045]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



there is no reason why future integration of immigrants into
the uk wont continue to benefit our already rich, textured
culture.
also, i feel genuine sympathy for anyone living in
intolerable conditions, anywhere in the world. i think its
perfectly understandable for them to want to get away from
oppression + make a life in a more affluent country.

BUT..

i also distance myself from misinformed liberals who seem to
think that britain is wealthy enough to operate an
'open-door' policy for immigrants.
if they were to do just a little research theyd realise
that, if the influx of immigrants continues as it has done
in the past, britain will be unable to provide even a basic
standard of living for its poorer citizens.
the margin is already too wide. there are too many
unemployed people, people in unacceptable living conditions,
homeless people etc.
its fairly obvious that too rapid a population increase will
only worsen these problems.
the way the country fails its current legal inhabitants
needs to be addressed soon.

immigration laws need a massive restructure - as theyre
proving largely ineffective..



 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-02-12 11:42 [#01070089]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker



but this too, is an aside from this particular case..
because the man concerned was an ILLEGAL immigrant. he
bypassed the laws that might have allowed him to gain legal
access to this country. i KNOW those laws are flawed.. but
theyre still laws. they should be addressed + reformed, not
ignored. otherwise you get to a point where anyone can
flaunt any law if it goes against what they want to do.
yes, reforming flawed laws is a long term process - but the
quick fix isn't always the best way of going about things.

illegal immigrants should not be in any country.. its a
simple as that really.
not just to protect the country's economy, its workforce
etc.. but also to protect the immigrants themselves.

my posts are getting too long + i have stuff to do, so i
wont go into it here (maybe we should start a new thread for
it) but i will point you in the direction of last week's
news story where the chinese immigrants died. in this
instance, its the spineless bastards who were employing them
who should be prosecuted.
this should never have happened.

nor should the death of that poor lad in this situation.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2004-02-12 12:35 [#01070190]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I agree totally and would have typed everything you typed if
I woasn't concerned about the risks of RSI :D


 

offline acrid milk hall from United Kingdom on 2004-02-12 16:56 [#01070596]
Points: 2916 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01070190



cheers!

it was worth it just for you to agree with me. :D

i'm suffering now, though..


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-13 00:56 [#01070977]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #01069538



Well my family entered this country as so-called economic
migrants, not even asylum seekers. Are we a drain on
resources? Or do we contribute to the economy by working?

People have been saying the same shit about immigrants since
the 19th century with the Irish. Then it was the Jews and so
on and so on.

We seem to have the resources to wage an illegal war (£200
million a month no less) but we can't afford to offer people
sanctuary from the very countries we bombed.



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-13 00:59 [#01070982]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to acrid milk hall: #01070045



We NEED immigration. Now more than ever. There is a
demographic timebomb in this country. We have an aging
population and not enough people working to pay for the
drooling grippers in their nursing homes.

The argument that there is only so much room and only so
many jobs is ridiculous. The more people working in a
country the richer we become. Ever heard of the post-war
boom and the Windrush?


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-13 02:09 [#01071021]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #01070982



Why is a lot of our production work moving to asia then?

I've got so many mates made redundant because it's cheaper
to employ in these other countries.

And I get fed up with UK buisness call center operators
based in different counties who sometimes don't understand
what I want.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-13 02:29 [#01071032]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chri5py: #01071021



This is exactly it. The elites fill our newspapers with crap
about the immigrants taking all the jobs while they move
jobs abroad. If capital can move borders why can't people?

But immigrant labour is needed to do a lot of the service
sector jobs that many people here won't do. Or the dangerous
work like the cockle-pickers in Morecambe.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-02-13 02:31 [#01071033]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Do you have minimum wage in the UK?


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-13 02:37 [#01071035]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01071033



yeah, zero


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-13 02:38 [#01071037]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #01071033



Yeah, workers over the age of 18 are paid £3.80 an hour,
while the over 21s receive £4.50. Because people deserve
more the older they get and people under 18 deserve fuck
all.



