|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2009-01-06 04:38 [#02262510]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
I watched it last night, and it was really good. a bit hard to watch at times, especially the scene in the wardrobe after the first match, and the broken relationship with his daughter.
There are also some really good directional moves which draws parallells to wrestling stardom, and the reality of life.
Mickey Rourke is nothing but fantastic in "The Wrestler", and has resurrected like his character in the film. His portrayal of a broken, beaten down soul is Oscar-worthy
9/10
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-06 04:51 [#02262512]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
9/10 from me too. It's beyond great.
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2009-01-06 05:01 [#02262515]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker
|
|
thanks, ill be watching this soon.
|
|
Indeksical
from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-06 05:06 [#02262518]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to cuntychuck: #02262515 | Show recordbag
|
|
You'd better be sunshine...
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2009-01-06 05:08 [#02262519]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to Indeksical: #02262518
|
|
*blushes*
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2009-01-06 08:41 [#02262592]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
wow, i didn't even know of this movie.
|
|
Tractern
from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-06 11:17 [#02262648]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
Shouldn't this be in the Movies You've Seen thread?
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2009-01-06 12:26 [#02262662]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
just got this, been meaning to watch it.
|
|
Phresch
from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2009-01-06 14:28 [#02262688]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02262648 | Show recordbag
|
|
no, it's special.
|
|
steve
from chicago on 2009-01-06 14:32 [#02262689]
Points: 1156 Status: Lurker
|
|
I didn't really enjoy watching it because it was filled with elements I try to avoid in everyday life, such as 80s metal, wrestling, trailer park dwellers, ugly men, trashy women with kids, and emotional girls with daddy issues. Nevertheless, it was a well made film, probably a 4/5, even though I didn't like it.
|
|
oyvinto
on 2009-01-06 14:55 [#02262694]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to steve: #02262689 | Show recordbag
|
|
you try to avoid it because that's what you are, innit?
|
|
rudster
from the glasgow on 2009-01-06 15:37 [#02262706]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker
|
|
excellent film
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2009-01-06 16:02 [#02262709]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I'm looking forward to seeing it, looks like the Jake the Snake portion from Beyond the Mat. Right down to the daughter thing.
|
|
RussellDust
on 2009-01-06 17:31 [#02262724]
Points: 16078 Status: Regular
|
|
Sounds like he's actually made a good movie!
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2009-01-06 19:22 [#02262736]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict
|
|
pi and requiem are good the fountain lost me, tried it 3 times
|
|
b6662966
from ? on 2009-01-06 21:00 [#02262749]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker
|
|
Excellent performance from Mickey Rourke, but pretty average film overall. The second half of the film seems hurried, specifically the relationship with his daughter which almost seemed like an afterthought in the way and speed in that it was handled.
|
|
oxygenfad
from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2009-01-07 04:58 [#02262796]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular
|
|
Marisa Tomei is so hot in that movie ! It's cool that CZW is in it ! The hardcore match is against a real wrestler, just youtube CZW it's really over the top.
|
|
MASUGNEN
from Lund (Sweden) on 2009-01-09 11:23 [#02263410]
Points: 836 Status: Lurker
|
|
Aronofsky is great. I even liked The Fountain, in fact adored its pulse and computer game aesthetics. I look forward to this one.
|
|
jules
from United States on 2009-01-09 12:28 [#02263426]
Points: 754 Status: Lurker
|
|
I loved the fountain. i liked it more than pi actually. i just cant get over how he did the special effects in space. its all super microscopic photography of chemical reactions, not just cg crap, but actual photography.
|
|
rudster
from the glasgow on 2009-01-09 13:13 [#02263439]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker
|
|
rourke is set to play a super villain in iron man 2
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2009-01-09 13:58 [#02263444]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
I'm looking forward to seeing this, actually! I have a love-hate relationship to this guy's movies, but mostly love. :)
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-09 15:55 [#02263466]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to jules: #02263426 | Show recordbag
|
|
fountain is brilliant, looking forward to this!
|
|
rudster
from the glasgow on 2009-01-09 15:56 [#02263467]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker
|
|
didnt like the fountain, everything else is great but the fountain i just didnt get
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-17 15:10 [#02265485]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
just seen the wrestler, wow...
i'm speechless, one of THE acting performances of the decade
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2009-01-17 15:17 [#02265487]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
seeing this tomorrow :)
|
|
thatne
from United States on 2009-01-17 17:57 [#02265531]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker
|
|
this movie was shit and so was rourke, everyone needs to get the bozack
|
|
beneboi
from WATMM on 2009-01-17 18:01 [#02265538]
Points: 53 Status: Addict
|
|
shut up that one, the movie was good and you know it
|
|
thatne
from United States on 2009-01-17 18:55 [#02265566]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker
|
|
well *i* didn't like it
|
|
recycle
from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2009-01-17 19:56 [#02265585]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict
|
|
kick ass on watmm young padme
|
|
oyvinto
on 2009-01-17 20:18 [#02265593]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Followup to steve: #02262689 | Show recordbag
|
|
now i see what you mean.. i didn't like the film very much either. close to shit. but rourke did a good effort.
