some truths about 'Jesus Christ' | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
belb
recycle
...and 424 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index | Topic is closed
some truths about 'Jesus Christ'
 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:00 [#00867437]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



organized religion is a puppetmaster

seperation of church and state is a farce.

it's all the same thing: CONTROL


 

offline rez from here on 2003-09-17 12:06 [#00867442]
Points: 1366 Status: Lurker



buddhism is undoubtly the best of all beliefs


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-09-17 12:09 [#00867446]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to rez: #00867442



best for you? excellent


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:41 [#00867513]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00867417



And I quote myself:
"I don't support ridiculing christians or any other
religion"



 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:43 [#00867519]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00867417



And it's fully not the same thing at all anyway.
1) you can be private about your religion much easier than
you can about a disability, race, even sexuality.
2) Religion is a choice.



 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-09-17 12:44 [#00867521]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



omg why does every thread on religion inevitabely turn into
a slag fest


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:48 [#00867529]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00867427



Oh please don't tell me that a christian could be any more
oppressed or prejudiced than an atheist in this world. I
won't even mention being an atheist at work, where people
will have no problems using biblical quotes or something
like "Have Faith In Jesus" as a screensaver. What about
roadside billboards talking about how Jesus loves me? Do
you think an atheist campaign of some sort could ever get
away with posting billboards saying "the bible is fiction?"
Who's prejudice against who, then?


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:55 [#00867534]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to atgmartin: #00867529



i said NOTHING of the sort.....what i'm saying is picking on
someone whether it be race, religion, sexual orientation,
etc....is PREJUDICE. and i'm just tried of seeing it brought
up, over and over and over again by the SAME peepz because
they wanna feel superior.

i don't start threads about things (like religion, like
drugs, like politics) that DIVIDE, because it's been talked
to DEATH.

i just would like to have conversations without the need to
have to defend my beliefs because someone thinks i'm
brainwashed and can't think for myself.....can you
understand that?

btw.....i don't care what religion anyone does or DOES NOT
belong to, it's a personal choice. what i do oppose is
BASHING people's belief systems, whatever they are, that
help them get through life.

there is really ENOUGH tearing down of people in day to day
life .... i wish we could all just agree to disagree and
leave it at that. =/


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:57 [#00867539]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00867534



I said that I don't support bashing any religions. I just
pointed out that it is also quite different from gay bashing
or racism. Please read my thread again, and stop getting
mad at me, cos I'm delicate.


 

offline atgmartin from DeathMallMegaComplexville (United States) on 2003-09-17 12:58 [#00867542]
Points: 873 Status: Lurker



thread meaning post


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-09-17 13:00 [#00867543]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to atgmartin: #00867539



i'm not mad at you.......i'm just tired of hashing and
rehashing things.

and just forget the point i was trying to make cos i'm DONE
with this topic....whewwwww


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-09-17 13:19 [#00867566]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to JAroen: #00867521



hmm well i must say that i appreciated the level headed
start that marlowe provided to this topic. i was inspired to
talk



 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2003-09-17 13:32 [#00867580]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00866238



everyone should question their place in life and the
validity of their beliefs. christian or not, if you follow
anything blindly, you will stay blind.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-17 13:37 [#00867588]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



agreed


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-09-17 13:40 [#00867590]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00867580



i dont think people have to believe that everything has a
place, now im thinking about it..

hmm no no reason! although it is a good thing i believe, its
ultimately not necessary..

ahh got it! the truth in monotheism is just that - because
of ones devotion, they become spiritual :)


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-09-17 13:41 [#00867591]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



taken me long enough to understand the truth in monotheism
:) fantastic!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-17 14:08 [#00867617]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I would just like to point out that some of the religious
people on the board would rather, it seems, impugn the
personalities, motives and emotions of the non religious
than address the substance of their statements.


 

offline Crocomire from plante (United States) on 2003-09-17 15:49 [#00867706]
Points: 2116 Status: Lurker



aren't spiritualism and organized religion like comparing
apples and oranges?

aren't organized religions like music: everyone is doing
basiclly the same thing in their own way?


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-17 16:13 [#00867741]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



This thread is now funny. The same couple of people spouting
the same thing at different people. READ PEOPLE'S POSTS!


