 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (3)belb recycle Hyperflake ...and 111 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2614187 Today 32 Topics 127546 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
...I have the possibility to mark my reords "for sale". Is this a new feature, or is it just me going senile? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i dont. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i dont either, when was the last release added anyways ? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it's been there since the recordbag function was first added, it doesn't have any effect yet because it wasn't finished. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I wonder what will happen to the dicography. I find 127 labels listed at the time. If the labels release 5 records a year, thats over 600 a year. About two releases each day to add, and scan artwork from. Ambitious stuff. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
however, there are hundreds of artists in the discogs that have never even made a proper release according to the discog itself... I think phob should clean out the shit and try to rebuild a better discography with more additions of new artists! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah like klf. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i mean artists who according to the discog have never made a proper release. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
and "the jams" |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the thing that bothers me a bit is there are same releases on various labels, so if i'd want to complete my recordbag it would take me ages to do it properly... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
THE DISCOGRAPHY IS A FUDGING DISGRACE! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
The discography/records listed on xlt should be wiki-like; maintained by anybody with an account, and history kept for each item modified/added/deleted. This board runs on trust anyway (I mean, shit, the fun you could have with cross scripting and html trickery), so it'd work out allright. I was against the wiki concept at first, but considering more people are half decent and only a small percentage are utter wankers, it's rather self moderating. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
When I got my premi account, I used about 3 hrs going through warp/rephlex/skam catalouges and added like hell. Then I checked sometime later on and did a check-up to verify what i had. Infact I got this funny from Phobia regarding it. :D |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I've said it before and i'll say it again. We should be allowed to add things to the discography but they won't appear until they've been verified, or whatever you want to call it. Much like discogs.com. Even limiting it to those members who've got Premiuim accounts would be a start. At least then people could add something and the discog would get finished a lot quicker. There's only a few people working on it and they only have so much time. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
haha :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i wanted to add as much as i have in my home. i stopped after adding autechre, was too boring to click all teh same buttons. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i would rather like to have my own records listed, and available to download ( or linked, that was promised some months ago, xlt space for artists ) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
