amon tobin on leaks/downloads | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
010101
belb
...and 586 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
amon tobin on leaks/downloads
 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-09 11:23 [#02060279]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



link

"today, the release date for my album, it's unlikely that
you will see it in most high street shops and after the
initial run it's unlikely that you will be able to order a
copy even from online stores. this is because in-spite of
more people having access to and apparently listening to my
music than ever before, the predicted sales of the record
were so low that it didn't justify the manufacture or
distribution to any significant level. strange? not when you
consider how hard it might be to convince any retail outlet,
physical or digital, that they should try and sell something
everybody could already get for free months beforehand."



 

offline jackeroffer from Aruba on 2007-03-09 11:28 [#02060281]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker



why does it always seem so 1999 when Artists come out
complaining about shit like this?

i always get flashbacks of James Ulrich of metallica


 

offline jackeroffer from Aruba on 2007-03-09 11:29 [#02060283]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker



i can understand his frustration, but imagine how much
harder it is for a non established artist to get
distribution these days with Mp3 trading. He's acting like
its impossible to make a decent amount of money off his
album. Im sorry but thats just bullshit. Hes on ninjatune
records, he got hired to do a soundtrack for a splintercell
game and his songs are features in 100,000 million dollar
budget car commercials. The ones i feel really sorry for
are the little electronic musicians out there who have no
money to live off of.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-09 11:34 [#02060286]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to jackeroffer: #02060283



As an extremely amateur electronic musician I think it is
ironic that mp3 transfer, which has indeed helped me out
quite a bit, may work against me one day.


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-03-09 11:40 [#02060290]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



free music -> no more artists -> no more music -> free
nothing

Nothing is free, right ?


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2007-03-09 11:44 [#02060292]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Combo: #02060290



It sucks, his company likely saw all of the torrents
availible for the leak and said, "Hey uhh... We dont want to
lose money. Most people who want your album already have it.
We'll just put out a few copies on a few shelves and see how
that goes, Mr. Tobin. Cya!"

Really sucks!!!


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-03-09 12:09 [#02060302]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



Why did it leak, btw?


 

offline HmND from your mom (Israel) on 2007-03-09 12:11 [#02060304]
Points: 660 Status: Regular



The label pipe had a hole in it. The plumbers didn't come in
time :(
Damn you, Mario.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-09 12:47 [#02060328]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



It's alright Amon, I didn't download your album, and it in
no way affected my decision not to buy it either, on the off
chance that I saw it on a shelf. Principally this is
because

I find what I've heard of your music dull.
I don't like the name Amon Tobin.

I think you should be grateful anyone's even bothered to
listen to your work. I'm sure you get money from licensing
tracks out to compilations, adverts, video games etc.

However, if this isn't the case, that you have no corporate
customers, and that even your fan base can't be bothered to
buy your album, it may be time to stop blaming everyone
else
, think about why no one's all that bothered, and
start practicising for doing some job interviews.



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2007-03-09 12:58 [#02060337]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Now see here

(about half way through the topic onwards)


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-09 13:00 [#02060339]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to ecnadniarb: #02060337 | Show recordbag



That's probably a better thread than this one. Though I
didn't get Jivver's Amon Ulrich joke until now, so it's not
all lost.


 

offline thatne from United States on 2007-03-09 17:24 [#02060444]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



does it strike anyone that online trading
could lead to socialism? assuming that
other entertainment industries might fol
low suit after music became absolutely
free. i dont see movies or sports becom
ing free any time soon but i can imagine
that the overall quality of media would
become better and more representative
if it were provided free of charge in a
society devaluing overproduction and
the greed that inspires it.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-03-09 17:45 [#02060453]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I needs me some good old fashioned overproduction once in a
while, it can be fun to indulge and listen to/watch the
indulgences of others.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2007-03-09 20:08 [#02060494]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



my opinion about the whole thing, there will never be "no
more artists" even if music is essentially free - if you
really want to do something you do it without regard to
money - hence there will always be people that create art -
if you are creating the art solely for the money, then yes,
say goodbye to your meal ticket. On the otherside - if you
like the music that you hear, you should purchase it - its
just how things are - you are taking something that another
person created, and also taking something that the record
company releases and distributes - there is the kicker you
shouldnt take something just because you can get it for
free. even though amon sounds a bit whiney and sore, he does
have a good point just at the end - if you like it you
should support it.


