Do We Over Analyze Music ? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 408 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614262
Today 9
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
Do We Over Analyze Music ?
 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-11-08 08:37 [#00433106]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Analyzing is fun, it's fun to pick apart every little detail
and pit bands, albums, and songs against one another in a
brutal fight for supremacy.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2002-11-08 08:38 [#00433107]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



this is jist a bunch of jessies talkin pish man.


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2002-11-08 08:52 [#00433119]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker



Now were analizing over wither we analize music too
much.........when will it ever end ? :D

And yes I probably do over analize music,because I enjoy it
:)


 

offline Clic on 2002-11-08 10:29 [#00433247]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00432783



You look a bit like Spike Speagle in that photo.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2002-11-08 11:18 [#00433295]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker



If what’s being said it genuine and someone feels and
trruly believes what they are saying and have enough passion
forr a piece of music then I think they can go as farr as
they want. But I think a lot of the time people don’t and
therre is a lot of bullshit.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-08 11:18 [#00433297]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00432924



yes!

thats the point i was getting at. the music starts to lose
something when you talk and talk and talk and talk about it.


sometimes one should just listen and experience
it......rather than make suppositions about what the artist
was trying to do....or what you THINK he/she was trying to
do.

so saying that.....for me ART (as in painting and sculpture)
is wholly different. not only do i enjoy looking at the
piece....i like knowing what it's made of, where the artist
came from, and what might have inspired him.

is this a double standard....why yes.....i guess it
is.......ehheheheh =0D


 

offline uzim on 2002-11-08 13:55 [#00433481]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



it depends of the music of course, i think you can't
generalize with all musics.
and do you mean analysing the instrumental part, the lyrics,
or the whole thing?

analyzing lyrics NIN or Tool albums/songs for example is
necessary to fully appreciate them.

as for idm... only thing you could do is to search for
technical things (which i don't know any single think about
btw - "amen break"? "snare rush"? huh). not as much
interesting i think, no meanings at all, but that's only my
opinion.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-08 14:00 [#00433485]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



well...

I think its important to analyze music, as long as you can
still just listen.

when i want to, i can listen and anazlye, but i make a
concious effort to do it.

other wise, i just listen. I think its important to be able
to do both (as a musician).

But i will say, if you just analyze and dont listen, its
very bad. So many people at berklee (mostly the jazz
students) are just so obsessed with theory and what chords
to use etc etc etc... it loses its emotion.

i make a concious effort to learn as much about music as i
can, but not lose the ability to just listen.

i know people who listen to music and say "oh, listen to
that, the chords are Amaj7, F7, E7, C#-7, and the melody,
its goin Do Ti La Re Do Mi Do.

i fucking hate that to no end. JUST LISTEN.

sure, if i stopped, and got into analyzing mode, i could
hear all that too, but its not what i focus on.

The same applies to production techniques. I just listen,
but then ill acctually think "ok whats goin on" and analyze
the production.

so... yeah.

Long story short: analyzing good, listening good.
Just analyzing:bad, just listening: not nessasarilly bad,
but its alsogood to analyze.

imo


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-08 14:04 [#00433487]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



yeah, I'm pretty similar...kinda have 2 listening modes;
sometimes I'm just listening for the sheer thrill of
listening to music, no real thought involved, just
enjoyment...catch me at the right time & I dance me socks
off...:)..

then sometimes I like to listen really closely to
tunse...especially shit like AE...paying attention to all
the details & enjoying the textures & rhythms on a different
level...less physical, more cerebal...

Both are equally enjoyable, I reckon....

And I think sometimes, espcially on mbs, it's handy to use
music as a jumping off point to other subjects...so what can
looks like people over-analysing stuff is really just using
it a reference point; it something we all share so it's
handy, kinda like a shared language...



 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2002-11-08 16:00 [#00433655]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to LeCoeur: #00433297



It's nice to see us agree (on the music anyway... is this
a double standard....why yes.....i guess it
is.......ehheheheh
... hm, it's no fun when you just
admit it like that! :-p Now i can't cleverly point out you
have a double standard anymore ;-))... because it's always a
nice experience to see someone else say what you're
thinking... hehe... it's like i wrote this myself:
sometimes one should just listen and experience
it......rather than make suppositions about what the artist
was trying to do....or what you THINK he/she was trying to
do.
I fully agree! (hell, i even wrote an essay on this
subject when i was still in artschool... pretty much saying
how arthistory-class sometimes ruined art for me ;-) And she
(teacher) loved it, lol).

