[producing] using two comps? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
big
...and 511 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
[producing] using two comps?
 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-06-05 09:19 [#01623234]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



ive been composing and producing music for a real long time
on my one laptop, but soon im returning home (at college)
and want to set up a studio with a second esktop i have.

so whats the best way to hook up the two up?

should i buy an external bmp monitor and connect them both
to that? or is there some usb/ethernet/whatever interface i
dont know about.

and btw i use fruity loops as if it were a 6ths limb and can
make my way around cubase and sonar.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-06-05 09:20 [#01623235]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



d'oh, im hooking my laptop up to a Desktop.


 

offline i_x_ten from arsemuncher on 2005-06-05 09:22 [#01623237]
Points: 10031 Status: Regular



actually you'd probably be better off just having two
monitors on the laptop.


 

offline plaster from splitska 10 on 2005-06-05 09:24 [#01623240]
Points: 4173 Status: Regular



you can buy a midi interface which is actually a sync clock
for stuff like that.



 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-06-05 09:25 [#01623242]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



yeah, but my lappy is struggling as it is, itd be nice to
devide the cpu usage between the two, as well as other fun
stuff i can't think of right now.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-06-05 09:26 [#01623243]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to plaster: #01623240



yeah, thats what i meant by bmp monitor. so is this the best
option? cuz id prefer the two to be somehow linked through
software as well.


 

offline plaster from splitska 10 on 2005-06-05 09:55 [#01623255]
Points: 4173 Status: Regular | Followup to hedphukkerr: #01623243



umm...i think this little gadget is called midisport!

although i'm not sure!



 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2005-06-05 18:01 [#01623671]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



There is a software I use called MidioverLan which emulates
a midi connection over your computers LAN connection. Use
it. You'll save alot of money.


 

offline stilaktive from a place on 2005-06-05 19:34 [#01623711]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker



my 410 has two firewire ports can i use that on both my
comps?


 

offline bryce_berny from chronno (Canada) on 2005-06-05 22:31 [#01623744]
Points: 1568 Status: Lurker



v-stack is what you desire


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-05 23:21 [#01623757]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Just get a more powerfull desktop with two monitors. Thats
what I got. Ideas of using a two computer setup kind of
evaporated when I did this...


 

offline fungusman from Monster Island on 2005-06-05 23:34 [#01623759]
Points: 381 Status: Lurker



Using 2 computers can be very nice. The best way to do it is
split up the work load so that you actually use both
equally.

If you are using FLstudio I don't think you need 2
computers. I mean ... why would you? Isn't FLstudio an all
in one studio? If you want to over complicate your
workspace, you should find a system that will relie on the
use of 2 simulanious computers.

Use the laptop to make tunes when you shit or something. Use
it as your "When I'm sick of being in my stupid fucking
bedroom I like to make tunes at the park" or something.

But I don't make electronic music so I wouldn't know
anything ...


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-06 00:06 [#01623765]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to fungusman: #01623759



I don't know... there is probly a latency benefit, but with
my setup, my computer operates at a very low latency. Its
practically non-existant on my computer.

Another way of reducing latency is to save all your
soundfiles on one hard drive, and have your audio processing
tools on another hard drive. You don't need much drive space
to hold plugins, and you can share that drive with files for
long term storage, so it doesn't get fragmented as quickly.

Also getting more ram is a way to enhance your processing
power, so you can have more effects/softsynths running at
the same time. Of course, that is pretty much common
knowledge.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-06-06 16:18 [#01624535]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to pomme de terre: #01623671



that midioverlan software looks promising, but im having a
hard time finding an *ahem*affordable*cough* version. can
anybody help me out with this?


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2005-06-07 13:39 [#01625624]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



*bumpski*


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-06-07 13:41 [#01625628]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Godfather


Attached picture

 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2005-06-07 13:45 [#01625638]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #01625628



Stop throwing the music making topics off... lest I have to
build a room for you.


Attached picture

 

offline ecnadniarb on 2005-06-07 13:51 [#01625641]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #01625638 | Show recordbag



STOP TROLL!

STOP, TROLL!

STOP. TROLL!


 


Messageboard index