Bad art ? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
Combo
Roger Wilco
steve mcqueen
...and 424 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614140
Today 12
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
Bad art ?
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2004-10-08 04:09 [#01356674]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



What is "bad art" and how would you define it ?


 

offline aquagak from Berlin (Germany) on 2004-10-08 04:29 [#01356683]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular



here you go
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/37...


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-08 04:30 [#01356685]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Your avatar.


 

offline zkreso from Kr.sand (Norway) on 2004-10-08 04:31 [#01356687]
Points: 274 Status: Lurker



I can't define it with words, but show me a piece of art and
I will tell you if it is bad or not.


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-08 04:31 [#01356688]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



A man pissing into a cup of soot while making a noise like
"sssssssssss".


 

offline uzim on 2004-10-08 06:02 [#01356728]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



everyone's got their own definition of art, their own taste,
their own values... so you decide, it's all up to you.

i wouldn't call anything "bad art" nor "good art" anyway;
sometimes i say "bad music" or "good music" but i should say
"music i don't like" and "music i like" instead... same with
art, i like it or i don't like it but pretending that art
could be objectively "bad" or "good" would be just stupid
and even sound fascist to some ears.


 

offline uzim on 2004-10-08 06:03 [#01356729]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



(as far as i know, anything can be art as long as there is
someone to pretend it is and someone to believe it... or
even just someone to believe it...)


 

offline nacmat on 2004-10-08 07:36 [#01356774]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



bad art is not art


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2004-10-08 07:37 [#01356775]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



art that i don't like.


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-08 08:14 [#01356796]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



Country Wester music and the haircuts of its afficionadoes


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 08:25 [#01356800]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



My list of Bad Art:
Fantasy art
Fan art
Adolescent surrealism
People still doing Abstract expressionism 50 years too late
Digital Photography
Video installations
Photoshop



 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2004-10-08 08:26 [#01356801]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



Tribal logo art


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-10-08 08:27 [#01356803]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



kline is definately bad


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-10-08 08:27 [#01356804]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01356800



that's a bit general, isn't it?

I would say sadly most video installations are shit, but
there are a few good ones.

what do you mean when you say digital photography?


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 08:39 [#01356812]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



All digital photography, it's like music, now everyone can
make it easily it's become shit. Everyone's now a fucking
photographer... digital photos.... here's another anonymous
picture of some litter but just look at the resolution, it's
gone through the fucking roof!!!!

And ALL Video installations are vile, apart from the ones
that I have had any involvement with. I wish I had a copy of
the video we did in tribute to Bruce Nauman.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 08:43 [#01356817]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



the verb "to be" is incongruent with "badness." a more
accurate verb would be "to seem."

badness seems. this is clear when oneself is the
fundamental measure of "badness" and "goodness." anyone who
claims to determine "goodness" or "badness" based on
objective qualities is fooling themselves.

whenever you assert that "that painting is bad," you would
more accurately say "that painting seems bad."

after all, you really don't know much about what "is."


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-10-08 08:46 [#01356820]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to plaidzebra: #01356817



yeah, but I think most people grasp the idea that "good" and
"bad" are subjective terms, so I think we can manage.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-10-08 08:47 [#01356821]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01356812



Portrait of the Failed Artist As a Young Man..


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 08:51 [#01356826]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



more accurately, experiences and objects seem bad.

you're wrong, qrter. the majority of people think that
their reaction to things and experiences are features of the
things and experiences themselves. witness offense taken at
"offensive" language. people who argue that people who do
not like the music that they like are "stupid." take a look
around this very message board.

this delusion and its manifestations cause innumberable
problems for us human beings...



 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 08:52 [#01356828]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



you can manage qrter, but you speak only for qrter...

i'm sure you manage well...


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 08:59 [#01356837]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01356821 | Show recordbag



I was going to write a book along those lines, based on my
dispiritng experiences... I wrote about 20,000 very
sorrowful words on the subject in a thinly veiled
autobiographical sob fest.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-10-08 09:00 [#01356839]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01356837



nice. and a bit emberrassing, I bet.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 09:05 [#01356848]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01356839 | Show recordbag



Well I put a thick varnish of (attempts at) "humour" over
the chiaroscuro depictions of mortal dread and failure.


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-08 09:07 [#01356850]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



That is a very Clintonian excursion into semantics
plaidzebra.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 09:47 [#01356872]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to godataloss: #01356850



no one said it "seems good" to listen to what "seems bad."

society is borne of argument and agreement.

clintonian? that's a very large can of worms that as much as
i'd like i can't take the time to address. i'm sure you're
heartbroken.

but i'll agree that without a universal law, we're left to
argue endlessly about what "is" truth and what "are"
lies...



 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-08 10:02 [#01356877]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



The subjective nature of perception obviates any such
notions as truth or lies and only fools argue moot points,
but I still say country music sucks...

blue grass on the other hand...


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 10:48 [#01356909]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



i become physically ill in the presence of zydeco...


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2004-10-08 10:50 [#01356912]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



Any art that defies your criteria for good art. Simple.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 10:52 [#01356917]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



and yet nearly the whole world continues to argue those
subjects...

fools?

or maybe we are all students...

perhaps we should begin a "what is country music anyway?"
thread...

or just link to the discussion at xlcountry.com...

that means "excellent country music," btw...


