Confield / Draft 7.30 - any good? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
Hyperflake
...and 291 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614165
Today 10
Topics 127544
  
 
Messageboard index
Confield / Draft 7.30 - any good?
 

offline Krendo from Leicester (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-21 10:53 [#01401561]
Points: 360 Status: Regular



I've got all of the Autechre albums, having recently picked
up Draft 7.30. But, if I'm not mistaken, their last two
albums are really not very good. I don't know what the
opinion is on this, and it would be interesting to hear it.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2004-11-21 10:54 [#01401562]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



can. of. worms.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 10:54 [#01401563]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i disagree, personally... i think that confield and draft
are their best works to date. between the two, i prefer
confield a little more.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-11-21 10:55 [#01401564]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



:) its all good


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-11-21 10:58 [#01401568]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Draft 7.30 is the best thing they have done.


 

offline nacmat on 2004-11-21 10:59 [#01401569]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



confield is the best electronic music album ever


 

offline virginpusher from County Clare on 2004-11-21 11:03 [#01401571]
Points: 27325 Status: Lurker | Followup to r40f: #01401563



i agree


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-11-21 11:05 [#01401572]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Confield is the high point of ae's career.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-11-21 11:06 [#01401573]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



me likes draft a wee bit more ;)


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-11-21 11:09 [#01401578]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker



confield is the most overrated album in the history of
electronic music.

yeah it's a good experimental album


 

offline Krendo from Leicester (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-21 11:13 [#01401581]
Points: 360 Status: Regular



It's interesting to hear what people think. I've just been
looking at some on-line reviews, in particular at
milkfactory, and it seems that most people really like these
albums. I have only just bought Draft 7.30, so perhaps it's
unfair to judge it, but I've had Confield for months and I
really find it quite boring. Does anyone agree? I really
like the first five (in particular LP5 and Tri Repetae), yet
the obsession with 'glitch' sounds and the seeming
disinterest in melody is ewildering. I do see that these
albums are heading in a totally new direction, which is
admirable, but does no-one think that anything is missing?
I realise I might be slandering what in these circles must
amount almost to deities, but I would like to hear what
people think.


 

offline Krendo from Leicester (United Kingdom) on 2004-11-21 11:13 [#01401583]
Points: 360 Status: Regular



oops:

...is BEwildering...


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-11-21 11:16 [#01401585]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to Krendo: #01401581



if you ask me: ae are artists and i enjoy their art with the
exception of incunabula and amber *wink


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 11:16 [#01401586]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



i've noticed that many people who like early autechre don't
like later autechre... i'm the other way around - i find
their early stuff to be boring, and i really enjoy their
recent records a lot. i guess it's just two different
styles...


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2004-11-21 11:30 [#01401600]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker



confield and draft are indeed their worst releases to date.


 

offline Spookyluke from United States on 2004-11-21 11:42 [#01401613]
Points: 1955 Status: Lurker



I think the old stuff is all right-- but the newer stuff is
much more interesting. There are plenty of melodies in
Draft and Confield, but they require more attention than
something like Bike or Yulquen for example.

So, yah, I think the two newest ones definitely deserve to
be appreciated, even if one may have to spend time trying to
hear the melodies through those dense rhythms.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-11-21 11:50 [#01401621]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



You know when horrible people bang on about you having to
educate your palate in order to "enjoy" some vile tasting
wine of theirs, it's the same sort of thing with this
loveless, academic racket.


 

offline AlbertoBalsalm from Reykjavík (Iceland) on 2004-11-21 11:53 [#01401624]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker | Followup to Spookyluke: #01401613



i don't have the patience to spend a year trying to print a
melody into my brain.

anyway confield or draft 7.30 aren't about melody. it's
sound experiments, it's kinda like an abstract painting.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-11-21 11:53 [#01401625]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Yes confield is one of my less favorite autechre albums...



 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 11:54 [#01401628]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01401621



so only the most accessable, easily-understood music is
worthy to listen to, and music that's challenging is
automatically snobbish and elitist?


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-11-21 12:53 [#01401656]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to r40f: #01401628 | Show recordbag



We're talking about two specific Autechre albums, not the
entire catalogue of challenging music, so don't get mardy,
young man. I have listened to these albums a lot but I just
don't enjoy them, I think Autechre have the one of the
weirdest, backwards, diminishing returns careers in music.



 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-11-21 12:55 [#01401658]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01401656



You think wrong.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-11-21 12:56 [#01401659]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to mappatazee: #01401658 | Show recordbag



You're probably right.