Like i've said before: i don't make music myself, so i can't
even listen to music in that way... 'how was it created'...
like Zeus described. Sometimes i just feel blessed for my
ignorance ;-)

I mean... eversince i learned to work with QuarkXpress i
can't look at posters or magazine-layouts normally anymore.
I just see QuarkXpress-compositions. Most of that stuff
seems boring to me now.

I fear it would be the same for music. When you understand
it too much, you lose lose something at the same time.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 16:53 [#00433702]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



OK, when I said non-referential, I meant non-referential
to language, is that OK? And the language is the house of
meaning as Heidegger put it so nicely. A music that refers
to another music is still non-referential when it comes to
associating meaning with it.


Fuck Heidegger with an old shoe.

Music is a form of communication. In some forms it may be as
obscure as Chinese to you (I'm assuming you don't speak
Chinese here, okay).

But just because you don't understand Mandarin is no reason
to say the Chinese are talking nonsense. And the same is
true of music: whether or not you understand the
language/idiom, there is semantic content. Hell, just the
fact that it's structured at all is a kind of message--what
do you think SETI is looking for?

[snip]

(When listening to tuwan folk band Huun huur tu I always
get all those religious associations, whereas most of it
talks about breeding horses and living in Taiga).


I think you're making HUGE assumptions about the relative
importance or unimportance of breeding horses and living in
Taiga to those who do it! I suspect it may be a lot more
important to them than it sounds to you.

I have to say I am a little surprised that I have
succeeded in maintaining an intelligent discussion without
resorting to talking about porn for three posts straight.


Wet dripping snatch! Soapy tit wank! Cum on my face and
tits! Bang my ass harder and longer!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 16:56 [#00433706]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00433485



A great way to get out of analytical listening mode is to
slip on the ol' headphones and fire up the tunes, then drink
a beer while posting to the ol' bulletin board.

Do anything else while listening. That's how I found out
what a good soundtrack loop finding jazz records is to sweet
sweeet loooooove makin'.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 21:08 [#00434130]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



fleetmice:

Fuck Heidegger with an old shoe.

*chokes* ... how could you ... what blasphemy!

Music is a form of communication. In some forms it may be
as
obscure as Chinese to you (I'm assuming you don't speak
Chinese here, okay).


Music is a form of communication? Sometimes ... not always
though. I mean hippies chanting "all we are saying is give
peace a chance" most definitely have a message to
"communicate" ... but I don't really think Wagner was trying
to "communicate" a point (although debatable, as his music
was inspired by Schopenhauer - thus arguably "communicating"
the will). More importantly, how do you define
"communication"? It seems you put a lot of weight on meaning
and content. But a definition can't be all encompassing -
there will be something exceeding this definition (by
definition). To exclude what exceeds this definition is
facism. Of course, it works the otherway as well - if
music/language is defines as pure non-communication. viva le
différance!

so .. analysing is cool I guess (and depends on matter of
degree).. but an attempt to totally reduce music imo hides
some of this mysticism about music.



 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-08 21:15 [#00434134]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



good to see ya k dallas.......

yea......i mean i think analyzing is OK to a certain degree
(esp classical music) however i've just seen some songs
talked to DEATH on the MB and it just gets ummm dare i say
boring.....ehhheh

i like to FEEL music....body and BRAIN!

i don't make music....so the techie stuff doesn't really
interest me....i'm glad because unlike some people on this
MB i think richards piano work is AMAZING.....anyone who
disagree's will be killed by the 'thought NINJA' so
beware.....ehhehheh =0)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 21:16 [#00434135]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



But a definition can't be all encompassing -
there will be something exceeding this definition (by
definition). To exclude what exceeds this definition is
facism.


You're talking crazy talk. Something that exceeds a
definition is by definition part of another definition. What
you're describing as fascism is more accurately called
clarity.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 21:24 [#00434138]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



Yo LeC: :)

Tend to agree there .. i mean by labelling music by
artist/album/genre is arguably analysing .. but again .. all
a matter of degree.

