messed up individuals | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 292 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
messed up individuals
 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:26 [#01194609]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to korben dallas: #01194602 | Show recordbag



irrefutable proof that human beings are simply collections
of chemicals and that subsequently, free will is an illusion
and that even thought is simply a pre-determined chemical
process resulting in nothing more than a combination of our
genes and our environment. In short- that we know all there
is to know about the body/conciousness and that we can prove
"souls" (or whatever approximation you want to give to that
sort of term for your being) prove that's all there is.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 17:26 [#01194610]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



You have to be rid of belief to know something.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 17:27 [#01194614]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01194609



Show me irrefutable proof that there is no stuffed purple
bunny orbiting the galaxy M80.

It makes more sense to ask where your proof is that there
*need* be a soul or free will.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:29 [#01194617]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to clint: #01194605 | Show recordbag



At the other end of the spectrum though, telling people it's
okay to fail in escaping their depression and it's not their
fault hardly encourages them to put their heart and soul
into beating it. It's a tricky one, isn't it? :)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:32 [#01194622]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to mappatazee: #01194614 | Show recordbag



No shit? You think I've not thought of that? :P

That's why no one has proven whether or not God exists.
That's where belief enters the equation.

Okay, substitute "irrefutable proof" in my previous
statement for a "very highly likely" (say, just as likely as
being true and subsequently as commonly accepted among
educated people as our current laws of physics, basic
biology, maths, etc.) and it still means the same.


 

offline clint from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-05-18 17:32 [#01194626]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker



Yea I agree! I think each case should be judged accordingly.
Althou I sometimes doubt the doctors'/psychiatrists'
judgement :s I feel a lot of times they approach mental
problems wrongly

Hmm I'll sleep on it. Nite :)


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 17:33 [#01194629]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01194617



Proving that people are "simply collections of chemicals "
wouldn't mean that freewill is an illusion. This collection
of chemicals could be able to think freely and behave
freely, because it is a collection of chemicals that has
individual and independant consciousness.

Also we ARE a collection of chemicals as far as I can tell.

Also I guess you could be meaning that we are a "collection
of chemicals" and no more. But this collection has abilities
and one of them is freedom in genrating thought and
behaviour. What you want to prove is not that we are
chemicals, but that we are chemicals that don't have this
ability.

Good luck proving that ):


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-18 17:36 [#01194632]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



ah so you mean your "irrefutable truth" ... error is
indispensable.

god is dead


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:38 [#01194633]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Salma Hayek: #01194629 | Show recordbag



Good luck proving that ):

I wouldn't want to prove that though and if I discovered it
to be true, I'd probably destroy the evidence and then kill
myself. The world would be a pretty (even more so) grim
place without free will :-/

Not just unpleasent because of people's actions, but also
hellishly boring and it'd be extremely demotivating.


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-18 17:41 [#01194636]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker



wow, im a messed up individual who listens to electronica.

what are the odds!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:41 [#01194637]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to korben dallas: #01194632 | Show recordbag



Yes, I've read Nietzsche. Don't think any of that is new to
me ;)

In this particular example I don't mean just my truth- I
mean proven to a reasonable degree in what is "generally
accepted reality"- that is, what most, educated, mentally
"healthy" people agree to be true.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:41 [#01194640]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Gwely Mernans: #01194636 | Show recordbag



5:1 on apparently ;-)


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 17:42 [#01194641]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01194633



it's interesting. You are religious, yet you don't believe/
or don't want to discover that destiny is predetermined?

lots of religious people think your fate is already set...


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 17:49 [#01194653]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Salma Hayek: #01194641 | Show recordbag



A lot of people (often fundamentalist Christians) seem to
confuse the concept of "God's Plan" as a loss of free will.
The Bible makes a point of the fact that God gave us free
will and it's precisely this free will that makes it
possible for us to sin (because we choose too). I won that
debate in a Christian Union I went to a few years ago by
giving the fatalist a sharp dig to the arm. When she asked
why I did it, I said, "Do you think that was part of God's
plan?" "No", she replied. "Exactly, I did it because I have
free will and I did it to prove my point. I chose to do it
to show you that you are wrong."

The point was wasted on her, but a few of the brighter souls
got it.

I believe God's "intereference" with affairs on Earth is
fairly minimal (he hasn't overthrown any governments of
late, despite what Bush claims ;-) and that he prefers to
sit back and watch and lend a helping hand when we ask him
to and it agrees with his plan.


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 17:52 [#01194659]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01194653



i'm for the existence of freewill, but as you say some
religious people tend to believe (not confuse!) that things
are completely predetermined.

which is what i understand you don't want to know about):

which is fair enough....
):


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 17:52 [#01194660]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Who believes in God anymore?


