You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
(nobody)
...and 195 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614263
Today 10
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
War...
 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 11:02 [#00591965]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00591943



So I take it you don't think resolution 1441 should have
passed? After all, aside from full compliance military
action is it's only possible result.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-03-12 11:11 [#00591970]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00591962



If that's true then Hans Blix had no idea what he was
talking about when he said that they couldn't find the
"smoking gun". If they couldn't find it, it indicates that
they were looking for them. Iraq already gave them a list of
things that they have. If you assume that Iraq still has WMD
and they are not there your assumptions are wrong that's why
they look for them


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-03-12 11:18 [#00591975]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00591965



"After all, aside from full compliance military action is
it's only possible result."

"serious consequences" can mean all kinds of things
otherwise they would have called it "full scale war"


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 11:30 [#00591986]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00591975



Serious consequences is diplomat-speak. There are no other
serious consequences besides military action.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 11:36 [#00591997]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00591970



Did he say the 'couldn't find' or 'haven't found'? There's
actually quite a difference there.

An extract from 1441:
"to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to
comply with its disarmament obligations under relevant
resolutions of the Council".

This clearly puts the emphasis on Iraq to disarm, not to be
disaremed by inspectors.

Yes, Iraq presented a list of it's military programmes to
the UN. Pretty much everyone except Iraq is agreed that it
falls short of a complete declaration., something which Hans
Blix has decried on numerous occasions.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-03-12 11:37 [#00592003]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00591986



"Serious consequences is diplomat-speak. There are no other
serious consequences besides military action."

....because?


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 11:40 [#00592009]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00592003



OK, you tell me. What other serious consequences are there
in the context of 1441?


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 11:42 [#00592013]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



bush is THE greatest threat to world safety. comments
please.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-03-12 11:44 [#00592015]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00592009



boycots, no fly zones, bomb WMD, etc


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 11:47 [#00592021]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00592015



Boycott what exactly?

No-fly zones are already there.

As for bombing the WMD, they're hidden, that's the whole
point. If we knew where they were we would have told the
inspectors already.


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-03-12 11:55 [#00592032]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00591997



"to afford Iraq, by this resolution, a final opportunity to
comply with its disarmament obligations under relevant
resolutions of the Council".

This clearly puts the emphasis on Iraq to disarm, not to be
disaremed by inspectors"

it doesn't say anything about inspectors...

"As for bombing the WMD, they're hidden, that's the whole
point"

or sold(likely), or destroyed(unlikely) or used up or a
combination or the above. It's all assumptions


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-12 14:27 [#00592333]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Laserbeak: #00592032



You say it's all assumptions, well surely Saddam Hussein
could easily clear it all up?

The quote from 1441 was just that, a quote. There's plenty
of references to inspectors in it. Doesn't change the fact
that the onus is on Iraq to co-operate.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 04:53 [#00593121]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00591885



Promo: you haven't got a fuckin clue. It WAS inhabited and
the creation of Israel went hand in hand with the forcible
removal and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.

Again, you never fail to come out with a load of steaming
shit.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 04:55 [#00593127]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00591895



Ceri: no offence, but that is quite possibly the stupidest
thing you have ever said.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 05:02 [#00593143]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00591928



http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/comment/0,115
38,899123,00.html


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-13 05:08 [#00593154]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Which comment:
That a pre-emptive strike would in some instance be
justified

or

"I'm not saying we do have proof"?

or

The majority Palestinans are envious of the Jew's wealth and
education.

or

It being pretty shite land before the Jews developed it.

I presume you mean the latter?

Here's a picture of Israel back in the 20s... not quite as
impressive as it is now is it?

I know you have a penchant for giving the land of all
cuntries back to whoever had it 100s of years previously,
but yuo seem to forget that the jews did once have some of
Israel (and yes, they fought the palestinians then), before
it was given to them after WW2.