 

offline Aesthetics from the IDM Kiosk on 2007-03-10 04:43 [#02060559]
Points: 6796 Status: Lurker



How come some releases only leak in the week before the
actual release and others months ahead?


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-10 05:10 [#02060564]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



The trouble is, it's hard to actually get people to listen
to stuff if you're a new artist with only free music to
download. People in general don't seem interested in
discovering new artists, which is fair enough (we'll stick
to what we know will probably be decent) but it means that
with millions of new bands with a myspace pages popping up
all the time, music won't be given the time it (sometimes)
deserves.

I couldn't get into Autechre initially, for example, but I
can't deny that what encouraged me to give them time was the
fact they had a few records out, were on Warp, and lots of
other people seemed to like them. As record sales plunge
lower and lower, I'm not sure people will bother giving new
music much attention with millions of mp3s floating around
cyberspace and everybody requesting listens in a virtual
environment. It cheapens the music.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-10 05:11 [#02060566]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #02060564



*apologies for the dreadful writing above, but I stand by
the basic point..thing...


 

offline zero-cool on 2007-03-10 05:24 [#02060569]
Points: 2720 Status: Lurker



does anyone knew when boomkat is getting in the re-printed
version of nothing? which is for free?


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2007-03-10 06:28 [#02060577]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



No one will buy it because it is crap.

I listened to his new album and its rubbish, therefore I
didn't buy it. I did buy the EP, but I'm not entirely sure
why now.

The point is the predicted sales are so low because the
album is a load of old poo. Face it Amon, people bought
supermodified because it was good. People are not going to
buy the new one because it is bad... so erm yeah boo hoo
torrents winge winge. make some decent music


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-03-10 06:51 [#02060581]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



i bought it (bleep/flac) and think it's great!


 

offline swears from junk sleep on 2007-03-10 07:04 [#02060589]
Points: 6474 Status: Lurker | Followup to thatne: #02060444



I think the overall quality will drop because somebody that
has to make a living from something like music is gonna put
that extra bit of effort in. 99.99999% of music is crap
anyway, you need some sort of commercial system to sort out
the good stuff. The average release on a label like Skam or
Warp or whatever is always going to be better than the
average amateur mp3. (Even though there is shit signed stuff
and good amateur stuff.) But overall this is a bad thing, it
may well be why innovation and general quality in music has
fallen since the 90s.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2007-03-10 07:33 [#02060595]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



i dunno if its piracys fault, but movie tickets cost double
the amount they did in the mid 90s, that shits crazy.
cd's however have somehow become cheaper, i remember they
used to cost 179 nok, now you can get most of them for 129
nok.

the truth is 80% of people who download everything for free
are dumb as hell.
just check out any torrent message board, any irc channel
with warez discussion etc, most of them do not care and do
not know about the consequences, they just want free stuff.

another thing that pisses me off to no end is pro-piracy
activism..
they don't seem to realize that a lot of money has to go
into productions. especially pc game production.
there are small companies that make kickass games, and then
the game is pirated and SALES GO DOWN.
imagine if the internet didnt exist, and you heard from your
friends about the cool new game they are playing, wouldnt
you buy it, if it seemed interesting?
a lot more people would buy stuff if it wasnt available for
free online, and nobody can or should deny that.

and like someone else said, just downloading an mp3 cheapens
the music. if you buy an album, go to a concert or
otherwise, then the circumstances are much more unique.

however, as an amateur musician i do put most of my music
online for free, but thats my CHOICE, and nobody is breaking
the law by downloading them.

if the capitalism system is to work, then nothing should be
available for free, and there should be a proper tasting
system where customers can listen in advance then purchase
if they like it.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-10 07:40 [#02060597]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to cx: #02060595



Good stuff here. I think a result of all this will be a
decline in quality in things like games, films, and music;
even a few big games companies, for example, are struggling
to make enough money while spewing out one shitty chart
topping wrestling/football/generic-film-tie-in games. How on
earth is a smaller company producing something a bit
different make ends meet? So many wonderful game studios
have been wiped off the map recently (mind you, I suppose
that always happened...)


