fucked by copyright | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 401 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613454
Today 7
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
fucked by copyright
 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 15:09 [#02450943]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



just got this charming notice on soundcloud that one of my
tracks has been pulled for illegal samples. this rather
pisses me off, as the song did not have any samples
whatsoever (with the exception of the drum waveforms baked
into a yamaha dx200).

i have to fill out this form with my real address and check
all sorts of scary boxes saying they can "serve" me if i'm
lying just so some scumbag company can't claim my shit as
theirs.

worst part is that the track they're accusing me of sampling
is some horrid dubstep crap that's pretty much the
antithesis of what i do.

anyone else had to deal with this?


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-05 15:37 [#02450948]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



I had a think on this and here is my hypothesis:

There is technology out there by the echo nest which can
analyze music. I would bet that soundcloud tries to preempt
pirating by analyzing all uploaded songs. My gut tells me
your song was found to be too closely related or maybe even
matched (whatever abstract form of a song comes out the
other side of the algo) some shitty dubstep song.

Just an idea that is LOL if true....


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 15:43 [#02450950]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



good thinks. maybe one day you'll understand more than
picking peanuts out of poo

irony is, i've sampled TV and movies all over the place, and
none of them have ever been flagged. the flagged track is
ariel off the ariel EP. it's been on
soundcloud for two years without a problem....


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-05 15:50 [#02450952]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



Yeah, I wasn't talking about film and TV samples that nobody
cares about. I'm talking more about pirating music that's
popular right now.



 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2013-03-05 15:53 [#02450953]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



My understanding is that Soundcloud's content match system
looks and the first 30 seconds or so and tries to match it
up to the signatures of copyrighted music. If it matches,
the song gets taken down. A human doesn't listen to the song
until you contest their claim.

It looks like your song fired off a false-positive. I
wouldn't get too upset about it. Soundcloud has to protect
themselves, since they could be shut down if they were
hosting a bunch of copyrighted content. This has happened to
me before (YouTube has a similar system). I'd fill out the
form and I'm sure when they can get around to it they'll say
sorry and put the song back up.

Have you tried to use something like Shazam to see if the
song erroneously matches something else?


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-05 15:53 [#02450954]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



irony is, you made a song that fooled an algo into thinking
it's popular music and yet your music is not popular. Or
music.



 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-05 15:55 [#02450955]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



That's exactly what I was suggesting, Pomme...but don't let
him hear that or he'll critique your intellect.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2013-03-05 15:59 [#02450957]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to listen2meTalk: #02450955 | Show recordbag



Aye, sat here with the window open and didn't see your
response. You're absolutely right. I do have it on good
authority that they only scan the first 30 seconds of a
track.


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 16:28 [#02450959]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular | Followup to pomme de terre: #02450953



don't give a shit that soundcloud has to protect itself; i'm
paying the fuckers 79euro a year. if they're going to put
the burden of filing copyright claims on me i'll just host
mp3s on my website, for no additional cost. i like the
social aspect, the comments 'n' embedded players etc. but
this crap along with the new interface has me leaning
towards not renewing my subscription next time 'round.

put simply: i don't care if they have a computer match it
up, but they should have a human listen to it before pulling
my track.


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2013-03-05 16:33 [#02450960]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



What's their stand on "dj sets" then, has that changed? A
friend today had one of theirs pulled as it had David Essex
in ti (...)


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 16:44 [#02450961]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



probably against site policy etc. but they're lax on
enforcing it, and only a few get pulled.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2013-03-05 17:24 [#02450964]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to EpicMegatrax: #02450943 | Show recordbag



Fucking evil shit. Sorry you're being put through this
deeply humiliating shit :(


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2013-03-05 17:31 [#02450966]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to EpicMegatrax: #02450959 | Show recordbag



I agree; human ear (not even a muso) manually comparing the
computer's (potential) false positive with the track on
their site should be a service you can expect if
you're using the paid for service.


