european elections | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 422 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614106
Today 3
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
european elections
 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:16 [#01233744]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01233730



but you're not getting my point.

i don't like any of the parties because they never ever do
what they say they're gonna do.

it's all fucking lies, just so that they can get into
power.

i won't be a part of it. not you, or anyone else will make
me and don't tell me what i have the right to complain about
- the whole point of an opinion is that it's how i think.
unless you're gonna employ some kind of mind grooming
techniques used in, oooh lets say 1984, then you're not
getting anywhere by saying something like that.

i'm sorry for being so vehemently angry over this, but i
will not be told what to do and what not to do. if i don't
wanna vote, that's up to me. not anyone else.

if someone doesn't like it, go and suck on one of those
white dog shits that you see on the street when all the
flies have sucked all the "goodness" out of it.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-10 17:16 [#01233746]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to drummond: #01233737 | Show recordbag



Yes, someone I know who doesn't vote anymore has a saying,
"10% of the populance not voting is voter apathy, 40% of the
populance not voting is protest. "

Meaning, whilst some are just people to0 apolitical/lazy to
vote, a great deal more are expressing that they are not
happy with any of the major parties.


 

offline drummond from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2004-06-10 17:20 [#01233757]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict | Followup to Ceri JC: #01233746



its a shame there isnt a 'fuck off and die you middle right
scum, and congratulations on adopting other peoples policies
you fucking twats so there's no fucking difference what i
vote' box, otherwise i wouldve bothered.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-10 17:21 [#01233759]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01233744



Man I totally see your point, I just don't agree with it. If
you think all the parties are crap, vote for the least crap
one so that you get the least crap government. Makes sense.
You don't have to like who your voting for. By voting you
are at least restricting the worst ones.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:22 [#01233762]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to drummond: #01233757



i was gonna make up a party and vote for it on the form, but
my mom told me that it was illegal to do that, so i didn't
:(

but then someone in work told me that you can put an X over
the whole sheet and that's classed as a void vote.

is that illegal?


 

offline dequalsrxt from Los Angeles (United States) on 2004-06-10 17:22 [#01233766]
Points: 468 Status: Regular



but...

(oscillik you can skip this if you like because i'm not
talking about you in particular and it might just make you
angrier and if it does...i warned you)

year after year of "i'm not happy, i'm not voting" has got
to wear a person down, don't you think? i would guess that
eventually such a situation will eventually lead to

a.) a vote
b.) lifelong misery, or
c.) a couple of years in jail for blowing up a car



 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:23 [#01233767]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01233759



that's like saying there's 4 types of food for you to eat
here:

1: Cat Shit
2: Dog Shit
3: Human Shit
4: Rat Shit

choose which one is the least nasty to eat.

i would choose none

simple


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2004-06-10 17:24 [#01233768]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



oscillik, voting is annomous so you can do what you like on
your ballot


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:24 [#01233770]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to dequalsrxt: #01233766



how can you say that a lifelong of not voting will lead to
that?


 

offline drummond from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2004-06-10 17:25 [#01233771]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict | Followup to oscillik: #01233762



absolutely not. i was thinking of doing that myself.

if voting changed anything it would be made illegal.
remember that.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:25 [#01233772]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to 010101: #01233768



i don't think it is - i'm sure that the postal voting sheets
we've got in England have your name on them


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:26 [#01233774]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to drummond: #01233771



shall we find out about Emanuel Goldstein?

we can go and find him if you wanna?


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-10 17:27 [#01233778]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01233767



No its not, because unfortunately in society you can't opt
out of politics. You can't argue that politics doesn't
affect your life. Unforunately you're going to have to eat
some of the shit.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:29 [#01233786]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01233778



clint, i can choose what i want to do (for the time being).

if it ever gets to the point where we're facing a situation
that resembles 1984 I shall change my name to Emanuel
Goldstein and I shall do my best to overthrow it all.

or i could just sit here and die


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:31 [#01233791]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to clint: #01233778



and yes i can argue that politics doesn't affect my life,
because i don't support lying bastards.

i'm not a lying bastard myself either.

i try my best to not have anything to do with lying
bastards.


 

offline drummond from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2004-06-10 17:31 [#01233792]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict | Followup to clint: #01233778



very true


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:31 [#01233793]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



if you're gonna turn around and say something like the ID
card fiasco is to do with politics, no it's not.

it's to do with being put on a leash. plain and simple.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-10 17:32 [#01233798]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to drummond: #01233757 | Show recordbag



new labour = old tories.