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-03-10 07:40 [#02060598]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



just downloading an mp3 cheapens the music

so your own music put online must be very cheap too


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2007-03-10 07:41 [#02060599]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular | Followup to cx: #02060595



*your


 

offline cx from Norway on 2007-03-10 09:14 [#02060611]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to obara: #02060598



Well, what I meant was the "collector" attitude that is
prevalent in many mp3 downloaders, coupled with the
"easyness" of downloading music.

I dunno about you but it's kind of anticlimatic to just put
the torrent on dl, then put it on later, as opposed to
walking down on a cold frosty morning to the record store to
pick up the new autechre (for example).

I also feel that I get a better sense of what the artist
wanted to convey when I have an actual cover to look at, and
it sets the mood more than just seeing a title an artist on
oink.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2007-03-10 09:15 [#02060612]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to cx: #02060611



*and


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-10 10:49 [#02060623]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



It's true, or at least it appears to me, that certain people
hoard mp3 and gigs worth of material which they'll never
listen to, and that doesn't harm the market as they wouldn't
have bought a fraction of it anyway, I suppose what's wrong
with that though is that these people redistributing it make
it that much easier for people that might have bought
something, the more discerning listener, to find it for
free.

The market for, let's say, IDM, is young males. As time goes
on and IDM is now established as a genre like "Goth" or
"Death Metal" it's another alternative "lifestyle" for teens
to identify with. It's dance music AND intelligent, that
long-sought after cocktail of being appearing cool
and being a nerd.

In general those young lads don't earn a fraction of the
money required to splash out on every record they either do
actually want to own, or to check out and hear or take a
risk buying something unheard (god knows I wasted a lot of
money on Rephlex releases that were shit and ended up in a
skip when I left the country, and funny enough I've never
bought one since apart from Analord and Astobotnia, I'd get
the Black Devil but then again, I can't really give a fuck).
To be able to legitimatly purchase a fraction of the
avalanch of music that's "potentially" interesitng to this
market, you'd have to be a CEO of a large financal company.
The type of person who thinks Norah Jones is pushing the
envelope.

I SAY THIS TO ELECTRONIC MUSIC LABELS: Issue a licence, a
one month, or one year licence that allows the user to
download whatver they like from whatever labels are included
in the scheme, like a radio license. That way, everyone gets
at least a little something, and people aren't reduced to
criminals just because they like to hear music. OK? And that
little idea will cost you $100,000 as I could do with a
fucking holiday.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2007-03-10 10:55 [#02060625]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #02060623



you'd have to be a CEO of a large financal company.
The type of person who thinks Norah Jones is pushing the
envelope.


O god, a colleague had a daughter last month and named her
Norah. And yes, she's named after the artist. And whattaya
know, that colleague is a hotshot business controller. It's
no CEO, but he sure is financial allright. I call "lucky
guess", although the world is far more predictable than i'd
ever like to admit.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-10 11:27 [#02060632]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #02060623 | Show recordbag



This is why I've pretty much given up trying to keep up on
the "scene". I just get the certain artists I like and stick
with that. Anything else is downloaded as I just can't
afford to do it.

RDJ
MB
TJ
SB&RB

Everyone else will have to increase their game to get on the
list of people I definitely buy.


