THE 'IDM' THEORY | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 423 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614118
Today 1
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
THE 'IDM' THEORY
 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:09 [#01279477]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker



spotted on ninjatune:

"Early 1990s:
'IDM', as it emerged in the early nineties, came to the
public's attention through a relatively small handful of
pioneers and exponents such as Aphex Twin and similar
'bedroom producer' artists. As a genre it enjoyed a few
early years of exciting, weird, fresh music that had no
obligations to any existing scene nor to any existing
standards of pop production.

2004:
Fast-forward to 2004, and now we have laptops, we even have
software synths with plugins designed to emulate Aphex Twin
sounds, and most importantly of all we have ten thousand
bedroom prodigys for every one artist like Autechre we used
to have, fifty thousand hopeful 20-year-olds bleeping away
on the Mac their
parents bought them, and a hundred thousand laptop producers
making demos, setting up their own websites and even
performing at their local community centre hall.

So it's no wonder that all these 'IDM' related forums are
full of arrogant, bitter little users who rip apart every
new release by the likes of Squarepusher or Aphex Twin.
When you look at some of these new pretenders trying it on
in the world of electronic music, it's hard not to laugh at
the audacity of some of their claims to be 'artists', when
all they've done is slap four tracks together on Fruity
Loops, set up their own website and printed their own
teeshirts up.

I.D.M. R.I.P."



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-07-18 12:11 [#01279478]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i agree. ha.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-07-18 12:13 [#01279481]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



i still dont know why aphex is said to be god of idm.every
time you read something about idm, you can see aphex. iaphex
= britney spears of idm world, hahaha


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-07-18 12:14 [#01279482]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



britney spears > autechre


 

offline dopper from Bern (Switzerland) on 2004-07-18 12:18 [#01279485]
Points: 436 Status: Addict | Followup to aristotle: #01279477



thou dost speaketh words of wisdom


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-07-18 12:20 [#01279486]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #01279482



i knew you are going to say that


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-07-18 12:21 [#01279489]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular



sad but true.......... altho it's the same for any genre of
music.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-07-18 12:23 [#01279493]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Technology has democratized music production, just as it has
democratized journalism, art, literature, cinema - just
about everything except sculpture.

For the first time in the history of humanity, just about
anyone with aspirations can take a shot at their goals with
equal opportunity.

The loudest yelping about this is going to come from the
institutions that have the most to lose financially, like
the RIAA and MPAA and diverse media conglomerates - they
have lost control over the means of production and
distribution and the revolution is coming from all sides at
once.

So I'm sorry if some people feel overwhelmed by the "little
people" taking their shot, but the elitist yapping is going
to play right into the hands of the media barons who have an
interest in maintaining artificial scarcity and don't want
ANYONE except their anointed media priesthood to have access
to production and distribution.

We'll be lucky if in ten years every licensed legal computer
doesn't have a big fucking electronic padlock on it. So stop
fucking whining about the wrong people having the
opportunity, because in the eyes of the powerful WE ARE ALL
THE WRONG PEOPLE.


 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:24 [#01279495]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker



"altho it's the same for any genre of
music."

do you really think so? i think the point of the diatribe
was that it is a unique genre in the sense that any kid in a
bedroom with a computer can claim to be part of it.



 

offline dopper from Bern (Switzerland) on 2004-07-18 12:25 [#01279497]
Points: 436 Status: Addict



betting on the new madonna album being IDM has now been
shortened to 1-2. get your money on it before the books
close.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-07-18 12:26 [#01279498]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



95% of idm these days is shit...


 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:27 [#01279501]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01279493



"So stop
fucking whining about the wrong people having the
opportunity,"

do you reckon those people are making the most of the
opportunity? i mean, are they any good? (on average)


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-07-18 12:31 [#01279505]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



what a load of shit. full of generalisation they are the
arrogant ones. they just can't stand it anymore not to be
the few elitists who have the possibilities to make music.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-07-18 12:32 [#01279506]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



btw, what's ninjatune's got to do with idm?