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 17:55 [#01194665]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01194660



Ceri JC!


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-18 17:56 [#01194667]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



so something more like "truth" as a/the social condition?

anyway chaps . . .


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 17:56 [#01194668]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01194660



and Bin Laden and Bush):

I kid..

although it's true...


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-18 17:57 [#01194669]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



mappatazee ... its not so much the belief in god or not -
its the shadow he casts, and the shadow we still live in
which should be questioned.


 

offline korben dallas from nz on 2004-05-18 18:00 [#01194673]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular



sorry - i've been reading way too much Nietzsche
recently .. he's brilliant though!


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 18:00 [#01194675]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



It's the idea that cast the 'shadow'.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 18:01 [#01194676]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to korben dallas: #01194673



I love the way he writes (wrote?) A brilliant man.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 18:01 [#01194677]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Salma Hayek: #01194659 | Show recordbag



Certainly for other religions, belief in varying degrees of
fatalism is an integral part of the religion (Seikhs, for
example, believe in branching "Paths" through life), that's
fine. But for a (biblical) Christian to believe there is no
free will is a heresy and I will burn them at the stake for
it! >:D

//inquisitorModeOff

Just out of interest, what do you base your belief on free
will on? From my reading of philosophy it seems only to be
mentioned in relation to a soul or higher conciousness of
the individual (ie something we cannot yet measure/put into
physical terms) or the reasons why we should/should not be
fatalistic to varying degrees.

Surely if we are just collections of chemicals, we have
little more real "thought" than animals, or even
micro-biological life forms?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-18 18:05 [#01194681]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to korben dallas: #01194673 | Show recordbag



Yeah, it's good stuff. (well, it's beyond good and evil, but
you know what I mean ;-)

I know a couple of really intellectual Christians (much
brighter than me) who are fans of it. One of them who is
training to be a priest says it "makes the most sense of all
philosophies, if God really were to be dead." I think it's
good that religious people can study things like that from
an empathic point of view. Just like it's good for people to
have a basic understanding of other religions (even if they
themselves aren't religious).


 

offline Gwely Mernans from 23rd century entertainment (Canada) on 2004-05-18 18:06 [#01194685]
Points: 9856 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01194681



please dont use the "C" word


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 18:10 [#01194697]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #01194677



well, first i have a religious background so i was edcated
into it.

but i don't dismiss it now. freewill doesn't require a soul
that exists independant from the body. Free consciousness
could be thought of as an ability to think creatively,
actively, and individually. Other animals have brains, but
they are less advanced, they can make decisions on
behaviour, but they are not based on sophisticated thinking,
not decisions in our sense of the word i guess.

it's like what you did to that girl. i can demonstrate that
i have freewill by simply doing stuff. And i can demonstrate
active, creative thought by comming up with stuff!... but of
course another person could say, well whatever you
apprantely "choose" to do has already been set. You only
think your are choosing. An 'illusion', as you said a while
ago.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 18:12 [#01194698]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #01194697



But can you show that your actions aren't the result of the
precisely defined interactions and movements of all the
trillions of subatomic particles in your brain, along with
all the antecedant and external factors?


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 18:15 [#01194706]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01194698



can you?

also thought being indeterministic doesnt mean it is not
freely generated.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-05-18 18:16 [#01194708]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to Salma Hayek: #01194706



Well where exactly is it that your mind deviates from
physical laws of the universe? And how for that matter I'd
like to know. What makes it special?


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 18:18 [#01194711]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #01194708



i don't have all the answers contrary to popular belief!

but thought doesn't have to 'deviate' from physical laws.
thought is generated through physical laws, our brains are
wired up so that they have a 'special' or maybe not so
apecial ability to generate thought actively.



 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-05-18 18:20 [#01194715]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



I know this thread went off on a tangent but for the record
I don't drink, smoke or do drugs. My life is one non-stop
party let me tell you!


 

offline Salma Hayek on 2004-05-18 18:21 [#01194717]
Points: 1056 Status: Regular | Followup to DJ Xammax: #01194715



great to see someone is still trying to stick with the
thread's glorious historical roots....


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-05-18 18:23 [#01194719]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



I'm reliable like that


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-19 06:56 [#01195364]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



even religions can cause suffering, if you allow them to
replace your inner self

it seems anything can get in the way of your inner self (or
soul?) being heard .. be that lifestyle, ideals, peers, you
name it. im trying to uncover my own :)

i think any type of music can mess you up. its the old rock
and roll dream - it can invade the musician or listener with
appealing images of self, when one lowers their defenses to
it .. and ultimately it doesnt last


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-05-19 07:07 [#01195384]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



I agree with Ceri... it's all in your mind... I used to be
full of paranoia and nervousness and all that... and very
shy and shit... but over the years I got better control over
my mind, and I'm a lot different now... I don't think I've
been really depressed, but I used to have up and down
periods where my moods would change fast... not hugely
drastic changes, but still... and with effort, I got control
of that... so I do think the solution is just controlling
how you think... and yes, keeping yourself active!


