wo, wtf, overly open christian | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 246 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
wo, wtf, overly open christian
 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-24 08:22 [#01866545]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866530



are there only two of us on this board?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-03-24 08:25 [#01866548]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01866545 | Show recordbag



What, who can see the appeal of Islam? ;-)

There were a few people who have stuck their head over the
parapet and said that they were Christians, only one I can
remember by name, other than us, is Tibbar. I'm pretty sure
there were a couple more Americans, but I can't be certain.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-24 08:26 [#01866549]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866530



also (out of curiosity) could you show me how that is
unclear or there is a contradiction? I've never really heard
of this area.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-03-24 08:29 [#01866552]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to virginpusher: #01866549 | Show recordbag



Sorry, I don't understand. Do you want me to show you
something in the bible that detracts from this Calvinistic
belief that offends giginger or that is evidence for it? IE
Which POV do you want me to play Devil's Advocate for?


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-24 08:38 [#01866565]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866552



talking about the calvinistic belief. sorry i should have
made myself more clear.

See the way i look at it is while i believe grace is the
gift. Faith comes with accepting the grace and no one is
forced to take it. The idea that "God picks and chooses who
he saves and you and your actions play no part in it" doesnt
seem sound because it removes the idea of free will which we
have here on earth.

Thats how one can be an apostate and turn from their faith
having already matured in it. But i suppose thats a whole
other issue.

Basically in my personal view its not that he predestined
it. He knew in advance who would and wouldnt and didnt force
anyone to do anything. (just personal opinion)

Like how if we created robots/etc for a living. We know them
inside and out. We know what they will do in a given
situation based on how we made and programmed them. Its the
same idea here except there are billions of variables
involved. That probably doesnt make sense but it does in my
head :p


 

offline big from lsg on 2006-03-24 08:52 [#01866588]
Points: 23730 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



no it's pretty comon to hate beliefs that are closer to your
own, so as to assure yourself in your own


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 08:59 [#01866602]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866530



Well if you believe that God is the logos, the logos is
always a living thing, a process, an activity. It's alive in
the mind, not on the printed page. So individual perspective
and interpretation is inextricably bound to it. Trying to
freeze-dry it into doctrine can only kill it a little.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 09:01 [#01866604]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01866588



Yeah that's why evangelicals froth at the mouth and become
completely unhinged over Mormonism and Jehovah's Witnesses,
more so than over Buddhists Jews etc.


 

offline evolume from seattle (United States) on 2006-03-24 10:02 [#01866662]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular



There were 4 mormons on Cash Cab the other night. They only
won $375. Fuckin' losers.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-03-24 11:30 [#01866756]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



ha, this site sucks.

they cling to their faith like michael jackson clings to
four year old boys.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-03-24 11:31 [#01866758]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



they will all go to hell anyway. only mormons go to heaven


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2006-03-24 12:19 [#01866807]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to evolume: #01866662 | Show recordbag



Mormons run las vegas. Fact. VP: I'll try to dig out a
couple of the quotes. Gigi will be over the moon that we're
turning this thread into the XLT bible study group. :D

Have a good weekend all, I'm off out.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-24 17:23 [#01866973]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



From what I have seen the bible teaches election and
predestination along side free will and personal
accountabilty, sometimes in the same paragraph. I can only
guess that it is not a matter of contradiction but based on
such advanced principals that it couldn't really be
explained fully to a human person. It does say somewhere
that it is God's will to draw all men to himself, so I can't
imagine that there is just some arbitrary selection process
at work. It probably comes down to God knowing every
intimate possibility in a persons life including every state
of mind, emotion, environment, etc that a person will be in,
and based on all of that knowing whether or not a person
would ever be able to accept salvation. Then, based on the
foreknowledge of a persons salvation or reprobation (note
that foreknowledge does not necessarily mean fatalistic
predetermination there is still a very valid and real choice
for the individual within time and space), God may design
events around that persons life that are tied and locked
into the events of others so that everything is, in that
sense, predestined. How could God use, say, the Romans as
his instrument of judgement against Israel and still allow
the
Romans to be people with their own will. The Romans would
have had to have wanted to do it anyway, but God in his
providence arranged events in time and space to suit his
purpose.

I sometimes think of it like a movie where there is a
director, editor, etc (someone who has final cut) and the
film is written with a start and an end, both of which are
known, however the actors are sometimes improvising,
sometimes following prompts from not not only the director
but other actors and even people off screen yelling
directions at them, and it is up to the director/editor to
make it all work into something that somehow follows the
script.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-03-24 19:10 [#01866992]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01866973



why would a god want to direct a movie? just for fun?


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-03-24 19:43 [#01866996]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



You can't argue with an angsty teen yelling about how much
Christianity sucks.

