|
|
Dozier
from United States on 2004-04-28 06:16 [#01164156]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker
|
|
it's obvious to me that the film was made with the intent of being very open to interpretation. if we are used to hollywood cinema then this is somewhat foreign to us. my first response after seeing it was that it kinda sucked because it didn't answer any questions, it only posed them, but the problem wasn't the film, it was my expectations of it. i've since bought it on dvd and it's one of my favorites. it strikes me as being a very existential piece of work, since, to me, the film is asks what's the difference between perception and truth. and as someone said earlier it's also very much about choices. i don't personally think solaris was heaven, at least not the judeo-christian vision of it. i don't have an explanation for it, it just is. and, anyway, it's really only a construct to explore the ideas presented earlier.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-04-28 07:25 [#01164254]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Followup to Dozier: #01164156 | Show recordbag
|
|
but does solaris really exist?
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-28 07:26 [#01164257]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
stroke me
|
|
euphonicfilter
from illadelphia (United States) on 2004-04-28 07:50 [#01164301]
Points: 2443 Status: Addict
|
|
photek = garbage
|
|
clint
from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-28 11:31 [#01164616]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker
|
|
Yeah its totally open to interpretation. I think that's the beauty of it... that solaris is left unfathomed. You're kinda of left not knowing if it is physical or spiritual, or even just physcological... It is a beautiful film, the sets and graphics are gorgeous. I haven't seen the original... I tried reading the book but I realised I'd rather be ignorant and enjoy the inevitably flawed movie!!!
|
|
clint
from Silencio... (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-28 11:36 [#01164627]
Points: 3447 Status: Lurker
|
|
That sounds gay sorry. Err yeah the woman is hot
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-04-28 11:37 [#01164630]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
my interpretation of the movie is that it was really bad.
two and a half thumbs down.
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-04-28 16:45 [#01165367]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01164630 | Show recordbag
|
|
u stole my avatars
|
|
Dozier
from United States on 2004-04-28 18:05 [#01165508]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01164254
|
|
do you mean within the movie, or within the 'real' world?
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-04-28 18:05 [#01165510]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #01164630 | Show recordbag
|
|
try watching it again
|
|
Dozier
from United States on 2004-04-28 18:19 [#01165520]
Points: 2080 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah, like i said, the first time i saw it i was disappointed.
|
|
revpersona
from Plainfield (United States) on 2004-04-28 21:03 [#01165709]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker
|
|
Evidently you have never heard the T-Raenon EP off the OP-ART label by Photek. I bet after you heard those three songs your opinion of him wouldn't be so negative.
|
|
revpersona
from Plainfield (United States) on 2004-04-28 21:14 [#01165718]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker | Followup to revpersona: #01165709
|
|
@euphonicfilter
|
|
big
from lsg on 2004-04-28 21:46 [#01165741]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Followup to big: #01165367 | Show recordbag
|
|
that should've been a followup to someone else but epohs shouldve liked the movie anyway, so im allowed to pick on him
|
|
Messageboard index
|