 

offline mimi on 2004-11-21 12:57 [#01401661]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



i like all the autechre records, but their earlier ones
better i think. i don't know, draft is ok, and i like
confield, but in all honesty they sound just like autechre
fucking off, twiddling around, whatever you wanna call it.
it's cool, and they sure are good at it, but i don't really
think it sounds THAT 'complex' or whatever.


 

offline mimi on 2004-11-21 12:58 [#01401662]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to r40f: #01401628



what's so challenging about autechre? seriously, i am
missing something or maybe i am just brilliant..haha.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-11-21 13:00 [#01401663]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



my two cents: i like autechre fav+ artist(S), i like their
music, i especially like draft and confield, imo there not
as experimental as everyone claims they are, to me its just
music, draft was a wee bit better imo, thank you :)


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-11-21 13:10 [#01401667]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to mimi: #01401662



Or maybe you're not brilliant enough to realise what you are
listening to.


 

offline mimi on 2004-11-21 13:15 [#01401668]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular



durrr


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 15:11 [#01401722]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



dog_belch - fair enough, good sir, but your previous comment
was much broader than that.

look, i'm not saying autechre are re-inventing the wheel,
but i think most listeners will probably agree that their
music isn't obvious in the sense that a pop song is obvious.
and what i'm really getting at is that it shouldn't be
about who can make the most confusing, complex music - i
don't think that's autechre's point either. it's not
supposed to be like brain surgery, but it isn't all that
simple either. music works on different levels and everyone
draws something different from it... if you pay close
attention you'll probably get a very different experience
than if you just have it on in the background.


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-11-21 15:21 [#01401734]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



They're both a good lay.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-11-21 15:22 [#01401736]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to DJ Xammax: #01401734



their such sluts


 

offline uviol from United States on 2004-11-21 16:32 [#01401846]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



I agree with Alberto Balsalm. It's not about melody, or
beat, per se. It really is like abstract painting. They
(beats, melodies, etc) exist in the music, yes, but it seems
to me they are present for their own sake. If you're making
an abstract painting, you don't go to the trouble of trying
to make a certain figure recognizable or representational..
you just put whatever needs to be there in the painting. If
there needs to be a line, you paint a line. If Autechre is
making a track and feels there needs to be a sequence of
notes, they put in a sequence of notes, and so we call it a
melody. However, we shouldn't be wasting time analyzing the
quality or abundance of these melodies in the music as a
basis for saying whether the music is good or bad. Those
kind of speculations are pointless. It can be the basis of
opinion, sure.. but the later work is not 'inferior,' it
seems to have different artistic goals.. The early stuff was
primarily concerned with more conventional and
representational constructions, emotional melodies, etc. I
think the later stuff is a natural evolution towards a more
pure sound that can evoke emotion from human beings.. not a
sound that is charged with emotion *from* human beings.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 16:34 [#01401852]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to uviol: #01401846



okay, that's a good point that i mostly agree with. some of
it may be speculation, but otherwise i agree.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-11-21 16:39 [#01401863]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



I think, and i know it doesn't matter, but as technology
makes it easier for us to achieve the actual thing we're
after (in musc, say), we're losing all the mistakes and
happy accidents that make for unique music. If you could
control every sound, every element, i think Draft or Confeld
is what you come up with, something so dry, so devoid of
..... it's fucking jazz. All music ends up as dry jazz.
Syncopated arhythmical beats, discordant farts, unendurable
(except by moody goth teenagers) noise, ... it's the logical
conclusion of all art, a fucking horrible mess. It's the
sound of facistically trying to control every element. And
that, in life, isn't possible, nor desirable.


 

offline X-tomatic from ze war room on 2004-11-21 16:53 [#01401869]
Points: 2901 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01401621



"You know when horrible people bang on about you having
to
educate your palate in order to "enjoy" some vile tasting
wine of theirs, it's the same sort of thing with this
loveless, academic racket.
"

Excellent summary of these two albums and their fans.
90% of all things labelled "art" nowadays are a fucking j...


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 16:54 [#01401870]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01401863



oh come on, that's a cynical generalisation at best...

it goes around in circles... you say everything is getting
clinical, then you say that everything is a horrible mess?
the things you describe don't relate to each other. one
could be facistically controlling with insanely simplistic,
ultra-melodic music, and actually i can give you the example
of commercial pop - that is the end result of extreme
refinement and is totally clinical, yet it's often old
recycled melodies with the same 4/4 rock beat. on the other
hand, one could be totally sloppy and make noise or jazz or
whatever. the technique does not define the genre.

also, i'm not a moody goth teenager whatsoever, but i listen
to atonal jazz and harsh noise... i enjoy it - i love
listening to it in the same way someone would appreciate any
other sort of music...

so i just don't think what you're saying really makes sense.
i think what it all comes down to in this thread is taste.
i'm not knocking old autechre - i think they just went into
a different direction with their later works, and that's
what i prefer. but there's no sense in stereotyping here...