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2007-03-10 12:07 [#02060653]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



what the fuck is he on about though? 'Foley Room' is
available online everywhere.. I picked mine up online. If
record stores don't store the CD, isn't that more fault of
the record store than the record company? What retarded
record company would fund an artist and release, but not put
it in shops? Doesn't add up.. Tobe is being a whinge is all
I can gather.


 

offline vveerrgg from life (Canada) on 2007-03-10 13:44 [#02060661]
Points: 846 Status: Lurker



dog_belch have you ever looked into eMusic.com..... that's
their exact music retail model. You pay a certain price per
month and download a bunch of tunes... it doesn't exactly
add up to .99 cents a song. it's more about paying a service
fee and downloading what you want.... like a music buffet.

Regarding how some songs end up online just before they
launch... If a record company sends out pre-releases of
albums for reviewers to write about, some of these end up
being encoded and shared for free.

Amon is whining about something I think is irrelevant.
Regardless if ppl pay for his music or not... the fact that
he has listeners is something that has ALOT of value. As a
brand, when he lends his name to projects that has WAY more
value then whatever he thinks his music is valued at. Look
at all the projects he's involved with..... he thinks they
picked him cause he's good? or that he's best?

THEY PICKED HIM CAUSE HE HAS A BIG AUDIENCE.... that's his
real value... regardless on if they bootlegged his music or
not. He's got a huge fanbase and that is worth money to
someone.

He's gotta refocus his value and his priorities... infact
any artist with any smarts would do whatever they can to
grow and sustain a fairly large audience. Cause regardless
on how much they get from that audience.... the value is the
access which alot of ppl will be willing to pay top dollar
for in the near future.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-10 13:56 [#02060668]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I can't remember the site but it had an awesome business
model.
Basically, anyone can sell a track on there. However at
first it sells for free. The more people buy it the more the
price goes up until it reaches the max of 99cents.

I think that's a great way of pricing songs.

I bet it wasn't an actual site and I've just given away a
fucking pimp idea.


 

offline vveerrgg from life (Canada) on 2007-03-10 14:17 [#02060680]
Points: 846 Status: Lurker



That site is amiestreet.com

I was considering putting a release on there... they
definitely have an odd way of retailing tunes. It'll be
interesting to see how things work out for that site and if
that formula will take off or not.


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2007-03-10 15:01 [#02060689]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



I'm so happy that art becomes free.


 

offline giginger from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2007-03-10 15:14 [#02060693]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to vveerrgg: #02060680 | Show recordbag



Well at least I haven't given out an idea for free :D


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2007-03-10 16:10 [#02060702]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Followup to CS2x: #02060597 | Show recordbag



I just read an interview with Michael Capps of Epic Games
where he said piracy is killing PC gaming so they're
shifting their focus to console games. It's harder to pirate
Blu-Ray than it is to pirate a typical PC game (for now,
anyway). If you have the 600 dollar video card required to
get the most out of the Unreal 3 engine, you know how Bit
Torrent works.



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-03-10 19:48 [#02060733]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to Vin3islih: #02060653



i can't be arsed to fully follow this up, but i think what
he means is that the record label will end up pressing less
copies of his cd and putting less money toward promoting it.
maybe it will be sent to less distributors too, who knows...
sometimes these things can feedback into one another; where,
for example, if a record store or a distributor see that
there isn't going to be a decent amount of promotion, they
might not order as many. and rightfully so, because, as is
painfully obvious, lots of kids don't buy their music.

some good points are being brought up here about the overall
ambivalence of the present circumstances of music
distribution.

one thing i would say though, is that if you want to claim
that size of audience is what matters, for example, well
then please don't ever complain again about an artists
"selling out" to a corporation, because in a lot of ways you
are pushing artists to seek out that kind of funding... and
i think that sort of rationale gives ample grounds for
resentment on the part of the artist.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2007-03-10 23:29 [#02060755]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



out of all fairness, writing electronic music doesnt really
cut it as a job.

it think its more understandable for pop artists to make a
living out of music. thats because they provide the full
package; performance, a face for the product and an image,
all of that. the industry doesnt function on the song alone,
that is unfortunately the path of the one-hit-wonder.


