|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2004-04-20 18:16 [#01153239]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
what is language if not mental imagery?
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 18:18 [#01153241]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01153239
|
|
mental imagery maybe, but not visual imagery.
it registers differently.
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-04-20 18:18 [#01153242]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict
|
|
William Burroughs. James Joyce.
Is one any better than the other? Does how the work was created, or how long it took, actually make a difference to the quality of the content? Is it actually possible to consider their work objectively?
Postmodernism does not decontextualize, but rather sees the past and present simultaneously, not influencing each other's time but feeding from each other subjectively.
Postmodern art, music, literature, whatever: not better, or worse... there is no such thing. Just different. Maybe not even that.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 18:20 [#01153243]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01153237
|
|
I think there are "traditional" and "collage-y" ways of working in any artistic discipline.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2004-04-20 18:21 [#01153245]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
I admire your cock shrivelling arrogance, the way you can confidently state that it is "pointless" to compare collage and cut up writing techniques. I wish i knew what it felt to be so assured, to consider myself knowing fucking everything.
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 18:22 [#01153246]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to fleetmouse: #01153243
|
|
certainly. but a musical collage is a different beast to a textual collage.
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 18:23 [#01153248]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01153245
|
|
I'm sorry, would you like me to put "imo" after each post of mine, so as not to confuse you?
it must be awful to be so insecure to feel attacked by someone stating his or her opinion.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2004-04-20 18:25 [#01153249]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag
|
|
I don't feel attacked. I said i admired you. Don't confuse how you feel with how you think i feel.
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-04-20 18:26 [#01153250]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01153246
|
|
...but a musical collage is a different beast to a textual collage.
Why? Collage in the sense i think you mean relies on firing off associations between materials and allusions... surely this works very similarly in both textual and more conceptual musical collage, if not simply using collaged sound as texture.
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 18:26 [#01153251]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01153249
|
|
well, you wording was slightly agressive.
I'm not saying I know it all, only that this is what I think. if you think differently, that's fine, come up with good arguments.
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 18:30 [#01153252]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01153250
|
|
yes, but collage refers to the process, not to actual work itself.
I'm saying it's silly to compare, for example, music and text, as if they were on the same 'level'.
it's like comparing a table and a lamp. both are furniture, but both have their inherent uses and functions, and therefore rules. so if you compare a table and a lamp made by the same designer, you look at them in the context of being designed by the same person, but they are still a lamp and a table, very different things.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 18:31 [#01153253]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01153246
|
|
certainly. but a musical collage is a different beast to a textual collage.
Yeah, I'll admit that a collage approach to text has a much more decontextualizing / alienating / original-meaning-annihilating effect on its source material than a sound collage - mainly because writing has far more semantic content than music. Sometimes, maybe. And stuff.
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-04-20 18:33 [#01153256]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to fleetmouse: #01153253
|
|
exactly!
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 18:34 [#01153259]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #01153252
|
|
Jeez qrter, a pavane and a madrigal are very different things, better not compare them either.
|
|
dog_belch
from Netherlands, The on 2004-04-20 18:34 [#01153260]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01153251 | Show recordbag
|
|
Sorry, you're right. It was only that i felt you dismissed the Mouse's point out of hand. It's harsh to say something's "pointless". It isn't pointless, imo, to compare anything with anything else. That's all.
I am turning into the trollish nob i always feared i'd become.
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-04-20 18:37 [#01153262]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to qrter: #01153252
|
|
I see where you're coming from... It's the rule of "reading" a certain artform in a certain way that stumps me. How DO we appreciate art? Personally, i believe that our expectations of how certain artforms behave determine how we perceive them, not through any inherant objective meaning.
The idea of not collaging, but simply reusing, duchamp or jeff koons-style is something i find rather fascinating. How do we use it? Just because it has somebody else's ideas contributing to its immediate appearance, is this actually all it means? And what the fuck is meaning? Where does it come from? Me or you?