Do you paint by any chance? That might account for this
double standard? :)

fleetM:

exactly - to be ordered to speak clear and concise is this
very call of facism .. analogous if you like to squarepusher
being told to "make more sense" in his breakbeat work!!!



 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-08 21:28 [#00434142]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434138



ehhehe

i have an ART degree.....and i do paint, sculpt, draw
etc......and yes that may be the reason for the DOUBLE
standard. =0)

smartypants

i like how fleet has multiplied.....he's a MICE
now.....plural....tee hee


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 21:31 [#00434143]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434138



HAHA, every coherent word we speak births a jackbooted thug
carrying out counterrevolutionary beatings against the
proletariat!


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 21:36 [#00434145]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



Ahh.. well there you go. That "do you make music" poll might
account for this over-analysing?

Could just be (losely) incompatible vocabularies being used
- quoting jandso what can
looks like people over-analysing stuff is really just using
it a reference point; it something we all share so it's
handy, kinda like a shared language
.

The one says - "oh that's really nice, makes me all warm n
fuzzy inside" .. the other sais, "that's some mean ring mod
on the vox, and those granulated drums really kick."


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 21:38 [#00434148]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



fleetmice: if you want to put it that way .. tho i don't
think i'd be "fighting" for a revolution - just a right for
existence (co-existence)? dunno - it seems if you were to
totally reduce music, it would ammount to a contradiction -
which is perfectly fine by me. :) *puts on some pretty
music*


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-11-08 21:39 [#00434149]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict



Package, consume and recycle. Rhythms, melodies and beats.
Music for the masses. Masses for the music. Ever-changing;
money, records and hands. Many slaves to the industries,
yet a few remain free...

Post-Modern Weeze *


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 21:44 [#00434155]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



Amen ...

Music has no message, it is but a simularcum!


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 21:49 [#00434166]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434148



As the Church of the SubGenius used to put it, "science does
not remove the terror of the Gods". I don't think it's
possible to "reduce" anything. Understanding and
clarification embiggens the spirit.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 21:53 [#00434176]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



something along those lines yeah - didn't mean to come
across so preachy and all that .. but you get that with
Derrida :)

"Terror of the gods"?

dunno bout that though - it seems to me like an inescapable
delusion - (hence its not a delusion) - that might be
the terror?


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 21:56 [#00434179]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



What I think it means is that no amount of learning and
knowledge can remove the stark acid-etched terror that is
the mystery of existence, the abyss we all scuttle over one
another like frightened roaches to avoid gazing into.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 22:01 [#00434189]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



v. true that. The "problem of presence" (/existence). The
abyss of death (/suicide) is an understandable taboo - no
words can express the terror and the hypocrisy these words
yield. :)


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-08 22:04 [#00434192]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



well .. maybe not literal terror - its an unknown terror
[not that that makes any more sense] haha.

so back to anal-y-sing.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-08 22:43 [#00434214]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434189



Nono. What I mean is that totality is incomprehensible and
purposeless and that can be frightening when confronted.
Just ask God why he's here. If he knows then he isn't God,
and if he doesn't then He's just as baffled as we are.

So knowledge can never be a worthy enemy of mystery. It will
always fail so we don't have to fear it as a kind of
fascism.


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-11-08 23:01 [#00434221]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



Music is so great beacause it affects you at a level of
emotion that nothing else can touch. No words or pictures...
just sound producing emotion. Thats what its all about. If
your a musician then your trained to listen to certain
things (chords, syncopation, harmony), but other then that
its just about enjoying it. And I perfer that to analyzing
any day.

Music is mean to be listened to... and it should stand on
its own. Some music is meant to express certain things like
political, social, envioromental issues. I could understand
where those would want to be analyzed. Some music is there
just to listen to, and spark emotion.

I think talking about something so much can really be little
and ruin music. Thats why I dont really like to critique
other peoples tracks and tear them apart ... no music maker
wants to hear someone else tell them how to write their
track.... you know? I see it allot at WATMM and it really
pisses me off to no end. ...

