The Dark Tower: The Movie. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 257 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
The Dark Tower: The Movie.
 

offline x0hx from Lysdexia (United States) on 2007-08-28 17:10 [#02115472]
Points: 1318 Status: Regular



Confirmed.
here


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-08-28 19:57 [#02115517]
Points: 4910 Status: Lurker



you are stealing my thunder.


 

offline optimus prime on 2007-08-28 20:09 [#02115520]
Points: 6447 Status: Lurker



.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2007-08-29 10:00 [#02115696]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



I can't help but think that I will be dissapointed. I loved
the book (Drawing of the Three was my fav.)


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-08-29 13:09 [#02115800]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker



Book VII was rubbish. Stephen King is a troll-faced hack. He
is a poor writer who has the occasional good idea. Which he
then bludgeons to death.

Still, another Stephen King film! There's only been
about 75 of 'em so far, and they've all been so
good!


 

offline retape from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2007-08-29 13:19 [#02115803]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker



secret window was kinda decent imo.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-08-29 15:48 [#02115831]
Points: 4910 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #02115800



Troll-faced hack, haha.

I loved book 7 though. I can see why people had problems
with it, but I was very pleased with the way it ended.


 

offline x0hx from Lysdexia (United States) on 2007-08-29 17:38 [#02115872]
Points: 1318 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #02115800



You got any books out?
Any movies?
...


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-08-30 00:06 [#02115950]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to x0hx: #02115872



What's that got to do with it? Does being published grant
you immunity from criticism or signify that your effluence
is pristine and golden? i think not.


 

offline xkejjer from Malta on 2007-08-30 01:26 [#02115956]
Points: 274 Status: Lurker



there have been countless crap stephen king book to film
adaptations.. which is a pity, because at his best, king is
a fucking great writer..

but there have been great films as well..

stand by me
the green mile
shawshank
the shining
carrie (probably my favourite)
misery
the dead zone (not great, but passable)
salem's lot (ditto)

er.. that's it?


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2007-08-30 01:30 [#02115957]
Points: 4910 Status: Lurker



*spoilers*

If I was turning the Dark Tower into movies, I'd make it a
trilogy, editing out all of the stuff where Stephen King
writes himself into the story (I actually LOVED that in the
book, but it wouldnt work on film), and I would ditch most
of Song Of Susanna, as much as I loved that part of the
story too.

I would probably open the movie with Tull... with the Man In
Black riding into town under the sickly yellow sky, and
follow with Roland's amazing shootout where he kills the
entire town. From there I'd progress to the Waystation where
he meets Jake,
and then have him Draw out Eddie And Susanna.

I would probably devote the entire second movie to his
backstory as told in Wizard And Glass (it's sort of
important that we already know Eddie and Susanna before
Roland tells this tale), then for the third movie I'd sort
of squash together Wolves and the Calla and The Dark Tower,
probably leaving the battle with the Crimson King out of the
story all together but placing more emphasis on the Man In
Black... if I have one major criticism of Book 7, it was the
way he let that character die (Mordred the spider ate
him.)

Having said all that, I still probably wouldnt see the movie
even if I heard it was gonna be exactly like that... I dont
want to picture Robert Downey Jr. as Eddie and Halle Berry
as Susanna, or whoever they cast... I just know the movie
would rub off and fuck up the story for the next time I read
it.

Anyway I've always pictured a younger Clint Eastwood the
Gunslinger, but he's much to old to play the part now.



Attached picture

 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-15 11:09 [#02264882]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02115957 | Show recordbag



that picture just makes me so sad that he's now too old to
play the part :(


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-01-15 12:07 [#02264888]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



it would have had to come out by the late 80s for Eastwood,
I think.

if they just do one it will have to be something like W&G
that can focus on a smaller sub story. i think it would
even be tough to fit the entire Dark Tower into a trilogy.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-01-15 12:25 [#02264895]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



more spoilers

W&G and The Gunslinger could be condensed into flashback
sequences and non-linear (pulp fiction, the prestige) story
telling. In the first movie I would open on the beach, and
have one of the first thing that happens is he loses his
fingers to the lobstrosities. Then, as he is lying there,
you could have him remember a lot of the back story, and
then maybe continue peppering in scenes of events from those
2 books as a side story, kind of wrapping that up at the
bonfire scene (where he originally tells W&G in the books)
which would be in the 1st or 2nd movie. The 5th book would
also need to be really condensed down, and maybe occur from
the end of the 2nd and resolve at the beginning of the 3rd.
The 3rd would then be Modred, Mia and everything that
happens in those last 2 books.

I would also drop references from books like Insomnia or IT,
maybe even open a movie with Flagg fleeing at the end of the
Stand into Rolands world.


 


Messageboard index