bowling for columbine | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
Combo
Roger Wilco
steve mcqueen
...and 436 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614140
Today 12
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
bowling for columbine
 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:08 [#00685232]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00685215



yeah but actual poverty is lower here too... we have more
extensive welfare and other social services...

violent or not, there are fewer people living in poverty
here per capita anyway

when some new yorker said something like "well theres less
poverty in canada" he was like "ohh but the unemployment
rates twice as high!" as if he were trying to show that to
be a misconception, and it was definitely implying that its
not a factor in considering why murder rates are lower

it was misleading at worst, and simply irrelavent at best
imo

that was my impression anyway


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:10 [#00685237]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



...its not that i didn't like the movie.. i just thought it
was intellectually sloppy... like, if it were an essay being
marked by a teacher, there'd be red pen all over it with
comments like "unclear!" "what do you mean?" "what is your
point?" "youre contradicting yourself" etc

it was more thought provoking than informative... that may
have been his point


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:13 [#00685247]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Great movie.

But was he in the RIGHT CANADA? Very strange representation
of my country.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:14 [#00685249]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



it's a muddled point, i'll give you that.. i haven't seen
the movie in a few months so i can't say much more. and i
agree it's definitely not a formal documentary, he
sacrificed a lot of clarity for overall effect, which i
think is a good thing.. but he should write an essay or make
a dvd featurette to clear up things, because the facts are
on his side.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:29 [#00685286]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to Ophecks: #00685247



yeah... whats with all those people who leave their doors
unlocked???


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-05-05 15:30 [#00685290]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



whis all are that?

i saw him ask one person and try one door :)


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-05-05 15:31 [#00685293]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



which*


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:33 [#00685299]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



Give me a transcript of his tangent at the Grammys and I'll
point out why this guy's full of shit.


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-05-05 15:34 [#00685302]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to tolstoyed: #00685290



well i was half jojking.. but he did try more than one door,
and the ppl in the bar said they dont lock either


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:34 [#00685303]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00685286



They don't. All of that was prerehearsed.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-05-05 15:38 [#00685312]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



well, its kind of normal to keep doors unlocked where i
live...thats if people are at home

i think there were like two burglaries in 30 years in my
street
(i hope this doesnt sound like an invitation tho hehe)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:45 [#00685321]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cabbog: #00685303



oh yea? prove it was "prerehearsed."


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:49 [#00685331]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00685321



Give me a little while to find my source. In the meantime,
prove it wasn't.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-05-05 15:51 [#00685336]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



if nothing else that heston interview sounded pretty
serious...though he is an actor...


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 15:55 [#00685339]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cabbog: #00685331



i give him the benefit of the doubt. i also see a big
difference between telling someone what you're going to do
before you film them and "prerehearsing." it's being
considerate and appreciative, and it's not wasting time. if
he found research that said 15 out of 20 doors on your
average canadian block are left unlocked, he's not going to
walk up to 20 doors and film them all. not only would he
waste time on the 5 locked doors (which, you could argue,
should be included if it's that significant a number, but
then you would be taking the scene literally instead of
figuratively) it would also be rude to the residents to open
up their door and stick a camera in their face. he probably
did it for real off-camera, explained, asked permission, and
re-filmed. that's part of filmmaking, not deception.


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:10 [#00685355]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00685339



I'm definately not saying that there wasn't any truth to
Bowling for Columbine but the means by which Michael Moore
presented many of his points were downright dishonest and
misleading. He quoted misinformation numerous times and
even went as far as blatantly distorting media. Patronizing
his work because the overall message is semi-alligned with
your cause is a pretty petty thing to do.
Even for you.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:13 [#00685362]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cabbog: #00685355



you have no support for your claims that he's quoting
misinformation, being misleading or dishonest. i'm really
not going to debate this with you until you have some kind
of support for your ridiculous claims you obviously formed
after reading that republican propoganda piece of shit
"essay."


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:34 [#00685373]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



I'm pretty convinced that you voice your opinion solely for
the sake of hearing yourself talk.
This site unearths the truth from that "propoganda" piece of
shit 'Bowling for Columbine' :

http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html

I'll give it the benefit of the doubt.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:40 [#00685376]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



yes i know Cabbog, there was a thread about this a few weeks
ago. you and i both posted on it. it's a bullshit article
completely guilty of the distortion it claims of michael
moore.

i voice my opinion cos i want to... but i no longer want to
voice it on this topic until you make some solid points,
which you've yet to do. that article is not legitimate so if
that's your proof you should keep digging. i think you voice
YOUR opinion on this just cos you want to be contrary since
most people were impressed.


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2003-05-05 16:43 [#00685377]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



all this talk about opinions is making me a bit hungry


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 16:53 [#00685383]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00685376



"that article is not legitimate"

Prove it.
Michael Moore is a grotesquely overweight individual that
obviously cares nothing for his health or physical
appearance. If he doesn't care about his own welfare, why
should I believe he cares about that of anyone else? I
mean, can you imagine the effect that "documentary" had on
all the 13 year olds that went to see it?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-05-05 17:09 [#00685396]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cabbog: #00685383



i think it's pretty clear that america and the media it
feeds on is unhealthily fixated on fear and denial. i can
hardly believe you are convinced otherwise. it didn't take
the documentary to let me know that our culture is severely
diseased.