I dont know.. I guess what I am trying to say is that you
dont have to be a music major or an intellectual person to
apprieciate good music (or know good music when you hear it)
and talking hours and hours on end about it kinda takes the
fun out of it.



 

offline pachi from yo momma (United States) on 2002-11-08 23:08 [#00434226]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mickey Mouse: #00434221



well said, mickey

=)


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 00:03 [#00434251]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



fleetmice:

"Nono. What I mean is that totality is incomprehensible
and purposeless and that can be frightening when confronted.
Just ask God why he's here. If he knows then he isn't God,
and if he doesn't then He's just as baffled as we are.

So knowledge can never be a worthy enemy of mystery. It will
always fail so we don't have to fear it as a kind of
fascism. "


I tend to agree about the totality thing ... "language is
the house of being" .. constructs a false image (or its
false because it is an image). The prison house of
language is not a prison. However, within, or
in language, there can still be facism. To avoid it
completely probably leads to relativism .. (and that in
itself can be considered a form of facism. There must be an
escape from this facism, otherwise it becomes a concept void
of meaning). facism is being compelled to speak a certain
way - eg. sensical/clear, seething soaring, rising roaring.




 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2002-11-09 01:48 [#00434279]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



you are anaylizing how you anaylize music. clearly you
like to analize


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 04:04 [#00434308]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



... and listen to music :)


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-11-09 04:24 [#00434311]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



do we over analyse blatantecho relationship???

:)


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-09 16:24 [#00434739]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Mostly I just listen and daydream

or dance


 

offline corn_mouth from santiago (Chile) on 2002-11-09 16:53 [#00434762]
Points: 1321 Status: Lurker



do we over analyse this shithole called message board?????
and its shithead members???

☻_☻


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2002-11-09 16:59 [#00434769]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict



The hell...

:o


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-09 17:06 [#00434775]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434251



There must be an escape from this facism, otherwise it
becomes a concept void of meaning). facism is being
compelled to speak a certain way - eg. sensical/clear,
seething soaring, rising roaring.


We must go forwards, not downwards; upwards, not backwards,
and always twirling twirling twirling towards freedom.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 17:15 [#00434779]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



We must go forwards, not downwards; upwards, not
backwards,
and always twirling twirling twirling towards freedom.


true, esp. the "always twirling twirling twirling" part ..
emphasis on the verbs ... freedom isn't a statitic state ...
or something.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-09 17:29 [#00434789]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434779



wAIT A SECOND HERE. wHO'S HAVING WHO ON AGAIN?!@

aHAHAHAHA



 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 17:29 [#00434792]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



all in all tho, music is feck'n great.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-09 17:32 [#00434795]
Points: 21459 Status: Lurker



analyzing, seperating into parts and seeing how these parts
interrelate, is the main reason music is interesting
perhaps.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 17:32 [#00434796]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



dunno fleetmice: you tell me
:) hehe
he


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-09 17:32 [#00434797]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434796



teehee


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 17:37 [#00434800]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



I think i'm going to go looking for a face ...

mwm: dunno .. i think there's a lot of things we do with
music - maybe.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-09 17:39 [#00434802]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #00434800



I think i'm going to go looking for a face ...

uh oh

That's what Ed Gein said


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 17:40 [#00434803]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



who's ed gein ?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-09 17:43 [#00434806]
Points: 21459 Status: Lurker



yeah. That's probably my favorite part. When listening to
something like antichrist superstar or eyes of stanley pain,
analyzing the parts isn't as interesting as the entire theme
expressed (probably only because it contains meaningful
sounds: language.. growls and stuff are meaningful too...
stuff like percussion hits are usually meant to be
interpreted as their relationship to eachother into a
pattern.)


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2002-11-09 17:44 [#00434809]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



people always forget about the silent gaps );


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-11-09 17:48 [#00434813]
Points: 21459 Status: Lurker



It's harder to work with silent gaps to make patterns
because if you have a solid stream of tone, then compose
with silent gaps... if any two gaps land on top of
eachother, you'll only percieve them as one, whereas you can
play a cymbol and a drum hit at the same time (unless you
have gaps of various sizes and scales... still the larger
ones will cover up the smaller ones.)


 


Messageboard index