rich white oligarchs run Earth | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
Roger Wilco
recycle
...and 474 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614093
Today 6
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
rich white oligarchs run Earth
 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-10-29 12:21 [#02248717]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



so does it matter who i vote for?


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2008-10-29 12:29 [#02248720]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



no


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-29 12:40 [#02248721]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



YES.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-29 12:41 [#02248722]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I mean, NO.


 

offline DirtyPriest from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-10-29 12:41 [#02248723]
Points: 5499 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02248717



Please just vote Obama. The rest of the world would
appreciate it.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-10-29 12:52 [#02248725]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to DirtyPriest: #02248723 | Show recordbag



agreed.. a politician for another, choose the less if you
have to,

at the end you know what's truly important regardless of
this..


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2008-10-30 02:48 [#02248833]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02248717



i completely agree, but for the sake of us foreigners, vote
obama.--


 

offline KLX from no (United States) on 2008-10-30 02:52 [#02248836]
Points: 140 Status: Regular



vote obama because it does matter


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 03:13 [#02248838]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



I like Obama too but the Democrats have their share of
problems as well. Don't forget the dems are completely
bought out by the Sierra club and other fear mongers who
release false propaganda on nuclear power.

I'm convinced we wouldn't be having this energy crisis, and
to a lesser extent, the economic crisis if we just built
more nuclear plants, like France (who powers the majority of
Europe). It's cheaper, much cleaner, and it's just a fucking
shame that we've been lied to about it for so long. Obama
says he will "look into it." pff. Not while Nancy Pelosi's
in charge of the House making sure everybody is well afraid
of the cleanest form of manufacturable energy known to man.

All that said, Obama seems like a decent and honest
candidate, and while I had some measure of respect for
McCain in the past, I think he's sold out badly by picking
that horrible right wing wackjob Palin as his running mate.
I'm wasting my vote on the candidate who best goes with my
own political philosophy; libertarian Bob Barr (it's a shame
Ron Paul didn't run under that platform).


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 03:54 [#02248841]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02248838 | Show recordbag



the 5 biggest lies about atomic energy:
1. Reactors are NOT safe. in the pedantic germany alone we
had lots of accidents like explosions and fires and i heard
that other countries dont do much better either.
2. Mining the uranium is NOT clean. huge amounts of toxic
mud are created within the process, which also harm the
miners.
toxic and radioactive byproducts are also created.
3. Where does the radio-waste from the reactors go?
its extremely expensive and difficult to find a solution
thats safe so it cant be accessed or go into the
groundwater.
4. Its NOT co2free. if you take the whole process of mining
and shipping the uranium and building the burning elements
you get about 31-61 gram co2 per kwh. this amount will rise
because of the decay of easy accessible uranium. gas-plants
that also use the heat created for heating houses are more
effective.
5. you cannot save the world with reactors
even in a small country like germany you would need to build
1.300 reactors. worldwide there are only 439 delivering
about 15 percent of the worlds need.

the money put into developing and flogging this dead horse
should be invested in other technologies. germany invested
24 billion € over the past 30 years without any success of
making this energy safer or more effective.

oh and france produced 543.600 kWh
and used up 482.400 kWh in 2005
theres not so much left to power the majority of europe.

i had to just get rid of that and no offence wolfie,
i still likes you





 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 04:43 [#02248843]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular | Followup to ijonspeches: #02248841



No offense taken man, it's just a good ol' fashioned debate
;p

First and foremost, you have to address the fact that the
coal plants are just filthy, the biggest polluters we have.
China is going to be building 2,000 in the next 10 years,
I've read. Solar is a a huge joke, apprently. Wind much the same.
Yeah, we need to find some new energy sources, nobody would
be happier than me if we could power our starships with
dilythium crystals, but it's just not in our grasp yet.
Nuclear is the WAY right now.