No one has commented on the suggestion I posted that a
palestinian friend said, "The Jews should go back to Poland
now WW2 is over".

Just out of interest, what do all the "give it back to the
palestinian" supporters here propose we do with the Jews?


Attached picture

 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 05:14 [#00593160]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593154



Your comments regarding Israel and the Palestinians. It is
not envy the Palestinains feel but rage; rage at over 50
years of western sanctioned ethnic cleansing.

What you said bears no relation to the real situation in
Palestine.

“Israel is to become the watchdog. There is no fear that
Israel will undertake any aggressive Policy towards the Arab
states when this would explicitly contradict the wishes of
the US and Britain. But if for any reasons the Western
powers should sometimes prefer to close their eyes, Israel
could be relied upon to punish one or several neighbouring
states whose discourtesy to the West went beyond the bounds
of the permissible.”

The Israeli paper Ha’aretz, 30 September 1951



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-13 05:51 [#00593192]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to jonesy: #00593160 | Show recordbag



Of course the Palestinians are jealous!

Their government keeps them ignorant, the quality of life is
lower, women are treated little better than animals ,
education is something only available to a priviliged
elite...

The Israelis on the other hand have a relatively stable (if
you ingore outside forces), liberal democracy (compared to
palestine- I know the Israelis are actually quite right
wing...) with a high quality of life.

Why wouldn't the palestinians be jealous?


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 06:00 [#00593206]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593192



They are victims of Israeli ethnic cleansing and terror. I
wouldn't call that jealousy. Were the Jews jealous of the
Nazis? The south Africans jealous of the Afrikaans?

Do you actually know what Israel has done to the Palestines?
Look at this:

Not a loony lefty but an Academy Award winning journalist
and filmmaker

http://pilger.carlton.com/palestine



 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-13 06:02 [#00593208]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593192



The situation is FAR FAR FAR too complicated and serious to
put it down to Palistinian jealousy...


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 06:04 [#00593212]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593192



Could the fact that Israel has destroyed Palestinian society
have something to do with the fact that they have nothing
while the Israelis have it all?

Or perhaps that the US bankrolls the Israeli economy?


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-13 06:04 [#00593214]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593154



and with respect to your picture... it looks like it could
be an old street from any old town in any country...

and it doesn't look much like a barren wasteland to me!


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-13 06:07 [#00593217]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593192



Jerusalem - the key to the entire situation has a history
that stretches back 5000 years!


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-03-13 06:07 [#00593218]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular



I'm waiting for the USA to invade France, that'll be fun!


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 08:02 [#00593408]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



BTW, Israel has 68 UN resolutions passed against them, while
Iraq has a measley 17.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-13 08:17 [#00593446]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00593208 | Show recordbag



No, it's not the only reason, but to deny that it
contributes to it is a little unrealistic...



 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-13 08:28 [#00593454]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593446



But is to oppose the ethnic cleansing of one's people
jealousy?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-13 10:27 [#00593640]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag




Hear what Avril has to say on the matter...


 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2003-03-13 10:29 [#00593645]
Points: 40080 Status: Regular



Avril is just a pretty face, if that

shut her up, and keep on making crappy tunes for the kids


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-03-13 10:46 [#00593662]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Musicians, actors and artists should stay out of politics
all together no matter what their views are. It is a wise
thing to do.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2003-03-13 10:51 [#00593666]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



"It's like this old song my drummer played me, about war. It
said "War! What is it good for? Absolutely nothing." Now I
know that was written like a million years ago before I was
like even born, but that guy's got a point, y'know? I think
some people really really need to listen to that record.
When I heard it for the first time the other day, I just
thought like, "Yeah!" - Avril Lavinge or the fuqq her name
is.

Hahaha, she's a pretty face, nothing else.
Hasn't she ever heard the tune before? And she's suppose ta
be "rocky"?