 

offline OK on 2007-03-11 01:17 [#02060762]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



well the thing is that there is no stopping piracy, so any
moral debate has no point, we're entering a new age, and if
people in the music business want to remain in it, they'll
have to accept it and find new ways to get rich and stop
whining because there's no way they can win this battle.


 

offline Moot from Antarctica on 2007-03-11 03:11 [#02060768]
Points: 169 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #02060702



id Software recently said the same in a Quake Wars
interview.

Piracy isn't ok. If it is, give out your account numbers,
passwords and social security number... Leave labeled copies
of your keys nailed to walls in public places... When you
get stuff stolen from you, it'll be ok too.

Liking music doesn't make you a criminal, braking the law
does. The RIAA mafia's racket is as misleadingly "fair" as
the "legality" of piracy via its anonimity and lack of
penalties.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-03-11 13:11 [#02060892]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to OK: #02060762



whether or not people pirate music, i think they should
consider the ethics of supporting or not supporting artists.


anyone can talk about a swing towards the socialistic in
terms of free music, but if you are still spending
significant dollars elsewhere (on essentials that are
produced irresponsibly and other frivolous stuff) then i
think it sort of rings hollow.



 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-11 13:17 [#02060897]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Bloody musicians, turning kids to computer crime just to
feed their IDM fix. Give the kids a chance to do the right
thing, MAKE NO MORE MUSIC. Just count browse your investment
portfolio or sell your mum's house to property developers.


 

offline staz on 2007-03-11 13:20 [#02060904]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #02060623



The issue you bring up about "IDM"'s audience is something
I've thought a lot about. I think the genre has the least
customer buying power of just about any genre. Well, unless
you're talking about AFX releases, which will entice even
the most moth ridden wallet to magically conjure up* the
amount required for the next faux calfskin record holster.

*ask parents


 

offline cx from Norway on 2007-03-11 13:27 [#02060923]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to OK: #02060762



The open market works on supply and demand like everything
else.
If artists and recording studios see that there is no demand
for physical CD's, they will have to either move on to the
internet, or at worst stop releasing music / paying artists
altogether.

If you think big record labels or even small labels will
invest in something that doesn't bring an income, you're
wrong. :P

This can be said about everything.. What if synth / sampler
/ music software programmers go out of jobs because nobody
buys their software?

What if movie studios see no valid reason to invest millions
upon millions into big movies anymore?

It has happened to some degree in the PC Game arena, the
music and movie industry is big enough atm to keep going for
a good while, but if piracy increases then it doesn't take
many decades or even years for it to all fall apart.


 

offline OK on 2007-03-11 21:22 [#02061108]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker | Followup to cx: #02060923



yes I understand, what's your point? that mass production
will die?

maybe that's a good thing.

as I said there's no stopping this and it is a consequence
of the very same market laws.

anyway as you said it if there's no demand blablabla no
demand means no one wants it, so either they come up with
something that makes people want to buy stuff or they come
up with another way to make money.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2007-03-11 21:55 [#02061109]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to OK: #02061108 | Show recordbag



or they come up with another way to make money

A compulsory IDM Tax, much like the BBC TV License in
Britain.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2007-03-12 03:34 [#02061200]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



free mp3 dowloads would work against you more than most any
other kind of artist out there..


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2007-03-12 11:09 [#02061344]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to OK: #02061108



maybe it's absurd of me to say so, but i'm not so convinced
that people really *know* what they want. people seldom
consider the results of their consumer activities beyond
themselves.


 

offline vveerrgg from life (Canada) on 2007-03-12 12:26 [#02061384]
Points: 846 Status: Lurker



either way... he and every other artist out there is going
to have to come up with a new way of getting ppl to be
interested in what they're doing musically....

since CD sales aren't making him happy, maybe he should go
into launching a brand of salad dressing...


Attached picture

 


Messageboard index