Sorry, I don't want to get into party politics too much, but
it had to be said ;)

Oscillick: You can write "CUNT, CUNT, BULLSHIT BOLLOCKS!" in
inch high letters across it if you want. Regardless of the
legallity, they could never, ever prosecute you for it, as
it would be a blatant admission that the ballot is no secret
:)


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:34 [#01233803]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01233798



ah ha!

i'll remember that next time there's a vote!

ANARCHY IN THE UK


Attached picture

 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-10 17:40 [#01233817]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to oscillik: #01233793 | Show recordbag



Oscillik: Yes, the ID card is reactionary wank to a
"heightened terrorist threat" (and I'm a Conservative!).

Reasons the ID card will be a sham, if implemented:

1. The general populance do not want it. A scheme such as
this needs public buy in to work.

2. The legislation has been rushed in, as such it will be
poorly written and ill defined. Expect a massive lack of
clarity, and a hell of a lot of profits for cynical defense
lawyers.

3. Unless it there is a composite primary key of some
"Redundant", unique DNA (by that I mean unique to a single
generation of the family and redundant in the sense that it
contains no info on race, etc.) and some unforgeable
biometrey, that will not change over time/through injury
(none exists to my knowledge), it'll be far from fool proof.
If it cannot identify a person with utter certainty
(far more than reasonable doubt), it will simply lull people
into a false sense of security and actually provide serious
terrorists/career criminals with "perfect" false identites:
currently even with a passport/driving license courts bear
in mind that person may not be who the ID says they are. If
ID does not offer this greater level of insurance, it is
redundant (just use Passport & driving license).


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-10 17:40 [#01233821]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01233793



Being put on a leash by the government is exactly politics,
thats what I'm saying!

But alas I am done debating. Peace.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-10 17:42 [#01233822]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to oscillik: #01233803 | Show recordbag



I know someone who wrote "Fuck the state" on their ballot
paper and has never gotten in trouble about it. It must
liven up the boring job of counting the votes ;-)


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:45 [#01233828]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01233817



i don't like the idea of these ID cards, because of the
Sandra Bollock film The Net.

that shit could actually happen.

that's really scary


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:46 [#01233829]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01233822



that's the bomb.

i'm gonna think something up over the next few years, and
wait until the next one :)


 

offline drummond from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2004-06-10 17:47 [#01233832]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict



you own a mobile phone? at any time you can be tracked to 2
metres (if its switched on). AT ANY TIME. they are slowly
introducing this system into cars, this is what scares me.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:49 [#01233837]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to drummond: #01233832



yes i have been aware of this for years

they'll introduce this system into everything if they want
to


 

offline drummond from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2004-06-10 17:52 [#01233844]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict



they do want to and they will. its up to the public to stand
against this.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-10 17:52 [#01233845]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker | Followup to drummond: #01233844



Absolutely :)


 

offline xceque on 2004-06-10 17:53 [#01233846]
Points: 5888 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Now if there was a party who guaranteed that they wouldn't
do that, then I might vote


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2004-06-10 17:53 [#01233847]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to drummond: #01233844



and voting will do fuck all to change it.

we need something more substantial.



 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-10 17:55 [#01233850]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



Revolution?


 

offline drummond from coffee, ahh, a burger, ahh on 2004-06-10 18:00 [#01233854]
Points: 1021 Status: Addict



oh hello. who says protest doesnt go unnoticed? blair thinks
he can get awat from anything. at least if you protest if
gets on the news and that is a good thing.

on a smaller note, i was extremely disturbed to find on "big
brother 5" (UK) "they" were so scared that they threw the
radical out. as we all know al the votes every week are
manipulated by what you see (what they decicde to show).
they were so shit scared, its even more fucking clear the
whole thing is a scam.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-10 18:24 [#01233907]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to drummond: #01233854 | Show recordbag



I thought leftists would dislike Kitten's antics. Although I
have seen very little of it and, like you say they choose
what to show, she seemed to have the intellect of a
malcontent child. She was such a charicature of your typical
radical that one might almost think she was some actress on
the right's payroll...

Whilst I concede that "they" choose what to show, it is
important to remember that people still have to do what is
shown- if you are perfectly reasonable 24/7 there is no way
they can portray you as an utter cunt, agreed?