1. Immediate fatalities
1970-92

Coal
6400

Natural gas
1200

Hydro
4000

Nuclear
31 LAZY_source

2. The small, unventilated uranium "gouging" operations in
the USA which led to the greatest health risk are a thing of
the past. In the last 40 years, individual mining operations
have been larger, and efficient ventilation and other
precautions now protect underground miners from these
hazards. Open cut mining of uranium virtually eliminates the
danger. There has been no known case of illness caused by
radiation among uranium miners in Australia or Canada. While
this may be partly due to the lack of detailed information
on occupational health from operations in the 1950s, it is
clear that no major occupational health effects have been
experienced in either country.
LAZY_source

3. gotta store it in caves. I find this argument extremely
hard to buy, that we couldn't manage to store the spent fuel
rods. From what I've read, a family of 4 over the course of
20 years using nuclear power, would use the amount of amount
of spent fuel rods to fill a shoebox. if you reprocess that,
you only have the amount to fill a shotglass. From all 100
nuclear plants in the US over their entire course of
history, the amount of waste produced is only big enough to
fill a high scho


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 04:51 [#02248844]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



to fill a high school gym. Per year it would be something
like 80 quart jars. Not very much. Stack that against the
amount of radioactive waste produced in hospitals every
day.

4. There is going to be co2 emissions tied to everything we
do as long as oil is our main fuel source. someday that will
change, but for now we have to use the best tools we have at
our disposal. The whole debate about subsidizing these
foreign oil lords is a seperate one entirely.

5. that 15% of the worlds need is equal to the ENTIRE worlds
need in 1960. More plants is way to go, not more dirty coal
mines



 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 04:52 [#02248845]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



LAZY_source 2


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 04:57 [#02248846]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



I should have said France *sends* power to the majority of
Europe. Still, It's worked really well for them and I see
France as the best example of a cleanly powered nation.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2008-10-30 06:09 [#02248849]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



If The World Could Vote


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-10-30 06:35 [#02248851]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ijonspeches,

if you want to debate atomic fission, let me know. you had
better be properly educated, though...



 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2008-10-30 06:40 [#02248853]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to Phresch: #02248849



I don't see Nader on that stupid site. Or anywhere else for
that matter.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2008-10-30 07:15 [#02248857]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02248853 | Show recordbag



would it really make any difference?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2008-10-30 07:16 [#02248858]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular



yup


 

offline cyrstal dude from LA all day! (United States) on 2008-10-30 07:57 [#02248860]
Points: 900 Status: Addict



jeez.

jus' vote 'bama, k?



 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 08:13 [#02248862]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02248851 | Show recordbag



im not into technical details.
i just repeated some stuff out of the greenpeace mag.



 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 08:16 [#02248864]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02248846 | Show recordbag



and i find them a lot more trustworthy than the
world nuclear association.

overflew their sources, which say that there were only 2
major accidents in fission history.

that is true, but there were a lot of minor accidents
that prove to me that this isnt as safe as they want to make
us believe.


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 08:18 [#02248865]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



and to their waste problem,
i doint trust that either.
if it produces so little waste,
why do we already have thousands of tons of it?


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 08:38 [#02248869]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular



I believe that would be thousands of tons of radioactive
waste period. Lot's of things produce radioactive waste...
like i said, hospitals produce a ton, just by sheer weight
far, far more than nuclear power plant waste (I'll grant you
the half-life is far shorter).

I have not read about these "many accidents" at nuclear
facilities but I would wager that they have absolutely
nothing to do with the nuclear process itself... besdies,
it's well proven that coal plants are not only poor quality
places to work, they hurt the enviornment and are a major,
major factor on our climate problem.

The bottom line is, we already have them. Europe already has
them. They're a proven cleaner alternative to coal mines,
and while Al Gore and the likes are telling us all to
"Reduce our carbon footprint," he's out there actively
shutting down working nuclear plants because they're
afraid of anything nuclear in this day and age.
Meanwhile, hundreds and soon to be thousands of coal plants
are cropping up to meet the wordwide demand for energy. Oil
prices might be low now, but I believe that's artificial and
we'll see the prices rise again soon.