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-09-17 17:51 [#00867837]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



you're all going to hell you communist bastards.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-09-17 18:07 [#00867847]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to kochlear: #00867837



If there is a hell, I'll see you there.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-09-18 04:16 [#00868214]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



Comparing what this thread initially started as, (ie tracing
some of the myths imposed on 'Jesus Christ' and showing
their earlier usage) to racism, homophobia etc, is just a
total breakdown of logic. They do not compare. It's not
PREJUDICE, it's not negativity to pass on information
regarding EXACT SAME rites that were used PRIOR to
Christianity and are used in Christianity now. And which are
historical and socio-anthropological truths.

It's well and good to quote Voltaire, and up to a point his
quote is accurate. But it's generalised, whilst I'm dealing
with something specific here, something that has been
documented for millenia, something whose evolution can be
plainly traced.


 

offline MistahKurtz from Paris (France) on 2003-09-18 06:59 [#00868399]
Points: 327 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00868214



If you look at the New Testament closely there really only
one clear and universally comprehensible expression of
Jesus' philosophy/teaching: the Lord's Prayer. Why would you
need to know more? Doctrinal quibbles simply alienate people
from the simplicity of Christ's message as do, in my
opinion, political and instituinal organisations such as the
catholic church (the orthodox chruch is different as the
religious authority is nation based and not centred on a
single power suhc as the vatican). All
mysteries/philsophical arguments/discussions on the nature
of christ and god are just unecessary extras to this
fundemental speech. Who agrees? Who disagrees?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-18 07:01 [#00868405]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to MistahKurtz: #00868399



What about the sermon on the mount? That's pretty foundational to
his message too, moreso than the lord's prayer methinks.


 

offline MistahKurtz from Paris (France) on 2003-09-18 07:19 [#00868431]
Points: 327 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00868405



yeah, but i think the lord's prayer (which of course is part
of the sermon) captures the essence of what the guy wanted
to say in a concise form.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-09-18 07:21 [#00868435]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



not like his said it in English tho, is it. So the prayer we
English-speaking folk say is not what he said - merely a
TRANSLATION. It's pretty dumb to follow a Religion when your
Holy Book is all translation.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-18 07:22 [#00868438]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00868435 | Show recordbag



That's my major beef with the Bible. It's a damn
translation!


 

offline MistahKurtz from Paris (France) on 2003-09-18 07:23 [#00868444]
Points: 327 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00868435



Name me one holy book as important as the bible that hasn't
been modified throughout the ages!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-09-18 07:24 [#00868448]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to MistahKurtz: #00868444



... and your point being?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-18 08:09 [#00868514]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00868435



ok, so i'm being "dumb"? thanks, glad to know you think so
highly of me.

obviously i agree that translations lose a little bit of the
original meaning each time, but the people translating it
have been holymen. i'm not saying they were incorruptable,
but with a few exceptions (the king james edition of the
bible, which is now something of a novelty) it's been very
trustworthy people doing these translations and in modern
time great efforts have been made to produce an error-free
translation of the original bible. so even though i agree
that when you change a text to another language the meaning
is lot, and multiple translations are subject to some
meaning corruption, intended and unintended, i hardly think
i'm being "dumb" finding wisdom in the bible. and before
someone says it, no, i don't believe the bible
word-for-word.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-18 08:11 [#00868516]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00868214



ok, and it's not prejudice to go up to a group of people,
half of which are black, and start giving them statistics
about their racial inferiority in certain aspects of life?
or to criticize their culture and history? the statistics
and facts may be true but it sure is rude and backwards of
you. you really should learn to love and accept people for
who they are. why should you give a flying FUCK if people
choose to be one religion or another? what does it have to
do with you?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-09-18 08:21 [#00868532]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker



the same as what I said had to do with you, I imagine.

btw, it's not even one translation the Bible has been
through. The Old Testement is a collection of diverse texts
from all over the middle east stretching back thousands of
years and translated many times before being thrown together
and put into the bible.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-18 08:21 [#00868533]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00868516 | Show recordbag



No it's not prejudice if it's for the means of informing and
giving people knowledge. It would be if you went:
"Now listen here you coon..... so you're worthless and
shit and I think you should just fuck off.

