Made my own Druqks 2 cd cut | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 492 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Made my own Druqks 2 cd cut
 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2005-12-13 03:08 [#01799514]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Something I have been meaning to do for a while and finally
got around to it. I never got into the flow of Druqks going
back and forth between drill and bass, the piano stuff, and
various ambient sound stuff. Not that those styles couldn't
work together, but imo more effort would need to be put into
transitioning them to keep a consistent flow. I just
finished making my two playlists, which is almost the entire
album minus a few cuts because I wasn't into them or they
didn't fit.

Disc 01 - Drill & Bass stuff.

Lornaderek
Cock/Ver10
Taking Control
Meltphace 6
Mt. Saint Michel Mix+St. Michaels Mount
Ziggomatic 17
Afx237 V7
54 Cymru Beats
Omgyjya Switch7
Vordhosbn
Gwarek2

Disc 2 - piano ambient

Penty Harmomium
Father
Nanou 2
Strotha Tynhe
Beskhu3epnm
Ruglen Holon
Kesson Dalef
Prep Gwarlek 3B
Kladfvgbung Micshk
Jynweythek Ylow
Avril 14th
Hy A Scullyas Lyf A Dhagrow
Petiatil Cx Htdui

Try out those playlists to see what you think whether you
like it better, like the way RDJ intended, or would move
stuff around differently.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 03:42 [#01799520]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I like it the way Aphex did it. Creates a good range.

That said, I have my own playlists of the tracks doing
something similar.

That said, Lornaderek doesn't feature on any of them and if
it did. Not in the Drill & Bass stuff.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2005-12-13 03:45 [#01799521]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to giginger: #01799520 | Show recordbag



I had Lornaderek open that disc for charm and amusement
purposes


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 03:46 [#01799523]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01799521 | Show recordbag



I guessed your reasons :)

They're most likely the same ones that Aphex put the track
on there himself.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 04:45 [#01799530]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



thats a good order - i dont really like the original order
myself - seems really muddled up


 

offline J198 from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2005-12-13 04:45 [#01799531]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



suggestion for phobiazero:

still spelling drukqs 'druqks' after all these years = b7?

i wish i had this album on my puter.


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-12-13 04:46 [#01799533]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



my playlist is just drukqs without the non electronic stuff
(... and no, lornaderek isnt electronic, and i didnt put it
in for charm : P )


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 04:50 [#01799538]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



i dont really like the non-drill and bass stuff on there - a
bit boring. Lornaderek is funny , and the first track is
quite good, but the rest is pointless. Bit 4, why bother
with that?!


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-12-13 05:04 [#01799545]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



i kinda agree, kinda.
after listening to electronic only stuff for so long it is
nice to hear the first track again. alot of the piano stuff,
for example, ruglen holon, sounds really nice and mellow and
relaxing, espicially for banging noises and such


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 05:05 [#01799546]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker



Ziggomatic 17 is still the mest track on there IMO.

Shame it's the only part of the CD that hasa HUGE scratch.

:(


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 05:06 [#01799547]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker



mest track.....?


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-12-13 06:17 [#01799561]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker



hehehe. and M is 2 keys away from B.
though, the other day i misspelt friend with friday ...


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2005-12-13 06:31 [#01799567]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



i did the same some years ago.
ha!
but only the drill cd.
and i added the 2 remixes and the track on rephlex
compilation


 

offline thatne from United States on 2005-12-13 09:25 [#01799657]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



drukqs is still really fucking hypersensational, if you
think about it


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-12-13 09:31 [#01799661]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



The track order is the beauty of it. You're ruining the
flavour.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-13 09:32 [#01799665]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



not a bad idea, but i enjoy the switches from melodic to
bionic flavors.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2005-12-13 09:34 [#01799667]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



funny thing is, when this cd first came out, rolling stone
gave it one star, saying it just sounded "phuqed up."

then i read a collection of album reviews at barnes and
noble by rolling stone, and in there they gave it four
stars, saying it is "mesmerizing."

it's an album people really aren't on the fence about - they
either love or hate it. i love it, personally. need to
listen to it again actually....


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2005-12-13 09:36 [#01799669]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01799538



why bother? because everyones tastes are different. Various
tracks appeal to various people. Why not bother?


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-13 09:37 [#01799670]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker



I love it too.


 

offline Labium Sweat from United States on 2005-12-13 11:08 [#01799712]
Points: 922 Status: Regular



No Byddoncchord?


 

offline pigster from melbs on 2005-12-13 20:55 [#01800047]
Points: 4480 Status: Lurker | Followup to Oddioblender: #01799667



wikipedia
'Richard claimed he had stored the entire new album on an
MP3 player, but had lost it on a plane with no backup
copies, and that drukqs would be a selection of unreleased
tracks instead. This is a plausible hypothesis, as the
electronic tracks are strikingly similar in style to
previous works.'


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2005-12-14 05:15 [#01800147]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



The story i heard was that he lost his mp3 player and feared
someone would find it on the plane and shove it all on p2p,
and that he only did Drukqs to avoid this.
and anyway, are the tracks strikingly similar to previous
works?!

maybe one or two of the non-drill and bass ones are vaguely
like SAW2.



 

offline recaps from keys on 2005-12-14 05:26 [#01800152]
Points: 177 Status: Lurker



i like the LP track order. it has a better flow.


 

offline Labium Sweat from United States on 2005-12-14 09:44 [#01800346]
Points: 922 Status: Regular | Followup to Ezkerraldean: #01800147



Thats what I heard too. Only a freakin idiot would degade
his tracks to MP3s and throw away the originals... I really
doubt RDJ would do that... I was always under the impression
that artists keep all their original samples, and write down
the methods they used to modulate each piece as well.


 

offline Dannn_ from United Kingdom on 2005-12-14 13:35 [#01800571]
Points: 7877 Status: Lurker



Well theres no reason to believe they were mp3s
specifically. But personally it sounds like a complete load
of wank, for one they don't sound strikingly similar to
anything he's done, I think the album has a really strong
overall vibe anyway. And yeah I doubt he would only have one
copy and then lose it.


 

offline xf from Australia on 2005-12-15 06:14 [#01800870]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dannn_: #01800571



sounds like bullshit to me, but one way to disprove it:
anybody analysed the tracks? mp3's have a telltale cut off
point.


 


Messageboard index