I'm not ranting on some weird conservative trip, I just
think people should open their eyes and see that nuclear
power works, and is clearly a better alternative to
coal plants.


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 09:17 [#02248874]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02248869 | Show recordbag



well i have to admit that npp do work,
there has been no major accident recently,
but the ones i read about could easily have been
more critical. we were just lucky in a few cases.
i cannot translate them all, but i do believe that this is
symptomatic and it happens in other countries too
without people knowing it.

nuclear power seems like the easiest way to get away from
popping coal plants and co2 emmission. but i just believe
that there will be alternatives if we will invest more into
it.
solar, wind and water are better than their reputation
and i want to see what geothermal energy brings up
in the next couple of years.



 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2008-10-30 09:31 [#02248882]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular | Followup to ijonspeches: #02248874



well I agree with you fully on that, we should be
researching new energy heavily. Maybe spend that 10 billion
the US is wasting every month and put 5 into new energy and
5 into the space program ;p


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-10-30 09:36 [#02248883]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



i voted for obama yesterday


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 09:39 [#02248887]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to Wolfslice: #02248882 | Show recordbag



yup, id like to see that :)


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-30 10:56 [#02248900]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Wolf, ijonspeches, thanks for that interesting debate.

I didn't know a great deal about nuclear power before
tonight, so thanks for educating me on this subject. =)


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-30 11:09 [#02248904]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Interesting to see the countries that are in favour of a
Republican governement. I suppose the poorest ones think
they'd get a stronger economy and better standard of life,
after seeing some middle class American lifestyles. Oh, how
little they know...



 

offline cyrstal dude from LA all day! (United States) on 2008-10-30 11:14 [#02248906]
Points: 900 Status: Addict | Followup to cygnus: #02248883



congrats!


 

offline gingaling from Scamworth (Burkina Faso) on 2008-10-30 11:47 [#02248912]
Points: 2281 Status: Lurker | Followup to ijonspeches: #02248841



"the 5 biggest lies about atomic energy:
1. Reactors are NOT safe. in the pedantic germany alone we
had lots of accidents like explosions and fires and i heard

that other countries dont do much better either.
2. Mining the uranium is NOT clean. huge amounts of toxic
mud are created within the process, which also harm the
miners.
toxic and radioactive byproducts are also created.
3. Where does the radio-waste from the reactors go?
its extremely expensive and difficult to find a solution
thats safe so it cant be accessed or go into the
groundwater.
4. Its NOT co2free. if you take the whole process of mining

and shipping the uranium and building the burning elements
you get about 31-61 gram co2 per kwh. this amount will rise

because of the decay of easy accessible uranium. gas-plants

that also use the heat created for heating houses are more
effective.
5. you cannot save the world with reactors
even in a small country like germany you would need to build

1.300 reactors. worldwide there are only 439 delivering
about 15 percent of the worlds need."

Rember folks these are the 5 biggest LIES about NP.
therefor:
1 it is safe
2 it is clean
3 cheap and easy to clean up
4 its CO2 free
5 it will save the world.

thanks to GreenPisswits for providing these delightful
infomations.

ijonspeches not meaning to belittle you, just green peace.


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-30 11:51 [#02248913]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



basshunter


 

offline oxygenfad from www.oxygenfad.com (Canada) on 2008-10-30 12:31 [#02248918]
Points: 4442 Status: Regular



Coal is crazy. A Canadian environmentalist was saying they
get these reverse smoke stacks and point them into the
ground , it poisons the soil and kills tons of wild life.

Also, from my own research, there is a chemical that they
extract from a substance called COAL TAR (the shit thats
left after they burn coal). This substance is called
TARTRAZINE. They use it as a coloring agent for a lot of
things, but they put it in a shit load of food. I went to my
grocery store and I could not find 1 brand of pickles that
didn't have tartrazine in it. I did a bunch of research and
it's a level one carcinogen.