This is because they have a very suscinct argument, which to
disprove requires about ten years worth of point-obscuring
elaboration.

I might as well post this now...


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2006-03-24 19:44 [#01866997]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular



fuck! I make no sense and I made a spelling error.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 20:53 [#01867001]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01866992



Well, he did get to pull one of those casting-couch
deals with one of his leading actresses...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 21:12 [#01867002]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to scup_bucket: #01866996



Pffft. I will disprove it in four words, two of them
hyphenated: religion is horse-shit.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 21:13 [#01867003]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867002



Wait - who am I disproving again - the angsty teen or the
Christian apologist? Well it applies to either.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-24 21:15 [#01867004]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Historically a triple fleetmouse post has been enough to
disembowel the toughest thread. I will seal its fate with a
quadruple.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-03-24 21:52 [#01867005]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867004



there's no turning back now. this iron chef battle is
OH-VAH!


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-25 01:44 [#01867026]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01866807



that sounds good. should be pretty interesting and most
definately an interesting change of pace from the usual
athiest/agnostic stance that usually roams the board.

look forward to it :)


 

offline bogala from NYC (United States) on 2006-03-25 05:04 [#01867075]
Points: 5125 Status: Regular



I hooked up with (sucked face) a promise keeper (no sex
until marriage) on a train trip a few year ago. She was
really hot and an incredible kisser. Kinda kooky though.Did
I mention that she wa hot and a really good kisser? It made
me even more horny that she was a virgin.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2006-03-25 06:25 [#01867084]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



the only big problem i have with christianity is the way it
alienates people. essentially we are all in the same boat.
we are all the same in the sense that we know literally fuck
all of the existance of any god. the ONLY difference between
me and a christian is that they decided that this single
book was correct and believeable. it's the difference
between saying a simple "yes" and "no" and this could change
soooo easily. i used to be a christian and i used to look
down on people and laugh at them thinking "hhahaha, you're
going to hell. you poor poor individual. you're lost in this
world, corrupted by evil."
eventually i decided that i was being incredibly naive and i
only believed in it because i desperately wanted to have
eternal life, which was the selfish part of me. my beliefs
have changed. i now believe in trusting my common sense, my
rational thinking and logic. i've come more to terms with
death. i've accepted it. i don't like the actual
idea of death but i just don't think about it and it
doesn't affect me. in a way this is what i was doing with my
beliefs before. using the idea of heaven to stop my fear of
dying. i just think people should be more honest with each
other and say "ok, let's face it, we are all doubtful. how
much trust can we really put into the bible?"


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 06:39 [#01867086]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



My only problem with Christianity is the idea that what's
subjectively true for some should be objectively true for
all.

Does your Christian testimony prove that there's a God? Then
the flipside of that is that my atheist testimony proves
that there's no God.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 06:40 [#01867087]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867086



Well ok, not the ONLY problem I see, but that'll do for now.
:D


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-25 09:08 [#01867106]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867086



You know that a testimony doesnt actually prove something to
the effect you can see (persay). Like i could tell you about
mixing vinegar and baking soda and what would happen but
then i could show you just that.

The Christian testimony isnt necessarily going to make one
that doesnt believe go "wow John really overcame his heroin
addiction. I didnt think he would in fact i thought he was
doomed. But if he credits it to God there must be something
there."

I think it can really serve to edify other believers. If
perhaps they are down about something in their life... to
read anothers personal testimony as encouragement. They can
see what that person went through and see how God worked in
their life helping them overcome whatever situation is at
hand.

On the flipside of that coin is your atheist testimony. But
this is where i am confused. Are you saying its like set up
similar? for example it may work like this if written
out....

1.used to believe
2. stop believing
3. good that came from stopping the belief system.

thats pretty much how the Christian testimony works from
what i read in my life....

1. grew up
2. came to know Christ
3. good things and changes that occured from that day on
that benefitted that individual and perhaps others.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-25 09:12 [#01867107]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to Raz0rBlade_uk: #01867084



i used to be a christian and i used to look down on
people and laugh at them thinking "hhahaha, you're going to
hell. you poor poor individual. you're lost in this world,
corrupted by evil."


I cant say i have ever met one true Christian that has ever
spoke like that in my life. The people i know are loving and
caring. They also dont find someone being doomed to hell as
being funny. Thats pretty twisted. They would be more
concerned with telling that individual about thier personal
beliefs and sharing the gospel with them.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 09:15 [#01867108]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01867106



1.used to believe

no one on earth starts out their life believing in a
specific god. they are taught to believe in it.


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-25 09:23 [#01867111]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01867108



that was the easiest way to put it for me.

alot of times you will (for example) have roman catholics
that lose faith later in life. I suppose it was an
assumption on my part. That was my bad.

you are right though because to know a specific religion
(muslim, jew, christian) you need to be directly taught
about it.



