illigal thread dont click FBI | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 518 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
illigal thread dont click FBI
 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-19 13:18 [#02259738]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



candycounterweight


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2008-12-19 13:24 [#02259742]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



good thread


 

offline rudster from the glasgow on 2008-12-19 15:46 [#02259789]
Points: 3169 Status: Lurker



got to say that dmx krew nu romantix is fuckin superb


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-19 17:08 [#02259809]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



hell ya it is
now go take some grrls pants off


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2008-12-19 17:10 [#02259811]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



tru


 

offline cyrstal dude from LA all day! (United States) on 2008-12-19 18:05 [#02259818]
Points: 900 Status: Addict



wtf is "illigal"

bitch learn to read


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2008-12-19 20:09 [#02259844]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i always get fed up with people who demand FLACs but still
wont just buy the fucking thing


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2008-12-19 21:18 [#02259849]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



mod please close this thread


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-19 22:03 [#02259854]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



roygbivcore, no doubt.

i buy the vinyls but my gear isn't up to the standard to do
a proper rip myself.

wish the packaging would become #1, again. hafler is an
experience (opening/listening)....even the cds.

wish others would follow suit.it would make it much more
intimate.

(waits flame)


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2008-12-19 22:32 [#02259857]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



my setup probably "ruins" records aswell,
that counterweight is ace btw! :D

because i can only afford a certain number of releases
a year id appreciate flacs for mp3s as tracks for sale.
i can see why some people may consider that a perversion,
but itd be better than not buying the album with that
excellent track on it at all...



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-20 01:46 [#02259861]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it's such a small group (marketing/selling group), (these
IDM/sub-genres)
you would think that even if a person TOOK THE TIME to
PIRATE YOUR MUSIC.

....even though you are seeing that as being STOLEN FROM ...
at least in/out of THIS ENTIRE PLANET OF PEOPLE NOW MAKING
ELECTRONIC MUSICS ... that at least SOME ONE took the time
to LIKE/APPRECIATE your musics enough to PIRATE IT.

that that would be appreciation enough. the people who are
pirating music are generally downloading it because they
like it ...so in the same sense taht you aren't getting paid
for it at this very moment, at least someone is having a
good time with regards to your tunes.

anyone get what im getting at , there ?


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2008-12-20 02:05 [#02259864]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #02259861 | Show recordbag



your whole justification is very elaborate and amusing.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2008-12-20 03:47 [#02259875]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



music for money is a mugs game anyhow. if you want to
survive find something sustainable .. then you can pursue
art for art's sake.


 

offline Mask 500 from now on 2008-12-20 04:32 [#02259877]
Points: 500 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #02259875



Easier said than done though, wish artists could apply for
some kind of compensation.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2008-12-20 04:43 [#02259879]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mask 500: #02259877



it is easily said, the reality is that theres no such thing
as an easy job! if we want to survive, then we need to help
others survive.


 

offline Mask 500 from now on 2008-12-20 04:48 [#02259880]
Points: 500 Status: Lurker | Followup to rockenjohnny: #02259879



Some artists are doing more and more live shows, even
Dopplereffekt. The markets are changing and are not as
profitable as they were during the 90's, I imagine it's very
hard for someone who made a living out of music and now has
to get a regular job. I know the main guy from Drexcyia used
to drive trucks and that never got in the way with his
music, it's someting the knew people have to consider.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2008-12-20 05:21 [#02259884]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to Mask 500: #02259880



ive always felt at odds with the needs of a market when it
comes to art. if someone is to pursue art for a living then
they certainly need to practice in keeping with current
trends.

i question whether that sort of conformity can allow for the
personalised potential of art: even though we are
conditioned by our peers and surroundings, every one of us
is as different from each other as leaves on a tree.

perhaps our creativity has the potential to reflect our
natural state? it seems to me that conformity to market
requirements can crush that potential.

of course, we can do whatever we want with our work.
historically speaking, painters often worked within their
trade for a living. some of them took risks, stepping
outside of market trends, and starved as a consequence! this
seems to confirm that art performed for arts sake cannot be
relied upon to put bread on the table.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-20 11:13 [#02259940]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it drives me a bit mad, for example...a painting or musics
or et al etc can be worth so much money;

why arent civil engineers, bridge designers, building
designers, held to these same standards of praise/pay?

how can a painting be worth millions of dollars, and the
designer of the bulbous bow not be compensated for work that
helps in the real world?

mindblowing.