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 17:31 [#02450967]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



not really humiliating, but it does make me mad. big content
has been harassing people over using p2p for years; pulling
youtube videos with someone's kid dancing to the radio....
and now i'm getting harassed over shit that's 100% mine, on
a service i pay money to use. not content with stepping on
toes, they want to stomp on some feet i guess


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2013-03-05 17:45 [#02450968]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to EpicMegatrax: #02450967 | Show recordbag



any way to get compensation for such unjust behaviour?


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 18:02 [#02450969]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



best i can do is complain about it and warn others that
they're doing this crap.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2013-03-05 18:59 [#02450975]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02450960



I wonder why Mixlr can still be connected to Soundcloud for
exporting mix recordings..


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2013-03-05 19:03 [#02450976]
Points: 7538 Status: Lurker



Can we hear the song?


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 19:14 [#02450977]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



i posted my track earlier. or do you mean the track it
claimed i sampled? here's that. must be a laughably shit
algorithm to match those two up.... durrrr, let's take the
centroid, that's some advanced maths shit


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2013-03-05 19:23 [#02450978]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



soundcloud is probably more strict on dj mixes since
mixcloud exists and they figure you should just use that,
but i've never had a problem myself.


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 19:24 [#02450979]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



i think the two-hour limit on free accounts does a pretty
good job on discouraging mixes without any additional help.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2013-03-05 19:24 [#02450980]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



love your comment on that track


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 19:25 [#02450981]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



lost count of the spam comments from artists like this that
i've deleted. in this futile, puerile gesture, karma has me
covered.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2013-03-05 19:54 [#02450982]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



i like that idea, swap the "[0:30]hey this is cool, check my
tracks!" with "this track is apocalyptically poo" on their
tracks.


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-05 20:02 [#02450984]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



i did that a couple times, back when -- left a return
comment calling their track poo -- then blocked the dudes
right after. one of them got real mad and went over to my
youtube channel to start spewing hate, since he couldn't
reply on soundcloud. i have to say it was kind of
satisfying, but once i'd had a laugh i decided to just stop
replying to 'em, 'cos it's like adam sandler's "piece of
shit car": only funny the first time 'round


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2013-03-05 20:56 [#02450993]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02450960 | Show recordbag



Yes, they treat DJ mixes just like single tracks, but I
believe they're only scanning the first 30 seconds, so there
are ways around it. I've had some taken down and some that
have stayed, but technically shouldn't have.

I think mixcloud is the most popular alternative for hosting
mixes but it doesn't have the bells and whistles that
soundcloud has.


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-05 21:15 [#02450995]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



Why do you pay soundcloud money, EpicMegaFarts?


 

offline Haft from Tublin (Ireland) on 2013-03-06 00:11 [#02451008]
Points: 884 Status: Lurker



Pretty shyte for these kind of cases, but algorithmic
methods are the only way of processing the amount of data
SoundCloud deal with. They are however a bunch of clueless
cunts as a company, as advertised by their horrific site
design and buttslave subservience to FaceWipe, and I'd
expect no less than cold disregard as a standard of customer
service from them, if you do/have complained.

On the plus side, I got a good laugh out of DJ Radius'
comment on the track you ripped off: "Love that part... One
of my fav"


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-06 01:46 [#02451017]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



shazam is amazing, to me. IDs stuff from a phone held up to
distorted pub speakers with people yelling over a mobile
voice connection... genuinely impressive.

consequently, i don't think soundcloud's detection has
anything to do with shazam or echo nest, both of whom seem
miles more accurate. i suspect soundcloud has developed
their own crappy, in-house software, and the more
copyrighted songs they add to it, the more false positives
it's gonna throw off.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2013-03-06 02:17 [#02451022]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



Bandcamp seems to have compiled their site well. I'd
recommend it over any other, for any musician. Otherwise,
pressing some vinyl or mixing a cassette is always a fun
reminiscable route.