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 09:44 [#01867115]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to virginpusher: #01867111



1. grew up
2. came to know Christ


so you really think you're a more mature person because you
believe in christianity than someone who doesn't?


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2006-03-25 10:11 [#01867126]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01867115



"grew up" shows that time has passed. For example i grew up
Catholic for 18 years and then departed from those basic
beliefs.

Grew up shows an aging in years and not a maturity.

I am sure we can all agree that i am immature.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2006-03-25 10:57 [#01867136]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



you could say though that the positive impact on ones life
from being a christian is losing the fear of dying. being
part of a community and feeling accepted are other things. i
think the fact it's christianity specifically has very
little to do with it. if i became a buddhist i'm sure my
life would improve but i prefer to stick with what feels
natural to me.


 

offline Ezkerraldean from the lowest common denominator (United Kingdom) on 2006-03-25 11:56 [#01867155]
Points: 5733 Status: Addict



religion can make you feel good etc. by making you think you
wont actually die but you will go to some nice fluffy place
in the sky instead. but then all the religions insist that
they are right and all the others are wrong. thats why the
whole thing sucks. aswell as the fact that they are mostly
not founded on any conclusive facts


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-03-25 15:15 [#01867230]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #01867086



My only problem with Christianity is the idea that what's

subjectively true for some should be objectively true for
all.


I am one of the other nominal Christians on this board, as
you may recall, but this statement is the exact opposite of
the way I feel. The only reason I believe in Christianity
is my sneaking suspicion that it is objectively true despite
my subjective wish that it wasn't. Trust me, I'd love it if
there was no afterlife at all, think of how much trouble
that would save everyone! However, at the same time, I look
at the church and the tenets it teaches about loving your
fellow man and I can't really see any harm in it, at least
in its pure form. If our actions really do mean something
and there is a God, then Christianity is the religion I
would choose out of them all because it identifies most with
what I would consider to be important, that is, treating
others as you would like to be treated. This, of course, is
speculative at best. There are other religions with similar
teachings, just as there are perversions of the Christian
message. To be honest, I think Roman Catholics have it
together much more than any given Protestant denomination.
I think everything in the universe is fairly doubtful, but I
still find some value in the Christian message.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 15:38 [#01867238]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01867230



Your wish and your sneaking suspicion are both subjective.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2006-03-25 15:48 [#01867239]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to virginpusher: #01867106



Atheist testimony:

1) never believed
2) tried prayer but nothing happened
3) noticed that taking action was more effective than
wishing
4) have yet to see any reliable evidence that there's
anything to religion other than a sometimes-beneficial,
sometimes-harmful form of self hypnosis

A friend of mine told me that if I lived as a Mormon for a
month I'd be convinced that it was true. I asked him what
would happen if he lived in an ashram as a Hare Krishna for
a month. Obviously it works because there are both Hare
Krishnas and Mormons - but they can't both be right!


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-03-25 16:00 [#01867240]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to uviol: #01867230



But why does that have to be an application of religion?
These morals could just be good morals, good manners,
healthy living. No need to slap a fish sticker on it.

Personally, my faith and belief system revolves around the
fact that there is so much complexity in the simplicity of
all things around you, so much that I get the same awe from
it as a christian does when they go euphoric and seizure on
a church floor. Nevermind Adam, more like Atom. heh


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 16:02 [#01867241]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag





Well, that was an analogy. Of course a movie isn't real and
the actors go home at the end of the day regardless of what
happened to their character on screen, so we wouldn't say
that God is directing a movie because what happens to people
is very real. The anaolgy attempts to look at an
interventionous God, who has already given the beginning,
ending, and major plot points of the story arc of time, but
still allows people their own will and choice. That's why I
said that people improvise, because although God has a
definite way He wants the story to end, and definite things
He wants to see happen along the way, people's free choices
become a wildcard. That is why editing is a metaphor for
God's foreknowledge in being able to organize and arrange
everything that will ever happen, including people's free
will choices and the consequences that come from them, into
something that will still turn out right in the end.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 16:03 [#01867242]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



It didn't link my response properly. I was replying to
R40f.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-03-25 16:07 [#01867243]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01867241



I take offence when people say god is a he. I don't beleive
in a god and I don't disbeleive in a god. But a god has no
fixation to our terminology. A god is so immensely superior
to mankind that to describe the wills and ways of its
actions would be incomprehensible. And to credit god to
things it takes no part in is mentally retarded. If there is
a god, and if god has ever done something, like set
something it motion, it was a big explosion of some sort. It
was the first and only conscious moment that came from
nowhere. It was intentionality.

Fuck sakes I knew if I came in this thread I'd start to rant
about bullshit.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 16:10 [#01867245]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01867241



i understand all that... my point was literally, why would
an omnipotent being do that? you're telling me that there
is this infinite sentient being or force that exists and has
created a universe for its own amusement? why?

and furthermore, if it is all predetermined, then the
actions in your life are controlled by god. your sense of
free will is illusory since you have been put here with a
deliberate purpose and function. that means that anything
you do in your life, whether you are a good christian or a
mass murderer, has been scripted by god for his "movie".


 

offline uviol from United States on 2006-03-25 16:25 [#01867251]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01867240



Gwely: It's true. You can have those 'good' morals or
'good' manners, but without a system of religion behind it
it seems hard to determine why one thing is 'good' and
another thing isn't. I do agree though that these manners
and moral characteristics alone don't necessarily have to be
indicative of a specific religion like Christianity since
someone can clearly be a philanthropist without being
Christian.

fleetmouse: Of course they are both subjective, but wouldn't
you agree that there is some way that things actually
objectively are, regardless of what any one person believes?
Unless you think existence is only an illusion of an
individual mind, which could be possible I suppose, then
there are external variables in the world that can't be
controlled. I was indirectly agreeing with your point that
too many Christians bend their perceptions of an 'objective'
reality based on what they subjectively believe, and then
try to bring in other 'believers'. What I'm saying is that
based on my upbringing etc. etc. I have a greater
inclination to give the Christian worldview a chance, but
that sure as hell doesn't mean I'm gonna try to convince
anyone else about it.. I can't prove Christianity more than
I can prove that aliens exist.

I'm skeptical of religion, my own included, but sometimes I
think people write it off too quickly. It isn't as if there
is one 'true' atheistic baseline state of the world, and
that people choose a specific religion as if they're
choosing a weight loss program. I agree that each belief is
subjective, but then again, I doubt there's any way we'll
ever really discover the objective state of reality that
religion is supposedly departing from.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 17:33 [#01867276]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01867243 | Show recordbag



Look I mean that is fine if you think that way, and I am
sorry if I offended you, but i am relaying the way in which
the God in the bible is portrayed. The God in the bible is
portrayed as interventionous and also presents himself in
the masculine because that is how he chooses to do it. I
didn't make it up.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2006-03-25 18:20 [#01867293]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to glasse: #01867276



Ofcourse you didn't make it up, a man did. A man did in a
time when women had no voice in matters. And maybe, just
maybe, way back in that time men referred to self profound
thoughts and realizations as godsend, because their diction
and intelligence hadn't evolved to the point of scientific
reason.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 18:25 [#01867295]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01867245 | Show recordbag



That is what I mean. We do still have very valid and real
choices. I don't believe that our choices are
predetermined. Think, though that if God knows what choices
everyone is going to make before the world even exists, then
God would be able to arrange and manage how history plays
out based on that foreknowledge. He could funnel, connect,
repress, allow etc. any and every action that people could
make. Now keep in mind too that God doesn't allow people to
do everything they want and if he does not always when they
want. He can also influence or guide someone to do
something other than what they want to do, the same as a
friend might talk another friend out of a bad choice. Other
times, as in the case of the story of Pharoah and Moses, he
may empower someone to do something against God's
principals, in order that they fulfill their own
reprobation, but it does say that before God hardened
Pharoahs heart, Pharoah hardened Pharoahs heart. So Pharoah
did exactly what he wanted to do anyway, God just enabled it
to happen in a way that would best suit his plan and purpose
(For instance Pharoah might have let the people go out of
fear because of the plagues put on Egypt, but what was
really in his heart was a will to defy Moses and God and not
let the people go)

As to why, I think God created people to love him and for
him to love them; the same reasons people have children.
When a couple decided to have kids, they know that some of
those kids could go down a bad path, get on hard drugs, rob
a liquor store, whatever, but they still decide to have them
anyway on the chance that they won't, or if they do will
feel bad and do better.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2006-03-25 18:27 [#01867296]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01867293 | Show recordbag



Did you ever fathom that for all of the scientific knowledge
and enlightenment that we have, we are still just like a
small boy standing by an enormous ocean with a tin cup?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2006-03-25 19:11 [#01867306]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #01867295



would you say you take a lot of drugs or A LOT of drugs?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2006-03-25 19:12 [#01867308]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



what the hell.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2006-03-25 19:18 [#01867311]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01867306



Haha! Glasse is a bit daft that's given but I like to read
Virginpushers views too. Fleetmouse has had his say a
million times and it was interesting. I'm as disturbed as
anyone by evangelical nutcases but It'd be nice to see
Virgin and Uviol talk for a bit. Everyone knows the
sceptical side but I do find it fascinating peoples beliefs.


 


Messageboard index