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-13 02:40 [#01071039]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



and then what happens in menial jobs is they will only
employ people under 21 because its cheaper for them to do so


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-02-13 02:40 [#01071042]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Haha.
Minimum wage is retarded,
there would be sooo many more jobs without one. I've never
actually worked for minimum wage myself, which shows that it
isn't necessary.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-13 02:43 [#01071044]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



i don't get out of bed for less than a grand


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-02-13 02:44 [#01071045]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



i spend a lot of time in bed


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-13 02:44 [#01071047]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #01071033



yea it does but I can't remember what it is.

I just hate the fact that if this guy had stopped the kid
might still be alive.
It upsets me that the man had to decide between the boys
life or his position in this country.

Hit and run acciedents, even ones that aren't fatal, are
completly irresponsible. Someone knocked me in my car once
and fucked off leaving me and my 3rd part F&F to fork out
£300


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-13 03:21 [#01071079]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



If I knocked someone down I'm not sure how I'd react. No one
can. I think people panic in many cases and just flee. And
this guy had more reason than most to panic.

I'm not trying to excuse hit n' runs, just understand.


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-13 04:25 [#01071114]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #01071079



That decision, whether he was panicing or not, is still
irresponsible.

I'd like to think that if people panic after hitting
someone, worst case they'll be frozen in their car, not
pissing off.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2004-02-13 04:32 [#01071119]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Chri5py: #01071114



But who knows until it happens to them? I'm not saying he
was right. Things just aren't as black and white and simple
as the tabloid-view of the world has it.

(Not that I believe you're a tab-head)


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-13 04:37 [#01071124]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #01071119



ha. I'd hate to be in that situation that's for sure.

I know that I wouldn't be able to forgive myself for driving
away, so I'd like to think I'd help... for all the good it'd
do for the kid with the state I'd be in.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-13 04:52 [#01071137]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #01070977 | Show recordbag



I have no problem with asylum seekers as long as they're
genuine. Entering the country and just expecting money to do
nothing not fine. If you enter and get a job then that's
great. You're contributing to society. I get pissed at those
that leech off society. Immigrant or not, they should be
dealt with. I should've expanded on my statement really. I
was talking about drains from withing this country. Adding
more was in reference to letting people in who have no
intention of earning money and just want to live off the
government. We have enough native people who do that.

The war we entered was something else we had fucking need to
do and it was a further waste of money. It's stupid shit
like that I hate. People voiced their opinions against it
yet the government ignored it and spent a shit load of money
anyway. What a fucking great way to run the country. We're
now having to re-build the countries we bombed at more cost
to the taxpayer. We're continually shelling out and getting
nothing for it.


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2004-02-13 05:16 [#01071153]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #01071137



yea. and people like that wife swap bitch becoming
recognisable as (UK) famous for being a slag pisses me off.

And all those gits who run out of money so they pop another
sprog. It gives people who honestly need benifit a shitty
name.

All those kids being brought into life for the soul purpose
of more cash fucks me off. No wonder I get harrased by 20 od
12 year olds when I come out of the gym.

That's a completely different arguement tho. soz.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-02-13 05:16 [#01071154]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to giginger: #01071137 | Show recordbag



My personal view is that we could deport one legitimate
resident "leech" for every immigrant willing to work that we
accept into the country.

I think the greatest argument for lowering taxes (across the
board) is that the government do have enough money
already. The fact we have so many layers of beauracracy and
can piss it away on things like the EU, the war etc. shows
we have plenty already, it's just the way they choose to
spend it. Michael Howard also has a point when he says high
taxes are in part to blame for the shortage of volunteers in
all sorts of organisations- if people are paying high taxes,
they feel they are already "doing their bit" for society and
they don't need to sacrafice their time as well. As an
aside, I think average travelling times to work also
contribute to this... a lot of people work 5 days a week,
but spend another working days worth of hours in traffic to
and from work. If people are out of the house for 11 hours
of the day, of course they're not going to be able to afford
the time to volunteer.


 


Messageboard index