|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-08-05 07:16 [#01684390]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
yo,
any chance for the 24-hour streaming to be intersparsed with those that want to "dj" live?
i reckon that'd be rad.
(also, phobes, why shoutcast, and not icecast? the shoutcast binary is old as hell, and icecast has some super neat additions.)
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2005-08-05 07:28 [#01684408]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
yes, i'd like that a lot! lots of people here who i'd love to hear music selections from!
|
|
_gvarek_
from next to you (Poland) on 2005-08-05 07:30 [#01684410]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker
|
|
fair enough
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-08-05 07:34 [#01684412]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
heh, that's answered here:
LAZY_TITLE
d'oh. should read closer :-)
again phobes, you need relays or a hand, sing out - i've done commercial streaming (video/audio) for years, adding another icecast/shoutcast installation to one of my boxes won't be a problem.
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-08-05 07:34 [#01684413]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to xf: #01684390
|
|
LAZY_TITLE
|
|
redrum
from the allman brothers band (Ireland) on 2005-08-05 07:44 [#01684431]
Points: 12878 Status: Addict | Followup to xf: #01684412
|
|
any chance of acting as the main source, providing a 128kbit stream, and xlt providing 96?
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-08-05 09:28 [#01684551]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker | Followup to redrum: #01684431
|
|
not really an ideal way to do it. a re-encoded song off phobes music store (which might already be a mp3), converted to streaming 128kbit, then converted down to 96kbit is going to sound like ass. but, sure, possible.
i heavily lean towards ogg these days - at low bitrate, it really, really rocks, and is incredibly bandwidth-friendly; a mono 64kbit 44khz stream sounds better than the current 96kbit , and is something like 1/4 the bandwidth.
pretty much every player these days will decode it fine, too, so the once issue of no support is pretty much non existent.
|
|
i_x_ten
from arsemuncher on 2005-08-05 09:41 [#01684569]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular
|
|
watm errr, XLT radio is great. it would be great to hear some regular shows, so long as they dont all play the same old mix of just the big electronic artists.
|
|
xf
from Australia on 2005-08-05 12:01 [#01684835]
Points: 2952 Status: Lurker
|
|
i hate to be the one to point this out as not to draw attention to it, but isn't the version of shoutcast you're running open to a number of remote exploits (you're running 1.9.2, 1.9.5 is out and fixes a number of bugs)?
(sooner or later, somebody might try something stupid.)
|
|
Phobiazero
from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2005-08-05 14:28 [#01684911]
Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag
|
|
xf: e-mail me and we'll discuss this further!
|
|
tridenti
from Milano (Italy) on 2005-08-05 14:31 [#01684912]
Points: 14653 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phobiazero: #01684911
|
|
phob when we premium members could put tracks on the radio?
|
|
Messageboard index
|