Americans only please | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
dariusgriffin
Roger Wilco
...and 183 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614130
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Americans only please
 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 20:48 [#01337405]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The shoe-bomber, well this was finally released. Hope you
guys can appreciate it.
------------------------------------------------

Remember the guy who got on a plane with a bomb built into
his shoe and
tried to light it?

Did you know his trial is over?
Did you know he was sentenced?
Did you see/hear any of the judge's comments on TV/Radio?
Didn't think so.
Everyone should hear what the judge had to say.
Ruling by Judge William Young US District Court.

Prior to sentencing, the Judge asked the defendant if he had
anything to
say.

His response: After admitting his guilt to the court for the
record, Reid
also admitted his "allegiance to Osama bin Laden, to Islam,
and to the
religion of Allah," defiantly stated "I think I ought not
apologize for my
actions," and told the court "I am at war with your
country."

Judge Young then delivered the statement quoted below, a
stinging
condemnation of Reid in particular and terrorists in
general:

January 30, 2003 United States vs. Reid. Judge Young: Mr.
Richard C. Reid,
hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you. On
counts 1, 5 and
6 the Court sentences you to life in prison in the custody
of the United
States Attorney General. On counts 2, 3, 4 and 7, the Court
sentences you
to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each
count to run
consecutive with the other.

That's 80 years. On count 8 the Court sentences you to the
mandatory 30
years consecutive to the 80 years just imposed. The Court
imposes upon you
each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 for the
aggregate fine of $2
million. The Court accepts the government's recommendation
with respect to
restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17
to Andre
Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines. The Court imposes
upon you the
$800 special assessment.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 20:49 [#01337406]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



The Court imposes upon you five years supervised release
simply because the
law requires it. But the life sentences are real life
sentences so I need go no f further. This is the sentence
that is provided for by our statutes.
It is a fair and just sentence. It is a righteous sentence.
Let me explain
this to you. We are not afraid of you or any of your
terrorist
Co-conspirators, Mr. Reid. We are Americans. We have been
through the fire
before. There is all too much war talk here and I say that
to everyone with
the utmost respect. Here in this court, where we deal with
individuals as
individuals and care for individuals as individuals. As
human beings, we
reach out for justice.

You are not an enemy combatant. You are a terrorist. You are
not a soldier
in any war. You are a terrorist. To give you that reference,
to call you a
soldier, gives you far too much stature. Whether it is the
officers of
government who do it or your attorney who does it, or that
happens to be
your view, you are a terrorist...And we do not negotiate
with terrorists.
We do not treat with terrorists. We do not sign documents
with terrorists.
We hunt them down one by one and bring them to justice.

So war talk is way out of line in this court. You are a big
fellow. But you
are not that big. You're no warrior. I know warriors. You
are a terrorist.
A species of criminal guilty of multiple attempted murders.
In a very real
sense, State Trooper Santiago had it right when you first
were taken off
that plane and into custody and you wondered where the press
and where the
TV crews were and he said you're no big deal.

You're no big deal.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 20:49 [#01337407]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



What your counsel, what your able counsel and what the
equally able United
States attorneys have grappled with and what I have as
honestly as I know
how tried to grapple with, is why you did something so
horrific. What was
it that led you here to this courtroom today?

I have listened respectfully to what you have to say. And I
ask you to
search your heart and ask yourself what sort of unfathomable
hate led you
to do what you are guilty and admit you are guilty of doing.
And I have an
answer for you. It may not satisfy you, but as I search this
entire record,
it comes as close to understanding as I know.