 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2008-12-20 11:23 [#02259946]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02259940



I'm an electronic engineer.

WORSHIP ME or STFU


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-20 11:45 [#02259958]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



oh fuck off, you know what i meant by it.


 

offline mimi on 2008-12-20 12:28 [#02259986]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



we need artists not capitalists!


 

offline rad smiles on 2008-12-20 12:52 [#02259992]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



we need less shit clogging the toilets


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-12-20 12:53 [#02259993]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



it's not a fucking dump truck!


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2008-12-20 12:55 [#02259994]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



yeah i mean

why would you give someone money for making something you
enjoy

and why would you want money for something you put a lot of
yourself into that people are just taking

pfffff artists


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2008-12-20 12:57 [#02259996]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



because artists are reflective of the society, and they're
job seems to be to reflect, while others jobs are to provide
for the system of civilized life to function.

Art and Music's real only purpose is to exist as an artifact
or replica of life.

and others jobs are to sustain life and keep it happening.

That's why artists are fucked up, because they are always
contemplating the worst shit about life.

Look at Ian Curtis from Joy Division, probably felt like he
HAD to kill himself just because of the amount of energy he
felt his band was giving to the world by doing his music, he
could not handle it, and made up his mind.

Art for the establishment is a trap, or atleast i think so.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2008-12-20 13:04 [#02259997]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to pulseclock: #02259996



oh yeah i was replying to elusive.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-20 13:07 [#02260000]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i think you have seriously mis-interpreted my meaning/what i
was trying to convey.

my apologies for not being able to describe my point better




 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-12-20 13:13 [#02260003]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



for one, god knows that anyone here who downloads music
regularly couldn't ever afford the volume of music they get
for free. so if they never would have heard the music nor
paid for it in the first place, what's the harm in letting
them listen anyway?

secondly, you say people are "taking" the music for free,
when there is no taking involved. no one is going in and
removing precious records off the shelves, preventing other
people from purchasing it. p2p file sharing is NOT theft.

third, paying money for cds/records hardly gets any cash
into the artist's pocket - most of the price of a cd goes
into paying promotion, pressing, recording engineers,
packaging etc.

like i said before, if you really care about giving
something back to the artist go see a live show and
buy some merch, that stuff has a much higher percentage of
the profit going towards the artists themselves.


 

offline rad smiles on 2008-12-20 13:19 [#02260004]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



we need more jimmy youtube videos


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2008-12-20 13:20 [#02260005]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



popular music now, with the rise of internet downloads and
mp3 listening, has created a whole different era from the
times of buying music from a store and paying for it with
cash.

I read recently online that ISP's will now put a filter on
their services and they will be able to look through your
downloads, and if they are mp3s of artists or anything of
that which would be considered "theft," they will add it to
your bill, this method hasn't started obviously, and might
not include all ISPs. who knows



 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2008-12-20 13:22 [#02260007]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to rad smiles: #02260004



why?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-20 13:33 [#02260011]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"popular music now, with the rise of internet downloads
and
mp3 listening, has created a whole different era from the
times of buying music from a store and paying for it with
cash. "


no shit?

