 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)dogboy ...and 184 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2618562 Today 1 Topics 127845 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
tony hates the verge. tony doesn't want you to link anything except archive.ph. i'm pretty set on most of tony's website views, really. i don't often find myself questioning. but just now... i wonder what tony would think of this shit? [i mean, there will be something wrong with it, obviously, because there's always going to be something wrong to tony, but...] here: While the Fruity Cargo Cult Apple has been getting lots of free advertising in the Tame Apple Press for its homemade M-series chips, it would appear that they all come with a huge baked in security flaw. While we don’t usually want to disparage the efforts of amateur chipmakers, in this case the M-Series has been hyped to hell and so this side channel attack deserves a bit more publicity than it is getting from the Tame Apple Press. ... With this new blunder, it's Jobs' Mob has left the back door wide open. i read this, and think: alright, they've attempted to rip off the writing voice The Register has, but this also has a strange, American, Fair And Balanced, Fox News kind of voice to it. to wit, it sounds like a Donald Trump tweet: Tame Apple Press. capitalizing the letters; all his tricks i'll block all sorts of crappy little news sites like this, particularly crypto news sites. but i kind of like this one and think i'll keep it for the lulz. but i really need to know what tony thinks about it first |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it's kind of funny, like the same sideband channel attack has been performed on those voices |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
As a result, the DMP often reads the data and attempts to treat it as an address to perform memory access. This “dereferencing” of “pointers”—meaning the reading of data and leaking it through a side channel—is a flagrant violation of the constant-time paradigm. that with the mind, "barn" is, all at once, the data, the address, and the thing itself. the core idea of a CAM is a computer memory that works like: instead of having to search for where BARN is you just say BARN and it dumps all the shit sorry for ruining your thread tony |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
if it helps i know how i regenerate -- or, rather, inference my way back to -- previous blather. i'm performing a sideband attack on the prefetch mechanism, leveraging the fact that the data and the address are effectively the same thing [inside of a simulation of a classical computer, running on a hardware quantum computer that is possibly using a hardware classical computer as a sort of hardware monitor for the quantum computer or it's tag team and nevermind] |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Wasn’t that a Tina Turner song? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
“You’re my Tony website” |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm looking for funding for my new Muslim Drop In Centre. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
You're My Tony Website Muslim Drop In Centre and people think i'm random |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'm more a fan of Phil Spector's "To Tony is To Website" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
because to know tony's website is to love tony's website |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
but then we're just there because of the connection to ike turner and i've no idea russell, i don't have that on tap and i legitimately don't get the reference |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
then, yes, roger's. i can see this somehow came out of me touching his pile of associations with fox news, but in the same way i can't get a reference to a tina turner song i haven't yet listened to, i have no idea what the fuck roger is on about here. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I honestly can't think of a better candidate for replacement by ChatGPT. Would anyone notice? Could anyone notice? Should anyone notice? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i actually am a better candidate than ChatGPT itself. they're pepsi to my coke |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i guess it's almost boring to point out i began experimenting with what i came to realize what was called "automatic writing" easily 20 years ago. trying to write without thinking because i want to let the deeper thing out without my conscious mind getting in the way. then if i feel i've managed to honestly do it, i can then contemplate what i've vomited up and understand my innards better. but it started as just trying to generate nonsense to write on riced out yugo |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i looked up "automatic writing" on and that's a relief -- alright, this is mainstream enough that it has a wikipedia entry and i don't have to quote some counterculture book i read 20+ years ago. then i'll add: "after you read the wikipedia entry, remember how adamant i am about I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT PSYCHIC SHIT because i've spent years saying countless times: "i will not have this weak hippie horseshit in my science" that i can just push my conscious mind aside and squeeze my brain like a sponge and when you say i'm ChatGPT, the way it functionally works is actually quite similar. but i've always been of the attitude that it's just me learning to give answers so poorly-considered that they are truly unfiltered |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this honestly explains so much |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