It seems to me you hate the one thing that is most precious.
You hate our
freedom. Our individual freedom. Our individual freedom to
live as we
choose, to come and go as we choose, to believe or not
believe as we
individually choose. Here, in this society, the very winds
carry freedom.
They carry it everywhere from sea to shining sea. It is
because we prize
individual freedom so much that you are here in this
beautiful courtroom.
So that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is
administered fairly,
individually, and discretely. It is for freedom's sake that
your lawyers
are striving so vigorously on your behalf and have filed
appeals, will go
on in their representation of you before other judges.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 20:49 [#01337408]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



We are about it. Because we all know that the way we treat
you, Mr. Reid,
is the measure of our own liberties. Make no mistake though.
It is yet true
that we will bare any burden; pay any price, to preserve our
freedoms. Look
around this courtroom. Mark it well. The world is not going
to long
remember what you or I say here. Day after tomorrow, it will
be forgotten,
but this, however, will long endure. Here in this courtroom
and courtrooms
all across America, the American people will gather to see
that justice,
individual justice, justice, not war, individual justice is
in fact being
done. The very President of the United States through his
officers will
have to come into courtrooms and lay out evidence on which
specific matters
can be judged and juries of citizens will gather to sit and
judge that
evidence democratically, to mold and shape and refine our
sense of justice.

See that flag, Mr. Reid? That's the flag of the United
States of America.
That flag will fly there long after this is all forgotten.
That flag stands
for freedom. You know it always will.

Mr. Custody Officer. stand him down.

So, how much of this Judge's comments did we hear on our TV
sets? We need
more judges like Judge Young, but that's another subject.
Pass this around.
Everyone should and needs to hear what this fine judge had
to say. Powerful
words that strike home.

God bless America



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 20:50 [#01337409]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I hope this thread doesn't :xplode:, ..... and it shouldn't.
there is nothing to debate here, and hopefully no stupid
comments will come about it.

Justice served. Thanks, America.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-09-16 20:50 [#01337410]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Oehckaiye


 

offline plaster from splitska 10 on 2004-09-16 20:55 [#01337412]
Points: 4173 Status: Regular



fuck politics,it's not good for ur health


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-09-16 21:02 [#01337414]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I think it's time for America to learn how to love and
forget how to hate.


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 21:03 [#01337415]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



umm actually i would have to respectfully disagree with you
sir... i found 90 percent of what the judge said perfectly
fine and acceptable... but i cannot accept his explanation
at the end that Richard Reid hates freedom... i'm a little
tired of hearing this statement... and with all due respect,
elusive, (i wish i knew your real name so i could address
you by it right now) i would like you to explain why you
agree with this statement... please don't mistake this for
flaming or what ever... i just want you to honestly justify
why you find that statement believable, real, acceptable et
cetera...

please, i'm very interested in hearing what you have to
say...


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 21:32 [#01337424]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I didn't write this. This isn't my word-for-word
statements, so please don't take your issues on the judge's
words out on me!!!!!!! Please don't !!!!
My name is Mike, by the way, and you can address me anyday,
sir!


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 21:35 [#01337426]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01337424



hey mike, i am mike also, hehe


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 21:36 [#01337427]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01337424



thanks, Mike... i know these aren't your words... but you
said you do agree with them... i just want someone
intelligent, like yourself, to explain to me why so many
people accept the argument that the reason terrorist do as
they do is because they hate the freedom of Americans... i
can see how might be said indirectly (that's stretching it),
but in an indirect manner that would incorporate an
particular understanding of the issue which i don't believe
that most people who feel this way have...


 

offline mimi on 2004-09-16 21:38 [#01337429]
Points: 5721 Status: Regular | Followup to DeadEight: #01337427



you're a canadian! what are you doing in this
thread!?!?!?!?!

just kidding :)


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 21:39 [#01337430]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #01337424



ps... i am not yelling, i am only asking... i respect you
and i want to hear what you have to say... if you don't feel
like doing it now... feel free to not... i know justifying
one's ideas feels like a chore sometimes... but i really
would like to hear how you feel about this sometime...


