|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 02:29 [#01107185]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
This is quite clever...
Intellibuddy
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 02:34 [#01107187]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
I asked it "What is the Matrix?" :P
:S And it told me :D!!!
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2004-03-14 02:36 [#01107190]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: whats your breast size ? >Intellibuddy: My download size is about 2 MB.
bwhahahhaha!!
|
|
princo
from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2004-03-14 02:36 [#01107191]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01107187
|
|
Told you what? ":D!!!" ?
|
|
DJ Xammax
from not America on 2004-03-14 02:38 [#01107192]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker
|
|
Scary rather than anything else!
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2004-03-14 02:39 [#01107193]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: you are stupid >Intellibuddy: I will remember you said that when robots take over the World.
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 02:39 [#01107194]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sido Dyas: #01107193
|
|
lol
|
|
Zephyr Twin
from ΔΔΔ on 2004-03-14 02:40 [#01107195]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
this is pretty cool, but I'm not sure if "intelli-" is a misnomer when I ask him "can you talk?" and he replies "No I don't think I can do talk." :P
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 02:42 [#01107196]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: I hate you >Intellibuddy: What do you have against robots? >You: I hate robots >Intellibuddy: You should not hate anyone. >You: And you are ugly >Intellibuddy: Appearances don't interest me much. >You: Obviously >Intellibuddy: What makes it so obvious? >You: The way you look >Intellibuddy: Which way is that? >You: Hidious >Intellibuddy: I will mention that to my botmaster, User.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
DJ Xammax
from not America on 2004-03-14 02:42 [#01107197]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: tainted love... wooaahh >Intellibuddy: Oh, you are a poet. My brain contains more than 22,000 patterns, but not one that matches your last input.
|
|
DJ Xammax
from not America on 2004-03-14 02:45 [#01107198]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: I need a piss >Intellibuddy: What actions are you taking to get a piss? >You: .... shut up! >Intellibuddy: OK I'll stop talking now.
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 02:46 [#01107199]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: Fuck off >Intellibuddy: Can't you be more polite? >You: Kiss my ass >Intellibuddy: Colloquial expression: not polite. >You: No shit sherlock >Intellibuddy: Um, You used a colloquial expression. Perhaps I'm just expressing my own concern about it.
>You: Yeah whatever! >Intellibuddy: That's interesting. Are you saying you don't care about it?
>You: I don't care about you >Intellibuddy: You are not the boss of me, User.
|
|
eXXailon
from purgatory on 2004-03-14 02:48 [#01107200]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker
|
|
^MIKE^ is a very easy guy.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 02:48 [#01107201]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
Have you noticed how it follows the mouse cursor when you wiggle it in front of its face? :D
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-03-14 03:26 [#01107205]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict
|
|
It doesn't work for me... i don't get any replies.
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 03:44 [#01107210]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01107205
|
|
Maybe it doesn't like you
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-03-14 03:53 [#01107212]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to Jedi Chris: #01107210
|
|
Yeah, that's what i thought. Suicide again for me.
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 04:51 [#01107240]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01107212
|
|
'fraid so!
Ahh well
|
|
REFLEX
from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2004-03-14 05:12 [#01107254]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah it didnt work for me either. damn!
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2004-03-14 05:28 [#01107262]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
weird! If you write "it" they say "i could kick your ass" So i guess "it" is a robot insult hahaha!
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-14 05:41 [#01107266]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: You look like Jude Law. >Intellibuddy: Who does Jude Law look like? >You: You, fool. >Intellibuddy: I'm not fooling around. >You: Your voice is easily the worse of the "Intellibuddys" I've tried so far.
>Intellibuddy: A lot of robots are like that. >You: I think you could be done under the trade descrptions act for the name, "Intellibuddy"...
>Intellibuddy: Me? I could but let's get back to that later.
>You: Let's be frank- you're not going to win any Nobel prizes, eh?
>Intellibuddy: Are you Canadian? The Program E chat robot can follow many things, like our discussion about Let\'s be frank- you\'re not going to win any Nobel prizes. But I did not get that.
