Leaks - for or against? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 285 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613461
Today 4
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Leaks - for or against?
 

offline olaabaza from Mauritius on 2010-12-08 13:49 [#02400602]
Points: 575 Status: Regular



For.


 

offline gingaling from Scamworth (Burkina Faso) on 2010-12-08 13:51 [#02400603]
Points: 2281 Status: Lurker



down aint it?


 

offline olaabaza from Mauritius on 2010-12-08 14:25 [#02400604]
Points: 575 Status: Regular | Followup to gingaling: #02400603



It goes up and down. I like this situation mostly because it
gave me a chance to read very valuable material. Very
informative.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2010-12-08 14:47 [#02400605]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



I'm not really interested in what information has been
leaked, but on what ground is he searched for now? Suspect
in a rape incident or spreading information -someone else-
has leaked. Besides, isn't he in the UK now, talking to the
police?


 

offline gingaling from Scamworth (Burkina Faso) on 2010-12-08 15:13 [#02400606]
Points: 2281 Status: Lurker | Followup to Fah: #02400605



yeah hes a rapist, po-po here are talking to him about his
rapes details can be found leaked on wikileaks, if only, how
ironic would that be!


 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-08 15:31 [#02400609]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



There's many different aspects to wikileaks all of which you
can be for or against.


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-12-08 15:35 [#02400610]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular | Followup to big: #02400609



boring


 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-08 15:39 [#02400612]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



internet = instant gratification machine


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-12-08 16:17 [#02400613]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



Nah it's just that you sounded a little bit like elusive
right there


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2010-12-08 16:34 [#02400614]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i like radishes more


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2010-12-08 17:05 [#02400618]
Points: 7841 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



pro
im certain platforms like this should exist,
because it can provide important information.
no more secrets



 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-08 17:28 [#02400619]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02400613 | Show recordbag



I think there's certain things wrong with Asange and his
openness about the organization. For me that was illustrated
by him walking out on that CNN interview because he didn't
want to answer question about his functioning as the
managing director.

I'm elusive maybe because on the internet he's revered as a
god and no questions are allowed. Which I think is
ridiculous because it goes against principles you'd
attribute to something like wikileaks.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2010-12-08 17:54 [#02400621]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I'd say things like this are more important and
interesting than Assange's personal details even if he
conducts his board meetings in a donkey costume. But of
course big's function as an agent of the lamestream media is
to focus attention away from issues and onto Assange as
though he were a Big Brother house guest.


 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-08 19:39 [#02400632]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Yes, like that ^_^

I want to deal with those issues to focus on the documents
better. I'm talking about how wikileaks functions. Since
wikileaks could be an important and dangerous tool, that's
not unimportant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoKcOOYFszs&feature=related


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-12-08 19:57 [#02400633]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



Irony: Assange Busted By Radical Liberalism

must read


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2010-12-08 20:30 [#02400635]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02400633



These ridicoulous rape charges never would have happened
under strict sharia law, which we will impose on the infidel
insha'Allah.


 

offline KovalainenFanBo on 2010-12-08 20:38 [#02400636]
Points: 23 Status: Lurker



There are leaks because governments, banks, etc., they all
have something they don't want us to know. There shouldn't
be nothing to hide. You wanna stop Wikileaks? Stop hiding
information.

/thread


 

offline wavephace from off the chain on 2010-12-08 21:22 [#02400638]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker



Leaks? I'm not detecting any leaks.


 

offline Jaser from Castle Greyskull (United Kingdom) on 2010-12-08 21:41 [#02400644]
Points: 2101 Status: Regular



not welsh, prefer onions myself.