 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:32 [#01279507]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01279498



"95% of idm these days is shit..."

that would probably be because 95% of the IDM producers are
talentless computer-owners, as the guy so eloquently put it
in his original rant!


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2004-07-18 12:33 [#01279508]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to aristotle: #01279507



i think so to...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-07-18 12:34 [#01279509]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to aristotle: #01279501



No, I think most people should be denied a MCL (music
creator's license) unless they pass an audition judged by
RIAA representatives.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-07-18 12:34 [#01279510]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #01279506



bullshit.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-07-18 12:35 [#01279511]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



95% of all music is shit, be it professionally produced or
hacked together in the bedroom.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-07-18 12:36 [#01279514]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



and I'm pretty sure they wrote this because they know this
will cause some discussing and flaming on the idm forum.


 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:36 [#01279515]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01279509



fleetmouse what on earth has the RIAA got to do with this?

and if you are an aspiring musician yourself, don't you
think that once you got signed your attitude about the RIAA
might change... drastically?!


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-07-18 12:36 [#01279516]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



forums*


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2004-07-18 12:38 [#01279518]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



i agree with the comments of the original post, although i'm
undecided on if it's a good or bad thing. i think i am a
great example of this. my music is pretty bad, but at the
same time i am grateful to have had the oppurtunity to
easily give it a go without spending years learning to play
an instrument (though i certainly wish i had) or thousands
of dollars on expensive hardware. the only thing i do know
for sure is that i hate that pretentious attitude carried by
so many nowadays that the ninjatune blurb refers to.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-07-18 12:42 [#01279519]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



i think that this convo is shitty and we should all go and
take a dump. or whatever.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-07-18 12:44 [#01279522]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker | Followup to hyakusen: #01279519



best thing you've said on this mobo


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-07-18 12:45 [#01279523]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



mobo??? damn what was I thinking. I mean mb


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-07-18 12:45 [#01279524]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to aristotle: #01279515



It's in their interests to foster the perception that most
unsigned artists are crap because when they pay politicians
to legislate away the right to possess the means of
production and distribution, hey, no great loss, right?


 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:48 [#01279532]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01279524



that seems to be an entirely irrelevant discussion to this
one


 

offline Torley Wong on 2004-07-18 12:49 [#01279534]
Points: 235 Status: Lurker



I have to smile at this, because it is a keen observation.
And humorous too. I mean, send in the clones (of twin
pillars Aphex and Autechre, and any other idm/braindance
under the sun you can think of)... still good stuff as
always, but subject to personal preference -- obviously --
and you have to dig for the good stuff. Or maybe it's just
me getting ol' and jaded and stuff is starting to sound the
same :(

Democratization of technology is one thing, but I never
expected microediting or glitch to be wrung-out cliches so
soon. I mean, how soon can we expect an MTV Music Generator
for the experimentalheads? Guess I was wrong on that front!
:)


 

offline aristotle from United States on 2004-07-18 12:54 [#01279539]
Points: 69 Status: Lurker | Followup to Torley Wong: #01279534



agreed.
although the vitriol of the original post is maybe taking it
too far, i have to say it struck a chord for me, as i do
frequent a few of these places and i too am getting bored
with the current swathe of idm-ey stuff


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-07-18 13:02 [#01279550]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular | Followup to aristotle: #01279495



"altho it's the same for any genre of
music."........ meaning, if you go back to the begining
there is always a person or a handfull of people who gave
birth to any given genre of music (or anything that was
created by man) & pathed the way for everyone else who came
along after.

I agree with fleetmouse on the technology aspect, but all
that has happened is that technology has leveled the feild
out (artoficialy) & now we are just going to have to wait
for the next breed of Aphex Twin to come along & use all
this technology to it's max...... altho I don't think it
will ever happen because technology has overtaken us & is
evolving so much faster than we are. all I can see happening
is technology will evolve faster & we as humans will evolve
slower to balance it out. I think technology is NOT the way
forward & we have alot to learn...... ultimately technology
will bite us in the ass & then it will be too late........
the sooner the better I think, the cycle can then restart &
we can get back to evolving......... it will probably set us
back a few billion years but atleast we'll have another
chance to get it right........ maybe this time we won't
evolve into a creature with opposing thumb & forefinger &
that will solve the problem............