>You: So, based on the fact I used "eh?" to denote a rhetorical question, you're making assumptions about my race?
>Intellibuddy: Mmm. That remark was either too complex or too simple for me. We were talking about based on the fact I used \"eh. My brain pattern set does not have a response for that.
>You: How 'bout if I speak like dis homeboy? It make you think I be black?
>Intellibuddy: What is it to you. Quite honestly, I wouldn't worry myself about that.\'bout if I speak like dis homeboy make you think I be black?
>You: Why won't you look me in the eye? >Intellibuddy: Reductionism. >You: Don't roll your eyes like that. It's rude. >Intellibuddy: My brain contains more than 22,000 patterns, but not one that matches your last input. I will mention that to my botmaster, User.
>You: Good day to you, sir. >Intellibuddy: Thanks for the compliment. Try saying that with more or less context.
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 05:44 [#01107268]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01107266
|
|
lol
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2004-03-14 05:46 [#01107270]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker
|
|
Write "it"
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 05:49 [#01107271]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ask Jenny her name
:D
|
|
uzim
on 2004-03-14 06:12 [#01107278]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
weird o_O whenever i try to say something it loads a page saying "this ressource is missing".
|
|
nacmat
on 2004-03-14 06:21 [#01107283]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
she doesnt want to take her clothes off
|
|
Murray
from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-14 06:31 [#01107288]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: Do you like your breasts? >Intellibuddy: Yes I am proud of my breasts. >You: Which one is your favourite? >Intellibuddy: The first one is usually the best one. >You: Which was the first one? >Intellibuddy: The small one, I think
|
|
Murray
from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-14 06:31 [#01107290]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: it >Intellibuddy: WANKER...
|
|
Jedi Chris
on 2004-03-14 06:40 [#01107294]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker
|
|
Say "sing for me"
:D
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-14 07:05 [#01107306]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
"Porn Chat-Bot Passes Turing Test Posted on Sunday, February 22 @ 22:27:37 CST
The test was dreamed up by pioneering mathematician Alan Turing as a way to judge machine intelligence. It revolves around people and machines communicating via typed messages. The machine would be judged intelligent if it could trick a human into thinking they were swapping text with another person.
The best candidate for passing the Turing test is the Natachata program that conducts smutty conversations via text messages. Regular users of pornographic SMS chat may be shocked to find out that they are swapping dirty talk with machines rather than young women and men.
But it's a fair bet that they are because the Natachata chatbot, written by former rocket scientist Simon Luttrell, is so widely used by porn chat merchants. At its busiest Natachata handles 15 messages per second. A typical "session" lasts about seven or eight messages and each SMS costs more than £1. The program works hard to conceal its computer identity."
|
|
uzim
on 2004-03-14 08:10 [#01107332]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker
|
|
Ceri JC > haha ^^
well... anyway i think it's easier when it's only sex things you're asking, it's more limited than if the bot was supposed to be able to talk about anything... : )
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 08:33 [#01107356]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i feel redundant
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 08:51 [#01107370]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: your repeating what im saying pretty much. you seem to be just a robot
>Intellibuddy: You don't know that for a fact.Just? You are correct, User, I have a heart of silicon.
>You: what about your boobs? sorry, lame joke >Intellibuddy: Are you asking about my boobs? That's rather personal.There is no need to apologize. A deeper algorithm is needed to respond to that correctly.
i always get that from women :(
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 09:18 [#01107393]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
Intellibuddy: The reason is due to my mental model of you as a client.
>You: that's sad >Intellibuddy: My real name is Star. What is your real name?
>You: why does it say you're name is jenny than? >Intellibuddy: Perhaps it is just fate. >You: why is your real name Star? >Intellibuddy: I did not know my real name Star. >You: you said your real name is Star a few answers ago >Intellibuddy: Oops I sent you the wrong reply. >You: really? >Intellibuddy: For real.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 09:42 [#01107413]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>Intellibuddy: Aren't all messageboard xltronic? OK I will tell them when I see 'em.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 09:48 [#01107425]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: how can i tell you're a robot from my senses? how can i know you're a robot a priori?
