|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-12-01 09:32 [#01411775]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
what a joke. that speech.. all it was was trying to justify the war in iraq, trying to convince canada that we should 'bring war to canada'.. then trying to convince us that it's okay to try to force palestine into democracy.
what a joke. what a joke. what a joke.
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-12-01 09:34 [#01411778]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
OMG WHAT A SASSY BIOTCH
|
|
elf shit
from Ithica (United States) on 2004-12-01 09:34 [#01411780]
Points: 111 Status: Addict
|
|
your jokes suck! not a joke at all.
|
|
stilaktive
from a place on 2004-12-01 09:35 [#01411783]
Points: 3162 Status: Lurker
|
|
someone should have told him to mm fuck off.
go canada!
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2004-12-01 09:36 [#01411785]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
I like the fact thet he refused to address parliment because he was advised that he would be heckeled. He will send young men to die in Iraq but he won't face the critism of his closest allies/trade partner.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-12-01 09:38 [#01411789]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
i hate how we're soo dependent on america. i mean, it's obvious no one likes america.. and especially the prime minister, but we need america. ugh. ugh.
like that woman who called him a moron and got fired because of it a few years ago. haha
|
|
corticalstim
from Canada on 2004-12-01 09:41 [#01411794]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #01411789
|
|
a few years ago?
you mean a few weeks ago?
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2004-12-01 09:44 [#01411796]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
America is fast running out of natural recorces and in the next 30 years analysts have predicted that America will become almost entirely dependant on Canada. That is unless they decide it would be a good idea just to invade and occupy countries rich in natural recorces.
Imagine if they did that...............
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-12-01 09:44 [#01411797]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to corticalstim: #01411794
|
|
no, that was when chretian was prime minister..
then just re-played the whole story this last few weeks because bush was comign to canada.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-12-01 09:46 [#01411799]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to 010101: #01411796
|
|
i thought they already did?
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2004-12-01 09:46 [#01411800]
Points: 24590 Status: Lurker | Followup to 010101: #01411796
|
|
heheh
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-12-01 09:54 [#01411808]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker
|
|
hmmm.
|
|
DeLtoiD
from Ontario on 2004-12-01 10:01 [#01411813]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker
|
|
meh. i'm more embarrassed about the insignificunts protesting against bush.
we're still cleaning up the mess in afganistan. go figure... who cares, he's gone now.
Did you see Ken Jennings lose last night on Jeopardy? good times!
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-12-01 10:03 [#01411814]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
nancy zerg
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2004-12-01 10:19 [#01411827]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker
|
|
blame cananda
canada = 51st state
knock knock, whos there? USA, USA who? USA needs some trees now.
hopefully not.
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2004-12-01 10:51 [#01411869]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker
|
|
America is going to run out of renewable drinking water. It will probably be a very very long time from now, but it will happen. All eyes will turn to the waters of the Hudson Bay. They will ask us Canadians if they can have some. If we refuse, they will find an excuse to take it.
|
| Attached picture |
|
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2004-12-01 10:53 [#01411873]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker
|
|
i love canada, we (usa) shouldnt just be taking whatever we want from you
thank god the us doesnt make it a habit of taking what doesnt belong to us.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2004-12-01 10:56 [#01411880]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
just so you know- the american economy will collapse within 2005. the only thing in america that you could have stocks in without loosing all your money is gold, and maybe defense stocks.
i used to have ~10,000USD in an account thinking that it would improve in relation to the canadian dollar, but i dont think it will for at least 5 years or something after the collapse.
im cutting my losses now and just converting it to CAD at the crappy exchange rate.
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2004-12-01 10:58 [#01411882]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker
|
|
its funny everyone is waiting for something fast and unexpected to happen, whether it be religious zealots, bush supporters, bush haters, etc..., everyone is waiting for something (ala 9/11) to happen, but i really dont think anything that extreme is going to happen - it will disapoint a lot of people but thats the way it goes.
|
|
brokephones
from Londontario on 2004-12-01 11:01 [#01411887]
Points: 6113 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01411882
|
|
Real life is always dissapointing. That's why its fun to fantacise the world's demise.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2004-12-01 11:02 [#01411889]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah i mean i guess killing 15000 people in iraq isnt that extreme, and undoubtedly continuing by invading several other countries and destroying them and thousands of innocent lives isnt bad either.
OH , you mean on AMERICAN SOIL, well yes, maybe not. oh except forcing the youth of your country off to die. yes friends, the draft friends. i know they said they wouldnt, well, they lied, just wait.
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-12-01 11:05 [#01411893]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01411882
|
|
yeah i dont think anything extreme like any of this will occur.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-12-01 11:06 [#01411894]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01411889
|
|
What was your plan for dealing with Iraq?
Ignore that it was a problem? Keep up the sanctions?
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2004-12-01 11:14 [#01411906]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01411889
|
|
well it happened in 94 as well, so you cant mean that it was unexpected.