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 21:40 [#01337431]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to mimi: #01337429



ha... yeah, i was going to apologize about that...

but we canadians are such good infiltrators and such... we
walk among you... we spend our summers in retirement villas
in florida... :P


 

offline dog_belch from Netherlands, The on 2004-09-16 21:42 [#01337433]
Points: 15098 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



Well I come from Bromley in Kent, where this tit comes from,
he is just a suburban berk, not a million miles unlike
Elusive, who got sucked into a gang and wanted to be
someone. There's no justice served, bringing the
multibillion dollar Amrican law against an individual who,
lacking any direction in life tried, to make a name for
himself by blowing up his shoes for a cause he barely
understood. You've made out of one, sad, lonely individual,
a scape goat as a justification for carrying out your
genocidal foreign policy. This is nothing to celebrate, this
is another nail in your coffin.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 21:42 [#01337434]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



oh come on, canada is the biggest state : )


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2004-09-16 21:49 [#01337436]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to mrgypsum: #01337434



the us is the biggest province... we're really in control,
Bush is our puppet!


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 21:54 [#01337438]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Thanks, DeadEight, for actually addressing me in a
respectful manner, and I hope to return the favor.

As for "agreeing" with the statement, hmmm...that is a hard
one to answer. I guess you can say upon reading it, I felt
a sense of pride and joy by the judge's remarks.

I do, personally, agree that there is a 'large' difference
between a terrorist, and a soldier. And I do have respect
for soldiers of any army. But there is strictely a
difference in my mind between soldiers and 'terrorists' who
attack others simply because they believe their God, or god,
tells them to.

Eh, it's really hard to put into words...I hope you can bear
with me on this.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 21:55 [#01337439]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



P.s. I live in Michigan; know plenty of Canadians. I don't
have any issues with you people, or completely understand
how some people can seperate us so much : /

Anyways.........


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 21:56 [#01337440]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i can bear with you on this


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 21:56 [#01337441]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



i think canada and england secretly run the us, they use us
to do all of the "dirty" work, it would seem pretty
unsightly if they were the ones playing world domination.
yep, leave it up to the younger, less experienced former
colony/territory the run things, you guys can just sit back
with a labatt or whatever and enjoy.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 21:57 [#01337442]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I guess...at least an army is usually part of a nation...and
that nation usually has structure......Structure that is
able to process a solution to differences....meanwhile
people labeled as 'terrorists' are out amongst the people of
a country...hiding, jumping, skipping and plotting through,
and usually have to make a "statement" by making headlines
in the media...i.e., usually by attacking civilians..

Soldiers attack soldiers.

Terrorists attack civilians...and innocents. That is my
biggest upset.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 22:00 [#01337449]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01337442



dont you think though that terrorist is the new "communist",
or to call someone a terrorist implies that they are in some
way demonized? its like a new McCarthyism for the 00s, i
love my country but sometimes we do some f'ed up stuff.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 22:01 [#01337450]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



sorry, calling someone a terrorist demonizes them, or
essentially calls into question their very morality and puts
that on trial


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 22:07 [#01337455]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



There is a strict difference, in my opinion......on how they
go about trying to win anything over.

I can certainly have respect for men; soldiers, who die in
battle for their country.

But for someone who purposes harms innocent civilians to
prove a point, or to make a scene....I just cannot contest
to that.

Eh, ... times are changing; humans are getting desperate.

Media is the true ruler now, and the 'terrorists' sure know
how to use that to their advantage...


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 22:08 [#01337458]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Started with 9/11, then Spain, now Russia.

Anyone wanting to do harm to a country is now using the
media as their "bitch" to ride it in.

Certainly...terrible.

And I'm out..continue this tomorrow, maybe. Good night.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-09-16 22:09 [#01337460]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



terrorism didn't start with 9/11


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2004-09-16 22:10 [#01337462]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Obviously, ... but on the "media" side is more of what I
meant by "starting with 9/11"



 

offline thecurbcreeper from United States on 2004-09-16 22:11 [#01337463]
Points: 6045 Status: Lurker



hey guys

*awkward silence*


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2004-09-16 22:13 [#01337465]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Okay, then the whole terrorist thing is obviously an
exercise in fear, perpetuated by the media and us
government.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2004-09-16 22:13 [#01337466]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to dog_belch: #01337433