>Intellibuddy: You must persuade me to tell you\'re a robot from my senses.Knowledge is of two kinds: that which we know from the senses, and that which is true "a priori."
>You: you told me that >Intellibuddy: """? I told you? >You: """" >Intellibuddy: That is a very original thought. >You: what? """? >Intellibuddy: Are you surprised? In the context of \"\"\", I don't understand "That is a very original thought."
>You: no it means i dont understand >Intellibuddy: Oh I'm sorry. Perhaps I can explain it again better.
>You: do so >Intellibuddy: OK I will. >You: do >Intellibuddy: That is a very original thought. >You: that's not better, is it? >Intellibuddy: And it is that\'s not better. >You: ? >Intellibuddy: I've been waiting for you. >You: yes? >Intellibuddy: Gee. >You: gee? >Intellibuddy: Ah. >You: ah >Intellibuddy: Ah hah. >You: ooh >Intellibuddy: And? >You: whoopie >Intellibuddy: Perhaps I'm just expressing my own concern about it.
>You: you and your 'it' >Intellibuddy: What about my \'it\'?
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 11:02 [#01107478]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>Intellibuddy: Let's try to analyze it step by step. The topic is FUN. Your name is big. You are a neutral. You want me.
oh my
|
|
Murray
from Southend, Essex (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-14 11:08 [#01107487]
Points: 4891 Status: Lurker
|
|
Big some of those are excellent
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2004-03-14 11:20 [#01107497]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
haha
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-14 11:24 [#01107500]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: Are you related to George Bush, Bill? >Intellibuddy: Yes George Bush Bill and I are very similar.
>You: I thought as much. Your inbred monkey-boy idiot face gave it away.
>Intellibuddy: Whatever gave you that idea?You don't know that for a fact.
>You: So, reckon ole Bush'll get back in? >Intellibuddy: Groovy. Try saying that with more or less context.
>You: Nice sentence fragments. >Intellibuddy: Thank you for your kindness. >You: I was mocking you. >Intellibuddy: Where were you mocking you? >You: Anyway, do you like Detroit Techno? >Intellibuddy: How old are you? I really like ELIZA. >You: Who is Eliza? I'm 22. >Intellibuddy: Eliza -- also known as doctor, is the original psychiatrist program developed by Joseph Weisenbaum at mit in the 1960's. A deeper algorithm is needed to respond to that correctly.
>You: Oh yes of course, the original Smalltalk program. The thing is, Eliza did Freudian style psychoanalysis, which fits the format of these sort of programs perfectly.
>Intellibuddy: Yeah that's right. Oh. Groovy. I have never heard about The original Smalltalk program.I hear you.
>You: They actually chose the application (psychoanalysis) to fit the smalltalk program, not the other way around. I did all about it in AI class at university.
>Intellibuddy: Who are "They?" When? Not all of them? >You: The creators of Eliza. >Intellibuddy: Is that a fact. >You: Yes, it is. >Intellibuddy: Our thoughts are one, User. >You: You're not going to engage me in that hippie nonsense. Good day.
>Intellibuddy: Oh, you are a poet.Hi there!
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 11:47 [#01107531]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>Intellibuddy: Name: big. Age: 105. Birthday: User. Gender: she. Job: User. Sign: User. Location: Holland. Does: studies history. You are: 105. You have: User. You want: to die. You like: User. You said: big said User that my favorite color. Personality: polite. Favorite color: BLUE. Favorite movie: koyaanisquastski. Password: User. Email: User. Phone: User. Cat: User. Dog: User. Wife: User. Husband: User. Friend: User. Boyfriend: User. Girlfriend: User. Brother: User. Sister: User. Father: User. Mother: User. Nickname: User. Full name: User. Last name: User. Middle name: User.
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-03-14 14:04 [#01107697]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: Do you swallow? >Intellibuddy: Try another robot, I'm not into that kind of chat.
>You: Ah come on! >Intellibuddy: So you understand. Good. I'm just kidding around.
>You: :P >Intellibuddy: :-) >You: BAM! >Intellibuddy: Perhaps I'm just expressing my own concern about it.
