|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-24 08:22 [#01866545] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866530
 | 
| 
     
 
 | are there only two of us on this board? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ceri JC
             from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-03-24 08:25 [#01866548] Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01866545 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | What, who can see the appeal of Islam? ;-) 
 There were a few people who have stuck their head over the
 parapet and said that they were Christians, only one I can
 remember by name, other than us, is Tibbar. I'm pretty sure
 there were a couple more Americans, but I can't be certain.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-24 08:26 [#01866549] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866530
 | 
| 
     
 
 | also (out of curiosity) could you show me how that is unclear or there is a contradiction? I've never really heard
 of this area.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ceri JC
             from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-03-24 08:29 [#01866552] Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01866549 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Sorry, I don't understand. Do you want me to show you something in the bible that detracts from this Calvinistic
 belief that offends giginger or that is evidence for it? IE
 Which POV do you want me to play Devil's Advocate for?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-24 08:38 [#01866565] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866552
 | 
| 
     
 
 | talking about the calvinistic belief. sorry i should have made myself more clear.
 
 See the way i look at it is while i believe grace is the
 gift. Faith comes with accepting the grace and no one is
 forced to take it. The idea that "God picks and chooses who
 he saves and you and your actions play no part in it" doesnt
 seem sound because it removes the idea of free will which we
 have here on earth.
 
 Thats how one can be an apostate and turn from their faith
 having already matured in it. But i suppose thats a whole
 other issue.
 
 Basically in my personal view its not that he predestined
 it. He knew in advance who would and wouldnt and didnt force
 anyone to do anything. (just personal opinion)
 
 Like how if we created robots/etc for a living. We know them
 inside and out. We know what they will do in a given
 situation based on how we made and programmed them. Its the
 same idea here except there are billions of variables
 involved. That probably doesnt make sense but it does in my
 head :p
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2006-03-24 08:52 [#01866588] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | no it's pretty comon to hate beliefs that are closer to your own, so as to assure yourself in your own
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 08:59 [#01866602] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866530
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Well if you believe that God is the logos, the logos is always a living thing, a process, an activity. It's alive in
 the mind, not on the printed page. So individual perspective
 and interpretation is inextricably bound to it. Trying to
 freeze-dry it into doctrine can only kill it a little.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 09:01 [#01866604] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01866588
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Yeah that's why evangelicals froth at the mouth and become completely unhinged over Mormonism and Jehovah's Witnesses,
 more so than over Buddhists Jews etc.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  evolume
             from seattle (United States) on 2006-03-24 10:02 [#01866662] Points: 10965 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | There were 4 mormons on Cash Cab the other night.  They only won $375.  Fuckin' losers.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-03-24 11:30 [#01866756] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | ha, this site sucks. 
 they cling to their faith like michael jackson clings to
 four year old boys.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-03-24 11:31 [#01866758] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | they will all go to hell anyway. only mormons go to heaven 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ceri JC
             from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-03-24 12:19 [#01866807] Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to evolume: #01866662 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Mormons run las vegas. Fact. VP: I'll try to dig out a couple of the quotes. Gigi will be over the moon that we're
 turning this thread  into the XLT bible study group. :D
 
 Have a good weekend all, I'm off out.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  glasse
             from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-24 17:23 [#01866973] Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | From what I have seen the bible teaches election and predestination along side free will and personal
 accountabilty, sometimes in the same paragraph.  I can only
 guess that it is not a matter of contradiction but based on
 such advanced principals that it couldn't really be
 explained fully to a human person.  It does say somewhere
 that it is God's will to draw all men to himself, so I can't
 imagine that there is just some arbitrary selection process
 at work.  It probably comes down to God knowing every
 intimate possibility in a persons life including every state
 of mind, emotion, environment, etc that a person will be in,
 and based on all of that knowing whether or not a person
 would ever be able to accept salvation.  Then, based on the
 foreknowledge of a persons salvation or reprobation (note
 that foreknowledge does not necessarily mean fatalistic
 predetermination there is still a very valid and real choice
 for the individual within time and space), God may design
 events around that persons life that are tied and locked
 into the events of others so that everything is, in that
 sense, predestined.  How could God use, say, the Romans as
 his instrument of judgement against Israel and still allow
 the
 Romans to be people with their own will.  The Romans would
 have had to have wanted to do it anyway, but God in his
 providence arranged events in time and space to suit his
 purpose.
 