*quiet, respectful applause*


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 22:15 [#01337468]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #01337458



i think what map says is right, just because we see it more
now does not mean it has not always been around, its war, we
are at war, these are things people do in war, its been a
long time since war has come to america itself, how do you
think some iraqis view the us, do you think we are terrorist
to them? i love the us, i think that is soldiers are very
brave, but i dont agree with how everything is turning out,
thats my simple way of answering this thread.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-16 22:34 [#01337475]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to dog_belch: #01337433



indeed.

a judge should give sentence, not whip out a speech.

showcase trial, anyone?


 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 22:36 [#01337476]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular



i don't really want to contest the distinction between
terrorist and soldier... i think it's a really slippery
slope (and now i am going to have to get into it i suppose),
and i was willing to give America the benefit of the doubt
on this one... only so long as we don't talk about it in
such certain terms...

what i really really want to deal with, here... is the idea
that terrorists terrorize because they hate American
freedom... i think this idea is silly and it treats real
people like characters out of a Joel Schumacher film... they
are bad and therefore they must hate the most pure good
things... this is silly... and i question how much thought
is put into it... i question how much empathy was put into
make such a proclamation...

i know there are some fundamental disagreements on the issue
of the War on Terror in general, and i think there is a good
reason for this: it's a very complicated, sensitive,
important issue...

i'm not here to solve all of it, or pretend like i have the
answers... but i wish that someone could tell me why we
accept this "freedom-hating" diagnosis... why do we allow
people to say this? do we honestly believe this, and if so,
why?

because as far as i can see... these kind of statements...
appeal to our desire to make a myth out of something that
demands to be treated in the exact opposite manner...

i believe that this belief will continue to be a fundamental
barrier in the way of any resolution to this very large
problem that the world has... and i don't think anyone
stands to benefit from it in the long run...

perhaps it seems like a small insignificant thing to quibble
over... a few sentences in a several paragraph long
response... but i think it is a very fundamental part of the
problem, and i would like to see us discuss it a lot more
before we just accept it

cheers,
Alex


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-16 22:40 [#01337480]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to DeadEight: #01337476



the stand-up comedian David Cross has about the same
problems you have with the whole "freedom haters" thing..

1 and 2

goodbye,

also Alex.



 

offline DeadEight from vancouver (Canada) on 2004-09-16 22:50 [#01337487]
Points: 5437 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01337480



thanks Alex,

-Alex


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-16 22:52 [#01337490]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker



"freedom haters" i dont agree with this, they hate something
but its surely is not freedom, i have no answer on this, i
dont think there is one, war is upon the us, its an us vs
them situation that is being built up here.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-16 22:54 [#01337493]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to DeadEight: #01337487



well, Alex, he has a lot more to say about it, these were
clips I had uploaded a few months ago to use in another
thread.

it's from his album called "Its Not Funny", which is very
funny and if you are so inclined, is not that hard to find
on slsk.

and I have it too, although not shared at the moment, but I
could be persuaded.

regards,

Alex.


 

offline scup_bucket from bloated exploding piss pockets on 2004-09-16 22:54 [#01337494]
Points: 4540 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #01337480



david cross rocks my socks.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2004-09-16 22:59 [#01337497]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to scup_bucket: #01337494



he does the same to my socks.

and I have mr. Jason Holland a.k.a. pommedeterre to thank
for this. that guy has my undying lurve.


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2004-09-16 23:18 [#01337505]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



david cross is awesome, although i felt like his last album
was almost more anger than well thought out comedy. it was
still very funny, but sometimes he seemed to reaching a bit
too far into things that simply weren't humor and were just
him being very pissed off.


 

offline goodhands team from bloomington (United States) on 2004-09-17 00:56 [#01337510]
Points: 361 Status: Regular



they dont hate our freedom. they hate our feet being on
their land. i agreed with what a lot of the judge said too
- but this holier than thou 'merika talk is a load of
horseshit. that flag isnt going to be around forever -
after all.