"I read recently online that ISP's will now put a filter
on
their services and they will be able to look through your
downloads, and if they are mp3s of artists or anything of
that which would be considered "theft," they will add it to
your bill, this method hasn't started obviously, and might
not include all ISPs. who knows "


sad that you are even attempting to explain net neutrality
or the concept of application layer packet inspection, when
you clearly don't have an understanding of anything in
regards. at least you are aware of what can happen, but you
really shouldn't be quite that terrified...that's a huge
claim to make and make possible. for now, dont lose any
sleep over this happening


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2008-12-20 13:38 [#02260014]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



well it seems like you know this VERY well, which is good
cause i dont' know shit about the way the net works (sadly,
maybe i can take a college course someday)

so then why do you even give a fuck about what people are
saying, let them defend their artists, and you'll get whats
coming to you.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2008-12-20 19:01 [#02260060]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to roygbivcore: #02259994



because it's rotten :)


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-20 19:22 [#02260061]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i don't really have a position in this thread; i just posted
some music. you are having a fit and mis-understanding
anything that i have conveyed here.


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2008-12-20 19:36 [#02260063]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular



midgets


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2008-12-20 20:45 [#02260067]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



It's very simple: the ease with which music is copied means
that music is now free. That is a fact, not a moral
judgement. People pass lossless or 320k albums around as
casually as lolcat jpegs.

I have hundreds of gigabytes of music. Some of it I'll
almost certainly never listen to even once. I'm constantly
downloading more. I'm just amused that someone can post a
bunch of links on zilty as though it were something rare and
special, rather than the dataclutter it actually is - and
that people will un-ironically argue about it. You might as
well argue over ice cubes or stacks of recycled paper.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-12-21 00:18 [#02260083]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



it's only a stage, some will grow out of it.

some have grown out of it.

one of the most rewarding feelings i had is the day i went
through all of my tunelists and deleted any shit tracks from
full album downloads...and just kept the good'uns or the
ones i listen to a lot...

i hada conversation with a coworker about this: he wanted
to have a massive collection, so that he could listen to any
track at anytime (if a guest requested a certain track, he
could play it).

i argued that it was overconsumption, and the way things are
today, it would take him no longer than 3-5minutes to find
basically any song. therefore, since it is available almost
on-demand, he should not be hoarding things he does not use
often (or downloading music just for the sake of it / it's
there / it's so easy).



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-12-21 01:07 [#02260084]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



everybody who reads this thread should watch that movie
"fando y lis"



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-12-21 01:12 [#02260085]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



cant believe nu romantix is 10 years old!


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2008-12-21 02:47 [#02260089]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



i need to shave my beard


 

offline spculum from MÜÜT on 2008-12-21 05:00 [#02260096]
Points: 472 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02260084



sick as.........


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2008-12-21 05:15 [#02260097]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



you will find that artists dont WANT money; they NEED money.


it is their gift to society. quite often they never see the
silly money that is paid for their art, van gough never sold
a painting in his life for example.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2008-12-21 05:17 [#02260098]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



basically money is a necessary evil today (more than ever).


 

offline cx from Norway on 2008-12-21 05:23 [#02260099]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02260003



im sorry man but thats bs..

downloading files is theft..

it doesnt matter if you take a physical item (which is
unique) or if you copy an mp3, the point is that you are
taking something which isn't yours until you have paid for
it legally.

the definition comes from the action, not the result.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2008-12-21 05:24 [#02260100]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



that said, i dont think you're justified posting these
here.
especially not last step, tuss, etc


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2008-12-21 06:20 [#02260101]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



delicious flacs.


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2008-12-21 08:26 [#02260108]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



richarddjames@hotmail.com


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-12-21 09:10 [#02260113]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to cx: #02260099



wrong.


Attached picture

 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2008-12-21 09:10 [#02260115]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



I remember writing my dissertation on whether art should be
a commodity. I wasn't running a label or releasing music at
the time though, so I guess my perspective is different now
though.

In an ideal world, music would and should be free. In
reality, having to work full-time to support your real love
is soul crushing and no doubt leads to a lot of talented
people going unnoticed, simply because they don't have the
energy to work to their full potential. Artists don't make
much money from music sales, but labels (which are often run
by artists anyway) depend on them to keep putting releases
out there. They don't have a magic money well and
eventually, if sales just aren't there, they're gonna give
up. Not every artist performs live either.


 


Messageboard index