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-05-05 19:29 [#00685523]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



"i can hardly believe you are convinced otherwise"

Neither can I -- What did I say that lead you to believe
that?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-05-05 20:20 [#00685583]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



i thought you disagreed with moore's assertions... and that
was pretty key to the film


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-05-05 20:20 [#00685585]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



forinstance, you call the film propaganda


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-05-05 20:22 [#00685593]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



I live in Canada.. and hm I lock my doors and most people I
know lock their doors. It's kinda comon sense unless you
live in a small town or something.. maybe.


 

offline nacmat on 2003-08-05 18:51 [#00810721]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I saw it tonight

glad it has been done


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-08-05 18:52 [#00810724]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #00810721



yeah it's a nice film


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-08-05 23:29 [#00811050]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



while I think Capitalism is very beneficial to the overall
quality of life we experience, I do think it dredgs up the
worst in people, a la Michael Moore.

He's just doing what Fox news does, adds a provacative spin
to something that people think they need to see.

When I am king, he will be first against the wall.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-08-06 05:31 [#00811370]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00811050



forgive him father for he knows not what he does..

btw capitalism may be beneficial for (most of) us, but what
about 3rd world countries? do they matter to you at all?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-08-06 05:59 [#00811411]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Cabbog: #00685373 | Show recordbag



I have to say, that article is a lot more convincing than
Bowling for Columbine. It is presented in a far more
academic and straight manner. It provides links to back up
its points, I've found nothing to suggest any of the "facts"
it states are untrue.

When watching the film, I found it entertaining, but was
concerned over how seriously to consider it a documentary.
It was apparent to me (and I know very little about film)
that a lot of deceptive editing occured, this article simply
confirmed that for me and pointed out some that I hadn't
spotted.


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-08-06 06:54 [#00811485]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular



That article is nothing more than a right-wing nutcases'
ramblings. What's he got to be so defensive about? Is he
scared that Michael Moore is exposing the truth. the blatant
truth........


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-08-06 07:09 [#00811497]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular



...And i think what many cynical conspiracy theorists are
failing to realise is that Moore made this documentary(or
whatever you want to call it), not to distort facts, not to
win an Oscar, but to point out the awful and increasingly
worse problem of guns in America. That's the bottom line.
Guns kill lives, ruin families, promote disorder. Isn't what
moore pointing out commendable? Or will some of you claim he
is making it up?.........


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-08-06 07:13 [#00811499]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #00811497



nope, it's all fake. michael moore worked with both pixar
and george lucas to create this beautiful and magical work
of fiction.


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-06 07:18 [#00811503]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Cabbog: #00685383



Michael Moore is a grotesquely overweight individual that
obviously cares nothing for his health or physical
appearance. If he doesn't care about his own welfare, why
should I believe he cares about that of anyone else?


i haven't read such nonsense in a while

i agree with mc_303 on this


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-08-06 07:19 [#00811508]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



i love it when people try to talk about ralph nader or
michael moore without realizing or knowing anything about
their long history of works and/or accomplishments


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-06 07:23 [#00811514]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Morton: #00811503



i mean basically that's saying that because he's fat and
isn't bothered by it, he can never be a kind of person that
is concerned about innocent people being shot (by lunatics
who can get hold of guns very easily)

where do you come up with this?
it wasn't you by accident writing that article ey?

btw i agree with tits and a lot of others too on this matter


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-06 08:03 [#00811584]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Wholly fuck - titsworth and conformist should cool it. Shut
up or I'll shut you up!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-08-06 08:14 [#00811602]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00811584



i don't even remember conformist.. old thread dude


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-08-06 09:14 [#00811726]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



He's the guy that you fought with ;)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-08-06 09:15 [#00811729]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to catharsis: #00811726



oh THAT guy! man, that was legendary, the only guy i've ever
gotten into an argument with on here ;)


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-08-06 23:12 [#00812516]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



i liked it when the guy protesting marilyn manson goes
something like:
"not everyone who listens to manson's music is going to be
affected, but not everyone who sees a Lexus ad is going to
go buy a Lexus.. BUT A FEW DO!!"

..such idiocy..


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-08-06 23:23 [#00812522]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00811370



man, how does a third world country fit into this picture
any more than capitalism is doing as mcuh to help African
coutries as Mr. Moore is.

He knows damn well what he does, it's a wind up just like
those right wing asshats on television.

Michael Moore should be taken with a grain of salt just like
every other hollywood feature flick.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-08-07 05:36 [#00812691]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00812522



"forgive him father for he knows not what he does" was in
about what you were saying and talking about doing

i think everyone and everything should be taken with a grain
of salt, not at face value


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-08-07 09:48 [#00813059]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00812691



oh, then that was a cheeky and fun reply.

titsworth keeps 'em guessing.


 


Messageboard index