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2004-12-01 11:14 [#01411907]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker
|
|
94 = 92
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2004-12-01 11:16 [#01411909]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #01411894
|
|
haha well look. first off, i dont have answers. is it american foriegn policy to go around removing 'evil' (as decided by american istself) bad guys from power? when they are NOT a threat?
well no its not. and if it is, i mean if american is going to start playing that role, they have a lot of other countries which they will need to be invading and removing the people in power.
the problem is that america doesnt do that everywhere. you can not selectivly do this sort of thing, especially when it could be argued that it is being done selectivly for american gain (be that oil, strategic defense positioning).
plus do you think america has the right to decide who is good and who is bad? and dont try saying 'no one would say saddam was a good guy', i know that, but i am talking about the US deciding solely on its own.
this was an illegal action you understand, and a 'war of agression' (which everyone in the world will tell you this was, except america) is the worst international war crime you can commit.
i dont know, dont listen to me, listen to someone more intelligent about this stuff.
but by definition this is not a war, it is a war crime . and yes that is a definition held up and considered valid by mostly every other country, so just cos stupid america doesnt care about what other people think and bush 'does what he thinks is right' doesnt make it right. you know he has repeatedly stated that 'god told him' to attack iraq/afghanistan, whatever.
|
|
somejerk
from south florida, US (United States) on 2004-12-01 11:48 [#01411936]
Points: 1441 Status: Lurker
|
|
canada is my last hope. d'oh.
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2004-12-01 12:02 [#01411950]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01411889 | Show recordbag
|
|
did you know the number of civilian deaths in Iraq is closer to 100'000.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-12-01 12:05 [#01411953]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01411909
|
|
i agree with you. bush did a horrible job of garnering support for this war, he pitched it as a part of the "war on terror", which i don't think it directly is (although indirectly, it is very important), and his ingrained religious beliefs scare me. support from the global community is imperative to success in iraq, and he seems to fail to see that.
however, in this specific case, as bad as things are, i think the way the world (read: the un) was dealing with iraq was and is worse than the way we handled it.
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-12-01 12:06 [#01411955]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #01411950
|
|
Depends on who's reports you believe. Who's considered a civilian and all. But, yeah, there are too many civilian deaths. Guerilla war is like that.
|
|
denniscpearce
from Canada on 2004-12-01 12:08 [#01411958]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular | Followup to pantalaimon: #01411950
|
|
wow. that is insane, i know its vastly underreported (by like factors of ten) in official reports. i havnt seen anything near that number though
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-12-01 12:45 [#01411991]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
not that I really want the bitch in my province, but he didn't even come to Newfoundland... and more people were stranded here from 9/11 then in nova scotia I believe... so him not coming is like a total slap in the face, that he didn't even do anything...
|
|
DeadEight
from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-12-01 13:07 [#01412004]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular
|
|
for the record... the lady who called him a moron back in the day was not fired then... and she has since had several other gaffes in public, often in reference to bush and america... and she was kicked out of caucus 2 weeks ago... her name is Carolyn Parrish, and she was apparently on Crossfire this week...
|
|
010101
from Vancouver (Canada) on 2004-12-01 13:30 [#01412037]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular
|
|
Why doesn't the US form governments and help restore the status quo in countries that acctually need it. Sommalia for instance, oh wait a second Sommalia has very few natural resources.....
I think I see a pattern....
|
|
epohs
from )C: on 2004-12-01 13:39 [#01412047]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker
|
|
How come other countries don't start offering up solutions instead of turning a blind eye, doing nothing, letting the situation spiral out of control then complaining when action is taken.....
I think I see a pattern....
|
|
mrgypsum
on 2004-12-01 13:41 [#01412050]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker
|
|
i thought i saw a pattern, but then i looked deeper and it was really just choas
|
|
virginpusher
from County Clare on 2004-12-01 13:44 [#01412052]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to denniscpearce: #01411909
|
|
You put that excellently!
On top of that you didnt unnecessarly bash americans in the process. If more debates had posts like that less flaming would occur.
Well done!
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-12-01 14:34 [#01412125]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to mrgypsum: #01411827
|
|
blame cananda
canada = 51st state
knock knock, whos there? USA, USA who? USA needs some trees
now.
hopefully not.
hahahahahaha thats awesome.
|
|
corrupted-girl
on 2004-12-01 14:38 [#01412134]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular
|
|
i don't think canada is that MUCH more superior than america, but i do think that america needs to stop black mailing us, and using our immense trades and border to threatened us and convince us that war is okay and we should help out with it. we obvously don't want to and it's hard not to be the bitch when it comes to america. we are so dependent.
|
|
plaster
from splitska 10 on 2004-12-01 15:01 [#01412181]
Points: 4173 Status: Regular
|
|
i'm not interrested in politics,but the US is scamming the whole nation and doesn't know how to operate without the human fear,cos they alone fear the whole world.
|
|
Messageboard index
|