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-08 11:05 [#01356923]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



I would rather gore out my eardrums with a rusty nail and
listen to the droning of my skull for all of eternity than
to listen to 5 minutes of country music.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2004-10-08 11:10 [#01356925]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



eternity is a long time...


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-10-08 11:13 [#01356927]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker



dog_belch at the end of the day you're mostly talking about
mediums, tools. we tend to forget that some humans can do
great stuff with some of the tools you mentioned...shame
over 90 per cent of folk use these tools to sound or be like
everyone else....once in a while people stand out.
regardless the tool, coz it's how you use it....oh shit now
i'm thinking about how it's true that a lot of modern tools
dictate a certain way of working, the process...
but then there's so many things you can do with a hammer....


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-10-08 11:14 [#01356929]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to hobbes: #01356927



lol, learn how to write!


 

offline godataloss from Cleveland (United States) on 2004-10-08 11:22 [#01356938]
Points: 1416 Status: Lurker



" ...at the end of the day...?"
heh. you write like my fat aunt speaks. I won't visit her
because she is too fat to fit into people clothes and smells
distinctly of urine.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-10-08 11:24 [#01356941]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



plaidzebra, you'rre wrrong.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-10-08 11:26 [#01356944]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



I wish I had yourr e-mail addrress, hobbes.


 

offline axion from planet rock (Sweden) on 2004-10-08 11:36 [#01356980]
Points: 3114 Status: Addict



anything picture that are similar to what the eye can see


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2004-10-08 11:53 [#01357018]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01356941



i've really grown fond of your pointed dismissals, anus.
maybe you'd like my email, then you could issue your casual
put-downs at more regular intervals...

anus replies : "no, i don't want yourr email."


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-10-08 14:07 [#01357206]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to godataloss: #01356938



so what was that you had to say? :) tosspot.

anus_presley: konlied/hotmail :)


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2004-10-08 14:22 [#01357219]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



hobbes, i added you to my MSN. i'm known as Charlotte. i
don't know if you use it orr not.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-10-08 14:29 [#01357233]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to Anus_Presley: #01357219



yeah i do, nice one.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-10-08 14:48 [#01357257]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict



As seems to be well-established by this Arty-Consensus
thread, i'm going to play devil's advocate and say that i
don't believe there's any such thing as bad art, just the
personal perception thing. If the "art" that someone makes
is congruent to yer own personal preferences, then by all
means go with it. Isn't that the postmodern
"viewer-artist-relationship" thing to say?

If i was more drunk, i might get all philosophical and rant
on about creativity being pointless, a pathetic shout into
that "Existential Void of GoffikNess", but i might realize
my own futility and go to bed all sad. Oh fine art study,
why do ye damn me so.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 15:35 [#01357325]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



HObbes, you're right, and I'm glad you thought about it all
a lot more than I did, which was, admittedly, hardly at all,
and I fell back on my knee jerk reaction (is that possible)
response when it comes to "Art". Having studied and
practised among artists for 5 or so years, I can say I've
never met anyone with anything, anything to say that
couldn't be written on the back of a fucking stamp rather
than creating an installation/12' canvas/24 hour slowed down
video piece.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-10-08 15:49 [#01357344]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to dog_belch: #01357325



Hahaha, indeed. Art colleges are 99% full of toss-rags.
Dudes who look very serious in knitted hats whilst copying
dali paintings in large-scale charcoal or girls with pink
hair who want to make Very Long Videos of themselves
masturbating over a copy of the bible.

Art college is rubbish, really.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 15:55 [#01357356]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01357344 | Show recordbag



Fuck, apart from the knitted hats it sounds like you were in
my year.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 15:57 [#01357363]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I guess the thing is, it's not all toss, but as you say, 99%
is a very near figure. And I guess that goes for lots of
other areas of life. It's just a shame that we're expected
to accept ALL ART as valid whihc just isn't true, and that
attitude obscures the really good stuff because one's too
busy "appreciating" all the shit work. Fuck the shit, is my
art manifesto.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-10-08 16:08 [#01357377]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to dog_belch: #01357363



Ohh, the shit, my friend, the SHIT. Anything can be art, and
it doesn't matter whether it's good or not. Are those
pink-haired girls saying Something Deep about, like, the
Role Of The Female, or perhaps the Palestinian Problem
(possibly through enlarged newspaper photographs with a
"statement" scrawled in lipstick)?

The college system rewards wank and good alike as long as
your tutor is stoned enough. I blame marcel duchamp.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-10-08 16:21 [#01357385]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01357377 | Show recordbag



Seriously, who better than Duchamp to have come up with such
an art wheeze as to foist upon future generations the notion
that anything is art. What an evil genius.


 

offline hobbes from age on 2004-10-08 16:31 [#01357394]
Points: 8168 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01357385



if that's you in the avatar, i can imagine your left arm
stretched out towards the keyboard, slowly typing. looks
like a cool t-shirt.


 

offline deepspace9mm from filth on 2004-10-08 16:32 [#01357396]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to dog_belch: #01357385



Oh, he KNEW what he was doing. It might've seemed "Krazy
Pseudo-Dada RevolooShon" at the time, but i'm sure he
intended to spawn the terrible devil-children of Scumbag
College in 80 or 90 years time.

Damn you and your evil "opening-up-what-art-can-be-about"
readymades, duchamp. Damn you all to hell. I'm preseving all
my fag-ends in wax right now, in the name of "Art". Don't
you know what you've DONE?


 


Messageboard index