"Avril Lavigne's new single Pointless will be in the shops
on 5 April. Her debut album Avril was recently voted "Best
Ever New Album in the World" at the MTV Awards January 2003.
She is also up for Best New Female Vocalist A Through H in
the MTV March 2003 awards. She is deep."

Deep? Ahahahaha- hilarious stuff.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-03-13 10:52 [#00593667]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



jonesy,

Yes they are jealous; thats why they wont the land because
they now see it in their interest.

But of course you're not jealous are you. You're above that
sort of thing aren't you. Lol.


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-03-13 11:00 [#00593672]
Points: 251 Status: Regular



Jerusalem - the key to the entire situation has a history
that stretches back 5000 years!

where is your hope in that note?
5000 years of difference, pride, factions, and
conflict...that is now testing the rest of the shrinking
world.

it's sad to see that, after years of following unending
unrest middle-east, that your own country can be drawn down
to the same base reactions of fear and vengence. and yet it
happens.


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-14 01:16 [#00594384]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to xian_ecci: #00593672



But Palestinian Jews and Arabs lived there quite peacefully
for thousands of years. It was only with the creation of a
Zionist state, and the forcible removal of Palestinian
Arabs, that led to the conflict.


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-03-14 01:52 [#00594406]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



man those of you in Europe are missing out on these
delicious freedom fries.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-14 02:07 [#00594417]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to Cfern: #00594406 | Show recordbag



Do they taste better? ;)

It must of cost scores of millions to change all literature
referencing "french fries"...

Perhaps they should of just changed them to "Chips" everyone
knows us Brits made them anyway.


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-03-14 02:33 [#00594453]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



haha.. well it was only like two places that changed the
name..


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-03-14 02:35 [#00594456]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



what a bunch of babies... i guess now everything having to
do with the french is going to be boycotted now?!?!? why
don't they just tear down the statue of liberty, while
they're at it.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-14 02:58 [#00594490]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tibbar: #00594456 | Show recordbag



I know, my mum is boycotting french food. She binned some
salad she bought when she realised it was french.

Good point about the statue of liberty :)

And we had to go to an indian rather than french owned
restaurant for my birthday :/


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-14 04:31 [#00594666]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00594490



I'm English, British, and European... NOT American.

Freedom Fries!!! I've heard of some stupid and pointless
shit in my life, but that has got to be one of the most
stupid and pointless! What a waste of money! Wouldn't that
money be better spent on the hundreds of thousands of EXTRA
refugees that this conflict will create?


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-14 04:33 [#00594673]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker



As if the French (or anyone) gives a fuck about whether
Yanks eat French Fries or Freedom Fries!!!


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-03-14 04:35 [#00594677]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00594673 | Show recordbag



It's not even like they're made in france- it's just the
name...

I'm Welsh. That's it. Just kidding, I count myself as
British, not European though...


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-14 04:35 [#00594678]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00593446



I think you need to look into the Palestinian situation a
little closer. Jealousy has about as much to do with it as
Freedom Fries do to the Iraqi situation!


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2003-03-14 04:45 [#00594693]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker | Followup to LuckyPsycho: #00594678



Even less I'd say.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-03-14 06:19 [#00594818]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to AphexAcid: #00593666



a ha ha ha

I don't think miss Lavigne actually wrote that column..


 

offline LuckyPsycho from a long way from home (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-14 07:14 [#00594923]
Points: 369 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00593662



Why should anyone with an opinion stay out of politics?
If you feel strongly about something then you should be free
to express those feelings... isn't that something to do with
democracy?


 

offline nacmat on 2003-03-14 08:39 [#00595171]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



1


Attached picture

 

offline nacmat on 2003-03-14 08:39 [#00595173]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



2


Attached picture

 

offline nacmat on 2003-03-14 08:40 [#00595177]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



3


Attached picture

 

offline nacmat on 2003-03-14 08:42 [#00595183]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to nacmat: #00595171



In nuber one it says:

ARMAGEDON
for love, for honour, for whatever


 


Messageboard index