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2010-12-08 22:56 [#02400649]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



LAZY_LEAKS


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-12-09 00:45 [#02400653]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



embarrassing officials by revealing curupt illegal practices
is fine because it gives us clearer picture of what sort of
outragious shit going on. but when the leaks involve
sensitive political plans; like the reunification of north
korea. then i'm sort of agaisnt it...because allot of this
information needs classification for our own safety



 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-12-09 13:06 [#02400670]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I had a diarrhea leak several months ago, which made me
realize that I had to get my diet in check. Though perhaps
knowing such information has taken away the safety net of
ignorance, and now I'm in a world of danger and tight anus
doom.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2010-12-09 13:15 [#02400671]
Points: 11233 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



it all depends on what is leaking


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-12-09 13:55 [#02400672]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



This isn't a black or white issue.

Personally I am all for making government transparent, but I
am against information being leaked that could put the
public at risk.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2010-12-09 15:55 [#02400679]
Points: 11233 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02400672 | Show recordbag



Seems that the media got control of you and your fears.


 

offline yoyoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2010-12-09 16:30 [#02400681]
Points: 778 Status: Lurker



wankyleaks


 

offline yoyoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2010-12-09 16:30 [#02400682]
Points: 778 Status: Lurker



for, yeah why not


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2010-12-09 17:09 [#02400689]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Sometimes it's bad to do truth. A bad man sometimes could
take that truth and hurt a little baby. That's bad! Do you
want to hurt a little baby?


 

offline diamondtron on 2010-12-09 17:26 [#02400690]
Points: 1138 Status: Lurker



after the release date
before takes fun out of it


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-12-09 17:38 [#02400691]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Followup to diamondtron: #02400690 | Show recordbag



Political boards have posts about electronic music.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-12-10 00:09 [#02400733]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #02400679



On the wikileaks topic, I am hardly anything other than
indifferent. Is that what the media is trying to get people
to feel now?


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2010-12-10 00:47 [#02400744]
Points: 11233 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02400733 | Show recordbag



No. but you said: "I am against information being leaked
that could put the public at risk", that's exactly what the
white house and media are saying right now..


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2010-12-10 00:50 [#02400746]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



As fleetmouse says, it's neither here nor there what Julian
Assange has been up to. Read the actual things that are
affecting you lives.



 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-12-10 01:35 [#02400754]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to -crazone: #02400744



Right. And before that I said that its not a black or white
issue. I also said that government should be more
transparent. I don't know how you got me being controlled by
the media through my fears. Maybe you should read peoples
comments a bit more carefully before making judgments on
their character.


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-12-10 02:50 [#02400758]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



You probably don't mean it like that, but "it's not all
black and white" is doublespeak used by the mainstream media
to create fake balanced debates between one radical opinion
and its much more accepted and advantaged contradictors.
Sorry it's a reasonable opinion but it's kind of hard not to
scoff at it.


 

offline clark672010 on 2010-12-10 03:07 [#02400759]
Points: 398 Status: Lurker



that's might not be good experience.


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-12-10 03:21 [#02400763]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



exactly


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-12-10 03:45 [#02400766]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i pretty much said the same thing as taxidermist earlier, i
like seeing some thigns exposed but it doesn't take a
genious to see the danger of certain info being let out. as
i said before info has leaked about china's plans to reunify
north korea, basicaly getting rid of the current
totalitarian regime. NK were testing nucluer bombs in 2005,
and the US have satalite images of more buildings being
contructed in their nuclear complex. They put most of there
spending power into their military rather than helping
support their own people, so yu can make a judgement that
these nucluer sites are also used to make bombs and not just
energy. you only have to think about this for yourself to
make the opinion. if you choose not to believe anything you
see or read, than that is your own choice. the information
is there you just have to decide for yourself. I normaly
don't bother with allot of polital world news, but on this
subject i take an interest..


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-12-10 04:11 [#02400767]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02400754



Anytime an issue becomes polarized in one direction or
another, its important to remind people that there is
usually a grey area worth considering.