 I sometimes think of it like a movie where there is a
 director, editor, etc (someone who has final cut) and the
 film is written with a start and an end, both of which are
 known, however the actors are sometimes improvising,
 sometimes following prompts from not not only the director
 but other actors and even people off screen yelling
 directions at them, and it is up to the director/editor to
 make it all work into something that somehow follows the
 script.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2006-03-24 19:10 [#01866992] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01866973
 | 
| 
     
 
 | why would a god want to direct a movie?  just for fun? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  scup_bucket
             from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-03-24 19:43 [#01866996] Points: 4540 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | You can't argue with an angsty teen yelling about how much Christianity sucks.
 
 This is because they have a very suscinct argument, which to
 disprove requires about ten years worth of point-obscuring
 elaboration.
 
 I might as well post this now...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  scup_bucket
             from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-03-24 19:44 [#01866997] Points: 4540 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | fuck!  I make no sense and I made a spelling error. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 20:53 [#01867001] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01866992
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Well, he did get to pull one of those casting-couch deals with one of his leading actresses...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 21:12 [#01867002] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to scup_bucket: #01866996
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Pffft. I will disprove it in four words, two of them hyphenated: religion is horse-shit.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 21:13 [#01867003] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867002
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Wait - who am I disproving again - the angsty teen or the Christian apologist? Well it applies to either.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 21:15 [#01867004] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Historically a triple fleetmouse post has been enough to disembowel the toughest thread. I will seal its fate with a
 quadruple.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2006-03-24 21:52 [#01867005] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867004
 | 
| 
     
 
 | there's no turning back now.  this iron chef battle is OH-VAH!
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-25 01:44 [#01867026] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866807
 | 
| 
     
 
 | that sounds good. should be pretty interesting and most definately an interesting change of pace from the usual
 athiest/agnostic stance that usually roams the board.
 
 look forward to it :)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  bogala
             from NYC (United States) on 2006-03-25 05:04 [#01867075] Points: 5125 Status: Regular
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I hooked up with (sucked face) a promise keeper (no sex until marriage) on a train trip a few year ago. She was
 really hot and an incredible kisser. Kinda kooky though.Did
 I mention that she wa hot and a really good kisser? It made
 me even more horny that she was a virgin.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Raz0rBlade_uk
             on 2006-03-25 06:25 [#01867084] Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | the only big problem i have with christianity is the way it alienates people. essentially we are all in the same boat.
 we are all the same in the sense that we know literally fuck
 all of the existance of any god. the ONLY difference between
 me and a christian is that they decided that this single
 book was correct and believeable. it's the difference
 between saying a simple "yes" and "no" and this could change
 soooo easily. i used to be a christian and i used to look
 down on people and laugh at them thinking "hhahaha, you're
 going to hell. you poor poor individual. you're lost in this
 world, corrupted by evil."
 eventually i decided that i was being incredibly naive and i
 only believed in it because i desperately wanted to have
 eternal life, which was the selfish part of me. my beliefs
 have changed. i now believe in trusting my common sense, my
 rational thinking and logic. i've come more to terms with
 death. i've accepted it. i don't like the actual
 idea of death but i just don't think about it and it
 doesn't affect me. in a way this is what i was doing with my
 beliefs before. using the idea of heaven to stop my fear of
 dying. i just think people should be more honest with each
 other and say "ok, let's face it, we are all doubtful. how
 much trust can we really put into the bible?"
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 06:39 [#01867086] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | My only problem with Christianity is the idea that what's subjectively true for some should be objectively true for
 all.
 
 Does your Christian testimony prove that there's a God? Then
 the flipside of that is that my atheist testimony proves
 that there's no God.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 06:40 [#01867087] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867086
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Well ok, not the ONLY problem I see, but that'll do for now. :D
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-25 09:08 [#01867106] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867086
 | 
| 
     
 
 | You know that a testimony doesnt actually prove something to the effect you can see (persay). Like i could tell you about
 mixing vinegar and baking soda and what would happen but
 then i could show you just that.
 
