 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)Roger Wilco ...and 262 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614125 Today 4 Topics 127542 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
calls for death of most humans by ebola! Boy, whut the hayull yew folks drinkin' in Takes-ass? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you know... that's completely fucking insane. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
What I don't get: if you don't value human life, which is the thing most people care about most (their own at the very least), why should you value anything else people care about - in this case, the earth? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
apreal fulls i zink deer bays |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
A genocide of Texans...it would solve a few of the worlds major problems. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"Apparently at the speaker's direction, the speech was not video taped by the Academy and so Forrest's may be the only record of what was said." All sounds a bit like a smear campaign to me. Anyway, he's wrong about Ebola-Reston. It is airbourne, but it doesnt have a 90% fatality rate in humans. In fact no human has ever died from the Reston strain. hence I think the whole article is a bit suspect. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
That seems extreme... I hope that article is fake. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yes I read this too. Haha. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I worship Dr Pianka! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
But why?? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
brilliant. but ebola is too greusome. something painless would do. save the earth. -holds up protest sign (made of wood)- |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
this can't be serious? if someone hated the human race that much why don't they do everyone else a favour and top themselves. maybe they would get a fucking head start in this obscene proposal. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the earth is more important than us. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
opinion |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah yeah yeah, opinions.. that doesnt really get us anywhere. we live in a time of drastic measures. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
no we don't. this is bullshit. people who really belive in it should go top themselves. its crazy talk. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
What I don't understand is how anyone can seperate humans (the evolution of, along with the advancement) from nature. It isn't likely that humans were put on earth by a force seperate from the force that put the rest of life here. Is there anyone who considers bird nests, beaver dams, and other similar masses of repositioned objects anti-nature? Then why are buildings and machines and pollution considered by so many people to be so? It's all just a part of the natural evolution of life. One could also definitely argue that plans such as this one are also just another part of nature, and that if one was successfully followed through on, I would consider the results to be part of nature too. So what does that leave? Both courses of action (reducing the human population or allowing it to progress unchanged), are both serving nature, both equal. Then how does one decide which to do? My point is that since everything is part of nature, doing something for the "benefit" of nature is just weird. Who gets to decide what would really be a benefit, and are there actually things such as "benefits" at all? How can you tell what is on the outside of the box when you're stuck inside? Is there even any outside at all, or even an inside for that matter? It's egotistical to decide anything at all. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i wanted to make that point i guess, but i didnt. whilst some might argue that current human behaviour is damaging the world around us, and i'd agree that it is, the human race is still part of nature. it isnt man vs. nature because man is nature. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yep. That's the way I feel. The "Green" camp are the ones who rather arrogantly like to draw a distinction between what we do and other animals. I honestly seriously doubt that even if we tried to, we'd be able to irreperably damage the earth, long term. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
-v-, you said that better than I could have Conservative equals liberals. One extreme is no different from the other. Is there a difference between someone who wants to eliminate all the bad people with a virus and someone who wants to eliminate all the bad people with nuclear weapons? No. Its bad chemistry. Bad chemistry in the mind of the right person... a person who can persuade en mass... can be devestating. When hitler decided to commit genocide, or when he started the ball rolling towards genocide. He thought he was doing what was the right thing. He was wrong. The truth of the matter is, the human mind is geared towards self destruction. I think its a safeguard that is imbedded in any species that manages to remove itself out from the middle of the food chain. The key to ballance isn't to remove that species from the picture entirely. Its to introduce a predator into its ecosystem, just slightly above that species, so that that species can become part of the food chain again. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yeah man, we just need more polar bears and stuff to eat people. Fuck this nancy-ass ebola crap. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Even though I largely agree with you, there is a difference between a skyscraper and a bird's nest. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
He should be the first to die then , yes, but still i'm with Dust and Pianka and Gwely on this one. We are ths scum of this planet. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
You're a bit confused aren't you? Maybe you should have a 'little' think again. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
wotthelolfuck |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
There is always something special about science meetings. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
To really make that post work you have to run it all into one big paragraph. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I think they just missed apr 1st by a few minutes when publishing the article. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
nature, in a sense, is defined by what is not a product of human culture. It's a vague term and barely sufficient for discussions about the "health" of the Earth. Cancer is natural. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Nature is an unattainable ideal of fruit eating and butt sniffing. Stop trying to be monkeys! You can't be a monkey! You have to wear pants and drive a car. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i'm not sure how anyone can take this seriously. people like having their buttons pressed. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Biocentrism=religion. Its the same belief in a higher power, and both require lots of people to die. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Or is it geocentrism...? Goddamnit, I can't be bothered to read! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
on the nature vs man debate: the difference between "us" and "the rest of nature" is that, to our best knowledge, animals aren't aware that they're hurting nature while we are. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
So knowledge is unnatural? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Sorry, I should have said awareness. You get the idea. Man-consciousness. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what? where did you read that? I'm just saying that foxes, for instance, if their bodies produced the same kind of shit a car does, and nothing else in the world was different, the fox wouldn't necessarily be aware that these fumes weren't good for the ozone layer; the fox hasn't done research and concluded that the ozone layer is in danger because of the fumes cars (and in the case of, and for the sake of, the example: foxes) produce. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you wrote it in your post lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
nuh-uh did not |
||||||||
| Attached picture | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Heh heh. what plaidzebra said. :D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
What, like the farting sheep of New Zealand ? Come on, it's clear to me that most animals don't need to start worrying about that as they aren't really destroying this planet. In fact you 'll find you'd be more inclined to 'destroy this planet' by removing certain species. Anyway how the flying fuck do you know what goes into all these creatures' minds? Elistist_fuckah! :) Just coz they have no vocal chords and you don't seem to understand them, doesn't mean a thing. Animals are AWARE! *this post was sponsored by VanDameâ„¢* |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Is there any type of audio recording to the scientists statements? Because for me, he's just fucking insane, and the school teachers whom gave the Madman a standing ovation, as as fucked as the scientist. Can you imagine what those students are learning there?? No wander why there's so many killings in schools in the USA........ |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yep, thats one of the most fucked up things i've ever heard. honestly, if I had been there I would have walked out shouting hitler the entire way, because that's who this guy reminds me of. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
So... no one is down for starting a genocide of child molesters I take it? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
No. I don't think that necessarily needs to be done. What happens when all the natural predators are removed? Something else moves in. In this case man has become its own natural predator. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
nice kneejerk reaction, there. I mean, I don't agree with the whole "90% of the Earth's population should be dead" gambit, but surely the only thing that links him to Hitler is that they both wanted a lot of people dead. which would link a LOT of people to eachother. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Yes. I'm amazed you even managed to reply to such bullshit. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
RUBBISH! where do you read this shit? Check out yogi bear's park for example, all going to shit for years and they didn't know why... they eventually found out and are now 'reinstalling' wolves. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm gonna genetically modify a fox to produce a fine fine gold dust in its adrenal glands and then put it around peoples necks and scare it so that the people inhale the gold dust and die from gold poisoning and then someone will send a secret agent to kill me, but I will get him first because evil always prevails and then I will rule the world and then I'll have all the candy ever! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I didn't read the article, but it brings up an interesting topic. whether it's ebola or another virus/bacteria. something like this is bound to happen eventually, whether we like it or not. our massive human population is essentially an untapped reservoir of biomass just waiting to be exploited by a clever new illness. the larger it gets, the greater the chance that some insideous new antigen will learn to feed on this abundant food source. it's only a matter of time i think. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