That would be prejudice. Merely stating something is not.

Marlowe's initial post was merely stating some knowledge and
not judging anyone or anything. He could quite easily have
found some facts about catholocism.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-09-18 08:32 [#00868549]
Points: 24589 Status: Lurker | Followup to giginger: #00868533



Don't forget Fundamentalists know everything, chris


 

offline euphonicfilter from illadelphia (United States) on 2003-09-18 08:37 [#00868557]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict



my main issue w/ religion is how everyone tells me so much
about it - when they know i dont give a sideways shit...

leave me alone religious, misguided, gullible person


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-20 02:40 [#00870939]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00868549 | Show recordbag



I always forget that. :)


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-09-20 04:42 [#00870975]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00867534 | Show recordbag



That shit you typed about picking on people would not be
prejudice it would be discrimination.

Prejudism is the judging of people or situations before
proper opinion could possibly have been formed, racism is a
form of of prejudice but not the only one...however there
are a lot of people on this board guilty of predilection.

If you went up to a group of black people and start
explaining shit to them because you assumed they are too
stupid to know otherwise then you are being prejudice, if
you go up to genuinely engage in conversation and they have
no objections then there isn't a damn thing wrong with it.

It has got to the stage were the majority of people don't
have a clue what racism is any more, where merely the
mention of race or ethnicity has become in itself a dirty
thing.

If you beleive in freedom of speech and the respecting of
others opinions then you have to accept not everyone will
hold the same views as you. If you don't beleive in free
speech and thought you are no better than every radical
oppressive leader world wide.

I shouldn't smoke weed in the morning should I :D!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-20 09:24 [#00871082]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



We add God to your misery: a trip to a homeless mission


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-09-20 09:33 [#00871089]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



to EVERYONE in this thread:

this thread needs to be closed

its just kind of proved why the world has had religious
wars...

we cant even talk about religion in an innocent way
(marlowes initial post was NOT attacking or criticizing of
christians AT ALL... it was merely informing people of some
FACTS) without it turning into an all out argument.

persuing this conversation will not achieve anything. You
will not change each others beliefs. You will just get more
pissed off at the other people for not beleiving the same
thing as you.

Turn away... turn away.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-09-20 15:41 [#00871399]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00871089 | Show recordbag



Stop it. You spammed enough and your repeated attempts at
preventing theologicaldiscussions will not be successful :P

Besides poeples true colours often come out when the
converse in anger :D


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-09-20 15:48 [#00871408]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



god shall smote this thread.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-20 15:48 [#00871409]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00871089



marlowes initial post was NOT attacking or criticizing of
christians AT ALL... it was merely informing people of some
FACTS


you're not familiar with the concept of "subtext" are you?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-09-20 15:51 [#00871411]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Paul is very good at eliciting strong response through
seemingly innocent prose. He has done it to me a few times
:D


 

offline kochlear from aud-stim.com on 2003-09-20 15:51 [#00871412]
Points: 2311 Status: Addict



i am accepting of all religions, genders, races, and
cultures.

(if you read between the lines that says "nuke the world, i
hate everything")


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-20 15:53 [#00871416]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker



Hey cool, an argument about religion :P

I haven't read all of this topic, mainly because I can't be
bothered, so I'll just say that religion is a millstone
around the neck of humanity and the sooner we ditch it, the
quicker we can evolve.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-09-20 15:58 [#00871419]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



just like youre not familiar with the concept of "being a
condesending dick to people all of the time... but then
suddenly cant handle it when people condesend you" ?

yeah?


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-20 15:59 [#00871420]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00871419



"LOL!"


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-09-20 16:02 [#00871421]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00871419 | Show recordbag



Damn that is nearly a knock out blow :D


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-09-20 16:04 [#00871422]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00871421



really? i found it pretty predictable, nothing he hasn't
said to me before. so are we going to have it out now, zeus
replies, i say something back, you cheer him on like the
little bitch you are, someone intervenes to point out how
stupid this is, etc.? is that what you want, freakshow?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-09-20 16:06 [#00871424]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Yes - I was shit stirring, I love a to watch a good message
board bitch slap :D


 


Messageboard index