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 16:56 [#01401872]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to X-tomatic: #01401869



well, that's pretty interesting, but i think they're making
a fuss because that giant mess of paint on canvas looks
beautiful to me, so probably others feel the same way. who
cares what the elitist art world thinks? it's all about the
art, not who makes it.


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-11-21 17:02 [#01401874]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Followup to r40f: #01401870 | Show recordbag



I agree 100% with what you say, 110% on pop music formulas.
It is just taste at the end of the day. I like the old days
*SOBS*


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2004-11-21 17:02 [#01401876]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular | Followup to dog_belch: #01401874



there there :)


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2004-11-21 17:10 [#01401879]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



I liked these two albums of organized sounds. Sorry if that
makes me sound elitest.


 

offline uviol from United States on 2004-11-21 17:15 [#01401880]
Points: 2496 Status: Lurker



we're losing all the mistakes and
happy accidents that make for unique music. If you could
control every sound, every element, i think Draft or Confeld

is what you come up with, something so dry, so devoid
of...


What we're failing to do here is recognize that there are
different aims in making music. Boards of Canada was all
about these little quirks and mistakes you mention, and put
them in their music intentionally to keep it human, like
you're saying. However, according to your perspective
Autechre is totally cold and clinical and inhuman. Yet, both
of these are labelled IDM. Maybe we should start
classifying genres according to 'discourse' or 'ideology' as
opposed to 'content.'
The music may be inhuman and 'undesirable' as you say, but
this seems to be one level of what Autechre are striving
for. They have said in interviews that they are trying to
achieve sounds that are totally or mostly non-referential.
This is the kind of stuff that isn't made with deep emotions
at heart.. these are, in theory, impersonal artistic
creations which, if we react to them, are doing so of our
own accord and not because we are tapping into some emotion
that was put into the music on the other end. I react quite
meotionally to Autechre's music, but it's reacting in the
same way you'd react to a beautiful waterfall or rock
formation. You might be deeply moved by its beauty, but
that's not because there's any human feeling behind it.


 

offline carrot from United Kingdom on 2004-11-21 17:28 [#01401894]
Points: 58 Status: Regular



I think they're great albums, Autechre doing what they do
best. Very difficult to listen to, or rather do anything
other than listen to them at first for me in parts. Guess
that's just the body adjusting to something new. Can't stop
playing V-PROC, absolutley love it.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-11-21 17:43 [#01401923]
Points: 621 Status: Regular



Entrance of 'Surripere' makes my brain to celebrate several
processes. Yes, there is something between early and late
AE. Difference in style is clear, I suppose, and intended -
AE is penetrating uncovered soundscape. I am waiting for
their 30th LP!!!


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2004-11-21 17:49 [#01401932]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



i think confield (i havent heard draft yet) is his best
release, but its a hard album and i can only enjoy it in
very particular moments... so i prefer earlier releases,
more simple and enjoyable... garbage, my god, garbage!


 

offline oyvinto on 2004-11-21 17:55 [#01401960]
Points: 8197 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I prefer their newest material. EP7, Confield, Draft 7.30..


 

offline yann_g from now on 2004-11-21 17:56 [#01401962]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker



highest point blah blah


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-11-21 17:59 [#01401968]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Draft is pure jazz.


 

offline yann_g from now on 2004-11-21 17:59 [#01401970]
Points: 3772 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #01401968



don't be an arse


 

offline elektric_drums from United States on 2004-11-21 18:10 [#01401995]
Points: 65 Status: Regular



The comments about the two being sort of like "abstract
paintings" are pretty much dead on.

Personally I don't really like either of the two, but I do
appreciate them. They each have their high points and are
immpressive at times. Both take more than a few listens to
be realized.

I wouldn't even call them "music" , their more like
expeiriments in sound. Definately something completely
original.


 

offline Sempoo from Barlinek (Pluto) on 2004-11-21 18:11 [#01401999]
Points: 621 Status: Regular | Followup to elektric_drums: #01401995



It IS music, the problem is in...
I will.


 


Messageboard index