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 03:29 [#01234458]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i see Labour did well, haha


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 04:27 [#01234649]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to drummond: #01233854



They threw Kitten out because she had received three formal
warnings for rule-breaking. Three strikes and you're out.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 04:29 [#01234651]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01233907



You might think she was an actress on someone's payroll, but
the press would have worked that out and reported it within
a couple of days had it been the case.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-06-11 04:30 [#01234654]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I don't vote, because every party has more bad than good
about it...


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 04:37 [#01234668]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01233772



Ballot papers don't have your name on them, but they do have
an ID number which can be linked to your name. The purpose
of this is to assist in investigations concerning electoral
fraud. Such access to ballot papers can only be granted by a
specially convened Electoral Court and has been from time to
time.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 04:45 [#01234680]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01233708



"The reality is, the VAT on confectionary (cakes,
sweets, candy, biscuits, pies, etc.) pays for any
additional
"health costs" more than 4 times over. "


There is only VAT on food that has been prepared and served.
This includes things like meals in a restaurant or hot
takeaway food. There's no VAT on the food you buy at a
supermarket, chocolate from the newsagent, etc.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-06-11 04:58 [#01234699]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to danbrusca: #01234651 | Show recordbag



I didn't say I thought she was- I don't. I just said her
antics were so stupid that you wouldn't have to be
delusional to see it that way...

Re: VAT, sorry, you're wrong- confectionary is VATed. The
question is simply what constitutes confectionary. Anything
you eat frozen (Including things like ice cream, choc ices,
lollies, etc.), Crisps, Popcorn (already popped, eg ready to
eat), carbonated drinks like Coke, lemonade etc. chocolate
bars (although not chocolate covered things like jaffa
cakes), etc. are all included.

Although it's a very grey area (and there are lots of cases
about it, even now) the basic rule is: if something is a
luxury rather than a neccessity, it's VATable. You don't
need chocolate bars, ice cream, etc. as part of a
balanced diet, hence they're luxuries.


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 05:08 [#01234714]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



how many people here made a protest vote? It seems a lot of
people did, Labour is 3rd, behinind Liberal Democrats and
Conservative :)


 

offline morge from United Kingdom on 2004-06-11 05:23 [#01234730]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #01233767



in that you will starve.


 

offline morge from United Kingdom on 2004-06-11 05:23 [#01234731]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



in that case you will starve

sorry


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-06-11 05:24 [#01234734]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



question: how can you be talking about "the european
elections?" As far as I know, there is no collective voting
going on all over europe...


 

offline morge from United Kingdom on 2004-06-11 05:24 [#01234735]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



i hate it when people say they don't vote because they hate
all the parties.
if you don't do politics then you really don't have an
opinion as far as society is concerned


 

offline morge from United Kingdom on 2004-06-11 05:28 [#01234742]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



its the EU, which Norway are not in, so you're not
involved.
go and sit in the corner with switzerland


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-06-11 05:32 [#01234747]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to morge: #01234735 | Show recordbag



If you don't do politics? hating all the existing parties
isn't equal to not being interested in politics.. on the
contrary, dear sir, it is a sign of true enlightenment that
comes only when you have researced every party to the extent
that you realize that none of them are any good. I haven't
thought of an alternative yet, but I'm working on it.

re: EU. Then this thread should be called "EU elections,"
and not the more pretentious "european elections," where one
assumes that all countries are part of EU.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-06-11 05:37 [#01234758]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I forgot to vote.


 

offline morge from United Kingdom on 2004-06-11 06:00 [#01234800]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01234747



at least you are working on it
most people say that they're not interested because they
can't be bothered and think that it doesn't matter, when it
really it does.
unfortunately voting is often picking the lesser of several
evils


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-06-11 06:06 [#01234816]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to morge: #01234800 | Show recordbag



yes, and that's what I dislike.

The best idea I've had so far (although a bit hard to do in
real-life, I think), is to have one party per cause, and
then people could enter the parties they thought were
important. Everyone could start a party (a cause), but each
party would only be represented in government based upon
membership-numbers (so if you start a party for creating a
new type of houses that were made completely of eatable
materials, and had only yourself in the party, you most
likely wouldn't be represented). The problem would be
keeping track of all the members and making sure there was
no cheating with the numbers, and creating easy ways of
entering and leaving a party.


 


Messageboard index