So if you eat a ton of pickles, drink a lot of "Apple Drink"
do you think overtime it will have non or very little effect
over your body ? Why would you even want to fuck around with
that possibility anyway ? And there is no need to put that
shit in my pickles, bread, drink anyway.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-10-30 13:05 [#02248928]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02248883 | Show recordbag



thanks for doing your best


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-10-30 13:23 [#02248931]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it only takes 1 accident.



 

offline bit bare from Chilean Vulture Rising on 2008-10-30 13:28 [#02248933]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



currently the obama has double projected electoral votes,
so your vote may not matter anyways. but you should go and
vote if you already registered.


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-10-30 14:02 [#02248942]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02248931 | Show recordbag



good point
best yet


 

offline bit bare from Chilean Vulture Rising on 2008-10-30 14:10 [#02248945]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



if i were a citizen i would for sure vote obama. his
campaign has been facts and plans. while the other fella has
just been tap dancing for the public.

plus obama has this secret weapon


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2008-10-30 14:26 [#02248951]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker



The world may be run by that establishment - and if it is
then Obama is apart of it too.

Obama is really no different then McCain - let alone Bush.

How come no mention of suspending the "Patriot Act" that the
"Bush Regime" implemented.

How come no talk about our Monetary Policy? McCain and
Obama instead rather sidetrack the public about these "tax
plans" and reaching out to Joe the Plumber.

How come there's little talk about our foreign empire? We
all know McCain is huge pro-war, but so is Obama. He has no
problem sending more troops to Afghanistan.

Why is Obama for these bailouts when they blame it on these
same institutions greed? Take a look around. Bush is for
all this government intervention and so is Obama and
McCain.

Stop buying into the propaganda. Bush and McCain are big
government individuals just like Obama is. Neo-Cons and
Liberals should just form one party - the amount of
unconstitutional and socialist things Bush has done these 8
years sounds like the platform Obama is running on.


 

offline bit bare from Chilean Vulture Rising on 2008-10-30 14:28 [#02248952]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



and you have been working for the McCain campaign for how
long?

go away you idoit zombie puppet


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-10-30 14:32 [#02248954]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



the only thing keeping a person from entering multiple
votes is a small red light and a beep. you can put in as
many as you want if you time it right and there's not a lot
of people, and even after the fact its not like they can go
in and nullify your vote ...


 

offline bit bare from Chilean Vulture Rising on 2008-10-30 14:34 [#02248955]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



voting sounds fun!


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2008-10-30 14:34 [#02248956]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker | Followup to bit bare: #02248952



Are you an idiot or just illiterate?


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-10-30 14:37 [#02248957]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to revpersona: #02248951 | Show recordbag



yeah, but obama is more likely to get mad and identify
himself with something else than a politician, but then
he'll probably get shoot by the mike & rich oligarchs


 

offline bit bare from Chilean Vulture Rising on 2008-10-30 14:46 [#02248961]
Points: 408 Status: Regular



no revpersona youre just realizing that youre part of the
problem everyone has to fix


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2008-10-30 14:48 [#02248962]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker | Followup to bit bare: #02248961



You're not even worth the time for a proper rebuttal. If
you fail at reading comprehension that badly then you
shouldn't be allowed to exercise your right to vote perhaps.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-10-30 15:11 [#02248967]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to revpersona: #02248962



why say mean things to each other?

i feel like humanity is about to be completely obliterated.
yeah it will be good for nature since we wont be around
fucking up natural habitats for animals and cutting down
trees, dropping poisons into the oceans, but - i dont know.
i kind of like being human, it has its fun parts i suppose.
i would like to see the human race go on for a bit in a
peaceful way


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-10-30 15:17 [#02248969]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02248967 | Show recordbag



that's not a president task!


 

offline b6662966 from ? on 2008-10-30 15:21 [#02248972]
Points: 1110 Status: Lurker



Vote for the black guy. Kool-Aid and Newport Cigarette
stocks will rise and the economy will begin to heal itself.


 


Messageboard index