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2004-05-19 07:09 [#01195391]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #01195384



im much the same .. except that my conclusion has not been
so much control as discipline. maybe you mean the same thing
.. control just has a subtly different meaning for me..


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-05-19 07:11 [#01195403]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to The_Funkmaster: #01195384



part of the problem for a lot of people who have serious
mental afflictions is that they can't control their
thinking.

did you actually take control of your mind, or did you just
grow a bit older and somehow learnt to cope? I mean, how
much of this "taking control" did you do actively?


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-19 07:14 [#01195411]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



OY! YOU!



Attached picture

 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-19 07:25 [#01195422]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



First, I don't like your approach to fellow humans.
You attack us by begging an answer with something that is
not even a question.
Than, you assign it to someone else's thread thinking that
you will get away with it.

Second, you socialize and make a distinction between you
(plural) and them who are either depressed, use drugs or
think that they are.

Third, you repress your actions by saying such things as "I
don't know" or "maybe".

fifth, you make a conclusion without any premisses

then you give us an apology after your evil deeds were done

after that you act like someone else
then you give such height to things you do that it makes me
think whether I am watching a TV or a computer screen.
Internet never lies, but you do.

Am I depressed or do I use drugs?

-what do you think answer is to that ???



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-19 07:27 [#01195425]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to 3051: #01195422 | Show recordbag



have you studiet rhetoric (spelling???)?


 

offline od_step_cloak from Pleth (Australia) on 2004-05-19 07:39 [#01195430]
Points: 3803 Status: Regular



I don't think all my actions are predetermined, by thsi
theoiry: if we could control every single piece of input
into a child all through it's childhood then we could
predict what it is thinking.

Like said we put a kid in a bubble and controlled everything
he saw+smelled+heard+touched etc for 20 years, when is it 20
we could predict how he could react when we asked him
complex questions (like this one) and we could actrually be
able to tell him what he is thinking.

BUT I don't give a shit to be honest, there is no real
answer I can attain so frustrating myself with a question
which has yeilded no answers (but only irritation) to those
before me. It's not a defeatist attitude - I just don't care
about it enough to warrant spending hours of thought on it.

Oh yes and I am an IDM head and I do a lot of drugs but I'm
not depressed usually I'm actually really fucking happy.
I'm really stupid though: I have to stress that :P


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-19 07:46 [#01195438]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



"have you studiet rhetoric "

hehe.. no but it would be another great idea for a
personal

(if you were talking to me)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-19 07:47 [#01195441]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to od_step_cloak: #01195430 | Show recordbag



You'd also need to know his genetic make up too- although
it's debatable how much, our genes have at least some
influence on our temperement/actions.

"BUT I don't give a shit to be honest, there is no real
answer I can attain so frustrating myself with a question
which has yeilded no answers (but only irritation) to those

before me. It's not a defeatist attitude - I just don't care

about it enough to warrant spending hours of thought on
it."


He he, that's why I shelved reading philosophy for quite a
long time :D


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-19 07:49 [#01195445]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to 3051: #01195438 | Show recordbag



yes, I was talking to you.

yes, it would be a great personal!

hahaha!

Rhetorics is a nice subject. Everything is almost intuitive,
so to not pass, you'd have to be very stupid.. even at
university-level, where I took it last year.


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-19 07:51 [#01195449]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #01195441 | Show recordbag



hahaha! never stop reading philosophy! If it annyos you that
you can't find the answer, you're going at it in the wrong
way. I'm studying it, and what you have to do is think like
"yeah.. it'll probably work out if I keep it in the back of
my mind for a while..."


 

offline 3051 from Vietnam on 2004-05-19 07:52 [#01195450]
Points: 626 Status: Addict



It should be a "fiery political rhetoric".

hehehe...

PANDA with political rhetoric



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-19 07:53 [#01195453]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to 3051: #01195450 | Show recordbag



"hello, my name is Lee. Ima panda, who is very adept at
fiery political rhetorics. I like long walks through
bamboo-forests, and Intelligent Dance Music"


 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-05-19 07:55 [#01195455]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01195453 | Show recordbag



(oh, and.. Lee was actually a coincidence.. no relation to
mr braindance)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2004-05-19 07:55 [#01195456]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Drunken Mastah: #01195449 | Show recordbag



Yes, it's always on the back burner- I just mean I stopped
actively (getting books on it and particular works) studying
it for a few years.


 


Messageboard index