 The Christian testimony isnt necessarily going to make one
 that doesnt believe go "wow John really overcame his heroin
 addiction. I didnt think he would in fact i thought he was
 doomed. But if he credits it to God there must be something
 there."
 
 I think it can really serve to edify other believers. If
 perhaps they are down about something in their life... to
 read anothers personal testimony as encouragement. They can
 see what that person went through and see how God worked in
 their life helping them overcome whatever situation is at
 hand.
 
 On the flipside of that coin is your atheist testimony. But
 this is where i am confused. Are you saying its like set up
 similar? for example it may work like this if written
 out....
 
 1.used to believe
 2. stop believing
 3. good that came from stopping the belief system.
 
 thats pretty much how the Christian testimony works from
 what i read in my life....
 
 1. grew up
 2. came to know Christ
 3. good things and changes that occured from that day on
 that benefitted that individual and perhaps others.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-25 09:12 [#01867107] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01867084
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i used to be a christian and i used to look down on people and laugh at them thinking "hhahaha, you're going to
 hell. you poor poor individual. you're lost in this world,
 corrupted by evil."
 
 I cant say i have ever met one true Christian that has ever
 spoke like that in my life. The people i know are loving and
 caring. They also dont find someone being doomed to hell as
 being funny. Thats pretty twisted. They would be more
 concerned with telling that individual about thier personal
 beliefs and sharing the gospel with them.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 09:15 [#01867108] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01867106
 | 
| 
     
 
 | 1.used to believe 
 no one on earth starts out their life believing in a
 specific god.  they are taught to believe in it.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-25 09:23 [#01867111] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01867108
 | 
| 
     
 
 | that was the easiest way to put it for me. 
 alot of times you will (for example) have roman catholics
 that lose faith later in life. I suppose it was an
 assumption on my part. That was my bad.
 
 you are right though because to know a specific religion
 (muslim, jew, christian) you need to be directly taught
 about it.
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 09:44 [#01867115] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01867111
 | 
| 
     
 
 | 1. grew up 2. came to know Christ
 
 so you really think you're a more mature person because you
 believe in christianity than someone who doesn't?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  virginpusher
             from County Clare on 2006-03-25 10:11 [#01867126] Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01867115
 | 
| 
     
 
 | "grew up" shows that time has passed. For example i grew up Catholic for 18 years and then departed from those basic
 beliefs.
 
 Grew up shows an aging in years and not a maturity.
 
 I am sure we can all agree that i am immature.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Raz0rBlade_uk
             on 2006-03-25 10:57 [#01867136] Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | you could say though that the positive impact on ones life from being a christian is losing the fear of dying. being
 part of a community and feeling accepted are other things. i
 think the fact it's christianity specifically has very
 little to do with it. if i became a buddhist i'm sure my
 life would improve but i prefer to stick with what feels
 natural to me.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Ezkerraldean
             from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-03-25 11:56 [#01867155] Points: 5733 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | religion can make you feel good etc. by making you think you wont actually die but you will go to some nice fluffy place
 in the sky instead. but then all the religions insist that
 they are right and all the others are wrong. thats why the
 whole thing sucks. aswell as the fact that they are mostly
 not founded on any conclusive facts
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  uviol
             from United States on 2006-03-25 15:15 [#01867230] Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867086
 | 
| 
     
 
 | My only problem with Christianity is the idea that what's 
 subjectively true for some should be objectively true for
 all.
 