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2013-03-06 03:37 [#02451027]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I had a video of mine on YouTube blocked cuz some electronic
label claimed copyright to the music. But of course, this
was done by some program. The funny thing is that it was
just me BEATBOXING. So thank you program, for thinking my
mouth beats are legit?


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-03-06 03:42 [#02451028]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



i actually spent a semester working on this in uni... or,
well, something similar: trying to ID the genre of an audio
recording by computer. the math got beyond me very quickly,
and about all i got out of it was an easy A and an
appreciation for how goddamn hard this shit is. to reliably
ID any piece of music without human ears is, to say the
least, non-trivial.


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-06 18:19 [#02451041]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



"an appreciation for how goddamn hard this shit is. to
reliably
ID any piece of music without human ears is, to say the
least, non-trivial."

Good. Now that that's settled, shut the fuck up about it.

You never did answer me though: why do you actually PAY
soundcloud? (lol)


 

offline drill rods from 6AM-8PM NO PARKING (Canada) on 2013-03-06 20:01 [#02451042]
Points: 1171 Status: Regular



That's really lame. I can see some dumb piece of software
getting fooled by 808 kicks and snares and considering them
to be illegal samples because it found them in published
music elsewhere.
Just upload the song again with a different name?


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2013-03-07 06:19 [#02451054]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



p.s. To anyone wanting more SC time/space, just make
multiple accounts and link them. But I suppose if you have
25 hours of shit, maybe it's worth it.

p.p.s. Nevermind.

p.p.s. Neverending Story Part IV Arcade Edition


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2013-03-07 09:19 [#02451060]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Haft: #02451008 | Show recordbag



buttslave subservience to FaceWipe = most likely to be
bought out as the official FaceWipe 'Music Service', to
ultimately be rolled into the behemoth = big money, big
prizes


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-03-07 22:53 [#02451127]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



Dude, FB is circling the drain regardless of what they buy
;)

"p.p.s. Neverending Story Part IV Arcade Edition"

lol


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-04-10 09:29 [#02453639]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



months later, the track is still "under dispute." whatever.
i just deleted it. the song is available 320 mp3 on the
riced out records site so why bother fighting it on
soundclod


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-04-10 09:30 [#02453640]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



p.s. i hope i didn't waive my rights to the track by
deleting it


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2013-04-10 11:24 [#02453647]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Followup to EpicMegatrax: #02453639 | Show recordbag



My balls are pretty riced out. I got cardboard spoiler
action on my left ball, so it looks so fly, mate.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2013-04-10 11:49 [#02453651]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i hate copyright. i want to make all my music in the future
free to download and use for whatever purposes (being given
credit would be preferable :P)


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2013-04-10 14:32 [#02453656]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #02453651



Creative Commons has got you covered! That's how I release
all my music already (altho because of all the samples I'm
prolly not technically allowed to).


 

offline listen2meTalk on 2013-04-10 19:50 [#02453673]
Points: 575 Status: Addict



EpicMegaFarts:

Have you paused to consider that you were in fact "fucked by
genetics?" I know life is hard on you and you've developed
emotional distortions as a result, but have you considered
that maybe it isn't all your fault?


 

offline Geoffrey Mills on 2013-04-11 00:59 [#02453714]
Points: 498 Status: Regular | Followup to listen2meTalk: #02453673



congratulations on taking paul daniels' crown for the past
30 years as tosspot by royal appointment. now go back to
your yamaha demo keyboard sounding music and perhaps leave
the internet alone for the next 50 years until you become so
physically weak you can't even type.


 

offline wavephace from off the chain on 2013-04-11 01:17 [#02453722]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker



the same thign happened 2 me on you tube, its wack


 

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2013-04-11 01:25 [#02453723]
Points: 25264 Status: Regular



spoiler adds like 10hp to semen production alone.


 


Messageboard index