You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
Now online (3)
recycle
DADONCK
belb
...and 136 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613865
Today 5
Topics 127525
  
 
Messageboard index
Oink shut down by pigs
 

offline rezpeni on 2007-10-23 11:00 [#02136830]
Points: 333 Status: Lurker



RIP Napster, Audiogalaxy, Oink. Notice a trend? Every time
they get better. This shit is not going away.


 

offline Sano on 2007-10-23 11:08 [#02136834]
Points: 2502 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sano: #02136750



I can almost taste it.


 

offline OK on 2007-10-23 11:09 [#02136835]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



I hear din venezuela they are going to remove a paragraph of
the constitution that states the protection of intellectual
property.

maybe they should move servers there.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 11:15 [#02136837]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to OK: #02136835



i heard the most beautiful women live in venezuela. lets all
move there.


 

offline OK on 2007-10-23 11:31 [#02136841]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



lets make of it the IDM capital of the world!

.. no maybe lets not... because all the hot women will move
from there.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 11:41 [#02136843]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to OK: #02136841



all the women there are already part of the IDM 2.0
phenomenon

you're a dinosaur


 

offline _gvarek_ from next to you (Poland) on 2007-10-23 12:04 [#02136848]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker



they will catch us all!!!!!!


Attached picture

 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-23 12:11 [#02136849]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



ballix


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2007-10-23 12:53 [#02136865]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



oh noes!


 

offline hexane on 2007-10-23 14:52 [#02136912]
Points: 2035 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



haha i was on oink for all of 24 hours! what a cock tease

lol@'back to the pile'...im already there



 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-23 14:57 [#02136916]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



bbc report


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:03 [#02136920]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to PORICK: #02136916



most of the information in that news report is wrong

"members pay for subscriptions to download"

"the owner received thousands in subscription fees"


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 15:05 [#02136925]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



any legal person can confirm whether people can be locked
away for owning a torrent-site? i don't believe it for a
sec.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-23 15:07 [#02136930]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #02136920



yep, as per usual.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:09 [#02136931]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to goDel: #02136925



i think the main thing that they're concerned about is the
whole "donation" thing.

as long as he didn't make any profit from it, i'm guessing
there's not much that can be done seriously.....but if they
can prove he was making money from it, then that's when it
becomes a bit more serious.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:09 [#02136932]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to PORICK: #02136930



the media is awesome

don't you agree?

:)


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-23 15:12 [#02136935]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



im packing my bags and heading for mexico, whos with me???


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 15:12 [#02136936]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #02136931



does it matter whether he made any money if people gave him
money out of their free will - without anything in return?
you may be right, but i find it hard to believe. i think the
guy will be free in a couple of days.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 15:13 [#02136937]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to larn: #02136935



venezuela!


 

offline Co-existence from Bergen (Norway) on 2007-10-23 15:13 [#02136938]
Points: 3388 Status: Regular | Followup to PORICK: #02136916



What a laugh! The police inviting the BBC along on the
action part of the shutdown. Ha ha. Talk about staging some
propaganda for us...

Well, anyone nervous right now?



 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:15 [#02136939]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to goDel: #02136936



i agree......the authorities would have to make some pretty
tenuous links but i'm sure there's enough people who would
rather make an example out of this by any means necessary


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:16 [#02136940]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Co-existence: #02136938



exactly..you kinda beat me to it

this is all a show, to try and show the public "you can't
get away with this anymore - this is what will happen if you
try"

and the fact that both the police and the media are talking
horseshit is proof enough


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 15:20 [#02136943]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



what are the odds that it'll be up again in a couple of
days. it was a private tracker, only allowing people with an
invitation. people are allowed to exchange music in private,
right?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 15:22 [#02136947]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to Co-existence: #02136938



spot on


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:25 [#02136949]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to goDel: #02136943



well, the police are deliberately changing the facts to suit
them, by stating that it is a subscription site and not an
invitation site.

the whole "invite" scheme should be working in the admin's
favour, but it seems that this blatant and obvious fact is
being completely disregarded by the authorities


 

offline cuntychuck from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2007-10-23 15:29 [#02136952]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker



back to soulseek.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-23 15:35 [#02136957]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #02136949



with a bit of luck, the new oink - called moo - will be up
in a matter of weeks with the modification that pre-releases
of the majors aren't allowed - or pop-music in general (so
the big companies can go back to sleep).


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2007-10-23 15:36 [#02136958]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to goDel: #02136957



that would be awesome


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-23 17:02 [#02136979]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Followup to PORICK: #02136916 | Show recordbag



it's very crap bbc let themselves be used for propaganda.
i don't think the police has any proof the guy made alot of
money of the site


 

offline hexane on 2007-10-23 17:06 [#02136981]
Points: 2035 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #02136979 | Show recordbag



:(


 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2007-10-23 17:14 [#02136984]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



It will be back up and running again as soon as someone
works out how to make big money from it!


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-23 17:27 [#02136986]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



on the other hand i had to post here at 0:24
because those oink users are so stupid:
http://torrentfreak.com/oink-admin-released-from-custody-07
1023/


 

offline mimi on 2007-10-23 17:32 [#02136989]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



who wants to be in my cell block?