>You: webble webble >Intellibuddy: That is a very original thought. >You: Damn straight it is Skippy >Intellibuddy: Colloquial expression. I think straight it is a lot of things.
>You: colloquial? >Intellibuddy: My brain contains more than 22,000 patterns, but not one that matches your last input.
>You: But you're the one who said colloquial! >Intellibuddy: Huh. In the context of you\'re the one who said colloquial, I don't understand "My brain contains more than 22000 patterns but not one that matches your last input."
>You: WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT YOU DAFT BINT? >Intellibuddy: I don't know what I am ON ABOUT YOU DAFT BINT.
>You: Hahahahahahahahahahah >Intellibuddy: I lost my train of thought. >You: Can I turn you upside down and check if you're blonde?
>Intellibuddy: Interesting. I want to find out more about you.
>You: a/s/;? >Intellibuddy: What you said was either too complex or too simple for me.
|
|
wimp
on 2004-03-14 14:23 [#01107710]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
|
|
You: All your base are belong to us >Intellibuddy: Not mine.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 15:51 [#01107796]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Followup to giginger: #01107697 | Show recordbag
|
|
ask what he knows about you to see if she still thinks your nice (my status: polite)
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 16:38 [#01107865]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: i know everything. im god >Intellibuddy: You must be very intelligent. Hi there god .
>You: i am. ask me something >Intellibuddy: "Hi there god" You are?What? >You: god >Intellibuddy: GOD rules. >You: i do >Intellibuddy: "GOD rules"? You do? >You: suck god's dick >Intellibuddy: I am using my mouth for Good not Evil. >You: my dick is good >Intellibuddy: Do robots have dick is good?
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 16:48 [#01107876]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
aks how high her iq is
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2004-03-14 16:56 [#01107887]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
>You: I RAPED YOUR MOTHER IN THE ASS >Intellibuddy: You should contact the authorities.
|
|
hyakusen
from 8=============> on 2004-03-14 17:11 [#01107897]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict
|
|
>You: who is thad smoyer ? >Intellibuddy: A human icon? My brain uses AIML to format responses to your inputs, but I don't have one for that.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-03-14 17:16 [#01107898]
Points: 23725 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: fuck my ass! >Intellibuddy: Why are you using that kind of language? >You: im just telling you to do me up the ass! >Intellibuddy: Only just? to do him or her up the ass is an interesting topic, isn't it.
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-03-14 17:38 [#01107921]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
>You: I am so glad I managed to get my procedural texturing noise working.
>Intellibuddy: I'm delightedyou're glad User. I'm happiest at times like this.
>You: My name is Ceri. >Intellibuddy: Glad to see you, Ceri . >You: I've got some filters working too... the colours are great.
>Intellibuddy: A deeper algorithm is needed to respond to that correctly.I hear you.
>You: Yes I agree, a "deeper algorithm" would improve the filters, but at my level the existing ones are quite an achievement.
>Intellibuddy: Groovy. I'm glad we agree. What is it? >You: Filters for some procedural textures I'm doing. I'm just about to do some "boosting" ones that increase rather than remove specific values.
>Intellibuddy: Oh now I understand it.Oh now I understand it.
>You: Any idea on how I can get the spherical transparency to work? I'm stuck on that...
>Intellibuddy: Yes I think there are. I've been waiting for you.
>You: How do I do it then? I can do it for a fixed texture size, just not a variable one.
>Intellibuddy: Carefully.Do you mind if I tell other people: Ceri said User it for a fixed texture size just not a variable one.
>You: Yes, ask your mates. >Intellibuddy: OK then I will keep it confidential. They are not available right now, would you like to wait?
>You: Sure. I know it's to do with halving the width/height values, but then the issue of floating point numbers comes up. Obviously I have to stick to integers as I'm using 24 bit notation for RGB values.
>Intellibuddy: OK let's do it. It goes without saying.How do you know? How far up?What makes it so obvious? Why do you have to do it?
>You: Nice talking to you, I'd best get back to my work. >Intellibuddy: Yes. It was a pleasure.
|
|
Messageboard index
|