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-18 03:38 [#02265694]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to thatne: #02265531 | Show recordbag
|
|
ha, there is always one
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2009-01-19 14:23 [#02266233]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular
|
|
Not a bad movie. Didn't like the scripted dialogue though, nor the cinematography. The movie itself was pretty good, despite these problems.
Reminded me, surprisingly enough, more of Kim Ki-Duk or Clint Eastwood than any of the previous Aronofskies.
8/10
|
|
big
from lsg on 2009-02-22 06:59 [#02274197]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
8/10
saw it yesterday
it just could have been better
i like it because that whole american wrestling thing is pretty special.
i can't really go into rourke because then i have to think about how the movie could have been better. the movie shows his life sucks, but the things they use to show that aren't too original: his daughter doesn't like him, he lives in a trailer park and stuff.
i did like marisa tomei's part, it wasn't too original either but good nonetheless, i think. she made him say my favorite line of the movie: 'The only place I get hurt is out there.'
special mention goes to the supermarket boss, 'no, your special' made me laugh. and the whole part was realistic
|
|
big
from lsg on 2009-02-22 07:02 [#02274198]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
i'm a professional wrestler too, so i know what i'm talking about
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2009-02-22 07:37 [#02274200]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular
|
|
as a film it was ok. as an Aronofsky film, i was disappointed :(
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-02-22 08:11 [#02274203]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
i can't believe its not nominated for best film this year, its better than any of the nominations
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-02-22 08:12 [#02274204]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #02274200 | Show recordbag
|
|
strange, i thought it was the best film he has made, his other films are good in parts but this one is the only one where he get it all right imo.
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2009-02-22 08:55 [#02274208]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular
|
|
ive always had a sensation of emptyness with aronofsky's films,
lots of artifact, style experimentation, and even beauty, but like they lack something inside... i hope this one will be more introspective and calm and well etc
|
|
big
from lsg on 2009-02-22 09:04 [#02274211]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to melack: #02274208 | Show recordbag
|
|
i agree, and i guess it's the same with this movie. he does not know human emotion
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2009-02-22 09:06 [#02274212]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #02274211
|
|
oh shit...
i think ill go to watch it anyway, his films never left me unsatisfied after all... still good films
|
|
big
from lsg on 2009-02-22 09:09 [#02274213]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to melack: #02274212 | Show recordbag
|
|
yea, you'll like this. it's hardly a aronofsky film except for the fact just discussed
|
|
melack
from barcielwave on 2009-02-22 09:57 [#02274214]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #02274213
|
|
nice!
|
|
tragedy
from Gloucester (United States) on 2009-02-22 12:18 [#02274238]
Points: 4423 Status: Lurker
|
|
i love the grittiness of it.
|
|
BoxBob-K23
from Finland on 2009-02-22 14:58 [#02274271]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #02274200
|
|
yea, it just doesn't feel like aronofsky, except for the typical soullessness and hollowness. wow, that sounds horrible... but it's still a pretty good movie. But no MTV-style editing or computer special effects?? It's just not an Aronofsky film.
|
|
Samuel L Jigsaw
from swine flu central on 2009-02-22 15:00 [#02274273]
Points: 345 Status: Regular
|
|
Pitiful.
|
|
catfood03
on 2009-02-22 18:05 [#02274309]
Points: 1088 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #02274204
|
|
Didn't you complain about Milk having it's own thread?
"there is a thread 'rate the films you see' for film reviews"
|
|
oscillik
from the fires of orc on 2009-02-22 19:56 [#02274317]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to catfood03: #02274309
|
|
didn't you complain about someone complaining about a film having it's own thread?
Didn't you complain about Milk having it's own thread?
"there is a thread 'rate the films you see' for film reviews"
|
|
catfood03
on 2009-02-22 20:28 [#02274320]
Points: 1088 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #02274317
|
|
i honestly don't remember making such a statement
|
|
dariusgriffin
from cool on 2009-02-23 04:39 [#02274344]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular
|
|
it sounds like any american film about some guy
|
|
mohamed
from the turtle business on 2009-02-23 12:34 [#02274426]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
is this any good?
|
|
Messageboard index
|