 

offline hexane on 2007-10-23 17:36 [#02136993]
Points: 2035 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



R.I.P oink blog


 

offline yoyoyo from cornwall on 2007-10-23 19:14 [#02137015]
Points: 1543 Status: Lurker



"criminal investigation continues into the identities and
activities of the site's
users"

you are all going to jail


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2007-10-23 19:22 [#02137017]
Points: 24587 Status: Lurker | Followup to yoyoyo: #02137015



All 180,000. That'll teach us.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-10-24 01:00 [#02137075]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



The text on the side of the “police car” says
“Caught on camera” :D


indeed:


Attached picture

 

offline llc from United States on 2007-10-24 01:26 [#02137076]
Points: 250 Status: Regular



Wow, this sucks. =|

Well, let's hope they don't get my friend, he had 210gb
up/down, lol.


 

offline Co-existence from Bergen (Norway) on 2007-10-24 01:38 [#02137077]
Points: 3388 Status: Regular



Does anyone think that the pigs have infiltrated forums like
xltronic in the investigation? OMG, Sgt. Policeman!!!

lol.


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2007-10-24 01:51 [#02137079]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker | Followup to goDel: #02136943



it won't be back up. this isn't the pirate bay, this isn't
Sweden,

This Is England.

All that actions like these do is force the scene further
underground. They'll never kill it, no matter how much they
delude themselves that they can.


 

offline kid from mum (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-24 01:59 [#02137082]
Points: 551 Status: Regular



there goes my 7.6 ratio.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2007-10-24 03:37 [#02137092]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



wow, i havent had my computer all day, saw oink was down and
have been itching to discuss this.

im seriously appalled at this. grant, im not that surprised
it happened, but INTERPOL?? thats some pretty serious shit.
im almost a bit scared actually, because they at this point
know only a widespread attack on users will intimidate us.

that granted, i did indeed have the epiphany of "oh yeah, i
felt the same way about napster."

but beyond that, i really think that music (and other media)
sharing is a very important thing to move forward as a
society. imo, you should not be able to make a living off of
selling music. yeah, you should be able to make a few bucks
selling physical copies, and obviously live shows warrant
payment, but pre-recorded music? art should be a hobby -
it's not progressive to a society for people to be paid to
self-indulge as music lends itself. work should be
productive, art should be a passion.

of course, there's also the argument that all work is some
sort of art, we'll see what this brings up.


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2007-10-24 03:57 [#02137097]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



most of the great art work through history has been
commissioned by wealthy investors.


 

offline hexane on 2007-10-24 04:05 [#02137098]
Points: 2035 Status: Lurker | Followup to bogala: #02137097 | Show recordbag



dont forget that many great works of art have come out of
poverty too..


 

offline SlipDrinkMats from Thanks (Bhutan) on 2007-10-24 04:13 [#02137100]
Points: 1744 Status: Regular



... thats some pretty serious shit.
im almost a bit scared actually, because they at this point
know only a widespread attack on users will intimidate
us.


All that actions like these do is force the scene
further
underground. They'll never kill it, no matter how much they
delude themselves that they can.


Are we talking about some deluded geeks that think they have
a right to steal and disseminate property that belongs to
large multinationals, or the synopsis for the forthcoming
Terminator IV movie?


 

offline kid from mum (United Kingdom) on 2007-10-24 04:46 [#02137112]
Points: 551 Status: Regular



i must admit i was very suprised by oinks shut down.
especially as slsk is still going. surely slsk can't go on
much longer, or maybe the yank police are too busy eating
donuts.


 

offline kurrrak from Bialystok (Poland) on 2007-10-24 07:46 [#02137180]
Points: 1264 Status: Lurker



So this was this whole Oink thing for...


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2007-10-24 07:55 [#02137181]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02137092 | Show recordbag



I agree with you somewhat on filesharing, and would even go
as far as to say most pop-stars are grossly over-payed, but
I'm not sure about the idea that music/art should
necessarily be a hobby, and therefore separate from work. I
feel that it's possible that some artists spend their entire
day working on art, which might cause working a separate job
to be difficult. In these cases, art must also pay the
bills. Is it fair to deny great art to force a person to
work a "day job"?

My stance on P2P filesharing is that it should only be used
as a medium of demonstrating music or software. Of
the torrents I've downloaded in the last +/- 12months, I've
purchased every game or cd that I actually enjoyed. The
rest, I delete from my harddrive to save space/not steal.
It's obviously more expensive than just downloading
everything for free, but it's cheaper than buying music
without having heard it first. I submit that
buying/supporting music is its own reward, though you must
try to purchase directly from the artist as often as
possible. I've forgotten why I thought Napster, gnutella,
morpheus were so great back in the day. I'd much rather
physically own cds and then rip my own mp3s afterwards.
Maybe it's just me.


 

offline big from lsg on 2007-10-24 08:04 [#02137186]
Points: 23711 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the moral discussion is useless, unless you like philosophy
or your own psychology
people will just downoad because it's easy. oink made it too
easy (at least to 5 gig. which are more albums then most
people would buy in their life)


 

offline OK on 2007-10-24 10:09 [#02137222]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



intellectual property is such a ridicuouls concept anyway.


 


Messageboard index