I've been itching for a thread like this.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 18:48 [#01153268]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01153262
|
|
Things have meaning only in relation to other things - if you change the relationship, you change the meaning. There's no such thing as inherent meaning. That is why context has to be preserved. Hell, postmodern collage (in the broadest sense) relies on the audience being aware of the original context in order for the clash to have a spark.
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-04-20 19:02 [#01153281]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to fleetmouse: #01153268
|
|
Hehehe, "context is everything" is pretty much my mantra. The personal relationship between artwork and viewer is certainly more important to me than the original context that an artwork was created in. This is why a lot of postmodernist visual art (the subject i'd know best in this area) works for me personally: the implications of material and technique, lack of original context, the fallacy of "universal" meaning...
To cut a long story short, i'd certainly agree that things have meaning only in relation to other things but i'd add that only to YOU, or to ME my dear fleetmouse. Meaning is one-person-specific. I'd disagree that context is something to be preserved, though. Anything but personal context is a lie.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 19:06 [#01153285]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01153281
|
|
Barbecue anthill wedge snake lithograph eulogy? Anxiety porous filibuster!
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-04-20 19:10 [#01153287]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict | Followup to fleetmouse: #01153285
|
|
You take that back right now, vacuous beanraker.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-04-20 19:37 [#01153313]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker
|
|
Humans are irreverent and heavily abstracting beings, so it's completely inevitable for everything to be used in every which way..
also, people are definitely self-aware to a paranoid degree these days.. I certain think about doing things 2381093821093x more than actually doing anything.
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 19:39 [#01153317]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to deepspace9mm: #01153287
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
deepspace9mm
from filth on 2004-04-20 19:43 [#01153319]
Points: 6846 Status: Addict
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
pomme de terre
from obscure body in the SK System on 2004-04-20 19:58 [#01153333]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
DoctorMO
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 20:14 [#01153344]
Points: 99 Status: Regular
|
|
the idea that artwork might in some form present it's context to the viewer must be a shock and awe to artists. or maybe not. is art the result, the process or the meaning or some amalgamation.
perhaps when I look at your painting of the apple and know not why you did it or even how, I can just appraise it's link with what I know of the world around me, yes if I know more I may appreciate it more, but once created you have little control over what you've done and it's link with viewers.
hey I have an idea, why not call art the creation and then you can forget the viewer ;-)
-- DoctorMO --
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-04-20 20:17 [#01153345]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to sneakattack: #01153313
|
|
yes.. YES!
|
|
DoctorMO
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 20:29 [#01153354]
Points: 99 Status: Regular
|
|
You can't agree to several conflicting views, thats politics!
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-04-20 20:41 [#01153362]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to DoctorMO: #01153354
|
|
YESS, i says.
|
|
DoctorMO
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 20:44 [#01153367]
Points: 99 Status: Regular
|
|
oh well. that makes sense.
|
|
sneakattack
on 2004-04-20 20:49 [#01153369]
Points: 6049 Status: Lurker | Followup to DoctorMO: #01153367
|
|
change the context, abstract the premise, and all the points can agree.
yes that's right, I get slaughtered for a living.
|
|
DoctorMO
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-20 20:50 [#01153372]
Points: 99 Status: Regular
|
|
your a pig?
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-20 21:56 [#01153391]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker
|
|
Minnie, the love pig.
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-20 21:59 [#01153392]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
hurray for all of you! i really wish i hadn't gone to my soccer practice (well that's a lie... but i wish i could've been here for all of this)
|
|
fleetmouse
from Horny for Truth on 2004-04-21 06:16 [#01153816]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to DeadEight: #01153392
|
|
I wish I'd gone to your soccer practice instead. I feel all poncey.
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-04-21 13:37 [#01154664]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
fuck that shit! i'm not going to apologize to someone who thinks this conversation is to high brow or some stupid shit like that... if they don't like it, they can go start another thread about nothing...
|
|
DoctorMO
from London (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-21 14:14 [#01154718]
Points: 99 Status: Regular
|
|
"only when the words escape your mouth do you betray your true intentions."
so anyone who thinks they're better than the rest gan bog off.
-- DoctorMO --
|
|
Messageboard index
|