no opposing thumb & forefinger = no knob twiddlers
.......... sorted


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-07-18 14:30 [#01279648]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Rambling Madman: #01279550



It's not possible for technology to evolve quicker than man.
We create the technology.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-07-18 14:37 [#01279653]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



good read


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-07-18 14:45 [#01279657]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I think, I think... I agree 100% with the original post, I
feel exactly the same. I get disappointed with what comes
out now becuase, the tools people have now mean you can get
down tracks so quickly, create new sounds, compositions,
impossible timings and, yes, anyone can have a go. But what
do we get, straight up autechre or squarepusher "homages".
It's erroneous however to think anyone even tries to sound
like Aphex, I have never heard one artist, whether they be
signed or wanking away on the web, sound remotely like RDJ.
It's interesting to note his output has diminished of late,
maybe he's as fucking bored of it all as anyone else is. IDM
has been absorbed by the mainstream, which means adding "IDM
sounds" to RnB tracks. But worse still is the "alternative"
music genre, which is so rancid as to be unapproachable.
Music should fucking STOP for 5 years and then come back.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-07-18 14:48 [#01279659]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01279657



Music should fucking STOP for 5 years and then come back.

yeah, because i have allot of catching up to do :P


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-07-18 14:53 [#01279663]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



<3


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-07-18 14:53 [#01279664]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01279659 | Show recordbag



I just pray that's you in the avatar.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-07-18 14:54 [#01279666]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01279664



yes it is me


 

offline oyvinto on 2004-07-18 14:56 [#01279667]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



what a crappy discussion


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-07-18 15:01 [#01279671]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Wicked! I never liked the anime or whatever one, it's funny
how much an avatar can influence one's opinion on someone,
well for me anyway, and I am given to rash judgements.

Oyvinto: No, it, isn't.


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-07-18 15:02 [#01279674]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker



What about the endless stream of wannabe rappers and shitty
punk bands? They just need a few guitars. Guitars are
cheaped than computers, and you can buy rights to a beat
online for cheapola.


 

offline brokephones from Londontario on 2004-07-18 15:03 [#01279675]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker



^cheaper


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-07-18 15:04 [#01279678]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



looks like its time for my daily aural injection of Milk DX


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-07-18 15:09 [#01279682]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



All music is played out. I guess the worst catagory is
"Classical", those guys are fucking shameless. I guess it'll
rumble on and on, and I am sure there is hope in the future.
But i think IDM, like punk, metal, rock etc is now,
inevitably, destined to be a genre, a style, that people
pick up and edge forward inches whereas the pioneers of the
music took quantum leaps.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-07-18 15:10 [#01279683]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



yes


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2004-07-18 15:12 [#01279686]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to danbrusca: #01279511 | Show recordbag



I think that's a bit of a bloated total. 95% of the music
I've heard in my life is definitely not crap.

But it's true that a lot of it is just totally forgettable,
or just so average... there's only a limited number of hours
in a day in which I can listen to music... nothing I hate
more than looking into a bunch of obscurities, listening to
their albums, wasting my time on music that wasn't ever
worth my time to begin with.

It's tempered by all the awesome stuff that gets lumped in
there with it, somehow. It's all about balance.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-07-18 15:15 [#01279691]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



i have a theory..

no wait i dont.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-07-18 15:18 [#01279696]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I have a theory that I want an experience as mindbending as
hearing Autechre and that for the first time.


 

offline Rambling Madman from the future (United Kingdom) on 2004-07-18 15:18 [#01279698]
Points: 1492 Status: Regular | Followup to danbrusca: #01279648



do "we" really?..... what was the last technological
breakthrough you made?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-07-18 15:20 [#01279701]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



The definition of idm still isn't agreed upon if it ever
was. But as far as "idmish" things that I've come to like,
it does seem to be dying recently. Autechre, funkstorung,
aphex twin, telefon tel aviv, richard devine... all of these
producers very latest releases are worse than earlier ones
imo.


 


Messageboard index