 I am one of the other nominal Christians on this board, as
 you may recall, but this statement is the exact opposite of
 the way I feel.  The only reason I believe in Christianity
 is my sneaking suspicion that it is objectively true despite
 my subjective wish that it wasn't.  Trust me, I'd love it if
 there was no afterlife at all, think of how much trouble
 that would save everyone!  However, at the same time, I look
 at the church and the tenets it teaches about loving your
 fellow man and I can't really see any harm in it, at least
 in its pure form.  If our actions really do mean something
 and there is a God, then Christianity is the religion I
 would choose out of them all because it identifies most with
 what I would consider to be important, that is, treating
 others as you would like to be treated.  This, of course, is
 speculative at best.  There are other religions with similar
 teachings, just as there are perversions of the Christian
 message.  To be honest, I think Roman Catholics have it
 together much more than any given Protestant denomination.
 I think everything in the universe is fairly doubtful, but I
 still find some value in the Christian message.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 15:38 [#01867238] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01867230
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Your wish and your sneaking suspicion are both subjective. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  fleetmouse
             from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 15:48 [#01867239] Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01867106
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Atheist testimony: 
 1) never believed
 2) tried prayer but nothing happened
 3) noticed that taking action was more effective than
 wishing
 4) have yet to see any reliable evidence that there's
 anything to religion other than a sometimes-beneficial,
 sometimes-harmful form of self hypnosis
 
 A friend of mine told me that if I lived as a Mormon for a
 month I'd be convinced that it was true. I asked him what
 would happen if he lived in an ashram as a Hare Krishna for
 a month. Obviously it works because there are both Hare
 Krishnas and Mormons - but they can't both be right!
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Gwely Mernans
             from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-03-25 16:00 [#01867240] Points: 9875 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01867230
 | 
| 
     
 
 | But why does that have to be an application of religion? These morals could just be good morals, good manners,
 healthy living. No need to slap a fish sticker on it.
 
 Personally, my faith and belief system revolves around the
 fact that there is so much complexity in the simplicity of
 all things around you, so much that I get the same awe from
 it as a christian does when they go euphoric and seizure on
 a church floor. Nevermind Adam, more like Atom. heh
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  glasse
             from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 16:02 [#01867241] Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | 
 Well, that was an analogy.  Of course a movie isn't real and
 the actors go home at the end of the day regardless of what
 happened to their character on screen, so we wouldn't say
 that God is directing a movie because what happens to people
 is very real.  The anaolgy attempts to look at an
 interventionous God, who has already given the beginning,
 ending, and major plot points of the story arc of time, but
 still allows people their own will and choice.  That's why I
 said that people improvise, because although God has a
 definite way He wants the story to end, and definite things
 He wants to see happen along the way, people's free choices
 become a wildcard.  That is why editing is a metaphor for
 God's foreknowledge in being able to organize and arrange
 everything that will ever happen, including people's free
 will choices and the consequences that come from them, into
 something that will still turn out right in the end.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  glasse
             from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 16:03 [#01867242] Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | It didn't link my response properly.  I was replying to R40f.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Gwely Mernans
             from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-03-25 16:07 [#01867243] Points: 9875 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01867241
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I take offence when people say god is a he. I don't beleive in a god and I don't disbeleive in a god. But a god has no
 fixation to our terminology. A god is so immensely superior
 to mankind that to describe the wills and ways of its
 actions would be incomprehensible. And to credit god to
 things it takes no part in is mentally retarded. If there is
 a god, and if god has ever done something, like set
 something it motion, it was a big explosion of some sort. It
 was the first and only conscious moment that came from
 nowhere. It was intentionality.
 
 Fuck sakes I knew if I came in this thread I'd start to rant
 about bullshit.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 16:10 [#01867245] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01867241
 | 
| 
     
 
 | i understand all that...  my point was literally, why would an omnipotent being do that?  you're telling me that there
 is this infinite sentient being or force that exists and has
 created a universe for its own amusement?  why?
 
 and furthermore, if it is all predetermined, then the
 actions in your life are controlled by god.  your sense of
 free will is illusory since you have been put here with a
 deliberate purpose and function.  that means that anything
 you do in your life, whether you are a good christian or a
 mass murderer, has been scripted by god for his "movie".
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  uviol
             from United States on 2006-03-25 16:25 [#01867251] Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01867240
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Gwely: It's true.  You can have those 'good' morals or 'good' manners, but without a system of religion behind it
 it seems hard to determine why one thing is 'good' and
 another thing isn't.  I do agree though that these manners
 and moral characteristics alone don't necessarily have to be
 indicative of a specific religion like Christianity since
 someone can clearly be a philanthropist without being
 Christian.
 