I hadn't realized the mainstream media had picked up on that
term because I don't pay attention to the mainstream media.
I find it kind of hard to believe, seeing as they usually
make polarization into their thing, but I'm certainly not
going to stop using a phrase because its become a hot term
on cnn.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2010-12-10 05:09 [#02400769]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Compromise is best. When science man say we come from
monkeys and Bible man say we come from dirt, compromise man
say we come from dirty monkeys.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2010-12-10 05:40 [#02400771]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



how do you guys weigh in on the 4chan/anonymous war going as
a result of "cablegate?"

anon has attacked groups before, shutting down the
scientology website once, and harassed numerous people they
just didn't like, but this is the first time there has been
a real cause behind any of their actions. this was just
released:

anon war plan

we are viewing the first battles in a completely new kind of
war, people! more so than 9/11, more than anything else i
have experienced, this is the moment in history which people
will pour over and study for decades to come. for the first
time, we are seeing the full power of the information masses
harnessed, achieving one deed - it's beautiful, almost like
an ant colony, except without a queen. what transpires after
this will define the state of information in the 21st
century.


 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-10 10:06 [#02400777]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Also wikileaks did put people in danger with the Afghan
warleaks, blacking out informants names while it was easy
enough to deduct who they actually were. I feel wikieaks has
learned from that, working closer with the media this time
and not letting everything leak at once. But you pretty much
won't hear Asange say that, because he doesn't like
criticism. Also the insurance file is basically a threat to
do the same thing again.

All in all though, I'm for.

If wars erupt over these leaks, then it's still the
countries at war that are guilty.


 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-10 10:08 [#02400778]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02400771 | Show recordbag



Let's fight for freedom of speech by silencing the people we
disagree with!



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-12-10 12:40 [#02400783]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i know the diplomat comms are embarrassing, but if anything
aren't the cables pro-US propaganda?

this is exactly how i felt upon reading them - and yet for
some reason i haven't heard/read anyone else bring up this
angle.

to me, they seemed like clever propaganda. the US has all
this intel on why the world is so dangerous, but can never
talk about it in the open/public. with the cables leaked,
everyone can find out just how dangerous some parts of the
world still are, how much crazy shit is going on
(russia/italy coziness), and a host of other issues.

a lot of people seem to insinuate that the world is in bad
shape because the US is stirring up the bee hives/etc.
example - they say if we just pack up and leave iraq/afg.
then everything will suddenly become stable -- as if the
only reason shit is crazy over there is because we're there
and they want us out. but after reading some of the cables,
it almost made me feel like we do need a solid presence
there, because the world really is crazy.

anti-US views aside, did anyone else get this impression?
there's a lot of embarrassing bits in there to give the US a
black eye, but if you drill down and look at the current
state of affairs, it's a little troubling imho. i have a
lot of opinions about what the US is doing, but upon reading
this i almost feel like a lot of it is warranted in some
aspects.


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-12-10 12:46 [#02400785]
Points: 12394 Status: Regular



lol


 

offline big from lsg on 2010-12-10 12:52 [#02400786]
Points: 23624 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Yes, an respected dutch author said it in a column in my
paper, that'd Asange must be on the CIA's paylist. He more
said it as a joke though. Also I've seen said Israel was
behind the leaks. It's all regular conspiracy though. So
plausible if you disregard a lot of facts, and really
unplaisible, because the leaks are bad for the US and
there's no reason to think Asange is a government tool.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2010-12-10 15:27 [#02400791]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



you have to keep shooting the bads because they hate your
freedumbs



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-12-10 17:40 [#02400796]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i only insinuated that it gives everyday citizens a look at
the harsh realities and current states of many areas of the
world - that otherwise are kept private.

how can you read into my original post that the US or
affiliate somehow purposely leaked them is beyond me.



 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-12-11 01:38 [#02400818]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02400777



I would have to disagree with that, at least partly. If
wikileaks is going to be posting information that was not
designed to be publicly available, they need to take a
certain amount of responsibility in making sure the
information can't directly be used in a harmful manner.

Then again, if someone wanted to start a war and they do it
with info garnered from wikileaks, chances are that person
would try to use some other source if wikileaks weren't in
the picture.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2010-12-11 03:19 [#02400821]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Well, what if things are one way. I respectfully suggest
that's cause for concern but ultimately OK. And if things
are some other way, then that's OK too, but also cause for
concern.


 


Messageboard index