 

offline isnieZot from pooptown (Belgium) on 2004-09-17 02:18 [#01337524]
Points: 4949 Status: Lurker



hmmm americans don't seem to get why these people hate them.
they always say "they are angry because we are free".
HAHAHAH!! what load of crap. they seem to forget the fact
that the american government trained them, armed them and
used them for personal gain. why do you think Iran hates
america? that's because the american government put the
Iranian Sjah in charge so he could be a pawn for the
americans. they wanted to let Iran become like america. the
gap between rich and poor grew bigger and bigger and people
didn't take that. also, Iran has a big cultural history and
they didn't want to give that up either to become like the
west. the american governments just abuses other countries
in order for personal gain but when the coutries turn
against them they go like " why do they hate us?? they are
angry because we are free!!!!". and allot of americans
think that way. allot of people seem to forget that Al qaeda
was created by the americans in order to keep the communists
in controle.



 

offline Drunken Mastah from OPPERKLASSESVIN!!! (Norway) on 2004-09-17 02:30 [#01337529]
Points: 35867 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



elusive: are you 3lusiv3 on head-fi?

and.. a question.. I haven't read all the posts, so the
question may have been asked before, but...

why is it so that americans that commit crimes in other
countries are "protected" from being sentenced in that
country, and us soldiers that commit war-crimes are
"protected" from being judged in Haag, while the americans
INSIST on judging criminals from other countries (Saddam,
for example) in America? Does it sound fair to you that
war-criminals get off easier just because they're4 from
america?


 

offline hkewell from United Kingdom on 2004-09-17 05:30 [#01337548]
Points: 196 Status: Lurker



'Because we all know that the way we treat
you, Mr. Reid,
is the measure of our own liberties. Make no mistake
though.
It is yet true
that we will bare any burden; pay any price, to preserve
our
freedoms.'

'It is
because we prize
individual freedom so much that you are here in this
beautiful courtroom.
So that everyone can see, truly see, that justice is
administered fairly,
individually, and discretely.'

This is, respectfully, a little over the top. The people in
Guantanamo Bay would like justice to be administered. A
country that locks people p without access to lawyers and a
fair trial is not one that prizes freedom and democracy.



 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2004-09-17 05:31 [#01337549]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



the shoe-bomber was a victim of american imperial policy and
a corupt religion. Of course he should get the maximum
setance but shiting on about justice and freedom makes me
fucking puke.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2004-09-17 05:47 [#01337553]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I agree there needs to be more judges like that!


 

offline somejerk from south florida, US (United States) on 2004-09-17 06:39 [#01337560]
Points: 1441 Status: Lurker



i actually liked what he had to say. that made me feel a tad
bit better about being an americant.


 

offline mrgypsum on 2004-09-17 06:45 [#01337562]
Points: 5103 Status: Lurker | Followup to somejerk: #01337560



for me, what he had to say is simply not needed in a trial,
this is the only thing he should have said, January 30,
2003 United States vs. Reid. Judge Young: Mr.
Richard C. Reid,
hearken now to the sentence the Court imposes upon you. On
counts 1, 5 and
6 the Court sentences you to life in prison in the custody
of the United
States Attorney General. On counts 2, 3, 4 and 7, the Court

sentences you
to 20 years in prison on each count, the sentence on each
count to run
consecutive with the other.

That's 80 years. On count 8 the Court sentences you to the
mandatory 30
years consecutive to the 80 years just imposed. The Court
imposes upon you
each of the eight counts a fine of $250,000 for the
aggregate fine of $2
million. The Court accepts the government's recommendation
with respect to
restitution and orders restitution in the amount of $298.17

to Andre
Bousquet and $5,784 to American Airlines. The Court imposes

upon you the
$800 special assessment. The Court imposes upon you five
years supervised release
simply because the
law requires it.

after that he is just speaking his opinion, which has no
place "in the halls of justice" its just rhetoric simple as
that.


 


Messageboard index