 fleetmouse: Of course they are both subjective, but wouldn't
 you agree that there is some way that things actually
 objectively are, regardless of what any one person believes?
 Unless you think existence is only an illusion of an
 individual mind, which could be possible I suppose, then
 there are external variables in the world that can't be
 controlled.  I was indirectly agreeing with your point that
 too many Christians bend their perceptions of an 'objective'
 reality based on what they subjectively believe, and then
 try to bring in other 'believers'.  What I'm saying is that
 based on my upbringing etc. etc. I have a greater
 inclination to give the Christian worldview a chance, but
 that sure as hell doesn't mean I'm gonna try to convince
 anyone else about it.. I can't prove Christianity more than
 I can prove that aliens exist.
 
 I'm skeptical of religion, my own included, but sometimes I
 think people write it off too quickly.  It isn't as if there
 is one 'true' atheistic baseline state of the world, and
 that people choose a specific religion as if they're
 choosing a weight loss program.  I agree that each belief is
 subjective, but then again, I doubt there's any way we'll
 ever really discover the objective state of reality that
 religion is supposedly departing from.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  glasse
             from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 17:33 [#01867276] Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01867243 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Look I mean that is fine if you think that way, and I am sorry if I offended you, but i am relaying the way in which
 the God in the bible is portrayed.  The God in the bible is
 portrayed as interventionous and also presents himself in
 the masculine because that is how he chooses to do it.  I
 didn't make it up.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Gwely Mernans
             from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-03-25 18:20 [#01867293] Points: 9875 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01867276
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Ofcourse you didn't make it up, a man did. A man did in a time when women had no voice in matters. And maybe, just
 maybe, way back in that time men referred to self profound
 thoughts and realizations as godsend, because their diction
 and intelligence hadn't evolved to the point of scientific
 reason.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  glasse
             from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 18:25 [#01867295] Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01867245 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | That is what I mean.  We do still have very valid and real choices.  I don't believe that our choices are
 predetermined.  Think, though that if God knows what choices
 everyone is going to make before the world even exists, then
 God would be able to arrange and manage how history plays
 out based on that foreknowledge.  He could funnel, connect,
 repress, allow etc. any and every action that people could
 make.  Now keep in mind too that God doesn't allow people to
 do everything they want and if he does not always when they
 want.  He can also influence or guide someone to do
 something other than what they want to do, the same as a
 friend might talk another friend out of a bad choice.  Other
 times, as in the case of the story of Pharoah and Moses, he
 may empower someone to do something against God's
 principals, in order that they fulfill their own
 reprobation, but it does say that before God hardened
 Pharoahs heart, Pharoah hardened Pharoahs heart.  So Pharoah
 did exactly what he wanted to do anyway, God just enabled it
 to happen in a way that would best suit his plan and purpose
 (For instance Pharoah might have let the people go out of
 fear because of the plagues put on Egypt, but what was
 really in his heart was a will to defy Moses and God and not
 let the people go)
 
 As to why, I think God created people to love him and for
 him to love them; the same reasons people have children.
 When a couple decided to have kids, they know that some of
 those kids could go down a bad path, get on hard drugs, rob
 a liquor store, whatever, but they still decide to have them
 anyway on the chance that they won't, or if they do will
 feel bad and do better.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  glasse
             from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 18:27 [#01867296] Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01867293 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Did you ever fathom that for all of the scientific knowledge and enlightenment that we have, we are still just like a
 small boy standing by an enormous ocean with a tin cup?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  r40f
             from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 19:11 [#01867306] Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01867295
 | 
| 
     
 
 | would you say you take a lot of drugs or A LOT of drugs? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  qrter
             from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-03-25 19:12 [#01867308] Points: 47414 Status: Moderator
 | 
| 
     
 
 | what the hell. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  JivverDicker
             from my house on 2006-03-25 19:18 [#01867311] Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01867306
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Haha!  Glasse is a bit daft that's given but I like to read Virginpushers views too.  Fleetmouse has had his say a
 million times and it was interesting.  I'm as disturbed as
 anyone by evangelical nutcases but It'd be nice to see
 Virgin and Uviol talk for a bit.  Everyone knows the
 sceptical side but I do find it fascinating peoples beliefs.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |