Buddhist Monks/Meditation/Masturbation | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 50 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Buddhist Monks/Meditation/Masturbation
 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-05-28 05:28 [#01212069]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



"And martial arts were not born to learn how to fight"

marlowe, old bean... you confusing "martial arts" with "the
particular chinese style of kung fu you know about"

I'm talking about tthe japanese systems i've been studying
for a while. These were developed over centuries in a
country that was ravaged by war. A lot of it was used on the
battlefield where survival and bodycount was important.
(like medieval European combat) so yes... these were "born
to fight"

But..a lot of it was also used for espionage, information
gathering and protection, where killling somebody would be
detrimental to the overall tactics of the situation. Much
like in todays society. (killling people even if they try
and kill you, highly indefensible in modern law)

So learning not to fight is HUGELY important in modern
martial art and i think is one of the many inevitable goals
that evolve through longterm serious study. (i make a
distinction between martial arts and martial sports, where
fighting, in a competive and rule-based environment, is the
aim)

i don't know much about chinese styles but i do know that
the human body works the same everywhere and social
condtions leading to aggression are universal too.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-28 05:29 [#01212072]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01212033



hmm, so when I said Romanticised (which the same as
Romanised) for Westerners I was correct, except I should
have said "by" instead of "for"


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-28 05:34 [#01212079]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #01212069



Chinese martial arts predate Japanese martial arts. They
were developed from a set brought over by some Buddha from
India or somewhere, because he found the monks so
ill-adapted to sitting in the lotus position. that is where
the first martial art originated from.

I bet most people think Zen is a Japanese concoction -- it
originates from China, where its name is "Chan"

Modern martial arts are taken up by pasty white kids who
fantasise about beating up the school bully and getting
laid. Martial Arts are about preparing the body for the
gruelling physicalities of meditation and yoga. They
by-product of being able to perform great feats of endurance
and physical extremes is nothing special, just as developing
supernatural powers is merely a by-product of the study and
practice of magick -- the people who think that it is the
AIM of martial arts (or that supernatural powers is the AIM
of magick) are galloping down a dead-end which leads to no
more enlightenment than eating a grain of rice leads to a
full stomach.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-28 05:37 [#01212083]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01212067 | Show recordbag



eh.. the Shaolin Monastery existed first. then, the monks
there decided they needed a way of defending their temples
and sacred places from attacks, and developed Kung-fu.
Shaolin Kung-Fu is just kung-fu from the Shaolin Monastery..
it wasn't called shaolin kung-fu before the shaolin
monastery.

you heard the myth of how kung-fu itself was developed,
right? an indian prince was worried about his family (can't
remember exactly, but there was some trouble.. probably
assasination-attempts against the king (which is a common
feature in eastern legends and stories), and went to
meditate upon a hill, but was interrupted by some animal
(either a monkey or a crane catching fish.. I think the
crane was invented by a hurt monk once, but I can't
remember). he then watched the animal and copied its moves,
'cause to him, animals seemed to be superior in battle, and
he thought "what better way to deal with the problems than
doing as the animals, and becoming better in battle?"

however, this is only a legend, and while legends hold
certain amounts of truth, there are also other aspects that
can be distrusted.

what I DO know, is that it is common for religious groups to
use their own beliefs and rituals in combat (either
offensive or defensive) to "justify" their actions, which
would normally be judged as "bad" actions by their god (this
is a common perception in religion-studies, and I seriously
doubt it is any different for the Shaolin monks.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-28 05:38 [#01212084]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01212072 | Show recordbag



romanticised and romanised is not the same. romanticised is
when it is given a glory-filter, in a way.

romanised is about translating the souns of other languages
into roman characters.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-28 05:41 [#01212086]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01212079 | Show recordbag



japanese martial arts:

most of these are adapted from chinese and korean martial
arts, but they are to a greater extent about doing physical
damage, as Keys says. Karate, for example, as Bruce Lee
said, is like "a stick with a iron ball on the end, rigid
and stiff"


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-28 06:04 [#01212108]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01212084



Romanticised means the same as Romanised - I wasn't using
the modern definition, meaning "a shit hollywood film". The
Romantic languages aren't romantic because they have 10
billion words for "love", they are romantic because they are
an offspring of Latin, the ROMAN language.

Shaolin GongFu is the original martial art, and it from
where the Shaolin Monks get their name now -- have you been
watching too many dodgy imports? And, no, I didn't get my
version of the history from a Legend - I got it from History
books of martial arts and the Shaolin Arts, written by
practicioners from the Far East, with no Western influence
to taint them. The simple truth is -- the shaolin arts were
developed to strengthen the monks for primarily the lotus
position. Because they were later added to and adapted to
fend off marauders doesn't affect this, no more than the
Holy Roman Catholic Church changes who Jesus WAS -- it has
only changed the perception of who he was, just as the
modern preponderance for Martial Arts fighting films has
distorted the reality of its genesis.

Who cares what Bruce Lee says? Japan is a warrior nation,
that's why they fit into the Western Ideal so easily.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-28 06:15 [#01212115]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01212108 | Show recordbag



first of all, my sources are different books about eastern
philosophy, religion and martial arts. I've also seen quite
a few documentaries about china and its religious practices
plus quite a few kung-fu movies (yeah, I know those don't
count as a source, except for 36 chambers, 'cause the
training-methods are mostly true methods of training
(although the film is a bit "harder" on the "students").

Shaolin is one single temple in northern china. It was named
Shaolin long before they developed Kung-fu, and the name
Shaolin Kung-fu is a way of telling people where your
Kung-Fu comes from. At first it was only called Kung-Fu
'cause there was only one, but later, when everyone decided
they needed their own kung-fu (the various emperors
developed their own Kung-Fu, and named it after themselves,
and so-forth), the need to "brand" the kung-fu with a name,
telling people where it was from, became necessary.

and.. who cares what Bruce Lee says? I do, and it's because
there never has been and never will be such a great
practicioner of Kung-Fu (except for in legends)! He mastered
both the spiritual AND the physical, and moved on to
experience other forms of martial arts!


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-28 06:16 [#01212116]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



rockenjohnny, I really appretiate your consise, yet detailed
and informative reply.

Taichichuan? yeah I was doing that long time ago. It was
manditory to know it before becoming hardcore and using it
to fight.... BUT. I moved and I did not become hardcore.


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-28 06:20 [#01212118]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



I have tried doing tai-chi on a temperature that was about
-15 to -20 degrees celsius. After 30 minutes of practice I
was so warmed up that I did not need any jacket or anything.
I was in shirt and pants in the middle of winter. Only my
pinky, ears and nose were freezing. Everything else had a
continuous flow of blood and heat.

It was very neat and I did not get sick.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-28 06:25 [#01212119]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01212115



BruceLee is a hero to Westerners, god knows why -- he
concocted Jeet Kune Do, which is good, but to make the
claims you make are simply embarassing.

BTW, I mentioned the Shaolin Arts, which were from the
Shaolin Temple, which, tho only one temple, became a mecca
for students of the Arts and of Buddhism throughout the far
east... shaolin gongfu is named after the temple, I know,
but I'm talking about BEFORE the Shaolin Arts became Gongfu,
or Kung Fu as you call it, being a cracka.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-28 06:29 [#01212121]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #01212119 | Show recordbag



Bruce Lee is not only a hero to westerners. you forget his
HUMONGOUS fanclub in china, and his funeral, which had
people crying for three days!

he also worked his way back up from the doctors saying "you
will never be able to walk again," to developing Jeet-Kune
do!

Don't be all "postcool," saying you don't like Bruce Lee,
'cause you can't deny that he was a master!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2004-05-28 06:39 [#01212130]
Points: 24588 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01212121



I have his Tao of Jeet Kune Do and I admire him for certain
of his tenets, and I know about him breaking his back, and
of course, he was a master. However, to claim he is the best
martial artist ever etc etc is to fall into the Western
trap... it's like saying "The 4th patriarch was the best
patriarch ever!" It's fatuous... he was a supreme artist,
demanding much study and respect. That was my point. I'm not
dissing mr. lee. :)

I'm off to work now - catchya later -- check my spam thread
for a message to you which you may have missed.


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-05-28 06:47 [#01212138]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



the only good way is the way of the sword. dot.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-28 07:04 [#01212149]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to 3051: #01212116



yer welcome .. im inspired by my teachers approach and am
happy to share it with anyone who asks :)


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-05-28 07:09 [#01212155]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



Japanese Martial Arts - while they have their roots in
Chinese and Korean systems, were isolated enough for many
centuries to develop their own perspective.

Karate is a highly specialised Japanese (well, Okinawan to
be presice) martial art that has many different facets: in
the West they are mostly sport orientated. It's method of
movement suited to the islanders that developed it along
with their folk-dancing and it was never ment for
battlefield use. It got popularised in the West because it
got popularised in Japan in the 50's dues to Japanese
new-found aversion to weapons based systems. "whats this
empty-hand stuff that come from that tropical island - its
cool!" The Americans stationed there after the war cought
onto this popularity and novelty value and exported it along
with judo - which was developed in the 1900's for its use in
school educational programs. Both now have a masssive
following in the West but are highly sport-orientated. What
do you think Western special police units, secret service
and other frontline folks get thought? Sports like Karate
and Judo? Not at all.

For realistic fighting they get thought streamlined down
versions of Japanese "old-school" systems of jujutsu and
bujutsu and firearms. This is what i study except it isn't
streamlined (or watered down) as i have more time than a
professional security person to study these things. (unless
he studys them outside office hours of course)

I do not know about Chinese martial arts systems and their
evolution but i can say confidently, that if a martial art
has been in the hands of intelliegent humans for generations
and has evolved through actually dangerous times and not
been reduced to a dance or sport or parlour tricks then they
all reach the same conclusions about human mechanics,
psychology and the abiltiy to efficiently dampen aggresion -
not just japanese old-school arts.



 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-05-28 07:11 [#01212157]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #01212155



not every japanese martial art comes from china - i agree
they borowed most of things, and changed them for their own
purposes, but some martial arts are strictly japanese - tho
you can think that they are not from japan, its just about
similarities.


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-28 07:37 [#01212176]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



rockenjohnny, it is quite similar to what I have tried to
achieve with self-hypnosis, although meditation gives away
different brain waves. That can be quite helpful while
mastering hypnotic techniques. You can use self hypnosis
while doing martial arts. You can make everything seem
slowed down and react to opponen't movements at greater
speeds.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-28 07:45 [#01212191]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to 3051: #01212176



thats an interesting idea ..

im intrigued by the elasticity of time :)


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-28 08:02 [#01212209]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



Be careful you might become a spiderman !!! :)


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2004-05-28 08:06 [#01212210]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



damn, I never thought this thread would grow, and be so full
of info!

thanks guys!!!

:-D


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-05-28 08:08 [#01212213]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



have you done this then 3051?

i've seen plenty of weird things but only from people who've
got 25+ years experience in non-sports martial arts

the altering of ours and our opponents perception of time is
a part of it but to do it under actual aggresive conditions
takes, ironically enough, a long length of actual
time and study with people who really know what they're
talking about. Otherwise its David Blain psychodrama.


 

offline RedSky from Chicago (United States) on 2004-05-28 11:14 [#01212496]
Points: 139 Status: Addict



Go sit under a tree and become enlightened.

If Buddha could do it, so can you.


 

offline Mertens from Motor City (United States) on 2004-05-28 11:33 [#01212534]
Points: 2064 Status: Lurker



Has anyone studied the martial arts of other lands? For
instance, Capoeria of Brazil or Vale Tudo?


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2004-05-28 14:30 [#01212758]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict | Followup to Mertens: #01212534



vale tudo is not a martial art, its not even the art, its
just slapingh your head with fist, no ideology, culture, no
anything behind that.
fuck, saying that vale tudo is an art is like to say that
britney spears is the godess of IDM.

the same as K1, BJJ, and other stupid ...things, that you
can learn only to fight.


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-28 17:35 [#01212986]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"have you done this then 3051?"
Once. It was stress induced...

It probably happened to you. Have you ever fell from a bike
(lets say) and realized how everything was slow while you
were falling?



 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-28 17:37 [#01212988]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"If Buddha could do it, so can you."

Such enlightenment sounds to me like an open wound that
neither heals or has a cause.


 

online big from lsg on 2004-05-28 18:21 [#01213052]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i interviewd a buddhist today
but that prolly has nothing to do with this thread
greetinx


 

offline Dozier from United States on 2004-05-28 21:09 [#01213176]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker



hey, is it true that buddha's biggest fear was that he'd be
immortalized and worshipped as a god after his death?

isn't it ironic, dontcha think?


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-28 21:22 [#01213179]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dozier: #01213176



No.


 


Messageboard index